Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, September 2001, p. 390-403, Vol. 65, No. 3
Department of Biology, City College of New
York, New York, New York 10031
1092-2172/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.65.3.390-403.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Questionable Thymic Nurse Cell
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
STRUCTURE OF TNCS
THYMOCYTE INTERNALIZATION BY TNCS
IMMUNOLOGICAL FUNCTION OF THE THYMOCYTE-TNC INTERACTION
APOPTOSIS AND DESTRUCTION OF TNC-THYMOCYTES
FUTURE STUDIES OF TNC FUNCTION
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
SUMMARY
|
|
|---|
Since their discovery in 1980, thymic nurse cells (TNCs) have been controversial. Questions pertaining to the existence of the TNC as a "unit" cell with thymocytes completely enclosed within its cytoplasm were the focus of initial debates. Early skeptics proposed the multicellular complex to be an artifact of the procedures used to isolate TNCs from the thymus. Since that time, TNCs have been found in fish, frogs, tadpoles, chickens, sheep, pigs, rats, mice, and humans. Their evolutionary conservation throughout the animal kingdom relieved most speculations about the existence of TNCs and at the same time demonstrated their apparent importance to the thymus and T-cell development. In this review we will discuss and debate reports that describe (i) the organization or structure of TNCs, (ii) the thymocyte subset(s) found within the cytoplasm of TNCs and their uptake and release, and (iii) the function of this fascinating multicellular interaction that occurs during the process of T-cell development. Discussions about the future of the field and experimental approaches that will lead to answers to remaining questions are also presented.
INTRODUCTION
|
|
|---|
Much information has been published
about the role of thymic stromal cells in the process of thymic
education. The thymus is composed of bone marrow-derived macrophages
and dendritic cells, as well as nonlymphoid epithelial cells
(10). In mice, cortical epithelial cells are derived from
the ectodermal branchial cleft, while medullary epithelium originates
from endodermal cells of the third pharyngeal pouch (57).
Epithelial cells of the cortex interact with the earliest lymphocyte
immigrants. Immature thymocytes, both triple negatives
(
TCR
CD4
CD8
) and
triple positives (
TCR+ CD4+
CD8+), participate in intimate cortical lymphoepithelial
complexes (7, 14, 16, 48). Most mature single-positive
lymphocytes (CD4+ or CD8+) reside in the
medulla. As thymocytes move through the thymus, from triple negatives
to single positives, they produce a T-cell antigen receptor (
TCR)
on their cell surface (Fig. 1). The

TCR is believed to participate in an interaction with
self-peptides associated with major histocompatibility complex (MHC)
antigens on the cell surface of epithelial cells, as well as dendritic cells and macrophages (29, 49). The nature of that
interaction is proposed to be the crux of thymic education. Presently,
the most scrutinized hypothesis proposes that thymocytes producing an

TCR that binds tightly to self-peptide in association with MHC
antigens are not allowed to mature. These cells are selectively deleted
because they are potentially autoreactive if released from the thymus
(Fig. 2). Thymocytes producing
nonreactive 
TCRs are also deleted. On the other hand, thymocytes
producing an 
TCR that binds self-peptide with low affinity are
allowed to mature to the single-positive phenotype and are ultimately
released from the thymus as functional T cells (30, 31). A
major focus of many current studies is to define the thymic epithelial
cells that participate in this interaction with developing T cells. In
this review, we will discuss the investigative reports that examine the
population of thymic cortical epithelial cells given the name "thymic
nurse cells" (TNCs). More specifically, our review will focus on the
structural nature of this multicellular complex and the immunological
significance of this unique thymocyte-epithelial-cell interaction.
|
|
STRUCTURE OF TNCS
|
|
|---|
TNCs were discovered in mice by Wekerle and Ketelson in 1980 (58, 59). The initial report described TNCs as
keratin-expressing cells containing several thymocytes completely
enclosed within specialized cytoplasmic vacuoles. The number of
thymocytes enclosed was reported to vary from about 7 to 50 (Fig.
3). TNCs were also shown to express both
class I and class II MHC antigens on their cell surface as well as on
the surface of the vacuoles surrounding internalized thymocytes. The
expression of membrane class II MHC antigens is atypical for epithelial
cells. The expression of class II antigens is generally thought to be
restricted to cells of the immune system. Typically, epithelial cells
do not function within the immune system. Following their initial
discovery in mice, TNCs were isolated from the thymus of fish, frogs,
chickens, sheep, pigs, rats, and humans (5, 19, 44, 58,
59). In mice, TNCs express thymic cortex-specific markers
(1, 55, 60) and are not recognized by medullary-specific
monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), nor are they recognizable by MAbs
specific to macrophages, fibroblasts, or thymocytes (55).
Two basic questions were spawned from these initial reports. (i) Are
these complexes actually formed by the uptake of one cell by another
cell in vivo? (ii) What is their exact location within the thymus?
|
Micrographs of TNCs isolated from the thymus of all of the species
mentioned above appeared to show thymocytes completely surrounded by
membrane within the cytoplasm of a cell containing one large nucleus
(Fig. 3) (43, 58, 59). However, it has been proposed that
these structures result from incomplete enzymatic digestion of tightly
bound cells during their isolation from the thymus (23,
52). This implies that the TNC complex develops from nonspecific
wrapping of membrane fragments around tightly bound thymocytes in vitro
rather than the in vivo membrane fusion event required for true vacuole
formation within a cell. Although it is very difficult to show the
intact structure of TNCs in vivo using frozen sections of the thymus,
because of the very high density of cells within the thymic cortex,
visualization of the entire membrane surrounding engulfed thymocytes
has been presented. These experiments were done using human thymus
tissue and staining with antibodies against keratins or MHC proteins
(13, 44). Transmission electron microscopy (TEMs) of TNCs
reveal a prominent nucleus within the cytoplasm containing enclosed
thymocytes (Fig. 4). Cytoplasmic
organelles, mitochondria, Golgi, and lysosomes have also been described
within the membrane of TNCs (36). Other investigators used
biochemical techniques to determine the integrity of this unusual
structure (58). Extended treatment of TNCs with trypsin
was used to determine the structural relationship between trapped
thymocytes and TNCs. Extensive treatment with trypsin and collagenase
does not dissociate the cells within the complex (M. Pezzano and J. Guyden, unpublished data). Further, the thymocyte subset within TNCs is
inaccessible to thymocyte-specific antibodies before fixing and
permeabilization with detergent or acetone (26, 58).
