Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, March 2005, p. 12-50, Vol. 69, No. 1
1092-2172/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MMBR.69.1.12-50.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois
SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Definitions The Physiological ''Switch'': Three Examples Shake flask culture: glucose. Shake flask culture: tryptone. Glucose-fed high-cell-density fermentation. Short History Scope LIFE IN THE COLON WHY CELLS EXCRETE ACETATE Limiting the Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle Recycling Coenzyme A Regenerating NAD+ Environmental Influences Excretion Pathways Acetate as an Acid ACETATE ACTIVATION PATHWAYS Acetate Dissimilation: the PTA-ACKA Pathway Mutant phenotypes. Expression profile. Acetate Assimilation: AMP-Forming ACS Mutant phenotypes. Glyoxylate bypass and gluconeogenesis. Expression profile. REGULATION OF THE ACETYL P POOL
Expression and Activity of the PTA-ACKA Pathway Availability of Pathway Substrates Measurements of the Acetyl P Pool
ACETYL P AS A GLOBAL SIGNAL
Energy Source for Transport Function in Signal Transduction Evidence in vitro. Evidence in vivo. (i) Chemotaxis. (ii) Nitrogen assimilation. (iii) Phosphate assimilation. (iv) Outer membrane porin expression and other OmpR-dependent behaviors. (v) Implications for biofilm development and pathogenesis. (vi) Implications for metabolic engineering. How Does Acetyl P Work?
What Does Acetyl P Signal?
Characteristics of RRs That Respond to Acetyl P In Vivo
Other Acetyl P-Forming Enzymes
Pyruvate oxidase. Sulfoacetaldehyde acetyltransferase. Phosphoketolase. Glycine reductase. ''FLIPPING THE SWITCH'': REGULATING acs TRANSCRIPTION Expression Profile acs Operon and Promoter Architecture Independent Regulation of Overlapping Promoters {sigma}70-Dependent Transcription Activation of acsP2 by CRP Negative Regulation by Nucleoid Proteins Negative regulation by FIS. Negative regulation by IHF. Independent regulation of acs transcription by FIS and IHF. Other Regulatory Factors Signals POST-TRANSCRIPTIONAL CONTROL Post-Transcriptional Control by the Csr System Post-Translational Control by Acetylation-Deacetylation AMP-ACS-Dependent Acetylation and Chemotaxis ACETATE SWITCH IN OTHER ORGANISMS PTA-ACKA/AMP-ACS Acetate Switch of the Gram-Positive Bacterium B. subtilis Acetate Assimilation by the PTA-ACK Pathway of an Industrial Corynebacterium sp. ADP-ACS/AMP-ACS Acetate Switch of Halophilic Archaea ''Propionate Switch'' of S. enterica Mammalian ''Acetate Switch'' CONCLUDING REMARKS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES
|
|
|---|
P), the high-energy intermediate of acetate dissimilation, is discussed, and conditions that influence its intracellular concentration are described. Evidence is provided that acetyl
P influences cellular processes from organelle biogenesis to cell cycle regulation and from biofilm development to pathogenesis. The merits of each mechanism proposed to explain the interaction of acetyl
P with two-component signal transduction pathways are addressed. A short list of enzymes that generate acetyl
P by PTA-ACKA-independent mechanisms is introduced and discussed briefly. Attention is then directed to the mechanisms used by cells to "flip the switch," the induction and activation of the acetate-scavenging AMP-ACS. First, evidence is presented that nucleoid proteins orchestrate a progression of distinct nucleoprotein complexes to ensure proper transcription of its gene. Next, the way in which cells regulate AMP-ACS activity through reversible acetylation is described. Finally, the "acetate switch" as it exists in selected eubacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, including humans, is described. |
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematics showing the "acetate switch" during aerobic growth in minimal medium supplemented with glucose as the sole carbon source (A) and in tryptone broth (B). The single-headed arrow points to the physiological acetate switch. OD, optical density. [glc] and [ace], extracellular glucose and acetate concentrations. [ser], [asp], [trp], [ala], [glu], and [thr], extracellular amino acid concentrations. The double-headed arrows denote the interval of amino acid consumption. [acCoA] and [ac P], intracellular acetyl-CoA and acetyl P concentrations.
|
Shake flask culture: glucose. Cells undergo an "acetate switch" during buffered growth on D-glucose (Fig. 1A). During exponential growth, cells consume the sugar and dissimilate acetate (195). Before they exhaust the sugar, however, the "switch" occurs and the cells coassimilate both acetate and the remaining sugar (325). This "switch" occurs just as the cells begin the transition to stationary phase, defined in this review as the moment that the cells begin to decelerate their growth.
Shake flask culture: tryptone. During exponential growth on Bacto Tryptone broth (an unbuffered, essentially carbohydrate-free mixture of amino acids and small peptides), cells of E. coli consume amino acids in a strictly preferential order (Fig. 1B). First, they consume L-serine and then L-aspartate, while dissimilating acetate, which acidifies the unbuffered medium. As these cells begin the transition to stationary phase, they consume L-tryptophan while assimilating acetate. This consumption of acetate, combined with evolution of ammonia from amino acid metabolism, alkalinizes the medium. On entry into stationary phase, the cells consume a mixture of amino acids, two acetogenic (L-threonine and L-alanine) and one nonacetogenic (L-glutamate). The result is net acetate excretion, albeit to levels lower than those achieved during exponential growth. Because of the continued evolution of ammonia, the environment remains alkaline (78, 358, 359). Thus, the physiological switch can flip back and forth depending on the acetogenic nature of the amino acid(s) presently under consumption.
Glucose-fed high-cell-density fermentation. The feeding of glucose in a nonlimiting manner to an aerobic fermentation (buffered at pH 7.0) results in an extended growth phase. This extended growth phase results in high cell density accompanied by excretion of large amounts of acetate. These glucose-fed fermentations begin with a glucose-consuming, acetogenic exponential phase during which oxygen is consumed and carbon dioxide evolves. Near the end of exponential growth, the fermentation pauses for a short interval. During this pause, cells halt the consumption of oxygen and the evolution of carbon dioxide. After about 30 min, fermentation reinitiates. Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide evolution resume as the culture cometabolizes glucose and acetate. Despite buffering, a transient increase in pH accompanies the consumption of acetate (241).
