Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, September 2000, p. 548-572, Vol. 64, No. 3
1092-2172/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Department of Veterinary Science and Microbiology1 and Lunar and Planetary Laboratory,4 University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721; Radiobiology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan 104-00452; Radiobiology Section, DLR, Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Cologne, Germany3; and Department of Biochemistry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 060325
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
SPORE RESISTANCE IN THE LABORATORY
Parameters Contributing to Spore Resistance
Genetic makeup of the sporulating species.
Sporulation conditions.
Spore coats.
Core permeability.
Core water content.
Spore mineral content.
/
-Type SASP.
Repair of damage to macromolecules.
Laboratory Spore Resistance Models
Heat resistance.
(i) Wet-heat resistance.
(ii) Dry-heat resistance.
Desiccation resistance.
Chemical resistance.
UV radiation resistance.
-Radiation resistance.
Resistance to ultrahigh hydrostatic pressure.
SPORE DNA REPAIR MECHANISMS
General DNA Repair Systems
NER.
Recombination-mediated repair.
Other general repair systems.
SP Lyase, an SP-Specific DNA Repair System
Regulation of SP lyase expression during sporulation.
Genetics and biochemistry of SP lyase.
SPORE RESISTANCE TO EXTREME TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENTS
Differences between the Laboratory and the Environment
Source of spores.
Growth, sporulation, dormancy, and germination conditions.
Solar Radiation as Primary Source
Direct solar effects.
Indirect solar effects.
Protection of Spores from Lethal Solar UV Damage
DNA Photochemistry of Spores Exposed to Sunlight
B. subtilis Spores as Biological Solar Dosimeters
Monitoring the Ozone Layer with Spore Dosimeters
SPORE RESISTANCE TO EXTRATERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENTS
Space
Vacuum.
Radiation.
Temperature.
Interplanetary Transfer of Spores
Launching Spores into Space
Heat.
Pressure.
Acceleration.
Interplanetary Travel of Spores
Effects of space vacuum.
Effects of extraterrestrial solar UV radiation.
Effects of cosmic ionizing radiation.
Combined effects of space.
Time scales of interplanetary or interstellar transport of life.
Deposition of Spores from Space to a Planet
Outlook for the Future
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
SUMMARY
|
|
|---|
Endospores of Bacillus spp., especially Bacillus subtilis, have served as experimental models for exploring the molecular mechanisms underlying the incredible longevity of spores and their resistance to environmental insults. In this review we summarize the molecular laboratory model of spore resistance mechanisms and attempt to use the model as a basis for exploration of the resistance of spores to environmental extremes both on Earth and during postulated interplanetary transfer through space as a result of natural impact processes.
INTRODUCTION
|
|
|---|
In the latter half of the 19th century Tyndall, Cohn, and Koch (25, 84, 211a) independently discovered that certain species of bacteria spend at least part of their lives as dormant cellular structures now known as endospores (hereafter called simply spores for convenience). Spores have since been recognized as the hardiest known form of life on Earth, and considerable effort has been invested in understanding the molecular mechanisms responsible for the almost unbelievable resistance of spores to environments which exist at (and beyond) the physical extremes which can support terrestrial life. Examples of sporeforming bacteria are rather widespread within the low-G+C subdivision of the gram-positive bacteria and represent inhabitants of diverse habitats, such as aerobic heterotrophs (Bacillus and Sporosarcina spp.), halophiles (Sporosarcina halophila and the gram-negative Sporohalobacter spp.), microaerophilic lactate fermenters (Sporolactobacillus spp.), anaerobes (Clostridium and Anaerobacter spp.), sufate reducers (Desulfotomaculum spp.), and even phototrophs (Heliobacterium and Heliophilum spp.).
Despite the diversity exhibited by sporeforming bacterial species, the sporeformers about which we have gleaned the most detailed molecular information are common rod-shaped soil inhabitants belonging to the genera Bacillus and Clostridium, and among this restricted subset, most work has concentrated upon the descendants of a single strain of Bacillus subtilis called strain 168. Consequently, most of this review will concentrate upon spore resistance in B. subtilis 168 and its close relatives, from which we have gained several valuable (and hopefully universal) insights into spore resistance mechanisms. However, we can easily imagine that the spore resistance mechanisms uncovered through study of B. subtilis and closely related species may not be entirely applicable to sporeformers as phylogenetically and ecologically diverse as the gram-negative homoacetogen Sporomusa or to bacteria which do not form true endospores but form aerial spore-bearing mycelia (such as Streptomyces spp.) or fruiting structures (such as Myxobacter and Myxococcus spp.). This caveat has been most eloquently expressed by Slepecky and Leadbetter (200).
According to our current understanding, the developmental pathway leading from a vegetatively growing bacterial cell to a spore is triggered by depletion from the bacterium's local environment of a readily metabolized form of carbon, nitrogen, or phosphate. (For recent reviews of the molecular details of this surprisingly complex and fascinating differentiation process, see references 38, 46, 57, 65, 150, 190, 203, and 206.) In the dormant state, spores undergo no detectable metabolism and exhibit a higher degree of resistance to inactivation by various physical insults, including (but not limited to) wet and dry heat, UV and gamma radiation, extreme desiccation (including vacuum), and oxidizing agents. Despite their metabolic inactivity, however, spores are still capable of continually monitoring the nutritional status of their surroundings, and they respond rapidly to the presence of appropriate nutrients by germinating and resuming vegetative growth. Spore formation thus represents a strategy by which the bacterial cell escapes temporally from nutritionally unfavorable local conditions via dormancy. In addition to temporal escape, spores can also be relocated spatially via wind, water, living hosts, etc., to environments potentially favorable for germination and resumption of vegetative growth. As a result, bacterial spores can be found in environmental samples obtained from all parts of the Earth, both above and below the surface, and as such represent a highly successful strategy for the survival and widespread dispersal of microbial life.
Dormant spores exhibit incredible longevity and can be found in virtually every type of environment on Earth, even in geographical locations obviously removed spatially from their point of origin (for example, spores of strictly thermophilic Bacillus spp. can be isolated from cold lake sediments) (155, 156). Reliable reports exist of the recovery and revival of spores from environmental samples as old as 105 years (54, 81, 154), and there recently appeared a somewhat more controversial report that viable Bacillus sphaericus spores were recovered from the gut of a bee fossilized in Dominican amber for an estimated 25 to 40 million years (20)!