Additional support for cytoplasmic enclosure of thymocytes by TNCs was
provided with reports of the development of TNC lines (21,
31-33, 38, 42). The generation of TNC lines was important because prior to their development, the formation of this unique multicellular complex in culture had not been reported. Freshly isolated TNCs attach themselves to the bottom of tissue culture plates
and release their enclosed thymocytes; however, the subsequent uptake
of thymocytes by freshly isolated TNCs has not been reported. TNC cell
lines were shown to be able to internalize thymocytes that were added
separately to in vitro cultures. Data obtained from TEM and
antibody-staining experiments have been presented to show multicellular
complexes resulting from TNC internalization of added thymocytes. The
internalization event has also been visualized using long-term video
microscopy (42). In this presentation, internalization is
defined as membrane sealed or complete separation from the
extracellular environment.
|
The experiments reported above provided strong support for membrane separation between thymocytes inside of the TNC complex and those in the general thymic microenvironment. However, they do not define the nature of the resulting vacuole. These specialized structures could develop from tight membrane overlaps or from classical membrane fusion. Membrane fusion would produce vacuoles that are free to move within the cytoplasm. Vacuoles that result from overlapping membranes would not have free mobility because the membrane that generates their formation is contiguous with the plasma membrane. Overlapping membranes would create a seal that results in a tunnel-like structure along the surface of the plasma membrane rather than the "bag-within-a-bag" type structure of the more classical fused membrane vacuole. Although not definitive, more microscopic data exist to support the tunnel-like structure rather than the more classical vacuole. These data will be presented later in this review. As far as function is concerned, either vacuole type would suffice because both structures provide an isolated microenvironment for long-term contact and/or communication between enclosed thymocytes and thymic nurse cells.
The second point of discussion, the location of TNCs within the thymus,
was generated from a report by Kyewski and Kaplan (24).
Although these studies defined TNCs as subcapsular cells, subsequent
reports assigned their position to be more centrally located within the
cortex (35). Finding their exact in vivo location is
important because this information would aid in the determination of
the subset of thymocytes that interacts with TNCs. Such information
would subsequently shed light on TNC function during thymocyte
development. To answer this question, Kyewski and Kaplan immersed the
entire thymus in fluorescein isothiocyanate for increasing periods and
analyzed the incorporation of fluorescein into TNC thymocytes versus
free thymocytes. At each time point from 15 to 60 s, there was a
higher percentage of fluoresceinated thymocytes associated with TNCs
and an increase in the number of TNCs. They interpreted these results
to demonstrate the presence of TNCs near the outer cortex of the
thymus. These data never showed a comparative decrease in fluorescein
uptake. The open-ended nature of these results did not define the
limits of the compartment within the thymic cortex that house TNCs.
However, in our laboratory, subsequent staining experiments using the
TNC-specific monoclonal antibody ph91 revealed TNCs to be scattered
throughout the cortex from the subcapsular region to the
corticomedullary junction (Fig. 5)
(41).
|
One way to localize TNCs within the thymus is to use an alternative
approach, i.e., to define the thymocyte subset(s) enclosed within the
cytoplasm of TNCs. Much has been reported to show that triple-positive
thymocytes (
TCR+ CD4+ CD8+)
are more centrally located within the thymic cortex in mice while
triple-negative thymocytes reside in the subcapsular region (35). Several coculture studies defined the
TNC-internalized subset to be triple positive (20, 26,
32). However, conflicting evidence exists. Some reports show the
TNC-interactive subset to have the triple-negative phenotype (18,
21). One TNC clone, TNCR3.1, establishes multicellular complexes
in vitro with triple-negative thymocytes and supports growth and
maturation of its interactive subset to the triple-positive window of
development through the CD3
CD4+ intermediate
pathway. Similarly, IT-79MTNC3, another mouse TNC clone, supports the
growth and maturation of its interactive subset from the
triple-negative window of development to the CD3
CD4+ intermediate stage. Internalization of thymocytes was
not detected in IT-79MTNC3 cocultures. Support for the triple-positive
phenotype of TNC thymocytes has been obtained through analysis of
thymocytes enclosed within freshly isolated TNCs (15, 24).
Such conflicting data create difficulty in assigning an exact thymic
location for TNCs. Moreover, these opposing results initiated further
controversy. It should be stated, however, that until TNCs containing
triple-negative thymocytes are found in freshly isolated preparations,
the development of epithelial cell lines that interact with
triple-negative thymocytes may represent a thymic stromal cell
population that is distinct from TNCs.
It must be stated that the studies described above were performed using mammalian cells. The cell surface phenotype of the thymocyte population within TNCs isolated from other classes varies significantly from those found in mice, rats, and humans.
THYMOCYTE INTERNALIZATION BY TNCS
|
|
|---|
The internalization of thymocytes by TNCs was captured through the
addition of freshly isolated thymocytes to cultures containing cells
derived from the immortalization of TNCs (20, 21, 32, 37,
42) (Fig. 6). Prior to those
reports, it was difficult to determine the authenticity of these cell
lines because no TNC-specific antigens had been defined. It should be
made clear that at that time, the only TNC-specific characteristic
observed was their ability to engulf immature thymocytes. In 1984 Jason
and Janeway (22) produced short-term cultures of thymic
epithelial cells with characteristics similar to TNCs. These cells were
maintained in culture for approximately 6 weeks before fibroblast
overgrowth occurred. Although some of the cells in their cultures were
able to engulf thymocytes, they were not termed TNCs. Similarly,
Nakashima et al. isolated a long-term thymic epithelial line (TEL-2)
from BALB/c mice that form TNC-like complexes on incubation with normal mouse thymocytes (32). The cells of this line expressed
none of the T-cell-specific antigens and were Mac-1
.
