This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Young, K. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Young, K. D.

The Selective Value of Bacterial Shape

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Dakota School of Medicine, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58202-9037

Why do bacteria have shape? Is morphology valuable or just a trivial secondary characteristic? Why should bacteria have one shape instead of another? Three broad considerations suggest that bacterial shapes are not accidental but are biologically important: cells adopt uniform morphologies from among a wide variety of possibilities, some cells modify their shape as conditions demand, and morphology can be tracked through evolutionary lineages. All of these imply that shape is a selectable feature that aids survival. The aim of this review is to spell out the physical, environmental, and biological forces that favor different bacterial morphologies and which, therefore, contribute to natural selection. Specifically, cell shape is driven by eight general considerations: nutrient access, cell division and segregation, attachment to surfaces, passive dispersal, active motility, polar differentiation, the need to escape predators, and the advantages of cellular differentiation. Bacteria respond to these forces by performing a type of calculus, integrating over a number of environmental and behavioral factors to produce a size and shape that are optimal for the circumstances in which they live. Just as we are beginning to answer how bacteria create their shapes, it seems reasonable and essential that we expand our efforts to understand why they do so.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Fiuza, M., Canova, M. J., Zanella-Cleon, I., Becchi, M., Cozzone, A. J., Mateos, L. M., Kremer, L., Gil, J. A., Molle, V. (2008). From the Characterization of the Four Serine/Threonine Protein Kinases (PknA/B/G/L) of Corynebacterium glutamicum toward the Role of PknA and PknB in Cell Division. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 18099-18112 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Borgnia, M. J., Subramaniam, S., Milne, J. L. S. (2008). Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Highly Bent Architecture of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus by Using Cryo-Electron Tomography. J. Bacteriol. 190: 2588-2596 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Varma, A., Huang, K. C., Young, K. D. (2008). The Min System as a General Cell Geometry Detection Mechanism: Branch Lengths in Y-Shaped Escherichia coli Cells Affect Min Oscillation Patterns and Division Dynamics. J. Bacteriol. 190: 2106-2117 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hett, E. C., Rubin, E. J. (2008). Bacterial Growth and Cell Division: a Mycobacterial Perspective. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 72: 126-156 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cabeen, M. T., Jacobs-Wagner, C. (2007). Skin and bones: the bacterial cytoskeleton, cell wall, and cell morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 179: 381-387 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Legaree, B. A., Daniels, K., Weadge, J. T., Cockburn, D., Clarke, A. J. (2007). Function of penicillin-binding protein 2 in viability and morphology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother 59: 411-424 [Abstract] [Full Text]