P), the high-energy intermediate of the dissimilation pathway, might function as a global signal (298, 463). Today, mounting evidence suggests that, indeed, acetyl
P plays such a role, regulating cellular processes as diverse as nitrogen assimilation, osmoregulation, flagellar biogenesis, pilus assembly, capsule biosynthesis, biofilm development, and pathogenicity (24, 25, 187, 273, 274, 291, 322, 343, 354, 355, 358, 473).
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Acetyl-CoA (acCoA) sits at the crossroads of central metabolism.
|
P, the high-energy intermediate of acetate dissimilation. The review describes how cells regulate the size of the acetyl
P pool, presents evidence that acetyl
P can act as a global signal that influences diverse cellular processes, and addresses the mechanism(s) by which acetyl
P might exert its influence. Next, it focuses on the molecular mechanisms that facilitate the "switch" from acetate dissimilation to acetate assimilation. These mechanisms regulate transcription from the complex acs promoter and the activity of AMP-ACS. Finally, it describes variants of the "acetate switch" found in other eubacterial species, selected archaea, and humans. Although this review does not exhaustively review the literature concerning acid and organic acid stress, the topic is addressed in passing. It also does not directly review efforts to metabolically engineer the "acetate switch," although much of the information provided will aid researchers interested in such endeavors. |
|
|---|
Subsequent neonatal exposure to microbes through diet, and the competition between these microbes for limited nutrients and specific niches, cause the colonic microbiota to diversify (142, 143). The diversified adult colon hosts a complex flora, consisting of more than 50 genera and 400 species, generally attached as biofilms to particulate intestinal materials and embedded in the mucus layer that coats the colonic epithelial cells (colonocytes). This flora includes large numbers (1010 to 1011 per g) of anaerobes. It also contains a smaller number of facultative organisms, including E. coli, that maintain the reduced environment required by strict anaerobes. Some of these anaerobes, primarily members of the genera Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides, ferment dietary fibercomplex polysaccharides not digested and absorbed in the upper gutto simple sugars and SCFA. Other anaerobes, mainly Peptostreptococcus and Fusobacterium, as well as certain facultative organisms, e.g., Enterococcus and E. coli, presumably cross-feed on those simple sugars and SCFA (101, 283, 284, 341).
In the colon, acetogenic sugars arise from diet, bacterial metabolism, or the host-secreted mucus (143, 352, 460). This mucus, which overlays colonocytes, is a complex gel of glycolipids, glycoproteins, and a variety of sugar residues, including N-acetylglucosamine, N-acetylgalactosamine, D-galactose, fucose, sialic acids, glucuronate, galacturonate, and gluconate (5). When stripped from mucus, these sugar residues provide carbon that permits rapid growth while contributing to the local accumulation of acetate and other SCFA. As in culture, the nature of the carbon source(s) dictates colonic pH, which can vary from 6 to 8 (14, 55, 102).
SCFA constitute approximately two-thirds of the colonic anion concentration (70 to 130 mM), mainly as acetate, propionate, and butyrate. Of these, acetate predominates. These SCFA, rapidly absorbed by the colonic mucosa, represent the primary energy source for colonocytes, hepatic cells, fat cells, and muscle cells (283, 284, 300, 313, 447). SCFA also perform functions of considerable significance to the health of the host (36, 37, 352, 397, 460). Finally, they enhance the virulence of certain enteric pathogens, including E. coli and other members of the Enterobacteriaceae, mostly by inducing protective mechanisms (39, 122, 255, 260, 270, 377).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. The pathways of central metabolism. For glycolysis, only some of the intermediates and enzymes of glycolysis are noted. PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; Pyr, pyruvate; PFK, phosphofructokinase; TPIA, triosephosphate isomerase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; PDHC, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. For acetate metabolism: POXB, pyruvate oxidase; PTA-ACKA, phosphotransacetylase-acetate kinase pathway; ACS, AMP-forming acetyl-CoA synthetase. The dotted arrows denote the proposed PDHC bypass formed by POXB and AMP-ACS. For the TCA cycle: CS, citrate synthase; ACN, aconitase; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; 2-KG, 2-ketoglutarate; KGDH, 2-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase; SCSC, succinyl-CoA synthetase complex; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase; FUMA, fumarase; MDH, malate dehydrogenase; OAA, oxaloacetate. FRD, fumarate reductase, expressed under anaerobic conditions, bypasses SDH. For the glyoxylate bypass: ICL, isocitrate lyase; MAS, malate synthase; IDHK/P, isocitrate dehydrogenase kinase/phosphatase. Underlines and dashed arrows denote enzymes and steps unique to the glyoxylate bypass. For gluconeogenesis: PPSA, PEP synthase; PCKA, pyruvate carboxykinase; MAEB and SFCA, malic enzymes. Boxes and double-lined arrows denote enzymes and steps unique to gluconeogenesis.
|
This branched version occurs because the absence of oxygen severely inhibits the expression of many TCA cycle enzymes, but most dramatically succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), the succinyl-CoA synthetase complex (SCSC), and KGDH. A more moderate inhibition occurs in the presence of excess glucose (160, 170, 193, 212, 335-339, 413).
In the absence of oxygen, the oxygen-sensitive global regulators ArcA and FNR mediate the repression of many TCA promoters, but most dramatically the sdh-suc operon, which encodes SDH, KDGH, and the SCSC (104, 105, 170, 293, 335, 339, 406). The mechanism that causes glucose repression, and thus the Crabtree effect, is less clear. Glucose represses sdh-suc indirectly through the action of EIICB(Glc), but the mechanism remains a mystery (439). The membrane-bound EIICB(Glc), part of the phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS), phosphorylates and translocates glucose. This process causes dephosphorylation of EIICB(Glc) (351). Dephosphorylated EIICB(Glc) sequesters Mlc, a global repressor of genes that encode certain sugar-metabolizing enzymes and their uptake systems, including ptsG, the gene that encodes EIICB(Glc). Thus, translocation of glucose by EIICB(Glc) relieves Mlc-dependent repression, which permits expression of these glucose-activated genes. For a review, see reference 349.