TEL-2 cells express the 6C3 antigen, a cortical marker, and were MHC
class I positive. Cell surface MHC class II antigen was not detectable.
Again, these cells were not referred to as TNCs. However, recently
three long-term lines were established and characterized as thymic
nurse cells (21, 32, 38). Itoh et al. isolated an
epithelial cell clone (IT-79MTNC3 [mentioned above]) from a spontaneous thymic tumor in a BALB/c mouse (21). These
cells express Ia antigens only in the presence of gamma interferon. The
nature of class I MHC antigen expression in these cells was not
presented. IT-79MTNC3 cells support the proliferation of fetal thymocytes in the presence of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2), IT-79MTNC3 cells develop complexes with thymocytes that are similar to
those of freshly isolated TNCs. TEM studies showed thymocytes to be
tightly bound to the surface of IT-79MTNC3 cells, but internalized thymocytes were not detected. Cells from another nurse cell line, termed B/c TEC-L1 (36), were shown to take up
PNA+ lymphocytes in culture. PNA is expressed
exclusively on triple-positive thymocytes (42). Complete
internalization of thymocytes by B/c TEC-L1 cells was not described.
Another TNC line was developed from the infection of freshly isolated
TNCs (from C57BL/6 mice) with simian virus 40 (SV40) (38).
Cells of two identical clones (SVT-MP5 and SVT-II2) were shown to
internalize 
TCRlo CD4+ CD8+
thymocytes exclusively in vitro (38). Cells from
both cell lines expressed cytokeratins and class I and class II
MHC antigens. The long-term cultures of tsTNC-1 cells, another TNC line
generated through SV40 transformation with freshly isolated thymocytes, resulted in the maturation of 
TCRlo
CD69
triple positives into 
TCRhi
CD69hi cells (39). SV40-derived TNC lines were
also shown to express the neuroendocrine marker A2B5, which was
previously shown to be a characteristic of freshly isolated TNCs. A2B5
colocalizes in TNCs along with the neuropeptides oxytocin,
arginine-vasopressin, and their associated neurophysins (17,
38).
|
Long-term video microscopy was used to document the internalization event in SVT-II2 cells, one of the SV40-derived lines (42). Monolayers of SVT-II2 cells were exposed to freshly isolated thymocytes. Unbound thymocytes were removed, and the remaining cells were visualized over time. Immediately before an internalization event, membrane channels were detected within the TNC cytoplasm (Fig. 6). A thymocyte was marked and monitored throughout the internalization process. The marked thymocyte moved into one of the preformed channels beneath the surface of the TNC cytoplasmic membrane. It moved over 50 µm within the TNC membrane. These data suggested a cooperative mechanism between the two cell types that resulted in the movement of selected thymocytes from the cell surface into specialized structures within the TNC cytoplasm. Scanning electron microscopy studies showed the initial step of the internalization process to involve the production of fingerlike projections by the bound thymocytes that attach to the TNC cell surface.
Within an hour, membrane ruffling was detected. A wave of TNC membrane
covered bound thymocytes and then reattached to complete the event.
Fusion points were illustrated, but it was difficult to verify their
authenticity using micrographic data. Some thymocytes were selectively
excluded from the internalization event (Fig. 7). TEM of the multicellular complex that
resulted from thymocyte uptake produced images identical to those
detected in freshly isolated TNCs (32, 42). That is,
thymocytes appeared to be isolated within membrane vacuoles. Some
vacuoles were shown to contain more than one thymocyte. Movement of
thymocytes around one another within one vacuole, along with
unidirectional movement of several thymocytes within a single vacuole,
was also documented. TEM performed by Philp et al. showed TNC membrane
completely surrounding internalized thymocytes (42). In
some studies, membrane thickening and unique "bridge-like"
structures at contact points between TNCs and internalized thymocytes
were described. These bridge-like structures are indicative of
communicative apparatuses between cells (42, 58).
|
Membrane fusion after thymocyte trapping is essential for classical vacuole formation. Postfusion vacuoles should have the ability to move within the TNC cytoplasm. If, however, the structure surrounding enclosed thymocytes was formed from a tight or close association of the two membrane surfaces without fusion, the vacuole-like compartment would be prevented from movement away from the surface of the plasma membrane. The data presented above support the formation of the attached, nonfused structure. TEM would not detect the lack of authentic vacuole formation without serial sectioning through the entire structure. Micrographs of sections taken above or below the point of attachment between the two membrane surfaces would produce images identical to authentic vacuoles. The scanning electron microscopy data described above show a wave of moving membrane, resembling waves that form in the ocean. On reattachment of the membrane, the enclosed thymocyte could move within the fold created by the overlapping membrane. This would account for the formation of channels or tunnels detected using long-term video microscopy (Fig. 6). The production of such a structure would also explain the long-distance movement described for internalized thymocytes and the existence of multiple thymocytes within one membrane compartment. These data show a unique relationship between the cells of this complex. Although debate concerning membrane fusion may continue, the experiments described above suggest that enclosed thymocytes are selectively and completely separated from surface-bound or unbound thymocyte populations.
Existing data define the expression of both class I and class II MHC
antigens on the vacuole surface surrounding engulfed thymocytes of
freshly isolated TNCs from mice and humans (12, 36, 58).
Intercellular cell adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) was also found on the
TNC cell surface as well as on the specialized vacuoles surrounding
enclosed thymocytes (8). The extracellular matrix proteins
fibronectin, laminin, and type IV collagen have been reported to be
constitutively produced by TNCs but were not localized within the
vacuoles containing thymocytes (56). An unresolved
molecular question pertains to the adhesion molecules responsible for
the binding of thymocytes to TNCs. Many adhesion proteins and/or ligand
complexes (e.g., Thy-1, neural cell adhesion molecule [NCAM],
CD2/LFA-3, and LFA-1/ICAM-1) participate in the attachment of immature
thymocytes to thymic epithelial cells (6, 9). An
LFA-1-dependent interaction on thymic epithelial cells (not defined as
TNCs) is restricted to a subpopulation of CD4+
CD8+ CD3lo thymocytes (25).