It becomes apparent from studying the process of spore formation, the ubiquitous global distribution of spores, and the environmental record of spore longevity that a sporulating bacterium cannot predict beforehand how long or in what environment it will spend its dormant state. Therefore the sporulating cell must "prepare for the worst" each time it undergoes differentiation. How does the spore achieve such hardiness? The molecular mechanisms underlying spore resistance properties were until recently relatively refractory to experimental dissection. However, as the result of decades of elegant genetic, molecular biological, and biochemical studies, molecular models have emerged which describe how spores of bacteria such as B. subtilis resist exposure to germicidal agents such as heat, UV, and oxidative damage in the laboratory (reviewed in references 52 and 190). From these laboratory studies it is clear that spore resistance mechanisms during dormancy rely on diverse physiological events which occur during all stages of the life cycle: growth, sporulation, and germination. However, in spite of the vast amount of data that has been collected in the laboratory, we have very little idea of the possible degree to which our experimental models accurately reflect the life history of sporeforming bacteria in their native habitats. In order to maintain the potential for viability, the dormant spore must either (i) prevent damage which would inactivate critical cellular components needed for successful germination and resumption of growth or (ii) repair or replace those damaged critical components during germination, before their inactivation results in cell death. In the terrestrial (soil) environment where many sporeforming bacteria are found, such potentially lethal extreme conditions can include cycles of heat and cold, including freezing-thawing, physical abrasion, extreme dessiccation, exposure to corrosive chemicals, attack by other organisms and their extracellular degradative enzymes, and prolonged exposure to solar radiation (133).
Because of their notorious resistance and longevity, bacterial spores have also been studied as possible candidates for transfer of life between the planets as a result of impact processes (66, 107). The natural processes by which spores could be transported through interplanetary space would expose them to an entirely new set of environmental stresses, including extreme shock, acceleration, vacuum, and bombardment by UV and ionizing radiation as well as heavy high-energy atomic (HZE) particles (109). In this review, we will attempt for the first time to summarize recent advances in our understanding of how bacterial spores resist inactivation by stresses imposed by both terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments and to explore how the current laboratory models of spore resistance can serve as important intellectual scaffolds from which we can construct new environmental spore resistance models.
SPORE RESISTANCE IN THE LABORATORY
|
|
|---|
Studies of the resistance of Bacillus and
Clostridium spores to a variety of treatments in the
laboratory have identified a number of factors important in determining
the level of spore resistance. These factors include the genetic makeup
of the sporulating species, the precise sporulation conditions,
particularly the temperature, the spore coats, the relative
impermeability of the spore core, the low water content of the hydrated
spore's core, the high level of minerals in the spore core, the
saturation of spore DNA with
/
-type small, acid-soluble proteins
(SASP), and repair of damage to macromolecules during spore germination
and outgrowth. While all of these factors are important in at least one
or more spore resistance property, their relative importance varies
considerably both for the same resistance property in spores of
different species and for different resistance properties within the
same species (Table 1).
|
Parameters Contributing to Spore Resistance
Genetic makeup of the sporulating species. While mutations in a number of individual genes alter specific factors involved in spore resistance (181, 190, 191), it is also clear that in wild-type organisms the overall genomic information is extremely important in determining levels of spore resistance (52). This is seen most notably with wet heat resistance, as spores of thermophiles are more resistant than spores of mesophiles, which in turn are more resistant than spores of psychrophiles (52). At least a part of the increased wet-heat resistance of spores of thermophiles is due to their decreased core water content (see below). However, this does not explain fully these spores' increased wet-heat resistance, which may be due simply to the generally increased thermostability of the proteins of thermophiles.
Sporulation conditions. Many studies have shown that within a single species, modulation of the sporulation conditions has a significant effect on spore resistance (26, 52, 169). Parameters that have been varied include metal ion concentrations and temperature, and most often only spore wet-heat resistance has been analyzed. In general, the interpretation of changes in spore resistance with variation of the mineral ion content of sporulation media has been difficult on a mechanistic basis. However, sporulation at an elevated temperature invariably results in spores with increased heat resistance. This effect is mediated at least in part by a decrease in core water content in spores prepared at higher temperature. However, the mechanism(s) controlling spore core water content is not known.
Spore coats. The spore coats appear to play some role in spore resistance, especially in preventing the access of peptidoglycan-lytic enzymes to the spore cortex, and also likely plays a role in spore resistance to some chemicals, such as hydrogen peroxide (38, 102, 165, 169, 191). A B. subtilis mutant completely lacking the spore coat layers has been constructed (38). Spores of this mutant are highly sensitive to lysozyme and 5% H2O2 but exhibit normal resistance to wet heat and 254-nm UV light (165), indicating that resistance to wet heat and laboratory-generated 254-nm UV-C are probably not functions of the spore coat. However, the precise role(s) of individual coat proteins in these resistance properties is not clear.
Core permeability. The spore core exhibits relatively low permeability to hydrophilic molecules greater than approximately 200 Da (53). Since the spore has two membranes, either or both could be the permeability barrier restricting entry into the spore core. Although it is not clear if the outer membrane is an intact membrane in the mature dormant spore, some data are consistent with its being a functional membrane. The inner membrane is clearly an intact membrane, and while the reason(s) for its decreased permeability is not clear, it is significantly compressed in the dormant spore (205).
Core water content. While the water content of the cortex, coat, and exosporium regions of a spore suspended in water is similar to that in growing cells (75 to 80% of wet weight), the water content of the spore core is much lower (28 to 50% of wet weight) (52). While the precise mechanism by which the core's water content is reduced during sporulation is not clear, this event does involve the function of the spore cortex (4, 39, 52, 151, 152, 191). There is abundant evidence that core water content is inversely related to spore wet-heat resistance (52).
Spore mineral content. Spores have very high levels of divalent ions, in particular Ca2+, with the great majority of these cations being present in the spore core (128, 189). Both the amounts and identities of the major cations in spores can be varied, either by alterations in the metal ion content of sporulation medium (199) or by removal of spore metal ions by titration to low pH and then back-titration to pH 7 with appropriate metal ion hydroxide (12). Using these procedures, spores with extremely low divalent cation levels can be generated (H+, Na+, or K+ spores), as can spores with high levels of any of a variety of divalent cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, and Mn2+). Upon analyses of spore wet-heat resistance, Ca2+ spores are the most resistant, with resistance similar to that of native spores, while H+ spores are the least resistant; in general, divalent cation-loaded spores are more resistant than monovalent cation-loaded spores (12, 52, 98, 99). While studies are not as extensive, increased spore core mineralization is also associated with increased resistance to oxidizing agents (98) and, at least in spores of Bacillus stearothermophilus, with increased resistance to dry heat (1). Not all the reasons for the effects of spore core mineral content on spore resistance are known. However, increased core mineralization is often associated with decreased core water content, and this may contribute to increased spore resistance to wet heat.
