Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, March 2000, p. 69-114, Vol. 64, No. 1
1092-2172/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
andCenter of Marine Biotechnology, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, and Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
SCOPE OF THE REVIEW
ENUMERATION OF VIRUSES IN WATER SAMPLES
Introduction
Indirect, Viable Counting of Bacteriophage and Viruses in Water Samples
Direct Counting of Viruses in Water Samples
Characteristics of Aquatic Virioplankton
VIRAL ABUNDANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS
Temporal Variation
Depth Variation
Correlation of Virioplankton Abundance with Microbiological Parameters
Chlorophyll a concentration and bacterial abundance.
Bacterial production.
The dissolved-DNA dilemma.
Virus-to-Bacterium Ratio
IMPACT OF VIRUSES AND VIRAL INFECTION ON THE AQUATIC FOOD WEB
Significant Biological Factors for Modeling In Situ Phage-Host Interaction
In situ burst size.
Viral inactivation and particle destruction.
Host cell concentration and viral replication.
Host metabolic state.
Host range.
Phage life cycle.
(i) Temperance versus virulence.
(ii) Pseudolysogeny.
Viral Infection and the Microbial Loop: Theoretical Considerations
Demonstration of In Situ Virus-Mediated Mortality
Measurement of In Situ Virus-Mediated Mortality
Frequency of visibly infected cells.
Radiotracer incorporation.
Viral loss or decay and contact rates.
Method comparisons and conclusions.
VIRAL INFECTION AND THE MAINTENANCE OF HOST COMMUNITY DIVERSITY
Horizontal Gene Transfer: Transduction
Model for Viral Control of Host Community Diversity
The Problem of Resistance
Evidence of Viral Control of Host Community Diversity
CONCLUSION: VIRIOPLANKTON AS AN ACTIVE AND IMPORTANT COMPONENT OF AQUATIC MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
SUMMARY
|
|
|---|
The discovery that viruses may be the most abundant organisms in natural waters, surpassing the number of bacteria by an order of magnitude, has inspired a resurgence of interest in viruses in the aquatic environment. Surprisingly little was known of the interaction of viruses and their hosts in nature. In the decade since the reports of extraordinarily large virus populations were published, enumeration of viruses in aquatic environments has demonstrated that the virioplankton are dynamic components of the plankton, changing dramatically in number with geographical location and season. The evidence to date suggests that virioplankton communities are composed principally of bacteriophages and, to a lesser extent, eukaryotic algal viruses. The influence of viral infection and lysis on bacterial and phytoplankton host communities was measurable after new methods were developed and prior knowledge of bacteriophage biology was incorporated into concepts of parasite and host community interactions. The new methods have yielded data showing that viral infection can have a significant impact on bacteria and unicellular algae populations and supporting the hypothesis that viruses play a significant role in microbial food webs. Besides predation limiting bacteria and phytoplankton populations, the specific nature of virus-host interaction raises the intriguing possibility that viral infection influences the structure and diversity of aquatic microbial communities. Novel applications of molecular genetic techniques have provided good evidence that viral infection can significantly influence the composition and diversity of aquatic microbial communities.
INTRODUCTION
|
|
|---|
From studies of the genetics and biology of viruses has come a more profound understanding of the basic biological processes of life, not the least of which has been the discovery of DNA as the carrier molecule of genetic information (125) and mRNA as an intermediate molecule in the transfer of genetic information to the ribosomes (43). Other breakthroughs in molecular biology attributable to bacteriophage models are the definition and mapping of the first gene (18); discovery of the discontinuous nature of DNA replication (222); discovery of restriction endonucleases (212); and the mechanics of gene regulation (261). Indeed, basic research on the biology of the bacteriophage has been fundamental to the establishment of the field of molecular biology (73). The value of basic research to technological and economic advancement is perhaps best illustrated by the historical link between basic bacteriophage biology and the present-day, multibillion dollar biotechnology industry.
In contrast to extensive information on the biology and genetics of
viruses, there is only a limited understanding of the occurrence and
distribution of viruses in microbial ecosystems and in situ
relationships between viral and host communities in the natural
environment. The lack of recognition of viruses as naturally occurring
organisms was most notably exposed with the discovery that viruses are
abundant in a variety of aquatic environments, often exceeding
bacterial abundance by an order of magnitude (19, 257). It
was a surprise to learn from direct transmission electron microscope
examination of marine virio- and bacterioplankton the astounding
abundance of virus-like particles in seawater, considering that marine
bacteriophages were first described in detail more than 35 years ago
(301, 302, 331, 332). As an example, a transmission electron
micrograph of unfiltered Chesapeake Bay water is shown in Fig.
1. The realization that in most aquatic
environments the virioplankton is the most abundant plankton class has
revived scientific investigation into the natural state of viruses in aquatic environments. Important questions raised by discovery of the
abundance of viruses in natural ecosystems challenge accepted views of
the aquatic microbial food web and the hypothesized singular role of
obligate parasites in controlling microorganism population abundance
and diversity.
|
SCOPE OF THE REVIEW
|
|
|---|
This review is divided into four sections. The first and second sections cover methods for viral direct counting, reports of naturally occurring virioplankton abundance in a variety of aquatic environments, and the correlation between changes in virus abundance and changes in other important ecological parameters. The third examines aspects of aquatic bacteriophage biology which have a significant influence on host infection in aquatic environments. The final section focuses on viral infection and lysis, as both a factor in the mortality of host populations and a mechanism influencing genetic and clonal diversity of host populations. In general, the discussion is focused on in situ measurement of virioplankton populations. Model phage-host systems are included, as appropriate, for background information. Readers interested in aquatic phage-host relationships will find relevant information in reviews by Børsheim (29) and Proctor (253) and an earlier review by Moebus (193). A brief synopsis of current views on marine virus ecology was recently provided by Furhman (91). The distribution and survival of human and animal pathogenic enteroviruses in aquatic environments are not covered herein, since detection and distribution of human disease-causing viruses in natural waters have been extensively reviewed elsewhere (99, 103, 104, 112, 182).
ENUMERATION OF VIRUSES IN WATER SAMPLES
|
|
|---|
Introduction
Discovery of the abundance of viruses in natural waters reflects the development of direct counting methods for bacterial enumeration. From the use of direct-counting methods to enumerate bacteria in environmental samples (127, 381), it has been found that viable counts, obtained using culture methods, significantly underestimate the number of bacteria in the sample. This finding is not surprising since it was suspected from the early days of bacteriology, when staining methods were used to enumerate bacteria. Newer techniques yielded results that led many investigators to reject conclusions regarding the ecology of bacteria obtained solely by culture. Molecular methods developed for analyzing bacterial population dynamics and diversity have revealed large populations of unculturable bacteria in the environment, further fueling speculation that bacterial diversity may be 100 to 1,000 times greater than that suggested by results of studies involving culture methods (60).