Couture et al. reported another thymic epithelial cell molecule that
also selectively binds triple-positive cells (9). This
adhesion molecule contains two noncovalently associated glycoproteins
with molecular masses of 23 and 45 kD. The subset of triple
positives bound by this complex were reported to be precursors of
mature single positives. However, this adhesion molecule appears to be
specific to epithelial cells of the medulla, which suggested that a
subset of 
TCR+ CD4+ CD8+
thymocytes that have undergone positive selection maintain their triple-positive phenotype until they interact with cells of the medulla. This is consistent with other reports showing that the switch
to the mature T-cell phenotype occurs in the medulla (34) and not in the cortex, wherein TNCs reside.
None of the cell surface molecules described above have been
definitively shown to facilitate the TNC-thymocyte interaction. Furthermore, inhibition of the binding of triple-positive thymocytes to
TNCs was not detected using antibodies to CD4, CD8, CD3, 
TCR, MHC
class I and II antigens, CD44, or CD45 (26). A partial
inhibition was reported in the presence of anti-Ia antibody
(11). In unpublished data from our laboratory, antibodies
made against CD2, CD5, CD25, LFA-3, LFA-1, ICAM, and Thy-1 did not
block or reduce TNC binding of thymocytes. Also, neither PNA nor
antibodies against PNA inhibited the interaction. However, our
laboratory has generated MAbs that are specific to the cell surface of
TNCs (41). The MAb ph91 was shown to exclusively bind the
surface of TNCs in vivo and the TNC line tsTNC-1 in culture. ph91 also
recognized the multicellular complex that defines TNCs in the thymus.
This MAb identified stromal cells in the thymic cortex but did not
recognize cells of the medulla. ph91 also showed no specificity for T
cells, developing thymocytes, or B cells. In tissue culture,
preexposure of tsTNC-1 cells to ph91 significantly reduced the binding
of the TNC-specific thymocyte subset (
TCRlo
CD4+ CD8+), as well as its subsequent
internalization. In fetal organ culture, ph91 caused a 70% reduction
of thymocyte viability. These data suggest that the protein (protein
complex) recognized by ph91 participates in the binding interaction
between thymocytes and TNCs and has an important function in the
process of thymocyte development during the stage at which MHC
restriction occurs.
IMMUNOLOGICAL FUNCTION OF THE THYMOCYTE-TNC INTERACTION
|
|
|---|
TNCs have the capacity to present antigen (20, 53). These results suggest that TNCs may play a role in MHC restriction. Information obtained from studies with chickens revealed that TNC thymocytes have the ability to recognize self-MHC (35). The authors proposed that thymocytes producing self reactive TCR are internalized to form the TNC complex. They also proposed that the internalization of these thymocytes would allow direct contact with numerous self-peptide-MHC complexes. It would then be possible for the long-term interactions that facilitate positive or negative selection to occur depending on the TCR binding affinity. Experiments designed to test hypothetical models for the mechanism used by TNCs to facilitate this selective process have so far been inconclusive (26).
Again, it must be stated that the studies described above were
performed with chickens, which may have a significantly different pathway to the development of T cells than that within mammalian systems. However, Lorenz and Allen showed that TNCs isolated from mice
also have the ability to present antigen (28, 29).
The antigen-presenting capability of TNCs was shown to be deficient compared to that of macrophages or dendritic cells. This deficiency was
overcome in the presence of IL-1
. Initially, these data were viewed
with some skepticism because mature T-cell clones were used to perform
the experiments. The data were supported in studies using freshly
isolated thymocytes in coculture with TNC clones (39).
Triple-positive thymocytes were rescued from apoptosis (a subset lived
for over 4 days in coculture) in the presence of TNCs but maintained
their immature phenotype in the absence of IL-1
. However, this
rescued population matured to the 
TCRhi
CD69+ phenotype when IL-1
was added to the cultures. The
remaining thymocytes underwent apoptosis.
Collectively, these data support the involvement of TNCs in the process
of MHC restriction, mainly because the TNC-interactive thymocyte
population is the subset that participates in MHC restriction. However,
controversy about the phenotype of TNC thymocytes remains. For
instance, IT-79MTNC3 cells bind triple-negative thymocytes (21). This controversy can be settled (as far as
IT-79MTNC3 cells are concerned) if we redefine IT-79MTNC3 cells as a
cortical epithelial cell type distinct from that of TNCs. IT-79MTNC3
cells were shown not to have the capacity to internalize thymocytes, and their cell surface phenotype was inadequately described to determine their identity. To definitively show that TNCs participate in
MHC restriction, one needs to demonstrate that TNC-thymocytes shift
from the triple-positive phenotype to that of single positives. This
has not been reported. However, as mentioned above, studies using
clones of thymic nurse cells, which maintain the ability to selectively
internalize immature 
TCRlo CD4+
CD8+ thymocytes in vitro, were used in long-term
coincubation experiments to determine nurse cell function during
the process of MHC restriction. The results of long-term coincubations
produced apoptotic thymocytes and a subset of triple-positive
thymocytes that were rescued from apoptosis (40). The
thymocyte subset released from its association with TNCs contained both
viable and apoptotic cells. The cells that remained within
intracytoplasmic vacuoles died through the process of programmed cell
death. The rescue activity of TNCs was drastically reduced with the
addition of antibodies against either class I or class II MHC antigens
to cocultures. A subset of the TNC-rescued population matured from the

TCRlo CD69
phenotype to

TCRhi CD69+-expressing cells in the
presence of IL-1
. These results suggested that TNC rescue of early
triple-positive thymocytes from apoptosis was associated with an
interaction between the TCR and the MHC. Also, the shift from the

TCRlo CD69
phenotype to

TCRhi CD69+-expressing cells has been
reported to be an early step in positive selection (40,
51). Long-term cocultures of freshly isolate 
TCRlo triple-positive thymocytes with TNCs resulted
in high expression of the 
TCR and CD69, but single-positive
thymocytes remained undetectable (40). The results
obtained from these experiments suggested that TNCs may provide early
signals required for thymocyte rescue and maturation within the
triple-positive stage of development but that complete maturation
occurs elsewhere. Again, these data are consistent with reports which
propose that the switch to the mature single-positive window of
development does not occur until thymocytes enter the medulla.
