This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, K. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, September 2006, p. 660-703, Vol. 70, No. 3
1092-2172/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MMBR.00001-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

The Selective Value of Bacterial Shape

Kevin D. Young*

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Dakota School of Medicine, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58202-9037

Why do bacteria have shape? Is morphology valuable or just a trivial secondary characteristic? Why should bacteria have one shape instead of another? Three broad considerations suggest that bacterial shapes are not accidental but are biologically important: cells adopt uniform morphologies from among a wide variety of possibilities, some cells modify their shape as conditions demand, and morphology can be tracked through evolutionary lineages. All of these imply that shape is a selectable feature that aids survival. The aim of this review is to spell out the physical, environmental, and biological forces that favor different bacterial morphologies and which, therefore, contribute to natural selection. Specifically, cell shape is driven by eight general considerations: nutrient access, cell division and segregation, attachment to surfaces, passive dispersal, active motility, polar differentiation, the need to escape predators, and the advantages of cellular differentiation. Bacteria respond to these forces by performing a type of calculus, integrating over a number of environmental and behavioral factors to produce a size and shape that are optimal for the circumstances in which they live. Just as we are beginning to answer how bacteria create their shapes, it seems reasonable and essential that we expand our efforts to understand why they do so.

* Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Dakota School of Medicine, Grand Forks, ND 58202-9037. Phone: (701) 777-2624. Fax: (701) 777-2054. E-mail: kyoung{at}medicine.nodak.edu.

Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, September 2006, p. 660-703, Vol. 70, No. 3
1092-2172/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MMBR.00001-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Shum, H., Gaffney, E. A., Smith, D. J. (2010). Modelling bacterial behaviour close to a no-slip plane boundary: the influence of bacterial geometry. Proc R Soc A 0: rspa.2009.0520v1-rspa20090520 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Robertson, J., Levy, A., Sagripanti, J.-L., Inglis, T. J. J. (2010). The Survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Liquid Media. Am J Trop Med Hyg 82: 88-94 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cunningham, J. J. III, Kinner, N. E., Lewis, M. (2009). Protistan Predation Affects Trichloroethene Biodegradation in a Bedrock Aquifer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 7588-7593 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dworkin, J. (2009). Cellular Polarity in Prokaryotic Organisms. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 1: a003368-a003368 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • McManus, G. B., Katz, L. A. (2009). Molecular and morphological methods for identifying plankton: what makes a successful marriage?. J PLANKTON RES 31: 1119-1129 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Palsdottir, H., Remis, J. P., Schaudinn, C., O'Toole, E., Lux, R., Shi, W., McDonald, K. L., Costerton, J. W., Auer, M. (2009). Three-Dimensional Macromolecular Organization of Cryofixed Myxococcus xanthus Biofilms as Revealed by Electron Microscopic Tomography. J. Bacteriol. 191: 2077-2082 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Whitman, W. B. (2009). The Modern Concept of the Procaryote. J. Bacteriol. 191: 2000-2005 [Full Text]  
  • Huang, K. C., Mukhopadhyay, R., Wen, B., Gitai, Z., Wingreen, N. S. (2008). Cell shape and cell-wall organization in Gram-negative bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 19282-19287 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fiuza, M., Canova, M. J., Zanella-Cleon, I., Becchi, M., Cozzone, A. J., Mateos, L. M., Kremer, L., Gil, J. A., Molle, V. (2008). From the Characterization of the Four Serine/Threonine Protein Kinases (PknA/B/G/L) of Corynebacterium glutamicum toward the Role of PknA and PknB in Cell Division. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 18099-18112 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Borgnia, M. J., Subramaniam, S., Milne, J. L. S. (2008). Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Highly Bent Architecture of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus by Using Cryo-Electron Tomography. J. Bacteriol. 190: 2588-2596 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Varma, A., Huang, K. C., Young, K. D. (2008). The Min System as a General Cell Geometry Detection Mechanism: Branch Lengths in Y-Shaped Escherichia coli Cells Affect Min Oscillation Patterns and Division Dynamics. J. Bacteriol. 190: 2106-2117 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hett, E. C., Rubin, E. J. (2008). Bacterial Growth and Cell Division: a Mycobacterial Perspective. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 72: 126-156 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cabeen, M. T., Jacobs-Wagner, C. (2007). Skin and bones: the bacterial cytoskeleton, cell wall, and cell morphogenesis. JCB 179: 381-387 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Legaree, B. A., Daniels, K., Weadge, J. T., Cockburn, D., Clarke, A. J. (2007). Function of penicillin-binding protein 2 in viability and morphology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother 59: 411-424 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»