In contrast to spore core minerals, which play a clear role in spore resistance, the role of dipicolinic acid (DPA), with which much of the spore's divalent cations are likely chelated, in spore resistance is less clear. Studies in B. subtilis have shown that spores lacking DPA due to a specific mutation in the spoVFA or spoVFB locus (also called dpaA and dpaB), which encode the two subunits of DPA synthetase (33), have significantly increased spore core water and decreased heat and H2O2 resistance (7; M. Paidhungat, B. Setlow, and P. Setlow, unpublished). However, these DPA-less spores exhibit no decrease in UV resistance and are actually more UV resistant than spores of their wild-type parents (Paidhungat et al., unpublished). This finding is not unexpected, as DPA has been shown to be a photosensitizer in spores (190, 191). Spores of Bacillus cereus that lack DPA have also been isolated, although the specific mutation causing loss of DPA has not been identified; as expected, these DPA-less spores are heat sensitive (60, 231). However, secondary mutations which restored much of the spore's heat resistance but which did not restore DPA production were identified in the DPA-less strain (60), suggesting that DPA is not essential for full spore heat resistance. Unfortunately, the elevated heat resistance phenotype of these DPA-less B. cereus spores was extremely unstable, and these strains have never been studied further. A B. subtilis mutant that produces DPA-less spores that retain heat resistance has also been isolated (231). However, the identity of the mutation(s) generating spores with the DPA-less yet heat-resistant phenotype has not been determined, and again these mutant spores have not been studied further.
/
-Type SASP.
Spore DNA is saturated with a group
of unique proteins called
/
-type SASP (184, 186,
189-191). These proteins are synthesized only during sporulation
in the developing spore and are degraded beginning early in spore
germination. These proteins bind to DNA largely on the outside of the
DNA helix and straighten and stiffen the DNA while changing the DNA to
an A-like helix. DNA properties in vitro are also dramatically changed
when DNA is bound by
/
-type SASP, and the DNA's reactivity with
a variety of chemicals decreases dramatically. The properties of a
DNA-
/
-type SASP complex in vitro appear to be duplicated in
vivo, so much so that DNA does not appear to be the target for spore
killing by wet heat or a number of potentially genotoxic or mutagenic
chemicals. However, spore killing by dry heat and radiation occurs in
large part (and possibly completely) through DNA damage, and any
deficiency in
/
-type SASP in the spore results in spores that are
more sensitive to a variety of treatments than are the corresponding
wild-type parental spores and killed in large part by damage to DNA,
even by treatments (e.g., wet heat) that do not kill wild-type spores by DNA damage.
Repair of damage to macromolecules. As noted above, spores are killed by some treatments at least in part by damage to DNA. Consequently, it is not surprising that DNA repair during spore germination and outgrowth plays a role in resistance of spores to these treatments (133, 190, 191). Spores appear to contain at least some of the enzymes found in growing cells for repair of DNA damage, and DNA damage accumulated in the dormant spore will also often induce synthesis of DNA repair proteins upon subsequent spore germination (182). In addition, at least one protein is uniquely present in spores which is dedicated to the repair during germination and outgrowth of the major lesion caused by UV irradiation of spores, the thyminyl-thymine adduct termed the spore photoproduct (SP) (45, 185, 191). Not surprisingly, spores of species with mutations eliminating particular DNA repair pathways are invariably more sensitive to killing by agents which generate DNA damage repaired by the eliminated pathway than are spores of their wild-type parents (182, 185).
Since some of the treatments used to kill spores (e.g., wet heat and oxidizing agents) can damage proteins as well as DNA, it is possible that repair of protein damage during spore germination and outgrowth might also be important in determining spore survival after various treatments. Enzymes that might be involved in "repairing" protein damage include aspartate-O-methyltransferase, methionine sulfoxide reductase, and various heat shock proteins. However, aspartate-O-methyltransferase appears to be absent from at least B. subtilis (63), and methionine sulfoxide reductase plays no role in spore resistance to wet heat or oxidizing agents (62). Many workers have noted that spore recovery after a killing treatment (usually wet heat) is often much greater on rich media than on poor media, and this difference has been ascribed to the need for some type of protein "repair" in order for spore outgrowth and eventual colony formation on a poor medium (168, 169). Indeed, the heat shock proteins, which play a major role in the resistance of growing cells to heat stress (64a), have been suggested to play a role in spore heat resistance (174), but more recent work has indicated that this is not the case (112a; E. Melly and P. Setlow, unpublished).Laboratory Spore Resistance Models
There have been an enormous number of studies of resistance of spores of Bacillus and Clostridium spp. under many different conditions. However, many fewer studies have analyzed the effect of one or more key variables on spore heat resistance. The following discussion will focus on these studies, as these have given us the best insight into specific factors contributing to particular spore resistance properties. As mentioned above, many of these studies have been carried out with spores of B. subtilis, as the ease of genetic manipulation as well as the availability of the complete genomic sequence (86) have greatly facilitated studies with this organism. However, analyses of spores of other species have also provided valuable information. Several general conclusions that have come from these studies are that the causes of spore resistance are multifactorial and that the importance of these multiple factors varies both between species and for different resistance properties. The current state of our understanding of the importance of various factors in spore resistance to different treatments, primarily in B. subtilis, is summarized in Table 1.
Heat resistance.
The hallmark property of bacterial
spores is their remarkable resistance to heat. B. subtilis
spores can survive moist heat (100°C at atmospheric pressure) with a
D value (decimal reduction time, the time required to lower viability
by a factor of 10) of 20 to 30 min (47) (Fig.
1). Moreover, spores survive
approximately 1,000-fold longer in dry heat than in moist heat
(47) (Fig. 1).
|
(i) Wet-heat resistance.
Wet-heat resistance is one of
the most striking properties of spores of Bacillus and
Clostridium species, as these spores require incubation at
temperatures 30 to 40°C higher to achieve inactivation equivalent to
that of growing cells of the same organisms (52). The target
for spore killing by wet heat is not clear but is almost certainly not
spore DNA (190, 191), and there is evidence that the target
is a spore protein (11, 52, 191). However, the identity of
this protein(s) is by no means clear. Multiple factors cause spore
resistance to wet heat, with at least four factors identified to date,
including sporulation temperature, protection of spore DNA by
/
-type SASP, spore core mineralization, and spore core
dehydration (52, 191). However, the proteins of the heat
shock response, which can play a major role in protecting growing cells
of Bacillus species from heat stress (64a), play no significant role in spore heat resistance (112a;
Melly and Setlow, unpublished).