Evidence of thymocyte release from TNC intracytoplasmic
compartments has been presented (42). Long-term video
microscopy was used to capture the release of selected thymocytes. The
percent release was not determined in that study, nor was their cell
surface phenotype. Propidium iodide studies revealed that 4 to 11% of internalized thymocytes were deleted in SVT-II2 cultures, while the
majority of the internalized thymocyte population remained viable.
These reports indicate that TNCs may participate in the removal of
thymocytes from the developmental process. If this interpretation is
correct, it is then reasonable to propose that released thymocytes,
which express 
TCRhi CD69hi, have been
selected to continue through the developmental process. However,
conclusive data have not yet been reported. The induction of negative
selection by TNCs as well as other thymic cortical epithelial cells
contradicts many reports that propose positive selection to be an
exclusive function of cortical cells while negative selection is
limited to the medulla (27).
Although much evidence has been reported to show an involvement of TNCs
in MHC restriction, one report presented drastically different findings
(3). The data presented suggested that cell surface
expression of the 
TCR is not required for TNC formation. SCID
mice, which do not express an 
TCR, have normal numbers of TNCs.
In another experiment from that study, anti-CD3
antibody was
injected into BALB/C mice (2). Anti-CD3
induces
apoptosis in immature thymocytes. Mice receiving anti-CD3
MAb showed
an eightfold increase in TNC numbers per mouse thymus. The authors of
this report proposed TNC function to be the clearance of nonfunctional, nonselected apoptotic thymocytes. Although many of the data presented in that study are difficult to reconcile with the bulk of the information described above, the authors suggested that thymocyte selection could occur on the outer surface of TNCs. This would allow
positively selected thymocytes to continue their maturation while
negatively selected cells would become internalized. This suggestion is
consistent with studies that showed a subset of the TNC-bound thymocyte
population to be selectively excluded from the internalization process
(42). Assuming this explanation is correct, it will be
important to define the compartment(s) from which TNC-thymocytes are released.
APOPTOSIS AND DESTRUCTION OF TNC-THYMOCYTES
|
|
|---|
Viable and apoptotic thymocytes have been detected within TNC
vacuoles (4, 20, 39). Initial studies of apoptosis were performed using propidium iodide, DNA fragmentation ladders, or microscopic phenotypic characteristics (chromatin condensation) as
markers for death (4). More recent experiments exploited the TUNEL assay, which results in terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferase-mediated labeling of DNA with numerous strand breaks
as an indication of apoptosis. When the internalized population was
examined using the TUNEL assay, apoptotic cells were detectable
(39). There was a vast difference in the number of
apoptotic thymocytes per TNC when freshly isolated thymocytes were
examined; however, both apoptotic and nonapoptotic thymocytes were
visible within each TNC (47). These data were consistent
with earlier reports which suggested that TNCs have the ability to
maintain or increase the viability of a subset of its interactive
thymocyte population while selecting another subset to die through the
process of programmed cell death (39). Studies of
thymocyte apoptosis done in vitro supplied an added dimension to these
investigations. With increasing time in coculture of freshly isolated
thymocytes with TNC clones, apoptotic thymocytes within the specialized
TNC vacuoles began to lyse until the structure of intact cells was no
longer discernible. DNA fragments released from lysed thymocytes were
then detected within the cytoplasm of the TNC, indicating total
destruction of enclosed cells. A subsequent report using confocal
microscopy showed degradation of thymocytes to result from the fusion
of the specialized vacuoles containing apoptotic thymocytes with lysosomes (Fig. 8) (47).
These findings may be correlated with the role of TNCs in negative
selection.
|
FUTURE STUDIES OF TNC FUNCTION
|
|
|---|
It should be obvious that much work has to be done before the
precise role of TNCs in T-cell development is defined (Fig. 9). Many of the data described above
suggest that TNCs function early during the MHC restriction process.
These results described a TNC-interactive thymocyte population that is
either induced to die or allowed to continue along the differentiation
pathway (Fig. 10). The participation of
triple-positive thymocytes in the formation of the TNC complex,
evidence of MHC-TCR involvement in rescue from apoptosis or maturation,
and the selective release or destruction of enclosed thymocytes support
this contention. Whatever their function, the ability of TNCs to
selectively engulf another cell type, alone, is a very unique and
exciting biological phenomenon. Movement of thymocytes within the
thymus is very important to the developmental process, yet little
attention has been paid to this area of study. Future investigations of
thymocyte movement toward, along the surface of, within, and/or out of
TNCs should provide interesting information about T-cell development.
Data collected from such studies should aid in understanding the
developmental function of each maneuver. For instance, what is the
difference between the triple-positive thymocytes that bind TNCs and
those that do not bind? What is the difference between the population of bound thymocytes that are selectively internalized and those that
are excluded from this process? As stated above, some studies report
that all engulfed thymocytes are induced to die. If this is indeed the
case, the thymocyte selection process reported to occur within TNCs may
be restricted to the cell surface.
|
|
Future studies should reveal the complete molecular nature of the
TNC-thymocyte interaction. It is important that both the receptors and
ligands be identified. This interaction is key to understanding the
involvement of TNCs in T-cell development. We should exhaustively
describe the cell surface phenotype of thymocytes released from the TNC
interaction. One way to obtain these data is the use of
antigen-specific transgenic mice. With these animals, we should be able
to pinpoint TNC involvement during MHC restriction. It should be fairly
easy to determine developmental anomalies using fluorescence-activated
cell sorter profiles of thymocytes isolated from 
TCR transgenic
animals that have had their TNCs removed. TNCs can be deleted from the
thymus in organ culture and in vivo using TNC-specific antibody
treatment. Another approach would be to develop TNC lines that are
specific to the 
TCR transgene for in vitro experiments. TNC lines
that express an antigen recognized by an 
TCR would provide a
system specifically designed to examine the role of TNCs during MHC
restriction. Once such lines are developed, thymocytes from the
transgenic animal can be easily isolated and exposed to the TNC clones
in culture. Such a system would allow the determination of the fate of
large numbers of the targeted thymocyte population during and after
their interaction with TNCs.