For sdh-suc and other glucose-repressed promoters, however, the mechanism remains murky. The process does not involve Mlc directly (439), nor does it involve perturbations in the PEP pool (81, 82). Glucose translocation by EIICB(Glc) dephosphorylates EIIA(Glc), the immediate phosphoryl donor of the PTS. Dephosphorylated EIIA(Glc) causes inducer exclusion, by binding and inhibiting other sugar permeases (for reviews, see references 351 and 434). Dephosphorylation of EIIA(Glc) also may reduce cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels by reducing the activity of adenylate cyclase (351, 434), although this model has been disputed (239). However, despite the presence of putative DNA binding sites for the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) (472), it appears that cAMP-CRP does not control sdh-suc transcription directly (339). Apparently, another global carbon regulator, Cra (also known as FruR), also is not involved (339). Attempts to solve this puzzle are clearly warranted, especially given the negative effect exerted by acetate on the production of recombinant products during aerobic glucose-fed high-cell-density fermentations (15, 38, 174, 196, 219, 280, 332, 477).
Because the CoA pool is limiting, its composition responds readily to the quality and quantity of the carbon source. This response is observed largely as a change in the ratio of acetyl-CoA to CoASH, whose concentrations vary inversely (84, 85). The nature of the carbon source affects this ratio. The addition to starved cells of assimilable carbon sources, e.g., D-glucose, causes this ratio to increase rapidly. In contrast, acetate, succinate, and nonassimilable sugars exert little or no effect on this ratio (85). This behavior explains, at least in part, why acetyl-CoA levels rise and then fall during growth on D-glucose and in tryptone broth (86, 360). The acetyl-CoA pool peaks during consumption of assimilable, acetogenic carbon sources and diminishes as the cells assimilate the previously excreted acetate (Fig. 1). Not surprisingly, this behavior correlates inversely with that of the TCA cycle, which becomes repressed during growth on D-glucose (6, 320, 342) and induced during growth on acetate (226, 329, 342).
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Pathways for the excretion of partially oxidized metabolites. Excreted metabolites are underlined. LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PFL, pyruvate-formate lyase; PTA, phosphotransacetylase; ACKA, acetate kinase; ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase; FDO, aerobic formate dehydrogenase; FHL, formate-hydrogen lyase.
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Acetate activation pathways. PDHC, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; POXB, pyruvate oxidase; PTA, phosphotransacetylase; ACKA, acetate kinase; ACS, AMP-forming acetyl-CoA synthetase; PPase, pyrophosphatase; TCA, tricarboxylic acid cycle; GB, glyoxylate bypass. The dotted arrows denote the proposed PDHC bypass formed by POXB and AMP-ACS.
|
The resultant acetyl-CoA follows two alternative fates: either conversion to acetate or reduction to ethanol. The conversion of acetyl-CoA to acetate, catalyzed by the PTA-ACKA pathway, generates two ATP molecules per glucose but consumes no reducing equivalents (Fig. 4). The reduction of acetyl-CoA to ethanol, catalyzed by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), sacrifices energy but consumes reducing equivalents. Thus, by modulating the amount of ethanol and acetate it excretes, a cell can balance its requirement to regenerate NAD+ with its need for energy (for a review, see reference 54).
Acetate also can be excreted through the action of a third pyruvate-decarboxylating enzyme, pyruvate oxidase (POXB). Until recently, POXB had remained a mystery. This respiratory enzyme catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate directly to acetate. The reaction produces carbon dioxide and reduces flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) (Fig. 3 and 5) (48, 49, 150). While the PDHC and PFL are considered essential enzymes, POXB generally has been regarded as nonessential and potentially wasteful (79, 80, 159). Mounting evidence, however, suggests that POXB provides energy and acetyl groups (as acetyl-CoA) under the microaerophilic conditions that prevail between exponential growth and stationary phase. Its transcription, dependent on
s, is induced in the early stationary phase. Although it is expressed maximally during aerobic growth, some expression does occur during anaerobic growth (80). POXB null mutants grow less efficiently than their wild-type parent. When overexpressed or expressed constitutively, POXB can substitute for the PDHC, albeit less efficiently. Thus, it has been proposed that POXB contributes substantially to aerobic growth efficiency (2). How does POXB perform this function? After prolonged incubation (in the absence of acetate), mutants that lack the PDHC form microcolonies, whose development depends on a functioning POXB (79). The simplest model has POXB and AMP-ACS forming a pyruvate-to-acetyl-CoA bypass of PDHC (2) (Fig. 3 and 5), a model easily tested by the construction of mutants that lack both the PDHC and AMP-ACS. Some existing evidence, however, is consistent with POXB and AMP-ACS functioning at the same time: cells appear to coordinate the induction of acs and poxB transcripts (347), while poxB mutants exhibit reduced acs transcription (249).
|
|
|---|
P and CoASH, while ACKA reversibly converts acetyl
P and ADP to acetate and ATP (Fig. 5) (385). Thus, the PTA-ACKA pathway couples energy metabolism with those of carbon and phosphorus (463, 465). This pathway also can interconvert propionyl-CoA and propionate (385). Thus, it also functions in
-ketobutyrate metabolism (457), degradation of fatty acids with odd numbers of carbons, the assimilation of propionate, and, in Salmonella, growth on 1,2-propandiol as a carbon and energy source (331).
Mutant phenotypes.
During shake flask growth, PTA-deficient mutants (pta or pta ackA) do not accumulate extracellular acetate (171, 172, 224, 360) (Table 1). In contrast, mutants that lack ACKA (ackA) accumulate small amounts of acetate (225, 360), which probably accumulates because the acetyl
P produced by PTA is labile at physiological pH (61). During high-cell-density fermentations, pta or ackA mutants each accumulate a fraction of the acetate accumulated by their wild-type parent (78, 93, 172, 224, 483). However, their specific acetate production differs: ackA mutants produce acetate like their wild-type parents, while pta mutants exhibit a considerably smaller specific acetate production (93). Some evidence suggests that the small amount of acetate produced by pta mutants does not result from POXB (78), suggesting the involvement of another acetate-producing pathway.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Summary of pta and ackA mutant phenotypes relative to the wild-type
|
Excretion of D-lactate by pta mutants appears to replace excretion of ethanol as the primary mechanism for NAD+ regeneration. Excretion of L-glutamate is consistent with the observation that pta mutants up-regulate many TCA cycle genes (see below) and that aerobic growth on glucose represses KGDH (78, 439). The reduction in formate and dihydrogen levels suggests that the status of the PTA-ACKA pathway influences PFL activity (482), while the reduction in ethanol excretion supports the link between acetate (via the PTA-ACKA pathway) and ethanol (via ADH) as products of acetyl-CoA cleavage. Heterologous expression, in pta mutant cells, of enzymes or pathways that use acetyl-CoA as their substrate restores the wild-type pattern of fermentation products (with the exception of acetate) (78, 118, 482). These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that the PTA-ACKA pathway functions as an overflow pathway for excess carbon and that, in its absence, the cell uses alternative pathways to spill its excess carbon.