Indirect, Viable Counting of Bacteriophage and Viruses in Water Samples
Indirect titer determination by plaque assay (4),
coupled with the most-probable-number method (150, 309), has
routinely been used to enumerate viruses in water samples but has only
recently been used to elucidate the ecology of viruses. For example,
the abundance and distribution of coliphages in natural water samples have been determined by a plaque assay (99, 118, 244). In general, estimates of the abundance of specific viruses by culture methods have been so low that preconcentration of viruses was necessary
prior to inoculation and enumeration (titers per liter). The
distribution and abundance of phages infecting autochthonous bacterial
hosts in a natural body of water, such as the Chesapeake Bay,
illustrate the difficulty in interpreting data on the abundance of
specific bacteriophages by culture assay (K. E. Wommack, R. T. Hill, J. Ravel, and R. R. Colwell, Abstr. 96th Gen. Meet.
Am. Soc. Microbiol. 1996, abstr. N-23, p. 159, 1996). For example, 36 water samples collected at six stations during the year yielded only 10 samples that were positive for bacteriophages infecting one or more of
the indicator strains. Of the 10 successful bacteriophage isolations
from Chesapeake Bay water samples, only two of the titers exceeded the
detection limit of 1 PFU. After taking into account the 10- to 100-fold
concentration of virioplankton within the water samples, 7 PFU
liter
1 was the final abundance estimate. However, direct
microscopic examination revealed 100- to 1,000-fold more virus
particles in each water sample.
Even though culture-based methods are not efficient in the enumeration
of viruses, they remain indispensable for isolation and purification of
virus-host systems. There are exceptions, however, most notably the
methods used to study the distribution and abundance of phages of
marine Synechococcus spp. Cyanophages that infect two
Synechococcus strains isolated from Woods Hole harbor
demonstrated stable annual cycles of abundance, ranging from winter
lows of 10 ml
1 to late-summer highs of between
103 to 104 ml
1 (341).
These abundances were recorded directly from analyses of seawater
samples, without preconcentration, using a most-probable-number method and broth dilution cultures. Large numbers of cyanophage, often in excess of 105 ml
1, have also been
found in hundreds of water samples collected in the western Gulf of
Mexico (96, 312, 313).
Obviously, culture-based methods have proven very useful in the study of cyanophage ecology. Cyanobacteria are a relatively well characterized group of aquatic bacteria. Synechococcus spp., used as host strains for titer determinations, were similar in genotype to members of the natural host community, a factor helpful in the detection of cyanophages in environmental samples. Waterbury and Valois (341) noted that the Synechococcus strains most successfully employed in titer determinations were those which had lost phage resistance, a result of a long time lapse (>2 years) since clonal isolation. The most-probable-number method was used to enumerate cyanophages (308), and broth culture may have enhanced the detection of these bacteriophages in natural waters. In contrast, the most-probable-number technique has been successful in enumerating bacteriophages infecting aquatic heterotrophic bacteria only in the case of Aeromonas spp. (85).
The majority of bacterioplankton has been presumed to consist of heterotrophic bacterial species (72, 128). However, very little is known about the community structure of heterotrophic bacteria, not even which species are numerically dominant. In retrospect, reliance on culturing methods can explain why nearly 35 years after Spencer (302) reported the isolation of a marine virus, i.e., Photobacterium phosphorium bacteriophage, the dogma persisted that viruses were rare in natural waters and therefore were without significance for their host populations. As we have known for over three decades, ever since the report of MacLeod (169), only a small proportion (1 to 2%) of naturally occurring heterotrophic aquatic bacteria can be grown in culture. Given that hundreds, if not thousands, of bacterial species are believed to comprise the bacterioplankton, any single bacterial species selected for estimation of phage populations will very probably not be a dominant species within the bacterioplankton host community. Therefore, phage titers, obtained with a few host strains, will underestimate virioplankton abundance.
Direct Counting of Viruses in Water Samples
Direct enumeration methods for viruses have facilitated the
analysis of viral abundance in natural waters. Transmission electron microscopy is now used for direct enumeration of viruses, with one of
the earliest transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations of
viruses in seawater samples having been made by Sieburth
(292), who published a compendium on the diversity of marine
microbial communities. In 1979, Torella and Morita (326)
provided the first direct counts of viruses occurring within the
>0.2-µm size fraction of plankton samples collected from Yaquina
Bay, Oregon. At >104 ml
1, the abundance of
virus-like particles in filtrates of Yaquina Bay water was the highest
recorded at the time. It was postulated that viral numbers were
actually much larger, since many viruses pass through a
0.2-µm-pore-size filter. These findings provided the initial
supporting evidence for the proposal of Weibe and Liston
(354) that viral lysis and infection could both influence the growth and diversity of bacterioplankton and mediate genetic exchange. Despite these early, groundbreaking observations, active research on the ecological importance of viral infection languished for
almost 20 years.
In 1988, two important studies showed that viral abundance in the range
of 106 ml
1 occurred in seawater. Using
epifluorescence microscopy and a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) binding
fluorochrome, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), Sieburth et al.
(293) reported 5.8 × 106 blue-fluorescing
particles per ml in water samples collected during a monospecific bloom
of a newly described chrysophyte alga, Aureococcus
anophagefferens. Prior to enumerating free viruses in water
samples collected during the bloom in Narragansett Bay, TEM
observations of virus particles within Aureococcus
anophagefferens cells had been made. In exploratory mesocosm
experiments designed to investigate the potential of viral infection
for bacterioplankton mortality, Proctor et al. (257) added
virioplankton concentrates to water samples collected from the Eastern
Caribbean. A significant impact of viral infection was apparent when,
after a 24-h incubation period, the bacterioplankton abundance was 25 to 40% lower in mesocosms to which viruses had been added. TEM direct
counts of virus-like particles in concentrates indicated a natural
virioplankton abundance of between 103 and 106
ml
1.
Since direct counting can now be considered critical in studies of virioplankton ecology, comparison of the efficiency of methods used to count viruses is useful. Details of methods for direct counting of viruses are provided by Suttle (308, 309) and Bratbak and Heldal (35). The earliest and most commonly used method for viral direct counts (VDC) in water samples is TEM. From the results of studies by Proctor et al. (256, 257), Bergh et al. (19), and Sieburth (293), TEM has evolved into the benchmark for virus enumeration. Virus morphology, including capsid and tail size, can be determined by TEM.
The most commonly used TEM method is direct sedimentation of free virus
particles from an unfiltered, glutaraldehyde-fixed water sample onto a
fine-mesh, Formvar-coated copper grid. For most water samples,
prefiltration prior to centrifugation is not necessary. However, there
are technical as well as practical disadvantages of direct virus
enumeration. In water samples containing large amounts of particulate
matter, viruses are obscured on the grid and therefore cannot be
counted. Because of this problem, viruses in water samples collected
from the upper reaches of Chesapeake Bay could not be detected
(368). Suttle (309) has addressed two additional
problems in centrifuge pelleting of viruses onto TEM grids, namely,
that viruses do not sediment in parallel paths and therefore are
concentrated toward the edges of the bottom of the tube, and that very
small viruses are not recovered with 100% efficiency. The result is an
underestimation of virioplankton abundance. To minimize centrifugation
bias, viruses are counted using replicate grids placed at the bottom of
a centrifuge tube. Because of the high magnification required to
identify virus-like particles on TEM grids, the practical detection
limit of TEM direct counting is 105 viruses
ml
1, a detection limit high enough to prevent the
application of TEM direct counting of samples collected from
oligotrophic environments, where the number of viruses in the water is
small (138). Finally, there is loss of precision because of
uneven staining and nonhomogenous distribution of viruses on the grids.