We have recently proposed an interesting and easy set of experiments
using the H-Y transgenic model (23, 54). The H-Y transgenic-mouse model was developed for in vivo study of MHC restriction. Each developing thymocyte in the transgenic animal produces a cell surface 
TCR that recognizes the male-specific H-Y
antigen. In male animals having the selecting MHC background, the vast
majority of male transgenic thymocytes are deleted through negative
selection, while in female transgenic animals, above-normal positive
selection (as determined by the increased percentage of the
H-Y-specific single-positive subset) is detected. A simple experiment
would be to quantitate the number of TNCs in male and in female H-Y
transgenic mice. If TNC internalization is critical to MHC restriction,
the female transgenic animals should have a large number of TNCs
containing primarily viable thymocytes. Since female animals do not
express the H-Y-antigen, virtually all of the thymocytes should receive
the appropriate "low-affinity" selection signal through their
transgenic TCR, necessary for positive selection. The male H-Y
transgenic animals, which have the majority of their triple-positive
thymocytes deleted, should have small numbers of TNCs, with the
majority of internalized thymocytes being apoptotic. Alternatively,
these animals may possess the normal complement of TNCs but virtually
all of the thymocytes within them would be apoptotic. We expect to see
small numbers of TNCs in male transgenic mice because the
triple-positive subset of thymocytes known to interact with TNCs is
drastically reduced in these animals. The thymocytes that make it to
the triple-positive stage should produce a high-affinity interaction
with TNCs and become apoptotic. A simple analysis of H-Y
transgenic-mouse TNCs and their interactive thymocyte subset should
soon reveal important information about TNC function.
Another area that should be further studied is the seemingly redundant role played by TNCs and macrophages. Thymocyte apoptosis and destruction within TNCs is not in agreement with results reported by Surh and Sprent (50), who showed most if not all thymocyte apoptosis to be associated with macrophages. Interestingly, Ezaki et al. found that in rats 15 to 30% of TNCs have macrophages enclosed within their cytoplasm (15). Unpublished data from our laboratory obtained using long-term video microscopy, showed the movement of macrophages into and out of TNCs in a dynamic fashion. These results leave certain issues unresolved. First, if such a dynamic interaction occurs between TNCs and macrophages, it is going to be difficult to determine which cell is ultimately responsible for the induction of apoptosis within this multicellular complex. On the other hand, such an association may provide interesting possibilities, as well as offering clues to answer questions generated from contradictory results. For example, as stated above, Surh and Sprent presented evidence to suggest that the site of apoptosis may be exclusively associated with macrophages (50). Apoptotic thymocytes were always colocalized with antibody staining specific to macrophages. However, if macrophages enclosed in TNCs cooperate in the induction of apoptosis in negative selection of thymocytes, this event could be located in the cytoplasm of TNCs. Future studies in this area will be important to further understand the relationship between TNCs, macrophages, and thymocyte apoptosis.
On the other hand, we may be looking under the lamppost to find something that was lost in the dark. Some investigators believe that the expression of neuropeptides (oxytocin and vasopressin) by TNCs (17) qualifies them to serve a neurohormonal function in the thymus. The fact that this report and others showing neuropeptide expression by TNCs (45, 46) have been essentially ignored may reflect our lack of knowledge about neurohormonal regulation within the thymus or the interrelationship between neuropeptide production and the immune system. However, if the experiments proposed above fail to shed light on TNC function, we may be forced to begin our search in the darkness of thymic neuroendocrinology.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|
|---|
We thank Gregory Saunders for his technical aid.
This work was supported by NSF grant MCB-9602001 and NIH-RCMI grant G12RR-A103060. Michael Samms was supported by the NIH MBRS grant GM08168
FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, City College of New York, 138th St. at Convent Ave., New York, NY 10031. Phone: (212) 650-8559. Fax: (212) 650-7989. E-mail: mpezzano{at}sci.ceny.cuny.edu.
REFERENCES
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Adkins, B.,
G. F. Tidmarsh, and I. L. Wiessman.
1988.
Normal thymic cortical epithelial cells developmentally regulate the expression of a -lineage transformation-associated antigen.
Immunogenetics
27:180-186[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2. | Aguilar, L. K., E. Agilar-Cordova, J. Cartwright, Jr., and J. W. Belmont. 1994. Thymic nurse cells are sites of thymocyte apoptosis. J. Immunol. 152:2645-2651[Abstract]. |
| 3. | Andrew, P., and R. L. Boyd. 1985. The murine thymic nurse cell: an isolated thymic environment. Eur. J. Immunol. 15:36-39[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Bendelac, A.,
P. Matzinger,
R. A. Seder,
W. E. Paul, and R. H. Schwartz.
1992.
Activation events during thymic selection.
J. Exp. Med.
175:731-742 |
| 5. | Boyd, R., G. Oberhuber, K. Hala, and G. Wick. 1984. Obese strain (OS) chickens with spontaneous autoimmune thyroiditis have a deficiency in thymic nurse cells. J. Immunol. 132:718-724[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Brunet, J. F., M. P. Hirsh, P. Naquet, K. Uberla, T. Diamantstein, M. Lipinski, and C. Goridis. 1989. Developmentally regulated expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) by mouse thymocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 19:837-841[Medline]. |
| 7. |
Ceredig, R.,
D. P. Dialynas,
F. W. Fitch, and H. R. Macdonald.
1983.
Precursors of T cell growth factor producing cells in the thymus: ontogeny, frequency and quantitative recovery on a subpopulation of phenotypically mature thymocytes defined by monoclonal antibody GK-1.5.