Cells that lack part or all of the PTA-ACKA pathway grow more slowly than their wild-type parents when grown aerobically in tryptone-based media, in defined minimal media supplemented with pyruvate, or in aerobic or anaerobic fermentations (61, 78, 93, 118, 172, 225, 240, 297, 466, 473, 482). In contrast, no defect occurs during growth on the nonacetogenic carbon source glycerol or the gluconeogenic carbon source succinate (78). The heterologous expression, in pta mutants cells, of enzymes or pathways that use acetyl-CoA as their substrate partially alleviates the growth defect (78, 118, 482). Thus, the growth defect might result from pyruvate accumulation, which would reduce the PEP/pyruvate ratio and, hence, lower the rate of substrate uptake by the PTS (78, 269, 340). Alternatively, it might be explained by a redox imbalance. Note that pta mutants cannot grow anaerobically on glucose unless they also lack ADH. These pta adh double mutants grow anaerobically on glucose by excreting the less reduced D-lactate via LDH instead of the highly reduced ethanol via ADH (Fig. 4). Furthermore, pta adh double mutants cannot grow anaerobically on sorbitol (a more reduced hexose than glucose) or glucuronate (a more highly oxidized hexose acid). Thus, the inability of pta mutants to grow anaerobically may result from redox imbalance (171). A similar imbalance might cause slowed aerobic growth of pta mutants, a problem that a heterologous acetyl-CoA-draining pathway could alleviate by depleting the acetyl-CoA pool and thus reducing the need to balance reducing equivalents.
Expression profile. Slonczewski and coworkers (240) compared the proteome of wild-type cells to those lacking both PTA and ACKA. Similarly, Wolfe et al. (473) compared the transcriptomes of wild-type cells to those of mutants that lacked either ACKA alone or both PTA and ACKA. These analyses suggest that PTA-ACKA pathway mutants use a number of strategies in an attempt to cope with the loss of the energy-producing PTA-ACKA pathway. They increase the expression of TCA cycle enzymes, boost the expression of central glycolytic enzymes, and elevate the expression of a protein that facilitates PFL activity in the presence of oxygen (Table 1). In contrast, they do not increase the expression of the CoASH biosynthetic pathway or of enzymes involved in fatty acid biosynthesis, gluconeogenesis, or other fermentation pathways, including LDH and ADH. These mutants do, however, act as if they experience stress, especially that associated with the envelope and exposure to acid (240, 473). Indeed, their behavior resembles that of wild-type cells exposed to high acetate concentrations, an environment that results in down-regulated PTA expression (240).
Relative to their wild-type parents, both pta ackA and ackA mutants increase the steady-state transcript levels of genes that encode much of the TCA cycle (see Table S3 in the supplemental material of reference 473). They increase gltA (CS), icdA (IDH), sucD (a subunit of the SCSC), sucA (a subunit of KGDH), lpdA (a subunit of both the SCSC and PDHC), mdh, and b0725 (annotated as a hypothetical protein, but possibly only the 5' untranslated portion of the sdh-suc transcript) expression. This response suggests that PTA-ACKA pathway mutants attempt to compensate by using the TCA cycle to recycle CoASH and to generate ATP and is consistent with L-glutamate excretion. When coupled with the knowledge that both glucose starvation and anerobiosis increase the expression of the PTA-ACKA pathway while decreasing that of the TCA cycle enzymes and subunits IDH, SUCC, SUCB, SDHA, and LPDA (324), this response implies that elevated carbon flux through the PTA-ACKA pathway somehow decreases the expression of the TCA cycle. Because pta mutants survive glucose starvation poorly while ackA mutants survive about as well as their wild-type parents, Nyström proposed that acetyl
P might mediate this starvation response (324). However, heterologous expression in a pta mutant of an acetyl-CoA-draining pathway improves survival. Thus, Pan and coworkers have argued against Nyström's hypothesis (78). Interpretation of these studies remains problematic because of the intimate links between acetyl
P synthesis and acetyl-CoA levels. Future studies might benefit from a molecular and/or genetic system that uncouples this relationship, i.e., a system that permits acetyl
P synthesis without manipulating the acetyl-CoA pool or adding exogenous acetate, which can alter both the external and internal pH.
Both pta ackA and ackA mutants increase the steady-state level of the gapA transcript, which encodes GAPDH, the enzyme that catalyzes the NAD+-dependent oxidation of glyceraldehyde-3-P (Fig. 3). Similarly, pta ackA mutants increase the expression of triosephosphate isomerase, which catalyzes the interconversion of dihydroxyacetone phosphate and glyceraldehyde-3-P, just prior to the reaction catalyzed by GAPDH (Fig. 3) (240, 473). Note that both these mutants also up-regulate pfkB, which encodes the minor isoform of phosphofructokinase (473). Thus, pta ackA mutants may compensate by increasing carbon flux toward pyruvate. If so, then this compensation should increase the excretion of pyruvate and D-lactate, as observed (78, 482), and increase the amount of NADH.