TEM counts of viruses in natural water samples yield an average
coefficient of variation of 20 to 25%, versus 7 to 11% for
epifluorescence microscopy (122, 349).
To enumerate viruses in samples of oligotrophic water without having
to centrifuge the samples, virioplankton can be concentrated by
ultrafiltration. In fact, ultrafiltration is essential in virioplankton ecology. Methods for ultrafiltration and concentration of naturally occurring viruses include vacuum filtration (367),
centrifugal filtration (97), pressure filtration through
either a hollow-fiber filter (254, 256), or a spiral-wound
membrane filter (52, 316), and vortex flow filtration, a
variant of pressure filtration (139, 240). Viruses in
virioplankton concentrates are either pelleted during centrifugation or
dried onto a TEM grid and then stained. Ultrafiltration, while
improving the detection and enumeration of virioplankton and perhaps
even eliminating centrifugation, introduces a selective bias. As a step
in obtaining direct counts of viruses, it can affect recovery
efficiencies, e.g., 9 to 117% (
= 42 ± 42) for vortex flow filtration (138, 240) and 68 to 171%
(
= 114 ± 30) (mean ± standard
error) for vacuum filtration (367), indicating low but
variably reduced counts. The strongest evidence of ultrafiltration bias
was obtained by analysis of covariance, comparing direct counts of
viruses with and without ultrafiltration. Overall, viral abundances
estimated using unprocessed samples were nearly three times greater
than those estimated using concentrated samples (171).
Methodological limitations aside, ultrafiltration has made possible the
examination of virioplankton in both oligotrophic water samples and
mesocosms in which virus-host population concentrations have been
altered. In general, ultrafiltration provides conservative virus counts.
The practical limitation of TEM direct counting is the equipment
required, i.e., a transmission electron microscope and ultracentrifuge. Thus, it is not suitable for most field studies and is less likely to
be available to investigators at small research institutions. Also,
sample preparation and analysis are tediously slow. These limitations
can be bypassed by using epifluorescence light microscopy (ELM). In
essence, the latter is a variation of direct counting of bacteria.
Nucleic acid within the viral capsid is stained with a nucleic acid
binding fluorochrome (usually dsDNA). Stained viruses are captured on a
small-pore-size filter (
0.02 µm) and visualized at high
magnification (
×1,000) by light emission of the bound fluorochrome
stain. Successful enumeration of viruses generally requires
intensification of the fluorescent signal by means of a charge-coupled
device camera (97) or photographic processing designed to
increase film speed (116). Several different dsDNA binding
fluorochromes, e.g., DAPI, Yo-Pro, and SYBR, have been used as the
staining agent. An obvious caveat for those who use ELM to count
viruses is that the overlap in size between small bacterioplankton
cells and large virus-like particles, in some environments, can be a
source of error in direct counts of viruses (299).
With improvements in the specificity and fluorescence yield of dsDNA
binding fluorescent stains, ELM methods for direct counting of
virioplankton now approach a precision level similar to that of TEM.
Initial trials, using DAPI (Table 1),
found relatively close agreement between TEM and ELM
counts of viruses in Japanese coastal water samples (TEM/ELM ratio
0.8) (115, 116), in phage lysates of laboratory cultures
(TEM/ELM ratio
1) (254), and in virioplankton
concentrates from Santa Monica Bay (TEM/ELM ratio
1.6 ± 0.37)
(97). In only one study, using water samples from the Gulf
of Mexico and Tampa Bay, did TEM counts greatly exceed ELM (DAPI)
counts (TEM/ELM ratio
10 to 18) (240). Discrepancies among these studies probably can be ascribed to methodological differences, especially for the Gulf of Mexico and Tampa Bay samples, where image intensification was not utilized.
|
More recently, two other nucleic acid binding fluorochrome stains, Yo-Pro-1 and SYBR Green I, have been used for virioplankton enumeration (144, 173, 214). Specific advantages of these stains are low background staining and stability and brightness of fluorescence greater than that of DAPI. A notable disadvantage of Yo-Pro-1 is the 2-day incubation needed for adequate staining of virioplankton samples trapped on an aluminum oxide filter. Subsequently, it was reported that the cumbersome 48-h incubation time could be reduced to 4 min through microwave pretreatment of virioplankton samples (376). In several trials, Hennes and Suttle (122) found that ELM (Yo-Pro) virus counts exceeded those of TEM by a factor of ca. 3 ± 1.6. Similarly, Weinbauer and Suttle (349) observed that estimates of virioplankton abundance obtained by TEM averaged ca. 66% of those obtained with ELM (Yo-Pro). For the same Gulf of Mexico water samples, ELM virus counts obtained using DAPI staining averaged 86% of the Yo-Pro counts.
Two recent reports indicate that SYBR Green I may emerge as the best solution for epifluorescence counting of virioplankton (173, 214). Unlike Yo-Pro, SYBR Green I stains only viruses and cells in seawater samples with a short (<15-min) incubation and is not affected by the presence of aldehyde fixatives (214). As with Yo-Pro, SYBR Green I virus counts yielded a precision similar to that of TEM counts and generally exceeded TEM direct counts. In a most exciting methodological advancement, SYBR Green I staining has been combined with flow cytometry for rapid enumeration of virioplankton in seawater samples (173). Flow cytometric analysis of virioplankton populations in water samples collected from different depths in the Mediterranean Sea revealed two distinct virus populations, based on size. If the majority of the bright, Yo-Pro-1- or SYBR Green I-stained particles are viruses, most virus counts obtained through TEM (Table 1) are very conservative and probably underestimate the actual population size.
Characteristics of Aquatic Virioplankton
It is likely that virioplankton, besides being most abundant, is the most diverse component of plankton. Hundreds of viruses infecting a wide range of phyto- and bacterioplankton species have been isolated and described. However, as with aquatic bacteria, these represent only a small portion of virioplankton diversity. For example, recently it was discovered that in some marine environments, archaebacteria make up a significant proportion of the bacterioplankton (69, 70). The archaea were previously believed to be restricted to extreme environments characterized by high salinity, high temperature, or anaerobiosis (224). Only a few viruses infecting archaebacteria have been described (380) because of the difficulty of culturing the hosts and the slow growth of archaeal viruses. Archaea make up to 34% of bacterioplankton abundance in Antarctic coastal waters (70) and 40 to 60% of total bacterial abundance in temperate ocean midwaters (200 to 600 m) (94); therefore, it is probable that archaeal viruses constitute a significant proportion of the virioplankton in these environments.