J. Exp. Med.
158:1654-1671 |
| 8. | Cordes, U., M. Pedersen, L. Bastholm, M. Nielsen, and O. Werdelin. 1997. Murine thymic nurse cells express ICAM-1 on caveolar and vacuolar membranes. Scand. J. Immunol. 46:344-348[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 9. | Couture, C., P. C. Patel, and E. F. Potworowski. 1990. A novel thymic epithelial adhesion molecule. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:2769-2763[Medline]. |
| 10. | Crouse, D. A., J. B. Turpen, and J. G. Sharp. 1985. Thymic non-lymphoid cells. Surv. Immunol. Res. 4:120-134[Medline]. |
| 11. | Defresne, M. P., C. Humblet, A. M. Rongy, R. Greimers, and J. Boniver. 1990. Effects of interferon and tumor necrosis factor-alpha on lymphoepithelial interactions within thymic nurse cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:429-432[Medline]. |
| 12. | De Waal Malefijt, R., W. Leene, P. J. M. Roholl, J. Wormmeester, and K. A. Hoeben. 1986. T cell differentiation within thymic nurse cells. Lab. Investig. 55:25-34[Medline]. |
| 13. | Dipasquale, B., and G. Tridente. 1991. Immunohistochemical characterization of nurse cells in normal human thymus. Histochemistry 96:499-503[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Ewijk, W. V.,
P. L. Soest, and G. J. van Engh.
1981.
Fluorescence analysis and anatomic distribution of mouse T lymphocyte subset defined by monoclonal antibodies to the antigens Thy-1, Lyt-1, and T-200.
J. Immunol.
127:2594-2604 |
| 15. | Ezaki, T., K. Matsuno, and M. Kotani. 1991. Thymic nurse cells (TNC) in spontaneous thymoma BUF/Mna rats as a model to study their role in T-cell development. Immunology 73:151-158[Medline]. |
| 16. |
Fowlkes, B. J.,
L. Edison,
B. J. Mathieson, and T. M. Chused.
1985.
Early T lymphocytes. Differentiation in vivo of adult intrathymic precursor cells.
J. Exp. Med.
162:802-822 |
| 17. | Geenen, V., M. Defresne, F. Robert, J. Legros, P. Franchimont, and J. Boniver. 1988. The neurohormonal thymic microenvironment: immunocytochemical evidence that thymic nurse cells are neuroendocrine cells. Neuroendocrinology 47:365-368[Medline]. |
| 18. |
Goa, X.,
T. Nishimura,
Y. Takeuchi,
T. Sudo, and S. Habu.
1993.
Thymic nurse cell clone supports the differentiation of CD4 8 thymocytes into CD4+8+ thymocytes in vitro.
Immunol. Lett.
35:169-175[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19. | Hiramine, C., K. Hojo, M. Koseto, T. Nakagawa, and A. Mukasa. 1990. Establishment of a murine thymic epithelial cell line capable of inducing both thymic nurse cell formation and thymocyte apoptosis. Lab. Investig. 62:41-54[Medline]. |
| 20. | Holtfreter, H. B., and N. Cohen. 1987. In vitro behavior of thymic nurse cell-like complexes from mechanically and enzymatically dissociated frog tadpole thymuses. Am. J. Anat. 179:342-355[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. | Itoh, T., H. Doi, S. Chin, T. Nishimura, and S. Kasahara. 1988. Establishment of mouse thymic nurse cell clone from a spontaneous BALB/c thymic tumor. Eur. J. Immunol. 18:821-824[Medline]. |
| 22. | Jason, J. M., and C. A. Janeway. 1984. In vitro cultivation of nonlymphoid thymic cells: morphological and immunological characterization. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 30:214-226[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. | Kisielow, P., H. Bluthmann, U. D. Staerz, M. Steinmetz, and H. von Boehmer. 1988. Positive selection of antigen-specific T cells in thymus by restricting MHC molecules. Nature 333:742-743[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. | Kyewski, B. A., and H. S. Kaplan. 1982. Lymphoepithelial interactions in the mouse thymus: phenotypic and kinetic on thymic nurse cells. J. Immunol. 128:2287-2294[Abstract]. |
| 25. | Lepesant, H., H. Reggio, M. Pierres, and P. Naquet. 1990. Mouse thymic epithelial cell lines interact with and select a CD3low CD4+ CD8+ thymocyte subset through an LAF-1 dependent adhesion de-adhesion mechanism. Int. Immunol. 11:1021-1032[CrossRef]. |
| 26. | Li, Y., M. Pezzano, D. Philp, V. Reid, and J. Guyden. 1992. Thymic nurse cells exclusively bind and internalize CD4+ CD8+ thymocytes. Cell. Immunol. 140:495-506[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. | Lo, D., C. R. Reilly, L. C. Burkly, J. DeKoning, T. M. Laufer, and L. H. Glimcher. 1997. Thymic stromal cell specialization and the T-cell receptor repertoire. Immunol. Res. 16:3-14[Medline]. |
| 28. | Lorenz, R. G., and P. M. Allen. 1989. Thymic cortical epithelial cells can present self-antigens in vivo. Nature 337:560-562[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. | Lorenz, R. G., and P. M. Allen. 1989. Thymic cortical epithelial cells lack full capacity for antigen presentation. Nature 340:557-559[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. | Marrack, P., and J. Kappler. 1988. The T-cell repertoire for antigen and MHC. Immunol. Today 9:308-315[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 31. | McCormack, J. E., T. Wade, H. Morales, J. Kappler, and P. Marrack. 1991. Analysis of class II MHC structure in thymic nurse cells. Cell. Immunol. 138:413-422[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 32. | Nakashima, M., K. Mori, K. Maeda, H. Kishi, K. Hirata, M. Kawabuchi, and T. Watanabe. 1990. Selective elimination of double-positive immature thymocytes by a thymic epithelial cell line. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:47-53[Medline]. |
| 33. | Nishimura, T., Y. Takeuchi, Y. Ichimura, X. Goa, A. Akatsuka, N. Tamaoki, H. Yagita, K. Okumura, and S. Habu. 1990. Thymic stromal cell clone with nursing activity supports the growth and differentiation of murine CD4+8+ thymocytes in vitro. J. Immunol. 145:4012-4017[Abstract]. |
| 34. | Ohashi, P. S., H. Pircher, K. Burki, R. M. Zinkernagel, and H. Hengartner. 1990. Distinct sequence of negative or positive selection implied by thymocyte T-cell receptor densities. Nature 346:861-863[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. | Penit, C. 1986. In vitro thymocyte maturation. Budr labeling of cycling thymocytes and phenotypic analysis of their progeny support the single lineage model. J. Immunol. 137:2115-2121[Abstract]. |
| 36. | Penninger, J., T. Rieker, N. Roman, J. Klima, W. Salvenmoser, H. Dietrich, H. Stossel, and G. Wick. 1994. Ultrastructural analysis of thymic nurse cell epithelium. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:222-228[Medline]. |
| 37. | Penninger, J., and G. Wick. 1992. Thymic nurse cell lymphocytes react against self-major histocompatibility complex. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:79-83[Medline]. |
| 38. | Pezzano, M., Y. Li, Y. Yang, and J. Guyden. 1991. The immortalization of thymic nurse cells by SV40 virus. Cell. Immunol. 133:434-445[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 39. | Pezzano, M., D. Philp, S. Stephenson, Y. Li, V. Reid, R. Maitta, and J. C. Guyden. 1996. Positive selection by thymic nurse cells requires IL-1 beta and is associated with an increased Bcl-2 expression. Cell. Immunol. 169:174-184[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. | Pezzano, M., Y. Li, D. Philp, C. Omene, M. Cantey, G. Saunders, and J. C. Guyden. 1995. Thymic nurse cell rescue of early CD4+ CD8+ thymocytes from apoptosis. Cell Mol. Biol. 41:1099-1111[Medline]. |
| 41. | Pezzano, M., K. D. King, D. D. Philp, A. Adeyemi, B. Gardiner, J. Yang, M. Samms, W. Boto, and J. C. Guyden. 1998. A thymic nurse cell-specific monoclonal antibody. Cell. Immunol. 185:123-133[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 42. | Philp, D., M. Pezzano, Y. Li, C. Omene, W. Boto, and J. C. Guyden. 1993. The binding, internalization, and release of thymocytes by thymic nurse cells. Cell. Immunol. 148:301-315[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 43. | Rieker, T., J. Penninger, N. Roman, and G. Wick. 1995. Chicken thymic nurse cells: an overview. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 19:281-289[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 44. | Ritter, A., C. A. Suavage, and S. F. Cotmore. 1981. The human thymus microenvironment: in vivo identification of thymic nurse cells and other antigenically-distinct subpopulations of epithelial cells. Immunology 44:439-446[Medline]. |
| 45. | Roberts, F., V. Geenen, J. Schoenen, E. Burgeon, P. Defresne, J. J. Legros, and P. Franchimont. 1991. Colocalization of immunoreactive oxytocin, vasopressin and interleukin-1 in human thymic epithelia neuroendocrine cells. Brain Behav. Immunol. 5:102-115[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 46. | Roberts, F., and V. Geenen. 1992. Thymic neuropeptides and T-lymphocyte development. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 650:99-104[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 47. | Samms, M., F. Emanus, O. Osuji, M. Pezzano, and J. C. Guyden. 1999. Lysosomal-mediated degradation of apoptotic thymocytes within thymic nurse cells. Cell. Immunol. 197:108-115[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 48. | Scollay, R., and K. Shortman. 1985. Identification of early stages of T lymphocyte development in the thymus cortex and medulla. J. Immunol. 134:3632-3642[Abstract]. |
| 49. | Schwartz, R. H. 1989. Acquisition of immunologic self-tolerance. Cell 57:1073-1081[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 50. | Surh, C. D., and J. Sprent. 1994. T-cell apoptosis detected in situ during positive and negative selection in the thymus. Nature 372:100-103[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 51. | Swat, W., M. Dessing, H. von Boehmer, and P. Kisielow. 1993. CD69 expression during selection and maturation of CD4+8+ thymocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:739-746[Medline]. |
| 52. | Tousaint-Demylle, D., J-. M. Scheiff, and S. Haumount. 1990. Thymic nurse cells: morphological study during their isolation from murine thymus. Cell Tissue Res. 261:115-123[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 53. | Toussaint-Demylle, D., J.-M. Scheiff, and S. Haumont. 1991. Thymic accessory cell complexes in vitro and in vivo: morphological study. Cell Tissue Res. 263:291-301. |
| 54. | Van Ewijk, W., P. Kisielow, and H. Boehmer. 1990. Immunohistology of T cell differentiation in the thymus of H-Y-specific T cell receptor alpha/beta transgenic mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:129-137[Medline]. |
| 55. | van Vliet, E., M. Melis, and W. van Ewijk. 1984. Immunohistology of thymic nurse cells. Cell. Immunol. 87:101-199[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 56. | Villa-Verde, D., J. M. Lagrota-Candido, M. A. Vannier-Santos, R. Chammas, R. R. Brentani, and W. Savino. 1994. Extracellular matrix components of the mouse thymus microenvironment. IV. Modulation of thymic nurse cells by extracellular matrix ligands and receptors. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:659-664[Medline]. |
| 57. | Weissman, I. L. 1985. Thymic lymphocyte differentiation and thymic leukemogenesis. Int. J. Radia. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 11:57-64. |
| 58. | Wekerle, H., and U.-P. Ketelson. 1980. Thymic nurse cells- Ia bearing epithelium involved in T-lymphocyte differentiation? Nature 283:402-404[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 59. |
Wekerle, H.,
U.-P. Ketelson, and M. Ernst.
1980.
Thymic nurse cells. Lymphoepithelial cell complexes in murine thymuses: morphological and serological characterization.
J. Exp. Med.
151:925-944 |
| 60. | Whitlock, C. A., G. F. Tidmarsh, C. Muller-Sieburg, and I. L. Wiessman. 1987. Bone marrow stromal cell lines with lymphopoietic activity express high levels of a pre-B neoplasia-associated molecule. Cell 48:1009-1021[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»