PTA-ACKA- and ACKA-deficient mutants increase the steady-state levels of the YfiD protein and its transcript (240, 473). It has been proposed that YfiD acts as a substitute glycyl radical domain used by oxygen-stressed cells to repair oxygen-induced damage to the glycyl radical of PFL (461). Consistent with this hypothesis, growth in the presence of pyruvate or under microaerobic conditions elevates the level of YfiD (50, 290), while the pyruvate-sensitive regulator PdhR and the oxygen-sensitive global regulators FNR and ArcA control yfiD transcription (290, 476). Cells also up-regulate YfiD when exposed to low pH (50, 476) or to the organic acids propionate (50), benzoate (476), or acetate (240). Up-regulation also occurs in cells that express the heterologous FNR protein HlyX (161) or a heterologous acetyl-CoA-draining pathway (175). Intriguingly, peptidoglycan-free L-forms up-regulate YfiD, which appears as a phosphoprotein (141). In contrast, cells entrapped in gels down-regulate YfiD (344), as do those that overproduce threonine and excrete less acetate (262) or lack the global regulator FlhDC or the aerotaxis receptor Aer (356). Since YfiD is induced in acidic and/or microaerobic environments, it has been proposed to prevent the accumulation of acidic fermentation products by facilitating carbon flux through PFL (476). It remains unclear why PTA-ACKA pathway mutants attempt to compensate for their reduced ability to process acetyl-CoA by increasing the efficiency of an enzyme complex (PFL) whose products include acetyl-CoA. Perhaps these cells drive PFL backwards, thereby producing pyruvate and D-lactate instead of formate, as proposed by Slonczewski and coworkers to explain why formate results in reduced expression of acetate-induced proteins (424).
pta mutants resist extreme acid stress better than their wild-type parents do, a behavior that depends on crl, which encodes a transcription factor required for most
s-dependent phenomena (240). Consistent with their enhanced resistance to extreme acid stress, PTA-ACKA pathway mutants increase transcript and/or protein expression of Crl and a subset of
s regulon members (240, 473). This subset also includes a hyperosmotic stress-induced protein (OsmY), a stationary-phase-induced nucleoid protein (Dps) that contributes to acid and oxidative stress tolerance, and two periplasmic chaperones (HdeA and HdeB) induced by extreme acid stress. It also includes PFKB and the tryptophan repressor binding protein WrbA.
Transcripts of other genes implicated in stress responses also accumulate, most notably those that encode key chaperones and heat shock proteins (DnaK, GroEL, GroES, and ClpB) (473). The levels of most of these transcripts and/or proteins also become elevated in cells exposed to benzoate (256) or in those that express a heterologous acetyl-CoA-draining pathway (175). Other up-regulated stress genes include yhiE (which encodes a hypothetical protein implicated in the response to acid stress) and slp (encoding an outer membrane protein induced by carbon starvation). They also include ivy (formerly known as yfkE) (240, 473), whose gene product inhibits vertebrate C-type lysozyme.
In addition to HdeA and HdeB, increased expression of several other genes and/or proteins suggests that PTA-ACKA pathway mutants experience stress that affects the ability of the cell to fold, assemble, and/or insert envelope proteins. Such mutants up-regulate rseA, which encodes a negative regulator of
E, the sigma factor that responds specifically to periplasmic stress. They up-regulate RfbX, a putative O-antigen transporter. They also increase the expression of the outer membrane protease OmpT (240, 473). Finally, mutants that lack both PTA and ACKA, but not those that lack only ACKA, up-regulate the outer membrane porin OmpC (240, 473).
Several envelope- and/or stress-associated transcripts become down-regulated in PTA-ACKA pathway mutants (see Table S4 in the supplemental material of reference 473). These include genes that encode an outer membrane porin (OmpF), a component of the general secretory apparatus (SecG), a sugar-binding integral membrane component of a PEP-PTS system (GlvC, also known as PtiC), and a cytoplasmic, ribose binding component of the high-affinity ribose transport system (RbsD). They also include genes encoding a flagellar biosynthetic chaperone (FlgN), a hypothetical fimbrial chaperone (YqiH), and a capsule biosynthetic protein of unknown function (WcaM). Finally, they include genes that encode the protein repair enzyme isoaspartyl dipeptidase (Iad) and a cold shock protein (CspC) (240, 473). CspC stabilizes the rpoS transcript (346); thus, one might expect a decrease in the transcription of
s-dependent genes. Instead PTA-ACKA pathway mutants increase transcription of these genes, which argues that CspC does not play a key regulatory role under these conditions. Note that the two-component sensor RcsC negatively regulates yqiH, glvC and cspC. In contrast, it increases the expression of ivy and osmY (129), genes up-regulated in PTA-ACKA pathway mutants.
Although reversible in vitro, this reaction is irreversible in vivo because of the presence of intracellular pyrophosphatases (PPase). This high-affinity pathway (Km of 200 µM for acetate), therefore, functions only anabolically, scavenging for small amounts of environmental acetate (61, 251). The reversible PTA-ACKA pathway also can assimilate acetate, but only in relatively large concentrations, because the enzymes of this low-affinity pathway possess Km values for their substrates in the 7 to 10 mM range (61, 251).
Because acetate freely permeates the membrane in its undissociated form (56, 233, 375, 390), assimilation does not require a dedicated transport system. However, under certain circumstances acetate uptake is saturable, suggesting that such a system exists (224). Recently, Gimenez et al. reported the existence of an acetate permease (ActP, formerly YjcG) and provided evidence for the existence of a second acetate transporter. The authors propose that these systems play critical roles when cells scavenge for micromolar concentrations of acetate (153).
Mutant phenotypes.
Cells that lack AMP-ACS (acs) grow poorly on low concentrations of acetate (
2.5 mM) as their sole carbon and energy source (251). In contrast, cells defective for all or part of the reversible PTA-ACKA pathway grow poorly on higher concentrations of acetate (
25 mM) (61, 224, 251). Since growth on low concentrations of acetate depends on AMP-ACS while growth on high concentrations requires the PTA-ACKA pathway, mutants that lack both cannot grow on acetate at any concentration (251). The inability to grow on acetate at any concentration argues against compensation by other acetate-activating enzymes, such as propionyl-CoA synthetase, encoded by prpE (201), or the propionate kinases, encoded by tdcD in E. coli or Salmonella enterica (186) or by pduW in S. enterica (52, 331). PrpE can use acetate as an alternative substrate (201); thus, PrpE can restore growth on acetate to acs pta ackA mutants, but only when expressed from a high-copy-number plasmid and then only poorly (S. Kumari and A. J. Wolfe, unpublished data). Similarly, AMP-ACS can activate propionate; thus, cells must lack both AMP-ACS and PrpE (acs prpE) before they can no longer grow on low concentrations of propionate (201).