/
-type SASP (180, 191). However, in
mutant B. subtilis strains lacking the majority of
/
-type SASP due to deletion of appropriate coding genes, the resultant 


spores are significantly
more sensitive to wet heat and are killed in large part (if not
completely) by DNA damage, including abasic sites presumably generated
as a result of depurination (180, 191).
As noted above, the spore core contains an extremely high level of
divalent mineral ions, predominantly Ca2+,
Mg2+, and, to a lesser extent, Mn2+
(128). While the majority (
75%) of these ions are
associated with the spore's depot of DPA, some are also associated
with other core anions. In general, the higher the level of core
mineral ions, the more wet-heat resistant are the spores
(52). This effect appears to be due in part to a decrease in
core water with increasing core mineralization, but core minerals are
also likely to have more specific effects on protein stability. The
ability to remove core minerals by exchange with H+ and
then back-titration with metal ion hydroxides has also allowed demonstration that the identity of the core mineral ion influences spore wet-heat resistance, as Ca2+ and Mg2+
spores are most resistant, with K+ and Na+
spores being less resistant and H+ spores being the least
resistant (12, 52). However, the precise reason for these
effects is not at present clear.
While the factors cited above have significant effects on spore
wet-heat resistance, several of these factors exert their effects
indirectly through modulation of spore core water content. This is
clearly the major factor determining spore wet-heat resistance, as over
a rather wide range of core water contents in spores of different
species, there is a good inverse correlation between spore wet-heat
resistance and core water content (10, 52). However, it is
not precisely clear how a lower core water content results in increased
spore wet-heat resistance. It is thought that reduced core water
reduces the amount of water associated with spore proteins, thus
stabilizing them to thermal denaturation. Unfortunately, there are no
good data on the precise level of free water in the spore core, as this
knowledge would allow detailed examination of the effects of this level
of free water on protein heat resistance in vitro. In addition,
although it is clear that achievement of a reduced spore core water
content requires the action of the developing spore's peptidoglycan
cortex, exactly how this structure functions in modulating spore core
water content is not clear (39).
(ii) Dry-heat resistance.
In contrast to the situation
with wet heat, the killing of spores by dry heat does appear to proceed
in large part via DNA damage, as spores exposed to dry heat acquire
both DNA damage and mutations (140, 181, 231). In addition,
spores of DNA repair mutants are more sensitive to dry heat than are
spores of their wild-type parents, and during germination of
dry-heat-treated spores, genes encoding DNA repair proteins are greatly
induced (182). Consequently, DNA repair capacity is an
important parameter in determining spore dry-heat resistance. Again in
contrast to the situation with spore wet-heat resistance, spores of
thermophiles do not have higher resistance to dry heat than spores of
mesophiles (1). In addition to DNA repair capacity, two
other factors have been identified which affect spore dry heat
resistance, spore core mineralization and DNA protection by
/
-type SASP.
/
-type
SASP are much less resistant than wild-type spores to dry heat, and killing of 


spores is also
accompanied by DNA damage (181). Since
/
-type SASP
protect DNA in vitro against depurination caused by dry heat, these
data suggest that
/
-type SASP binding to DNA in spores is a major
factor in spore dry-heat resistance.
Desiccation resistance.
Spores are clearly much more
resistant than their growing counterparts to extended desiccation and
multiple cycles of freeze-drying with freezing at
78°C. When
typical laboratory vacuum systems are used for desiccation or
freeze-drying, wild-type spores often exhibit no detectable killing
after extended desiccation or multiple cycles of freeze-drying and
rehydration (56, 167, 191). A major reason for spore
resistance to these processes is protection of spore DNA by
/
-type SASP, as 


spores are
much more sensitive to freeze-drying, and possibly extended
desiccation, and killing by these processes is accompanied by DNA
damage (190, 191). It has been reported that extreme desiccation (10
6 Pa at 77 K for 24 h) resulted in
complete killing of Escherichia coli and Halobacterium
halobium cells, but spores of Clostridium mangenoti and
B. subtilis survived to 55 and 75%, respectively (85). Under prolonged desiccation in high vacuum
(<10
4 Pa for 80 h), spores of a repair-deficient
(rec uvr spl) B. subtilis strain were inactivated
to less than 10
4 survival. Lethality for wild-type spores
was not observed under this condition, but the survivors exhibited
significant mutagenesis (127). However, neither the
mechanism for this DNA protection by
/
-type SASP nor the DNA
damage caused by desiccation is known.
Chemical resistance. Spores are generally significantly more resistant than growing cells to a wide variety of toxic chemicals, including acids, bases, phenols, aldehydes, alkylating agents, and oxidizing agents (15, 102, 168, 169, 191, 209a). In many cases the reasons for spore resistance to these types of agents are not known, and for many chemicals (e.g., acids, bases, aldehydes, and oxidizing agents), the target for spore killing is not known, although there are some data implicating protein damage in killing by oxidizing agents (145, 146). However, for other agents (e.g., alkylating agents), it is clear that the target for spore killing is spore DNA (183).
Four factors important in spore resistance to at least some chemicals have been identified and/or suggested, including the presence of spore coats, the impermeability of the spore core to hydrophilic chemicals, low spore core water content, and protection of spore DNA by
/
-type SASP (15, 169, 191, 209a). However, in contrast
to the situation in growing cells, in which specific enzymes sometimes
detoxify chemical poisons, this appears not to be a factor in spore
resistance to chemicals, presumably because of the inactivity of
enzymes in the spore core (6, 21, 189).
The various layers of proteinaceous spore coats (and possibly the outer
spore membrane) which surround the spore cortex certainly protect the
spore from attack by very large molecules such as lytic enzymes that
can hydrolyze the spore cortex. There are also data indicating that the
coat and outer spore membrane protect spores against killing by some
smaller chemical agents, including glutaraldehyde, iodine, and some
oxidizing agents (15, 38, 102, 165, 169, 209a). The
mechanism of this effect is not clear; possibly the coat or outer
membrane is a permeability barrier to some chemicals, or the toxic
chemicals may simply react with the spore coats, thus reducing the
amount of toxic agent which can attack more-central spore molecules
such as enzymes or DNA in the spore core. However, for some toxic
chemicals (e.g., alkylating agents), the spore coats appear to play no
role in spore resistance (38, 183).
Pioneering work by Gerhardt and his coworkers showed that the spore, in
particular the spore core, is relatively impermeable to small
hydrophilic molecules larger than about 200 Da (53), and
even smaller molecules may penetrate the spore core only very slowly
(178). It seems very likely that this low spore core
permeability must play a significant role in spore resistance to toxic
chemicals. However, there are no data bearing directly on this point,
as there is no way known to readily modulate spore core permeability.