At present, direct TEM examination of aquatic viruses is the most common method of recording virioplankton diversity. While morphological data give only a limited view of virioplankton diversity, these data have been cited as evidence that bacteriophages comprise the majority of viruses within the virioplankton (172, 368). Other observations, such as the lack of significant correlation between algal biomass (chlorophyll a concentration) and VDC (Table 1), the ability of changes in bacterial abundance to predict changes in viral abundance (56, 115), the greater abundance of bacteria over that of other planktonic hosts (28, 56), and the predominance of viruses within the virioplankton with bacteriophage-sized genomes (20 to 60 kb), have all been cited as evidence to support this claim (116, 372). Further study may fully substantiate the prevalence of bacteriophages within the virioplankton. The morphology of marine bacteriophages has been reviewed extensively by Proctor (257), Børsheim (29), and Frank and Moebus (86).
Capsid size provides an index of morphological diversity. Classification according to capsid size has been accomplished, based on data obtained by TEM. In fact, viruses in environmental samples have been classified according to morphotype by some investigators (353). The most complete of these studies was a survey of bacteriophage diversity in Lake Plußsee, Germany, by Demuth et al. (71), who reported 39 morphologically distinct phages, which were classified into three principal morphotypes: B1 (Siphoviridae), A1 (Myoviridae), and C1 (Podoviridae). These morphotypes made up 50, 18, and 19% of the total diversity, respectively.
Other studies have reported only on the incidence of tailed bacteriophages. Hara et al. (116) and Wommack et al. (368) showed quantitatively that nontailed or short-tailed viruses comprised the majority of virioplankton in Japanese coastal and Chesapeake Bay water samples, respectively. Other investigators have reported (qualitatively) that either long-tailed (contractile and noncontractile) viruses (56, 256, 326) or non- or short-tailed viruses (19, 38) were dominant in water samples. The accuracy of reports on tail morphology, however, has been questioned, since preparation of water samples for viral direct counting may cause separation of phage capsids and tails (253). Since 96% of all known bacteriophages (ca. 4,600) are tailed (1), it is not surprising that careful preparation and exhaustive documentation of virioplankton diversity in aquatic environments (such as that done by Demuth et al. [71]) show that the majority of virioplankters are tailed.
Measuring virioplankton diversity by capsid diameter is
appropriate, since this feature varies widely among the bacteriophages described to date (20 to 200 nm) and is, in general, a consistent feature for bacteriophages (3). Data on the frequency
distribution of capsid size within virioplankton populations have been
reported for a variety of aquatic environments (Table 1), with the
dominant virioplankton capsid diameter being in the range of 30 to 70 nm (19, 30, 38, 56, 121, 171, 172, 320, 342, 347, 368). The
proportion of virioplankton observed to fall into the 30- to 60-nm size
class was ca. 65% or greater. Two investigators have reported the
predominance of 30- to 60-nm viruses within bacterioplankton cells
(121, 347), suggesting that the free bacteriophages most
frequently observed and characterized are indeed produced in situ. The
30- to 60-nm capsid size of aquatic virioplankton is slightly smaller
than the 60- to 80-nm range observed for purified marine (29,
86) and other (3) bacteriophages. It has been
suggested that the somewhat smaller size of free aquatic bacteriophages
indicates that marine phage culture collections do not contain the most
abundant bacteriophages that exist in aquatic environments
(29). Therefore, conclusions about natural bacteriophage
diversity that are based on knowledge gained from experiments with
purified bacteriophages must be drawn with caution. For example,
Bratbak et al. (34) observed large numbers (104
ml
1) of extraordinarily large phage-like particles, with
a capsid diameter of 340 to 400 nm and noncontractile tail length of
2.2 to 2.8 µm, in Norwegian and Danish coastal water samples.
Abundant large virus particles that overlap the size of small bacteria have also been found in water samples from a eutrophic freshwater reservoir (298), Antarctic lakes (144), European
alpine lakes (249), and the food vacuoles of phaeodarian
radiolarians (111). Pleiomorphic, spindle- and lemon-shaped
viruses have been found in hypersaline environments dominated by
halophilic archaea (113, 227).
Changes in the frequency distribution of viral capsid size over time and space suggest that the composition of virioplankton populations and, by inference, cooccurring host populations can vary. Evidence for a correlation between the capsid size of the virioplankton and the composition of host populations comes from the observation of Weinbauer and Peduzzi (347), who showed that bacteria within different morphological groups carry viruses of a particular size class. Analysis of Adriatic Sea water samples revealed that the 30- to <60-nm capsid size class comprised 75 and 100% of intracellular viruses in rods and spirilla, respectively. Cocci, however, more often contained larger viruses (60 to <110 nm) than the smaller 30- to <60-nm viruses (65 and 35%, respectively). Within the bacterioplankton, 84% of the population was rod shaped, supporting the results of earlier work showing a predominance of 30- to <60-nm capsids within virioplankton from Northern Adriatic Sea water samples (342).
Several observations of temporal and spatial changes in the frequency distribution of viral capsid size have been recorded for virioplankton populations. Cochlan et al. (56) found that viruses >60 nm in capsid diameter decreased greatly in abundance, from nearly 50% of the population to almost none, in an onshore-to-offshore transect in the Southern California Bight. The authors observed that differences in virioplankton abundance from water samples collected at different depths or in different environments (Southern California Bight and the Gulf of Bothnia, Sweden) could usually be attributed to the proportion of viruses in the <60-nm size class. A similar observation of the dynamic nature of the <60-nm capsid size class was made by Børsheim and colleagues (30) during a 20-day incubation of a Norwegian coastal seawater sample. In the first 5 days of incubation, the abundance of the <60-nm class increased at a rate of 41% per day. Two studies have documented changes in both virioplankton abundance and composition during Northern high-latitude spring diatom blooms. Bratbak et al. (38) observed two peaks in virioplankton abundance over a 1-month sampling period, during which virioplankton in the <60-nm size class were nearly always dominant and demonstrated the most erratic changes in abundance. Maranger et al. (172) noted a decrease in the abundance of the smallest size class (viruses of <50 nm) and an increase in the 50- to 70-nm size class in samples of Arctic sea ice during a 1-month bloom.
Not every study documenting the capsid diameter of virioplankton has reported changes in the distribution of capsid size with changes in time or location of water sample collection. Mathias et al. (176) noted no change in the frequency of four groups of capsid diameters among the virioplankton in river water samples collected over a 2-year period. It is interesting that viruses larger than 60 nm were most abundant in these water samples (mostly the 60- to <90-nm size class [ca. 40%]). The preponderance of larger viruses in the virioplankton of this riverine environment may be a reflection of differences in host community structure between marine and freshwater environments. In the hypersaline environment of solar salterns, the virioplankton members tend towards smaller capsid diameters, with the dominant size class between 20 and 50 nm (113). In this extreme environment, no correlations were observed between changes in salinity and frequency of capsid diameter; however, the abundance of a pleiomorphic, lemon-shaped virus (believed to be a virus of halophilic archaea) was strongly correlated with increasing salinity (113). Differences in viral size class distribution was noted for water samples collected from 22 Canadian lakes; however, no statistically significant trend connecting these changes to the trophic state of the lacustrine environment was detected (171). Similarly, the frequency distribution of capsid diameters did not change significantly with season or trophic condition for virioplankton populations in water samples from the Northern Adriatic Sea (342).