In contrast to null mutants of acs, those that lack actP grow about as well as their wild-type parent on all concentrations of acetate tested. Gimenez et al. explain this puzzling result by noting that the lowest concentration tested (2.5 mM) is 50 times higher than the Km for ActP (5.4 µM). Since AMP-ACS possesses a Km of 200 µM for acetate, the authors propose that ActP functions with AMP-ACS to scavenge acetate at considerably lower concentrations than those tested (153). The observation that acs mutants compete poorly with their wild-type parent during prolonged starvation (A. J. Wolfe, unpublished data) is consistent with this proposal. Presumably, acs cells cannot scavenge for the small amounts of acetate released into the environment by dying cells. If so, then AMP-ACS (and perhaps ActP) should play critical competitive roles in any environment depleted of primary carbon sources.
When grown aerobically in shake flask culture, acs mutant cells grow as rapidly and accumulate as much acetate as their wild-type parents do (249, 251), exhibiting only a slight reduction in total biomass (A. J. Wolfe and C. M. Beatty, unpublished data). This reduction probably occurs because they cannot assimilate the previously excreted acetate even though they possess a fully functionally PTA-ACKA pathway (249, 251). Although reversible, the PTA-ACKA pathway generally does not participate in the assimilation of excreted acetate by cells grown in shake flask culture. This inability to participate in acetate assimilation arises because the extracellular acetate concentration generally does not exceed 1 mM and the enzymes of this low-affinity pathway possess Km values for their substrates in the 7 to 10 mM range (61, 251). In contrast, the PTA-ACKA pathway contributes to acetate assimilation during high-cell-density fermentation, probably because such growth results in considerably larger concentrations of extracellular acetate (93, 241, 455).
In glucose-controlled high-cell-density fermentation, the behavior of the acs mutant is puzzling. It grows initially with the same maximum specific growth rate as its wild-type parent. Growth slows, however, after a few hours and the culture achieves less than half the final biomass attained by the wild-type parent. Intriguingly, acs mutants accumulate only about a quarter as much extracellular acetate (1.8 g/liter, compared to 6.9 g/liter for the wild-type), while their specific production of acetate falls to about half. These results may implicate AMP-ACS in the control of carbon flux through the PTA-ACKA pathway (93). They also may indicate that AMP-ACS controls the expression and/or activity of the glyoxylate bypass (GB) of the TCA cycle (Fig. 3). During high-cell-density fermentations, the acs mutant achieves extracellular acetate concentrations high enough to permit assimilation by the low-affinity PTA-ACKA pathway (93). If the absence of AMP-ACS permits increased carbon flux through the GB, then the AMP-ACS-deficient mutant might accumulate extracellular acetate to a level lower than predicted by its specific rate of production. Indeed, two predictions of this model appear likely. First, a derivative of E. coli K-12 (JM109) accumulates considerably more extracellular acetate than does a derivative of E. coli B (BL21), although both produce acetate at the same specific rate (456). The GB appears to provide much of the difference. Flux and transcription analyses show that JM109 possesses a relatively inactive GB. In contrast, the GB of BL21 is considerably more active (323, 347). Second, acs mutants exhibit substantially elevated aceBAK transcription (Wolfe and Beatty, unpublished). Efforts to elucidate the relationship between the expression of AMP-ACS and that of the GB should help us understand why cells undergo the Crabtree effect.
Glyoxylate bypass and gluconeogenesis. To assimilate acetate through either AMP-ACS or the reversible PTA-ACKA pathway, E. coli cells also require the GB (to replenish the TCA cycle) and gluconeogenesis (to provide sugar phosphates). Using two unique enzymes, isocitrate lyase (ICL) and malate synthase (MAS), induced during growth on acetate or fatty acids, the GB bypasses the two oxidative steps in the TCA cycle that evolve CO2 (Fig. 3). By avoiding the loss of two carbons at the expense of energy production, the GB permits the net accumulation of four-carbon biosynthetic precursors (e.g., succinate) during growth on two-carbon substrates (e.g., acetate) (for reviews, see references 90, 95, 100, and 246). Cells balance energy and biosynthetic needs, using exquisitely sensitive biochemical and genetic switches to control the flow of isocitrate through the TCA cycle and the GB. The biochemical switch modulates the activities of ICL and IDH (258). Whereas the phosphorylation of both ICL and IDH channels the flow of isocitrate into the GB, the dephosphorylation of both enzymes favors flow through the TCA cycle (203, 257). The genetic switch controls the aceBAK operon, which encodes ICL, MAS, and IDHK/P, the enzyme that reversibly phosphorylates IDH (44, 149). It involves repression by the GB regulator ICLR and activation by the nucleoid protein IHF and the global regulator Cra (also known as FruR) (reviewed in reference 95). ICLR also disassembles those transcription complexes that form, thereby augmenting its negative effect upon aceBAK transcription (478). For gluconeogenesis, PEP carboxykinase (PCKA) converts oxaloacetate (OAA) to PEP and the malic enzymes (encoded by sfcA and maeB) plus PEP synthase (PPSA) convert malate to PEP (329) (Fig. 3). Other gluconeogenic enzymes and reversible glycolytic enzymes drive the PEP toward glucose-6-phosphate. Note that Cra also activates genes that encode gluconeogenesis enzymes (319, 366, 367, 389).
Expression profile. Relative to growth on glucose, wild-type cells grown on high concentrations of acetate (42 or 84 mM) up-regulate the steady-state levels of the transcripts and proteins of the following enzymes and pathways: AMP-ACS, the GB, the TCA cycle, and gluconeogenesis. In contrast, these cells down-regulate the transcripts and proteins of the PTA-ACKA pathway, nonacetate carbon transport systems, and glycolytic enzymes (226, 328, 329, 342, 451). Expression profiling of acs mutants has not been reported.