Since most of the toxic chemicals used to kill spores are water soluble
and carry out reactions in water, it is reasonable to suppose that a
low spore core water content might slow reactions of toxic chemicals
with targets in the spore core. While one study found a decrease in
spore resistance to H2O2 with increasing core water content (153), further study on the importance of this factor is needed.
For several types of toxic chemicals (e.g., formaldehyde and
peroxides), there is strong evidence that one factor in spore resistance is protection of spore DNA from attack by the binding of
/
-type SASP (93, 175, 191). Oxidizing agents do not
appear to kill wild-type spores by DNA damage, while



spores lose resistance to these
agents and are killed by DNA damage (175, 190, 191).
Formaldehyde does kill wild-type spores by DNA damage, and



spores are much more sensitive to
formaldehyde killing (93). However, for some other chemicals
such as alkylating agents, DNA protection by
/
-type SASP binding
plays no role in spore resistance, even though these chemicals kill
spores by DNA damage (183, 191).
UV radiation resistance.
Depending on the species
analyzed, spores are 10 to 50 times more resistant than growing cells
to UV radiation at 254 nm in water (185). However, the
magnitude of the difference in UV resistance between spores and growing
cells can be different at different wavelengths. There are two main
reasons for the increased UV resistance of spores: a difference in the
UV photochemistry of DNA in spores and the efficient and relatively
error-free repair of the novel photoproduct formed by UV light in spore
DNA. While the major UV photoproduct formed in DNA of growing cells is
a cis,syn-cyclobutane-type thymine dimer, this
photoproduct is not generated by 254-nm UV irradiation of spores in
water (34, 185, 190, 191). Rather, the major UV photoproduct
formed in spores is the unique thymine adduct
5-thyminyl-5,6-dihydrothymine (130, 215), which is called SP
(Fig. 2).
|
/
-type SASP.
Indeed,
/
-type SASP binding to DNA in vitro suppresses formation
of all cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers upon UV irradiation and promotes
SP formation and also blocks formation of various 6-4 addition products
(135, 190, 191). Repair of SP and other types of DNA damage
will be discussed below.
Spores are also more resistant than growing cells to UV irradiation in
the dry state, and wild-type B. subtilis spores treated with
254-nm UV in the lab show similar inactivation rates whether irradiated
as air-dried monolayers (90% lethal dose [LD90] = 114 J/m2) (227) or in aqueous suspension
(LD90 = 156 J/m2) (C. Salazar and W. L. Nicholson, unpublished). However, UV irradiation of spores rendered
severely anhydrous under high vacuum generates significant amounts of
photoproducts other than SP (89); as yet, the identities of
these additional photoproducts are not known, nor is the reason for
their generation.
In addition to the elevated resistance of dormant spores to 254-nm UV,
germinating spores undergo a transient period of UV resistance even
higher than that of spores before they return to the UV resistance
characteristic of vegetative cells (207; reviewed in
reference 185). An explanation for the transient elevated UV resistance seen in germinating spores comes from the observation that this period coincides with an overall lowering of the
photoreactivity of DNA within the germinating spore (78, 177,
204). It is thought that during return of spore DNA from the A to
the B conformation during germination, it passes through a transitional
conformation which is geometrically unfavorable to the production of
either SP or cyclobutane-type dimers. Support for this hypothesis comes
from the observation that germinating spores of mutants lacking
/
-type SASP, whose DNA does not appear to be in an A-like
conformation within the dormant spore (136, 176), do not
exhibit this transient period of ultrahigh UV resistance (177). Another related but separate developmental phenomenon is high UV resistance exhibited by the fully germinated spores of
repair-deficient (splB uvr) mutants. This phenomenon has
been attributed to a specific germinative excision repair of pyrimidine dimers distinct from the nucleotide excision repair (114,
218), although direct genetic or biochemical evidence for this
postulated pathway is lacking.
-Radiation resistance.
In addition to UV
resistance, spores are often significantly more resistant than growing
cells to
-radiation (56, 167). It has been suggested that
one factor which may result in increased spore
-radiation resistance
is the decreased level of spore core water, which may reduce the amount
of hydroxyl radicals formed by
-irradiation. However, this
suggestion has not yet been tested directly. In contrast to the
situation with spore UV resistance, in which
/
-type SASP play a
predominant role, these proteins appear to play no significant role in
spore
-radiation resistance (190, 191). Although it
appears certain that DNA repair during spore germination will be an
important element in determining the level of spore
-radiation
resistance, there again has been relatively little work on the role of
specific DNA repair systems or on the nature of the DNA damage caused
by
-irradiation of spores.
Resistance to ultrahigh hydrostatic pressure. Extremophilic archaea and bacteria which have been isolated near deep-sea thermal vents from greater than 2 km below the ocean surface not only survive but grow at in situ pressures of 200 atm or greater (79) (1 atm = 1.013 bar or 101.3 kPa). Application of even higher hydrostatic pressure is currently being explored as a method for decreasing the numbers of vegetative bacterial and spore contaminants in a number of different types of food (94). Destruction of vegetative bacteria by pressure consists of two apparently distinct behaviors: (i) a step change in the number of survivors with the application of a pressure pulse and (ii) a first-order rate drop in the number of survivors during the ensuing pressure hold period (129, 160). The rate and degree of bacterial cell inactivation by ultrahigh pressure vary widely in different experiments and depend on a number of variables, including (i) the magnitude, rate, and duration of compression, (ii) the rate of decompression, (iii) the particular bacterium tested, (iv) the medium in which the bacteria are suspended, (v) the temperature, and (vi) the degree to which cells are allowed to resuscitate before viability is tested (196). Various mesophilic bacteria and fungi treated with 3,000 to 4,000 atm at 5°C demonstrated D values of 7.5 to 15 min (3). The effect of temperature can be quite dramatic; cells of Listeria innocua survived 4,400 atm at 25 to 26°C with a D value of 7.4 min (160), while Listeria monocytogenes cells were inactivated much more rapidly by application of less pressure (3,700 atm) but applied at a higher temperature of 45°C, exhibiting a D value of 1.1 min under these conditions (198).