VIRAL ABUNDANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS
|
|
|---|
In the few years since the presence of large numbers of free virus
particles in natural waters was reported, microbial ecologists have
used a variety of direct-counting techniques to enumerate viruses in
the aquatic environment. As shown in Table 1, the abundance of viruses
can range from <104 ml
1 to >108
ml
1. This extreme variability in numbers is distinctive
for this component of the plankton. In similar environments, the number of bacteria ranges between ca. 104 and 107
ml
1, with ca. 106 ml
1 reported
for coastal marine waters. The data given in Table 1 show that the
number of viruses is greater in productive and nutrient-rich environments. The wide variation in numbers suggests that viruses are,
indeed, an active component of aquatic microbial communities.
Temporal Variation
Seasonal variation in abundance has been noted since the earliest
reports of viruses in seawater by Bergh et al. (19). In Norwegian coastal waters, the concentration of virus particles during
the winter fell below 104 ml
1 from ca. 5 × 106 ml
1 in spring through autumn. Counts
made at other coastal ocean and estuarine locations have shown similar
seasonal trends. In both Tampa Bay and the northern Adriatic Sea, viral
abundances changed by an order of magnitude from winter lows of
106 ml
1 or less to late-summer highs of
>107 ml
1 (58, 136, 343).
Significant seasonal changes in viral abundance were observed in
Chesapeake Bay (368). In the only study done to examine the
seasonal dynamics of a freshwater virioplankton population, Mathias et
al. (176) recorded viral abundances ranging from 12 × 106 to 61 × 106 ml
1 in a
backwater system of the Danube River. Bacterial abundances showed
similar seasonal variability in these environments but changed only by
a factor of 5. An interesting coincidence between these studies is that
the greatest viral abundance occurred in late autumn. It is possible
that these annual peaks in viral abundance are a result of autumn
phytoplankton blooms. Spring phytoplankton blooms also are correlated
with increased numbers of viruses; however, the magnitude of the autumn
peaks is larger, possibly because of larger initial (summer)
virioplankton and bacterioplankton populations at the beginning of the
autumn bloom.
The volatile nature of virioplankton abundance is most apparent in
shorter-term temporal studies, especially those conducted on or around
annual phytoplankton blooms. Initial evidence that viruses were likely
to be active within the plankton came from a study examining changes in
numbers of free virus particles during a spring diatom bloom in western
Norway. Over the course of the March 1989 bloom, employing 2-day
sampling intervals, Bratbak et al. (38) documented a rise in
numbers of viruses from a prebloom low of 5 × 105
virus-like particles ml
1 to a maximum concentration of
1.3 × 107 virus-like particles ml
1.
Dramatic peaks in free-virus counts followed peaks in the abundance of
diatoms and other photoautotrophs, suggesting a close coupling of viral
infection and production to growth of the host population. In a 4-month
study of Lake Constance, a large mesotrophic lake, Hennes and Simon
(121) documented changes in virioplankton abundance, frequency of infected bacterioplankton, and bacteriophage production rate. Their observations, which commenced just prior to the spring phytoplankton bloom, showed that transient increases in bacterial abundance were closely followed by peaks in the frequency of occurrence of infected bacteria and in the abundance of free bacteriophages. Brief
peaks in virioplankton abundance suggested in situ phage production
rates of between 0.5 × 106 and 2.5 × 106 phage ml
1 day
1. Finally,
dramatic changes in virioplankton abundance were observed in Arctic sea
ice over the course of the spring phytoplankton bloom. In observations
of virioplankton in the lower 4 cm of sea ice, Maranger et al.
(172) reported the largest numbers of free virus ever
recorded in a marine environment. During the 1-month bloom, viral
abundance in sea ice increased by a factor of 100. Surprisingly,
viruses were 10 to 100 times more abundant in sea ice than in the
underlying water, suggesting that processes controlling virus
populations are dramatically different in the two environments.
Short-term changes in virioplankton abundance have been investigated
both in large-volume (
60-liter) mesocosms and in situ. In each case,
the number of free viruses in water samples changed significantly over
a diel cycle. A mesocosom experiment conducted by Jiang and Paul
(136) did not reveal a diel rhythm in changes in virus
numbers. During the experiment, a significant increase in VDC was
preceded by increases in bacterial abundance and chlorophyll a concentration, thereby providing circumstantial evidence
for close coupling of host community growth and viral production
(136). A diel cycle of viral abundance that was
significantly correlated with sunlight levels and bacterial production
was detected in 60-liter seawater enclosures (120). In the
enclosures, a direct link between host and viral abundance was not
observed, since the bacterial direct count (BDC) did not correlate with
VDC. However, a correlation of the VDC with the bacterial production
rate in the mesocosms supports the assumption that a faster-growing
host community is more effective in producing free viruses. Correlation of VDC with global radiation levels led Heldal and Bratbak
(120) to suggest that in the microcosms, sunlight stimulated
viral production by induction of lysogenic bacteria. In one instance, a
significant fluctuation in virioplankton abundance was noted during
intervals as short as 10 min. Bratbak et al. (40) recorded
two- to fourfold changes in VDC over periods of 10 to 20 min in
seawater mesocosms. These short-term changes indicated extremely high
viral production (6 to 13 h
1) and loss (5 to 11 h
1) rates. These radical changes in VDC were interpreted
as an indication of synchronous lysis of bacterioplankton hosts.
A limitation of mesocosm studies is the experimental error arising from enclosure of the planktonic communities. Many investigators acknowledge that the "bottle effect" can influence conclusions drawn from mesocosm data for natural populations of microorganisms (383). However, observations of virioplankton dynamics in seawater incubations do not indicate effects related to confinement. Rapid changes in virioplankton abundance recorded by Bratbak et al. (40) were not affected by the volume of seawater in mesocosms (ranging from 30 ml to 20 liters), leading the authors to dismiss the bottle effect as an explanation for high short-term virioplankton production rates. Weinbauer et al. (343) monitored diel in situ variability in virioplankton density for 42 h and found changes in VDC and other parameters. Peaks in BDC and chlorophyll a concentration preceded significant changes in VDC. These findings, along with those of Jiang and Paul (136) and Hennes and Simon (121), indicate that short-term changes in virioplankton abundance, observed in large-volume mesocosoms, reflect in situ processes.
Depth Variation
Physiochemical changes with depth can have a significant impact on planktonic microorganisms. Within the oceanic euphotic zone, specific distributional patterns of photoautotrophs occur that are related to light intensity and wavelength (225, 226). Water temperature or salinity gradients (clines) can result in water column stratification into separate physiochemical environments. For instance, in a salt wedge estuary such as the Chesapeake Bay, the water column is stratified by a strong halocline, separating denser seawater from seaward-flowing freshwater. During calm summer weather, the more saline bottom waters of the Chesapeake Bay become anoxic, which, in turn, affects biological processes significantly (218, 330).