P POOL
|
|
|---|
P pool should depend on the following factors: expression and activity of the pathway components, and the availability of pathway substrates. In E. coli, the steady-state levels of ackA and pta transcripts and their gene products ACKA and PTA, as well as their enzymatic activity, vary in response to diverse environmental factors. Oxygen tension is a major influence. Under anaerobic conditions, the levels of ACKA and PTA increase 8- and 10-fold (324) but their activities increase only 2- to 3-fold (61). In S. enterica, ackA transcription increases in response to anaerobiosis, but only about 2-fold (254). As described previously, the environmental pH and the presence of acetate both exert sizeable effects. During aerobic growth, the steady-state level of PTA decreases as the environment acidifies and increases as the alkalinity rises (424). In contrast, during anaerobic growth, the steady-state level of ACKA increases as the environment becomes more acidic (220). During growth on or after exposure to high concentrations of acetate, the levels of PTA protein and of pta and ackA transcripts decrease about two- to threefold (240, 328, 329, 451). Temperature also exerts an effect: as it increases, so too does PTA activity. In contrast, ackA transcription decreases (360). The richness of the medium also plays a role: the steady-state levels of both PTA and ACKA, and of ackA transcripts, rise three- to fivefold in glucose-supplemented rich medium relative to glucose-supplemented minimal medium (324, 440). A similar effect occurs on starvation: ACKA and PTA levels increase 1.5- and 3-fold, respectively (324). The nature of the carbon source influences ACKA and PTA activities, but only marginally; they double during growth on pyruvate, D-lactate, or D-gluconate relative to growth on all other carbon sources tested, including D-glucose and acetate. The increased PTA activity probably results from the ability of pyruvate to activate the enzyme (437). In contrast, the carbon source exerts no apparent effect on the level of transcript or protein in either E. coli (324) or S. enterica (254). Finally, NADH, ADP, and ATP inhibit PTA activity (437). Thus, a warm, alkaline, anaerobic, and nutrient-rich environment generally favors increased pathway expression and/or activity while a cool, acidic, aerobic, and acetate-rich environment does not.
P pool. This should be especially true when the concentrations of extracellular phosphate, the total intracellular CoA pool, and the energy charge in ATP and ADP remain constant (196, 297). Under these conditions, the steady-state concentration of acetyl
P should vary with the substrate (acetyl-CoA) and the product (acetate) and should be influenced by the same environmental factors that affect either. These factors include the acetogenic nature and amount of the carbon source, the availability of oxygen or nitrogen, the glycolytic flux, and the environmental pH and temperature.
P Pool
P in bacterial lysates have been reported on only a few occasions. Two biochemical approaches have been used: one that relies on two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography (53), and one that uses a coupled assay (208).
Prüß and Wolfe, using an adaptation of Hunt's assay, observed a strong correlation between the pools of acetyl
P and acetyl-CoA during growth in tryptone broth (Fig. 1B). Immediately following dilution of overnight cultures into fresh tryptone broth, acetyl
P was undetectable (
5 µM). The concentrations of both metabolic intermediates increased throughout the earliest stage of exponential growth, achieving a peak of 300 to 400 µM. The concentrations of both acetyl-CoA and acetyl
P decreased progressively, reaching about 20 µM by entry into stationary phase; that of acetyl
P remained low well into stationary phase (360). These results agree with measurements of acetyl-CoA levels in E. coli grown aerobically on glucose (86, 438). When one compares the consumption of amino acids with the accumulation of acetate and its activated derivatives, the following becomes apparent: acetyl-CoA and acetyl
P levels peak during the transition from L-serine to L-aspartate consumption, while extracellular acetate peaks during the transition from L-aspartate to L-tryptophan consumption. The reaccumulation of extracellular acetate during stationary phase occurs as cells cometabolize acetogenic amino acids, e.g. L-threonine and L-alanine, with those that require the TCA cycle, e.g., L-glutamate.
Using the two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography approach, McCleary and Stock showed that acetyl
P levels correlate with the acetogenic nature of the carbon source. Since the identity or quantity of the carbon source imposes only small effects on pathway activity and none on expression, these observations support the proposition that carbon flux exerts a major influence over the size of the acetyl
P pool. If the sole carbon source was either pyruvate or D-glucuronate, cells grown in low-phosphate defined medium, and harvested at midexponential phase, possessed high concentrations of acetyl
P (>1,000 µM). If the carbon source was D-glucose, they accumulated moderate amounts (300 µM). If the carbon source was D-fructose, glycerol, or fumarate, the levels were low or undetectable (
50 µM). Relative to cells harvested during exponential growth, those harvested during early stationary phase increased their acetyl
P pool three- to fourfold, but only if grown on D-glucose or D-fructose. If grown on pyruvate, in contrast, the pool decreased by two- to threefold (297). Note that cells grown on pyruvate behave quite similarly to cells grown in tryptone broth, i.e., elevated levels of acetyl
P during exponential growth and reduced levels during stationary phase (297, 360). This should not be surprising, since cells convert L-serine, the preferred carbon source in tryptone broth (359), to pyruvate by means of an energy-independent transaminase reaction (334).
Prüß and Wolfe also demonstrated a correlation between incubation temperature and the intracellular acetyl
P pool. At or below 34°C, they could not detect acetyl
P; above that temperature, the concentration increased. The influence of temperature became more obvious in mutant cells that lacked ACKA; acetyl
P could be detected at 34°C, and its concentration rose dramatically up to 40°C (360). These results are consistent with the observations that extracellular acetate correlates with temperature (250) and can be readily explained by reduced ackA transcription coupled with increased PTA activity (360). Using a similar rationale, one might predict elevated acetyl
P levels during growth on glycolytic intermediates at alkaline pH. Such an environment should favor synthesis of PTA over that of ACKA.
Indirect measures also have been performed, using acetyl
P-dependent reporter systems. The best example interconnects nitrogen assimilation and acetyl
P. In the absence of NRII, acetyl
P acts as the predominate source of phosphoryl groups for the activation of the NRI and, hence, the transcription of glnA (Fig. 6). Since glnA encodes the enzyme glutamine synthetase (GS), one can monitor acetyl
P concentrations indirectly by measuring GS activity. Using this assay, Atkinson and Ninfa demonstrated that the status of a cell's acetyl
P pool depends on its ability to modify GS and regulate its activity. An adenylyltransferase (ATase) inactivates GS; thus, one would expect ATase-deficient cells to exhibit elevated GS activity. Instead, cells that lack both ATase and NRII display reduced GS activity. Since this activity depends on PTA, the ATase must regulate acetyl
P levels. This regulation probably occurs indirectly by controlling flux through acetyl-CoA. Because L-glutamate, a GS substrate, is derived from 2-ketoglutarate, elevated GS activity may deplete TCA cycle intermediates. This would draw acetyl-CoA into the TCA cycle, diminish flux through the PTA-ACKA pathway, and hence reduce acetyl
P accumulation. In contrast, reduced GS activity should favor elevated acetyl
P levels (20, 127). Direct measurements should be performed to test these conclusions and those derived from other acetyl
P-sensitive reporter systems.