Spores are extremely resistant to killing by ultrahigh hydrostatic pressures, generally more so than the corresponding growing cells (29, 168). Analysis of spore killing by hydrostatic pressure has shown that spore killing rises as the pressure increases to some maximum level of killing and then decreases as the pressure increases further (168, 224). Not all the reasons for the latter observation are known. However, it appears most likely that spore killing by hydrostatic pressure is due to the induction of spore germination by this treatment, with the germinated spores then being killed rapidly by pressure (139, 143, 161, 168, 224). With B. subtilis spores, the mechanism by which spore germination is triggered by moderate pressure (100 MPa or 987 atm) appears to involve the normal germinant receptors, but at higher pressures (600 MPa or 5,923 atm), triggering of spore germination does not require the germinant receptors (168, 225). In addition, spores germinated at lower pressures (100 MPa) become sensitive to UV and oxidizing agents, while spores germinated at higher pressures (600 MPa) are much more resistant (224). Thus, while spores are germinated by both high and lower pressures, spores germinated at high pressures remain significantly resistant, presumably even to killing by pressure itself. The sensitivity of lower-pressure (100 MPa)-germinated B. subtilis spores to UV and oxidizing agents appears to be due to the degradation of
/
-type SASP accompanying the spore
germination induced by these pressures; in contrast, while higher
pressures induce spore germination, degradation of
/
-type SASP is
not induced (224). Although the reason for the lack of
/
-type SASP degradation accompanying spore germination induced by
high pressure is not known, this observation as well as other data
indicate that
/
-type SASP play an important role in the
resistance of B. subtilis spores to extremely high pressure (224).
SPORE DNA REPAIR MECHANISMS
|
|
|---|
Dormant but viable spores can persist in the environment over millennial time spans (see above) in a metabolically inactive state. Therefore, environmental damage accumulates unrepaired in spore cellular components during dormancy. As discussed in the preceding section, the cellular target of many sporicidal treatments is DNA, and spore resistance to DNA-damaging treatments is due in part to protective mechanisms which either (i) prevent or dramatically slow the rate of formation of certain types of DNA damage (e.g., damage induced by oxidizing agents, dry heat, or desiccation) or (ii) alter the type of damage formed in spore DNA (e.g., 254-nm UV light inducing formation in spore DNA of SP rather than cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers) (187, 190, 191). Despite these protective mechanisms, potentially lethal and mutagenic damage nonetheless does accumulate in spore DNA during long-term storage of spores in the laboratory (190) and during exposure of spores to environmental stresses, particularly solar radiation (201, 212) (see below). Therefore, another major determinant of the degree of spore resistance to extreme environments is the speed and accuracy with which spore DNA damage can be repaired during germination. In the laboratory, the critical time frame for DNA repair during germination can be quite short. For example, in germinating spores of Bacillus megaterium, de novo RNA and protein synthesis begins well within the first 5 min of germination, using entirely endogenous reserves of precursors and energy (192-194). Abasic sites, helix-distorting lesions such as SP, or breaks in the phosphodiester backbone of spore DNA could exert potentially lethal effects early in germination by blocking the progress of RNA polymerase, thus halting expression of any number of critical pathways leading to replicative DNA synthesis and outgrowth. In addition, unrepaired lesions in spore DNA itself would physically block replication, leading to both lethal and mutagenic consequences (reviewed in reference 51). We have not yet obtained a complete catalog either of the identities of all types of damage incurred in the DNA of spores exposed to extreme environments or of all DNA repair systems involved in spore DNA repair. Below is a summary of what we know to date from laboratory studies.
General DNA Repair Systems
NER. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) in B. subtilis closely resembles the analogous system in Escherichia coli, which has been extremely well characterized (87; reviewed in references 50, 51, and 88). Although the molecular details of NER in B. subtilis have not been elucidated to the same degree as NER in E. coli, several lines of evidence suggest that the two processes are essentially similar. First, the B. subtilis homologs of the genes encoding the UvrB and UvrC subunits of the E. coli excinuclease have been identified, mapped (115), cloned, and sequenced (22, 23) for some time, and the B. subtilis homolog of the UvrA protein has recently been identified as part of the B. subtilis genomic sequencing project (86). The deduced amino acid sequences of all three of these proteins show a high degree of similarity to their E. coli counterparts. Second, functional Uvr(A)BC excinuclease activity was obtained in vitro by mixing the purified B. subtilis homolog of UvrC protein with purified E. coli UvrA and UvrB proteins (87).
Regulation of expression of some genes for the B. subtilis NER pathway has been studied using uvr-lacZ fusions. The NER genes are expressed constitutively at a low level during vegetative growth (23) and during sporulation (P. J. Riesenman and W. L. Nicholson, unpublished). Expression of uvr-lacZ fusions is inducible by DNA damage both during vegetative growth (23) and during the outgrowth phase of germination of spores treated with 254-nm UV or dry heat (182). B. subtilis strains carrying mutations of genes in the NER pathway make UV-sensitive vegetative cells, but their spores are only slightly more UV sensitive than wild-type spores (115, 122) (Fig. 3).
|
Recombination-mediated repair. Munakata and Rupert (126) reported that in B. subtilis, spores of a recA single mutant were no more sensitive to 254-nm UV than were wild-type spores. However, when combined with mutations inactivating either NER (uvrB) or SP lyase (splB), mutation in recA significantly enhanced spore sensitivity to 254-nm UV, thus implicating the Rec pathway in spore UV resistance (126). More recently, it has been reported that recA single mutants of B. subtilis produce spores which are about twofold more UV sensitive than wild-type spores (59, 182). Expression of a recA-lacZ fusion is inducible by DNA damage and entrance of cells into the competent state (reviewed in reference 228). Levels of RecA protein were found to be quite low in dormant spores, and expression of a recA-lacZ fusion was induced during the outgrowth phase of germination of spores previously treated with 254-nm UV or dry heat (182). Thus, it appears that expression of the NER and Rec pathways in response to DNA damage is controlled by classic DNA damage-inducible (Din) circuitry (228).
Other general repair systems. In the recently completed sequence of the B. subtilis genome, a number of open reading frames presumably encoding components of various base excision repair and mismatch repair systems have been identified (86). To date, however, virtually no information exists regarding the role of these additional general DNA repair systems in spore resistance to extreme environmental conditions.