In open-ocean waters, virioplankton abundance declines rapidly below
the euphotic zone (200 m) to relatively constant, low abundances of
<106 viruses ml
1 (25, 28, 115, 240,
304). In one instance, deep-water viral abundance, at a station
in the Southern California Bight, was between 1.1 × 106 and 2.5 × 106 ml
1 and
showed an increase in near-bottom (900 m) water samples
(56). Within the upper 200 m, transient subsurface
maxima in viral abundance can occur, usually at ca. 15 m
(25), 50 m (28, 56, 115) and 75 m
(25) to 150 m (28, 56, 115, 304) in the
water column. Hara et al. (115) observed subsurface peaks in
virioplankton abundance in the north Pacific, above and below the depth
of the subsurface chlorophyll maxima. The discontinuity of viral
abundance around the subsurface chlorophyll maxima suggests that there
are changes in the processes responsible for virioplankton production or loss between 50 and 150 m deep in the open ocean. Cells
transported out of the high-productivity zone may be exposed to
nutrient limitation or changes in light intensity and therefore may be
more susceptible to viral infection or to curing of the lysogenic
state, resulting in higher rates of viral production.
Unlike deep-ocean waters, where viral counts at depth are 2 to 10 times
lower than surface counts, near-coastal and estuarine water often does
not show significantly fewer viruses with depth (56, 244, 343,
368). Consistently large numbers of viruses (usually
107 viruses ml
1) throughout the water
column are observed in near-shore environments. Nevertheless, in a few
instances, depth-related variability in VDC has been observed in
productive waters. During periods of water column stratification in the
northern Adriatic Sea, virioplankton abundance is significantly greater
at the thermocline (343). In a permanently stratified
Norwegian lake, viruses and bacteria were two- to threefold more
abundant at the chemocline (the boundary layer separating anoxic,
sufidic bottom water from oxic surface water) than at the surface
(329). This observation is not surprising, since
bacterioplankton, phytoplankton, and nutrients are known to concentrate
within the boundary layer of a stratified water column
(189). Similarly, the surface microlayer of natural waters is known to be a zone of high bacterial productivity. In the only report of virus abundance in the surface microlayer, Tapper and Hicks
(320) found that the highest abundances of virioplankton in
Lake Superior water samples were from the upper 20 µm of the water
column. With water column mixing, however, the subsurface thermocline
peak in the virus-to-bacterium ratio dissipates and the virioplankton
concentration is generally uniform throughout the water column
(343, 368). Stratification and deep-water anoxia in
Chesapeake Bay were observed to have a significant impact only on
bacterioplankton abundance, whereas virioplankton abundance at depth
was similar to that at the surface (368). However, the viral
abundance at the boundary layer was not measured. Altogether, temporal
and depth-related variability in virioplankton abundance provides
evidence that viruses play an active and important role in aquatic
microbial communities.
Correlation of Virioplankton Abundance with Microbiological Parameters
Chlorophyll a concentration and bacterial abundance. The unifying message of the data presented in Table 1 is that the production and distribution of viruses in aquatic environments is, not surprisingly, determined by factors which affect the productivity and density of host populations, especially the bacterioplankton. In most instances, where changes in virioplankton abundance and chlorophyll a concentration were recorded, no significant correlation was observed between these parameters. Conversely, in a majority of studies which have examined changes in BDC and VDC, significant correlation between bacterial and viral abundance have been observed (28, 56, 115, 121, 136, 144, 243, 304, 329, 342, 343, 348). Moreover, in nearly every environment where chlorophyll a concentration significantly predicted virioplankton density, bacterial abundance did so as well (28, 136, 343).
An exception to a positive correlation between chlorophyll a concentration, and BDC and VDC occurred in Canadian lakes. In a study of 22 lakes in Quebec by Maranger and Bird (171), the chlorophyll a concentration was significantly correlated with virioplankton abundance whereas bacterioplankton density was not. The authors offered two possible explanations for this observation. First, because freshwater ecosystems contain high concentrations of algae and cyanobacteria, increases in phytoplankton biomass result in more algal viruses. Second, in lacustrine systems, the short-term relationship between viruses and bacteria is negative, which, in effect, obscured the dependence of viral abundance on bacterial abundance in the small data set. The positive correlation between chlorophyll a concentration and VDC in the lakes supported the significant correlation found between bacterial production and virioplankton abundance (171). In essence, a high phytoplankton biomass in the lakes was associated with a more productive bacterial community, resulting in increased viral abundance. There is evidence that factors affecting algal distribution also influence the virioplankton. Most notably, multiple-regression analysis, using combined data from a variety of aquatic environments, indicates that chlorophyll a is a slightly better predictor of virioplankton concentration than is BDC (171). Similarly, along an onshore (eutrophic)-to-offshore (oligotrophic) transect in the Gulf of Mexico, VDC was found to be highly correlated with chlorophyll a concentration. This association, however, was not observed when data from estuarine and near-coastal stations were excluded (28). The central conclusion to be drawn from these correlative studies is that examination of chlorophyll a concentration, BDC, and VDC data from water samples taken over small temporal and spatial scales generally reveals only a correlation between BDC and VDC, whereas studies examining larger data sets, such as an onshore-to-offshore transect (28) or regression analysis of reported literature values (171), reveal the ultimate correlation of all biological parameters with levels of primary production.Bacterial production. It is possible that the confusion in determining factors that are significantly related to virioplankton distribution will be cleared up by examining the correlation of bacterial activity (production) with viral abundance. On the few occasions where viral abundance and bacterioplankton production have been measured simultaneously, significant correlations have been observed (Table 1) (120, 171). Other supporting evidence that bacterial activity can be correlated with virioplankton abundance is derived from data obtained from Arctic sea ice, where the region of maximal bacterial production corresponds to the region of highest viral count (172). A more direct indication that increased viral production coincides with the level of bacterial secondary production was noted by Steward et al. (304). A significant correlation (r2 = 0.64) was observed between the frequency of visibly infected cells (FVIC) (measured by TEM) and bacterial production rates (304). While it would appear obvious that a link between viral abundance and rates of bacterial production should exist, a clear demonstration of such a link provides strong evidence that maintenance of abundant virioplankton populations is dependent on an active bacterioplankton host community.
The dissolved-DNA dilemma. In addition to chlorophyll a levels, BDC, and bacterial production measurements, the connection between virioplankton abundance and dissolved-DNA (D-DNA) concentration has been investigated. Interest in the abundance and distribution of DNA in aquatic environments has been fueled both by research on the biological cycling of carbon through aquatic microbial communities and concerns about the consequences of the release of genetically engineered microorganisms into the environment. In the first instance, D-DNA (the DNA fraction which passes through a 0.2-µm-pore-size filter) is a readily measurable portion of dissolved organic matter (DOM) which is useful in studies of DOM dynamics. Because of its ubiquity in living cells and its specialized role in cell function and reproduction, DNA also serves as a useful tracer molecule for analyzing planktonic rate processes (142). An excellent model of the distribution of total DNA (particulate and dissolved) in the oceanic environment has been provided by Jiang and Paul (138). Secondly, the possibility has been offered that D-DNA serves as a reservoir through which exotic or engineered gene sequences could be introduced via transformation into autochthonous, aquatic bacteria (68, 238).
Our current understanding of the dynamics and distribution of D-DNA in aquatic environments is largely attributable to the work of Paul et al. (233-239, 241) and DeFlaun et al. (66-68). Through their efforts, measurement of D-DNA has become an important addition to the list of parameters used to characterize aquatic microbial communities. Paul and DeFlaun carried out their early studies prior to 1989, before the recognition of viruses as an abundant component of aquatic environments. Methods for quantifying dissolved DNA in water samples did not distinguish soluble DNA (sDNA) from encapsulated, viral DNA (vDNA) (67, 142). Thus, the discovery of abundant virus populations raised skepticism among microbial ecologists with respect to the existence of a large pool of free, soluble DNA. Therefore, prior to a discussion of the correlation between D-DNA concentration and VDC, it is necessary to review the studies examining the preponderance of vDNA in the D-DNA pool. In recent years, several authors, using a variety of approaches, have produced conflicting evidence about the contribution of vDNA to the aquatic D-DNA pool. Beebee (16), using ultracentrifugation and liquid chromatography, separated D-DNA into pellet (vDNA) and supernatant (sDNA) fractions. Pellet DNA comprised between 76 and 95% of total D-DNA and was of viral genomic size, i.e., >20 kb. Soluble DNA was generally 500 bp in size. Maruyama et al. (175) used DNase to quantify the proportion of free and coated (non-DNase digestible) DNA in Tokyo Bay estuarine water. They found that nearly 90% of the DNA contained within the <0.2-µm size fraction was non-DNase digestible. Furthermore, most coated DNA (assumed to be vDNA) was 20 to 30 kb in size, leading the authors to conclude that coated DNA originated from viruses within the <0.2-µm size fraction. The concentration of vDNA in Tokyo Bay samples was between 9 and 19 ng ml
1 which, using the standard conversion factor of 0.09 fg of dsDNA virus
1 (2), yields an estimate of
ca. 108 viruses ml
1 (175).
As pointed out by Paul et al. (241), neither of the studies
cited above enumerated viruses in water samples, which is necessary for
a direct test of their conclusions concerning the predominance of
encapsulated vDNA in the total D-DNA pool. Using the simple approach of
converting viral abundance to vDNA concentration, several authors have
demonstrated that vDNA is actually a minor contributor, generally less
than 20%, to D-DNA pools (28, 138, 240, 342, 343). It is
possible that the criteria of nuclease insensitivity extend to other
forms of D-DNA besides vDNA. Paul et al. (240) reported
anecdotal evidence that the proportion of D-DNA which is DNase
insensitive is greater than that of viral origin (estimated by
conversion of VDC). Jiang and Paul (138) presented
further evidence refuting the hypothesis that D-DNA is nuclease
insensitive. After careful development of a centrifugation method,
they were able to separate D-DNA into putative sDNA (supernatant) and
vDNA (pellet) fractions. In the two water samples tested, approximately
half of the DNA within the pellet was DNase insensitive, yet only 34 and 66% of that pellet DNA was vDNA. Using these and earlier results,
Jiang and Paul (138), postulated that D-DNA exists in two
forms, sDNA and stable or bound DNA. These fractions each make up 50%
of the total D-DNA in seawater. The stable form of DNA is composed of
vDNA (17 to 30%) and an as yet uncharacterized bound form of DNA (70 to 83%) (138). The nature of nonviral, nonsoluble D-DNA can
only be speculated. It is possible that this D-DNA fraction is
associated with small colloids, known to be abundant in ocean water
(153, 352), or polymeric molecules such as histone proteins
(240) and exopolysaccharides. Such associations could render
D-DNA inaccessible to DNase and fluorochomogenic dyes, such as Hoechst
33258, which have been utilized for quantification of D-DNA.
Finally, two observations lend additional evidence to the notion that
vDNA is not the principal source of D-DNA. Paul et al. (240)
observed that the abundance of D-DNA, estimated using the DNA-specific
fluorochrome Hoechst 33258 (242), increases after ethanol
precipitation (240). They demonstrated that ethanol
precipitation of D-DNA in water samples released both bound and vDNA
and increased the fluorescence signal of the Hoechst 33258 stain. Thus,
the difference between vDNA abundance and the post-ethanol fluorescence readings can be concluded to represent a bound form of D-DNA. This form
of D-DNA would be wrongly judged to be vDNA, based on the methods of
Maruyama et al. (175) and Beebee (16). If the source of D-DNA is primarily viral, D-DNA would not be expected to
contain a detectable amount of bacterium- or eukaryote-specific 16S and
18S ribosomal gene sequences. Jiang and Paul (138) tested this supposition by hybridization analysis. In two of three trials, significant hybridization (over background levels) was observed between
D-DNA and oligonucleotide probes specific for small-subunit rDNA genes,
suggesting a cell and not virus origin of D-DNA.
In three cases, D-DNA abundance was measured as part of a larger study
of virioplankton dynamics. In two reports from studies of virioplankton
dynamics in the northern Adriatic Sea, Weinbauer et al. (342,
343) found no significant correlation between changes in
virioplankton abundance and D-DNA concentration (Table 1). Furthermore,
the D-DNA concentration, unlike the virioplankton abundance, showed no
significant change over a transect which ranged from mesotrophic to
eutrophic nutrient conditions (342). This suggests that
factors controlling D-DNA and virioplankton abundance are probably
different. In the third study, results of multiple-regression analysis
showed that viral abundance in seawater collected at Gulf of Mexico
stations could be explained by bacterial and cyanobacterial abundance
and chlorophyll a and D-DNA concentration. However, when
analyzed separately, VDC and D-DNA abundance showed the poorest
correlation of the four independent variables (28). While
the data are limited, the lack of correlation between VDC and D-DNA
concentration lends support to the view that vDNA is likely to be only
a minor contributor to D-DNA pools in seawater.
Altogether, the findings of Jiang, Paul, and others provide a
convincing argument against viruses being the principal source of
D-DNA. Nevertheless, it is intuitive that viral lysis, by mediating a
portion of the flux of cellular DNA into D-DNA, should contribute to
the dynamics of the D-DNA pool. Through a series of conversions, using
measurements of viral abundance and the FVIC, Weinbauer et al.
(342, 343) estimated that release of DNA from
bacteriophage-induced lysis contributed between 2 and 74% of total
D-DNA per day. A direct demonstration of lytic release of D-DNA was
presented by Reisser et al. (265, 266). From in vitro
experiments with a phycovirus (host, Chlorella sp.) and a
cyanophage (host, Synechococcus cedrorum), they demonstrated
that D-DNA released during lysis was of host and viral origin and that
the sDNA fraction (0.5% of the total D-DNA released) consisted of DNA
less than 500 bp long (266). In situ observations of an
algal population decline supported their in vitro observations.
Immediately after the significant decline, virioplankton abundance
increased over 20-fold and the D-DNA concentration doubled
(265). These estimates and observations provide some insight
into the role of viral infection in the dynamics of DNA in aquatic
ecosystems. However, many interesting questions concerning the dynamics
and character of aquatic D-DNA remain unanswered.