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Regulation of nitrogen assimilation. Uridylyltransferase (UTase) and uridylyl-removing enzyme (UR) sense the relative amount of nitrogen. Under limiting conditions, UTase uridylylates PII to PII-UMP. In excess nitrogen, the UR deuridylylates PII-UMP to PII. PII favors adenylyltransferase (ATase) activity. ATase inactivates GS by adenylylating it to GS-AMP. PII (or its ortholog GlnK) also enhances the phosphatase activity of the histidine kinase/phosphatase NRII, which then dephosphorylates NRI P. This diminishes transcription from the nitrogen-regulated promoters such as ntr, nac, glnK, and glnALG. In contrast, PII-UMP enhances the deadenylylation of GS-AMP, hence activating the enzyme. PII-UMP exerts no direct effect on NRII; however, the lack of PII favors the kinase activity of NRII, which donates its phosphoryl group to NRI. Acetyl P also donates its phosphoryl group to NRI. Transcription from the glnALG promoter requires low amounts of NRI P (thin arrow), whereas transcription from the other promoters requires high amounts of NRI P (thick arrows).
|
P AS A GLOBAL SIGNAL
|
|
|---|
P is a high-energy form of phosphate (271). It possesses a larger
G° of hydrolysis (43.3 kJ/mol) than ATP (30.5 kJ/mol in complex with Mg+). Thus, acetyl
P stores more energy than ATP and almost every other phosphorylated compound, with the notable exception of PEP (62.2 kJ/mol) (265, 459). This is the basis for its pivotal role in ATP generation by substrate phosphorylation, as well as several proposed energy-related and signaling roles.
P (or a compound derived from it) was proposed as the energy source for binding protein-dependent (BPD) ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters (197, 198). This proposal relied on metabolic inhibitors and mutants of the PTA-ACKA pathway to suggest a correlation between acetyl
P and transport by BPD-ABC transporters. Strains that lack the pta-ackA operon are not defective for transport of nutrients accumulated by BPD-ABC transporters (90, 197), and studies with a reconstituted transport system in isolated membrane vesicles showed that acetyl
P was not sufficient to energize transport (209). Given definitive evidence that ATP hydrolysis functions as the energy source, it appears that acetyl
P does not play this proposed role. For a review, see reference 8.
Acetyl
P also was proposed as an alternative to PEP as an energy source for the PTS (135). Working with purified proteins, Roseman and coworkers demonstrated a possible link between the PTA-ACKA pathway and the PTS. They showed that the purified phosphorylated form of EI of the PTS pathway can reversibly donate its phosphoryl group to purified ACKA and that this reaction permits the transfer of phosphate between EIIA of the PTS pathway and ACKA (135). Since acetyl
P acts as a substrate for the phosphorylation of ACKA (136), the authors argued that acetyl
P could function as an alternative phosphodonor for the uptake of PTS sugars. They proposed that such a transfer of phosphoryl groups could link the TCA cycle to the PTS, thereby permitting the energy charge (ATP/ADP ratio) and TCA cycle intermediates to regulate sugar transport (135). Since this reaction sequence has been demonstrated in vitro only, in vivo studies should be performed to determine whether this alternative pathway actually functions. If it does, then acetyl
P could help to energize sugar transport during overflow metabolism or anaerobic growth on sugar, during which acetyl
P accumulates.
P functioned as a global signal (298, 463) and that it might act through its ability to donate its phosphoryl group to certain members of the family of two-component signal transduction (2CST) systems (127, 279). The most fundamental of these two-component signal transduction (2CST) pathways consists of a sensor and a response regulator (RR) (Fig. 7A). The sensor, a histidine protein kinase (HK), autophosphorylates a conserved histidine residue, using ATP (but never acetyl
P) as its phosphoryl donor. The RR autophosphorylates on a conserved aspartate residue, using its phosphorylated cognate HK as its phosphoryl donor. Some HKs also possess phosphoaspartate phosphatase activity (hereafter called HKP), which may be their primary regulatory role (74, 279, 322). RRs also may be perceived as phosphatases, whose phosphorylated intermediate possesses a signaling function (393). Each of these phosphatases uses the phosphorylated form of its cognate HK as its substrate (298). Phosphohistidine phosphatases distinct from RRs also exist (292, 327, 378). For reviews, see references 148, 191, 429, 431, and 471.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. (A) Acetyl P can donate its phosphoryl group to two-component RRs. HK-P, histidine kinase/phosphatase. (B) Model depicting how acetyl P can influence diverse cellular processes through the RR OmpR and its ability to repress transcription of flhDC. In contrast to acetyl P-dependent control of flagellar biosynthesis, its control of cell division does not require FlhC. ED, Entner-Doudoroff.
|
P can interact with 2CST pathways. In vitro, many RRs clearly autophosphorylate using acetyl
P as their direct phosphoryl donor (Fig. 7A; Table 2). In vivo, however, the evidence for direct phosphorylation of RRs via acetyl
P remains less certain. Most, but not all, reports that acetyl
P can influence a RR-dependent behavior in vivo have relied on strains that lack the cognate HK (Table 2). Using this strategy, one manipulates acetyl
P levels by varying the carbon source and/or by using mutants that lack PTA, ACKA, or both. The RR-dependent behavior is monitored indirectly by measuring the activity of a known target or reporter. These studies have demonstrated a strong correlation between the status of the acetyl
P pool and the activation of some 2CST targets. Furthermore, an increasing minority of reports present evidence that acetyl
P can influence the activity of certain RRs, even in the presence of the respective cognate HK (Table 2). