MMBR Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graves, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Haystead, T. A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graves, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Haystead, T. A. J.
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, March 2002, p. 39-63, Vol. 66, No. 1
1092-2172/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.66.1.39-63.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Molecular Biologist's Guide to Proteomics

Paul R. Graves1 and Timothy A. J. Haystead1,2*

Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University,1,1 and Serenex Inc.,2 Durham, North Carolina 277102

Summary: The emergence of proteomics, the large-scale analysis of proteins, has been inspired by the realization that the final product of a gene is inherently more complex and closer to function than the gene itself. Shortfalls in the ability of bioinformatics to predict both the existence and function of genes have also illustrated the need for protein analysis. Moreover, only through the study of proteins can posttranslational modifications be determined, which can profoundly affect protein function. Proteomics has been enabled by the accumulation of both DNA and protein sequence databases, improvements in mass spectrometry, and the development of computer algorithms for database searching. In this review, we describe why proteomics is important, how it is conducted, and how it can be applied to complement other existing technologies. We conclude that currently, the most practical application of proteomics is the analysis of target proteins as opposed to entire proteomes. This type of proteomics, referred to as functional proteomics, is always driven by a specific biological question. In this way, protein identification and characterization has a meaningful outcome. We discuss some of the advantages of a functional proteomics approach and provide examples of how different methodologies can be utilized to address a wide variety of biological problems.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Research Dr., C118 LSRC, Durham, NC 27710. Phone: (919) 613-8606. Fax: (919) 668-0977. E-mail: hayst001{at}mc.duke.edu.


Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, March 2002, p. 39-63, Vol. 66, No. 1
1092-2172/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.66.1.39-63.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. Eukaryot. Cell
Mol. Cell. Biol. J. Virol. J. Bacteriol.
ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.