SP Lyase, an SP-Specific DNA Repair System
Unlike the generalized NER and Rec systems, which operate in both vegetative cells and outgrowing spores on a variety of types of DNA damages (182, 190), SP lyase is specifically dedicated to the repair of SP which has accumulated in dormant spores exposed to UV. Elegant genetic, biochemical, and physiological experiments performed in the late 1960s and 1970s indicated that SP lyase was produced during sporulation, packaged in the dormant spore, and activated during early germination to monomerize SP in situ back to two thymines (124, 125, 219). This broad scheme of repair has in large part been substantiated and explored in greater detail during the 1990s using a number of molecular approaches. DNA from B. subtilis strain 168 which could rescue a mutant lacking SP lyase activity (the original splB1 mutation isolated by Munakata [113]) was cloned, mapped genetically to the pts-kinA region of the chromosome, and sequenced (45). From the nucleotide sequence of the region, it was observed that the SP lyase (spl) locus was organized as a bicistronic operon, consisting of splA, encoding a protein of 79 amino acids (a.a.) and 9.2 kDa of unknown function, and splB, encoding a 40-kDa protein which exhibited limited regional homology to the DNA photolyase/6-4 photolyase/blue-light photoreceptor family of proteins (45, 133). Mutational inactivation and complementation experiments indicated that the splB cistron encoded the information missing in the SP lyase-deficient splB1 mutant (43, 45, 132).
Regulation of SP lyase expression during sporulation.
Expression of the splAB operon during B. subtilis growth and development has been studied by constructing a
translational fusion between splB and the E. coli
lacZ gene (148). In these experiments it was observed
that the splAB operon is expressed as part of the
E
G regulon of forespore-specific genes, by the following
criteria: (i) the splB-lacZ fusion was expressed in the
forespore at stage III of sporulation, (ii) expression of the
splB-lacZ fusion was abolished in a sigG
1
mutant strain lacking sigma-G, (iii) expression of the
splB-lacZ fusion could be activated during vegetative growth by artificially inducing expression in trans of the
sigG gene encoded on an extrachromosomal plasmid, and (iv)
the splAB operon was efficiently transcribed in vitro by
purified E
G RNA polymerase from a major sigma G-type
promoter preceding the operon called P1 (148). Unlike DNA
repair genes such as uvr and rec (182,
228), expression of the splB-lacZ fusion was not DNA damage inducible during vegetative growth, nor was expression induced
by growing cells under conditions which induce genetic competence
(148). Interestingly, the SASP themselves are also expressed
in the developing forespore at stage III of sporulation as part of the
E
G regulon (138, 208; reviewed in
reference 188).
G-dependent promoter called P3 (148). Third,
in vitro mutations which inactivated the major P1 promoter and an
in-frame deletion of splA had the effect of increasing the
expression levels but not the timing, forespore compartmentalization,
or E
G dependence of expression of splB-lacZ
fusions integrated at the prophage SP
locus (149).
cis/trans analysis of partial diploids for splA
indicated that the SplA gene product is a trans-acting negative regulator of splB-lacZ expression and apparently
acts by modulating the level of transcription initiating from P1 versus P3 (44). Although neither the molecular mechanism of this
regulatory circuit nor its potential function during sporulation has
yet been elucidated, it is interesting to note that the deduced SplA amino acid sequence is similar to that of another small regulatory protein, the trp RNA-binding attenuation protein (TRAP) of
B. subtilis. By analogy, this observation opens the
possibility that SplA may operate at the level of splAB mRNA
by a TRAP-like mechanism (44; reviewed recently in
reference 5).
Genetics and biochemistry of SP lyase.
Soon after
cloning of the splAB operon, it was demonstrated that the
splB cistron encoded SP lyase activity, from evidence that
(i) only subclones of splAB containing wild-type
splB DNA could rescue Munakata's splB1 mutation
(43, 45) and (ii) knockout mutations of the splB
cistron but not the splA cistron resulted in spore UV
sensitivity (45, 132). The first clue to the enzymatic mechanism of SP lyase came from examination of the deduced amino acid
sequence of the B. subtilis SplB protein. The 342-a.a.
sequence of SplB was observed to contain only four cysteines, three of which were tightly clustered at residues 91, 95, and 98 and the fourth
at residue 141 (45). The SplB sequence surrounding residues C91, C95, and C98 was found through sequence database searching to
be highly similar to the amino acid signature for the [4Fe-4S] clusters of a family of S-adenosylmethionine
(SAM)-dependent, radical-utilizing enzymes represented
by anaerobic (type III) ribonucleotide reductase, pyruvate-formate
lyase, lysine-2,3-aminomutase, biotin synthases (BioB), and lipoic acid
synthetase (LipA) (132) (Fig.
4). All members of the family of
SAM-dependent, radical-utilizing enzymes have three features
in common: (i) they contain oxygen-labile [4Fe-4S] clusters and hence
require anaerobic conditions for their activity; (ii) they utilize
SAM as a cofactor; and (iii) they operate by a radical
mechanism, in which the [4Fe-4S] cluster splits SAM to
generate methionine and a 5'-adenosyl radical, which then proceeds to
participate either directly or indirectly in catalysis (reviewed in
references 163 and 223).
|
SPORE RESISTANCE TO EXTREME TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENTS
|
|
|---|
Differences between the Laboratory and the Environment
As discussed in the preceding sections, a fairly detailed molecular picture of spore resistance properties in the laboratory is emerging, which appears to be a combination of (i) mechanisms for protection of critical spore components, particularly DNA, during dormancy and (ii) mechanisms for rapid and accurate repair of cellular damage during germination. A fundamental biological question inevitably arises from these studies: Do the models which have been developed to explain spore resistance in the laboratory provide an adequate description of the phenomenon as it occurs in the environment? Although considerable effort has been directed towards investigation of spore UV resistance and DNA repair under a number of environmental conditions (see below), the gulf between the laboratory and the environment is only beginning to be bridged. In an attempt to answer the question of biological relevance, it is perhaps instructive to first compare some important parameters which differ between the laboratory and the field. We will use the spore UV resistance model as an example, as it is this model which has been advanced from laboratory studies in the greatest detail.
Source of spores.
Most but not all of the laboratory
model of spore UV resistance has been derived directly from studies on
a single organism, Bacillus subtilis. This situation has
arisen for the sensible reason that B. subtilis is by far
the best-characterized spore-forming microorganism because it is
amenable to highly refined genetic and molecular biological
manipulation (61, 86, 203). In addition, there is a body of
experimental evidence gathered from other spore-forming microorganisms
which supports the B. subtilis model describing the role of
/
-type SASP in spore DNA protection and UV photochemistry (reviewed in references 184 and
190). Studies on spore DNA repair mechanisms, in
contrast, have focused almost exclusively on B. subtilis
because of the early isolation of mutations affecting NER and SP lyase
in this species (113, 122); the sole exception in this case
is the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens homolog of SP lyase, which
has been cloned, completely sequenced, and shown to function in
B. subtilis (133). In addition, SP lyase homologs
have been cloned and partially sequenced from Clostridium
perfringens (211) and identified in the sequenced
genomes of Bacillus anthracis, B. stearothermophilus, Clostridium acetobutylicum,
C. difficile, and Streptomyces coelicolor.
Therefore, the evidence to date indicates that SP lyases, like SASP,
are widely conserved among the spore-forming eubacteria.
Growth, sporulation, dormancy, and germination conditions. In the laboratory, B. subtilis spores are usually prepared by cultivating the bacterium at 37°C in a liquid nutrient broth-based sporulation medium at a high growth rate and to high cell density until some essential nutrient (usually the carbon source) is exhausted from the medium (171). After 1 to 2 days of aerobic incubation, spores are purified from vegetative cells, the pasteurized spore suspension is air dried or diluted in buffer and exposed to the extreme condition being studied, and survival is quantitated by plating the spores on nutrient medium and counting colonies arising after incubation at 37°C (reviewed in reference 137). Although very little is known about the growth or sporulation of bacteria in their natural habitats, it is not difficult to envision that this process probably bears little resemblance to the manner in which spores are prepared and assayed in the laboratory. Growth of spore-forming bacteria in their natural environments (e.g., soil, decaying organic matter, plant surfaces, and insect and mammalian guts) (i) is almost certainly slower, (ii) probably takes place in microcolonies on and within a solid substrate (aggregated soil particles, e.g.), (iii) at the very least is subject to wide variations in temperature, UV flux, nutrient, water, and oxygen availability, and (iv) probably occurs in direct competition with other micro- and macroorganisms. To date, we know almost nothing about how spore-forming bacteria grow and sporulate under these diverse conditions or of the properties of the resulting spores.
Solar Radiation as Primary Source
Historically, most laboratory studies of spore UV photochemistry
and DNA repair have been performed using monochromatic 254-nm UV light
(UV-C) due to two technical expedients: (i) 254-nm UV is relatively
cheap and simple to generate using a low-pressure mercury arc lamp, and
(ii) 254 nm coincides well with the absorption maximum of DNA, so that
biological and photochemical effects can be observed at relatively low
fluences. However, sunlight reaching the Earth's surface is not
monochromatic 254-nm radiation but a mixture of UV, visible, and
infrared radiation, the UV portion spanning approximately 290 to 400 nm
(the so-called UV-B and UV-A portions of the UV spectrum)
(214) (Fig. 5). The laboratory
model of spore UV resistance has therefore been constructed largely using a wavelength of UV radiation not normally experienced on the
Earth's surface, even though ample evidence exists that both DNA
photochemistry (195) and cellular responses to UV
(213) are strongly wavelength dependent.
|
Radiation from the sun drives essentially all life processes at the Earth's surface, but paradoxically is also a major source of lethal damage to spore cellular components and both lethal and mutagenic damage to spore DNA. The physical effects of solar radiation can be divided into direct and indirect effects.
Direct solar effects. Solar UV radiation can cause lethal and mutagenic damage to spores by direct interaction between photons and DNA (116, 212). As mentioned above, the best-characterized UV damage in spore DNA is the unique thymine dimer 5-thyminyl-5,6-dihydrothymine, commonly called SP, as well as a number of less-abundant unidentified photoproducts (34), one of which may be the (6-4) photoproduct (90). SP has been detected in spore DNA irradiated at a number of UV wavelengths extending through the UV-C, UV-B, and UV-A portions of the spectrum, using either artificial UV sources or sunlight (212). The presence of additional photoproducts in spore DNA exposed to solar UV has long been inferred (212, 227), but the identity of some of these photoproducts has only recently begun to be elucidated (201) (see below). Although much attention has focused on the UV-B portion of sunlight, since it is a major cause of DNA damage, recent research has clearly demonstrated that UV-A, especially wavelengths in the range from 320 to 365 nm, can also induce production of pyrimidine dimers besides producing other kinds of DNA and cellular damage (201, 212, 213).
Indirect solar effects. Solar radiation exerts a number of indirect, albeit important secondary effects which have in some cases been mimicked in the laboratory, including heating of spores, desiccation of spores through evaporation, and generation of reactive oxygen species in spores (213).
As noted above from laboratory studies (Fig. 1), spores can withstand heating for extended periods at temperatures well above those normally prevailing in most environments at the Earth's surface. This observation has been confirmed experimentally using spores of several different B. subtilis strains exposed as air-dried films to solar heating at temperatures exceeding 70°C but shielded from primary UV effects (165, 201, 226, 227). The net result of these studies is that spores suffered little or no detectable loss in viability after exposures of up to 30 h under these conditions. The effects of extreme desiccation on B. subtilis spores and spore DNA have been studied using vacuum generated either in the laboratory (13, 36, 37, 42, 127) (see above) or in space orbit (66) (see below). Current evidence indicates that extreme desiccation under vacuum leads to predominantly single-strand breaks, DNA-protein cross-links, and other uncharacterized DNA damage in spores (13, 42); to date, vacuum-induced damage to non-DNA spore components has not been reported. It is almost certain that the desiccation induced by extreme vacuum in the laboratory is far greater than the levels of desiccation found in terrestrial environments. Although no systematic studies of desiccation resistance of spores in terrestrial environments have been undertaken, it is interesting to note that viable spores have been recovered from 300-year-old air-dried herbarium soils and from 10-meter-deep permafrost soils at least 10,000 years old (reviewed in reference 154). Several lines of evidence indicate that absorption of solar UV-B and UV-A by a variety of compounds within the cell can result in the generation of reactive oxygen intermediates, such as hydrogen peroxide and superoxide anion. These activated oxygen species target several cellular components in addition to DNA, causing enzyme photoinactivation and lipid peroxidation (reviewed in reference 213). These additional types of solar damage to non-DNA spore cellular components have not been examined to date. We have some idea of how each of the above secondary solar effects impacts spores in the laboratory, but how do each of these physical parameters affect spore DNA in the environment? Spores in the environment are not exposed to single, isolated stresses as studied in the laboratory. Rather, solar exposure creates some or all of these effects simultaneously. Factors such as the constantly shifting solar angle resulting from Earth's rotation and tilt combined with ever-changing atmospheric conditions cause complex cyclic variations in total radiation flux and spectrum, particularly at the UV-B extreme (214). In addition, spores can undergo untold numbers of cycles of desiccation-hydration, heating-cooling, and freezing-thawing during dormancy. Even spores buried in soil, whose DNA is well shielded from the primary effects of solar UV, are subjected to these indirect stresses.Protection of Spores from Lethal Solar UV Damage
What structures or features of the spore have been identified in laboratory studies which could protect the spore from lethal solar UV damage? As mentioned above, SASP binding to spore DNA in the spore core protects it both from 254-nm UV-C damage and from damage due to oxidizing agents (see above). These results imply that SASP may also protect spore DNA from the direct