Virus-to-Bacterium Ratio
In addition to correlations between VDC and environmental parameters, the virus-to-bacterium ratio (VBR) has been used to study the relationship between virioplankton and bacterioplankton populations. From VBR data presented in Table 1, it is easy to appreciate that even in oligotrophic environments, viral abundance exceeds bacterial abundance. With the sole exception of Lake Superior waters, where VBR values were consistently low (i.e., <1) (320), generally the ratio of virus to bacterial abundance falls between 3 and 10. VBR values are higher for more nutrient-rich, productive environments. This simple observation suggests that bacterioplankton host populations produce greater numbers of viruses under environmental conditions favoring fast growth and high productivity. These increases in virioplankton production under nutrient-replete conditions are also due, in part, to higher infection rates and larger burst sizes, two biological parameters which can strongly influence VBR. VBR can be useful in constructing theories on the effect of viral infection on aquatic bacterial host communities; however, it is important to also consider that this ratio can be influenced by a multitude of factors which control the production and loss of viruses and bacteria.
Studies of changes in VBR have revealed several associations between VBR and bacterial density. Results of field studies off the coast of Japan (116) and in a Norwegian meromictic lake (329) revealed that while BDC and VDC change dramatically with depth and over short temporal scales, VBR values remained consistent, suggesting a tight coupling between bacterial and viral concentrations and relatively constant levels of virus production and loss. An unchanging phage-to-bacterium ratio was also noted by Ogunseitan et al. (220) in freshwater mesocosm studies of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and bacteriophages UT1 and M1.
A positive relationship between VBR and bacterial numbers was noted in both oligotrophic water samples collected in the North Pacific (115) and eutrophic water samples collected from the northern Adriatic Sea (343). Hara et al. (115) suggested that the positive relationship between these parameters in Pacific Ocean water samples arises from a direct dependence of virus production on bacterial host cell density. They also suggested that, based on the observation that higher VBR values coincided with larger numbers of small bacteria, increased numbers of viruses may act as a positive selective pressure for reduced cell volume. This suggestion is also supported by the colloidal aggregation theory, which predicts that a smaller bacterium would encounter fewer phages through Brownian motion (115).
While these studies offer intriguing theories, they represent special cases of viral and bacterial community interaction. The most commonly observed relationship between VBR and bacterial abundance is either negative or inverse. Field studies of Tampa Bay (136), Arctic sea ice (172), Canadian lakes (171), and seawater mesocosms (328) have all provided results showing that the VBR decreases as bacterial abundance increases. In our analysis of Chesapeake Bay, we noted that the VBR was inversely related to bacterial abundance (368). The highest VBR values were recorded at times of relatively low bacterial abundance and vice versa, suggesting seasonality in virioplankton production in the nutrient-rich ecosystem of Chesapeake Bay. Seasons where a high VBR occurs would show more virioplankton production and hence more bacterioplankton lysis. Maranger et al. (172) reported an extremely high VBR of 72 in sea ice at the onset of the spring phytoplankton bloom, which declined precipitously as bacterial numbers increased. They speculated that as the bloom proceeded, the pressure of viral infection selected for phage-resistant mutant bacteria among the bacterioplankton. Toward the end of the bloom, resistant bacteria were dominant among the sea ice bacterioplankton, resulting in reduced active production of phage. The dominance of resistant bacteria could also explain the lower bacterial production rates recorded at the end of the bloom. Phage resistance often results in lower physiological efficiency (160).
Finally, Bratbak and Heldal (36) and Tuomi et al. (328), in explaining the negative or inverse relationships they observed between VBR and bacterial abundance, formulated the intriguing hypothesis that the VBR may be an indicator of host community diversity. In a bacterioplankton community dominated by only a few bacterial species, specific adsorption of viruses to their cooccurring host would be favored. Once adsorbed to their specific receptor, free viruses are effectively lost from the virioplankton. In environments with high host diversity, virioplankton would presumably spend more time as free viruses, since specific adsorption would be slower. This argument hinges on two plausible assumptions: (i) that specific adsorption is an important factor in viral loss, and (ii) that bacterial numbers increase as the overall community diversity decreases. The latter assumption can easily be accepted for mono- or polyspecific blooms, when populations can dramatically increase in number, with simultaneous loss in overall species diversity.
IMPACT OF VIRUSES AND VIRAL INFECTION ON THE AQUATIC
FOOD WEB
|
|
|---|
Significant Biological Factors for Modeling In Situ Phage-Host Interaction
In situ burst size.
Burst size, i.e., the number of
virus particles released upon host cell lysis, is an essential
component in calculations that relate estimates of in situ viral
production to the level of virus-mediated mortality of
bacterioplankton. Intuitively, there is an inverse relationship of
burst size and the level of host mortality due to viral infection. The
greater the burst size, the smaller the number of host cells lysed to
support a given level of virus production. Noting the dramatic effect
of burst size estimates on modeling the impact of viral infection on
host populations, many authors have chosen to use a range of burst
sizes for these calculations (see Tables 2 through 6). However, it is
likely that improvements in the precision of estimates of
virus-mediated mortality can most easily be achieved through more
accurate estimates of burst size under in situ conditions. To this end,
several studies have used burst size estimates, based on in situ
observations of bacterio- and phytoplankton, to calculate
virus-mediated mortality. Burst size estimates are summarized in Table
2.
|
Viral inactivation and particle destruction. Since the earliest studies of bacteriophage physiology (79), researchers have routinely reported data on the stability of purified viral isolates. Initially, data on viral inactivation were of practical use only in research; however, public health concerns about the safety of recreational, drinking, and shellfish-producing waters soon added significance to investigations on the survival of viruses in aquatic environments. Thus, most studies on the survival and fate of viruses in natural waters has focused directly on enteroviruses or on coliphages used as indicators of enteroviral pollution. The latest stimulus for investigating virus decay and destruction in natural waters has come from interest in the impact of viral infection on bacterial productivity. If, as enumeration studies seem to indicate, virioplankton abundance is relatively stable over seasonal scales, rates of viral production and loss should be equal. Therefore, estimations of viral loss and inactivation in aquatic environments should indicate the virus production rate needed for steady-state conditions. In turn, estimates of viral loss rates can lead to estimates of the level of virus-mediated mortality of bacterioplankton hosts. For excellent, comprehensive reviews of the early literature on viral inactivation, see references 5 and 141.
The difficulty in detecting viral inactivation factors in natural waters arises from the complex interplay of physical, chemical, and biological variables which influence the survival of an infective virus. Nevertheless, from the wealth of data on this topic, it is possible to draw conclusions about the viricidal qualities of various physical, chemical, and biological factors. Among studies of environmental virus inactivation, the most prevalent finding is that the presence of a natural bacterial community and particulate organic matter (POM) greatly increases the rate of viral inactivation. As shown in Table 3, in nearly every case the removal of bacterioplankton and POM (>0.22 µm) from water by filtration results in a lower decay rate than in untreated natural water. The rare exception to this general conclusion was the observation that water filtration slightly increased the decay of coliphage
X174 (190, 191) or did not change the decay of
poliovirus (6).
|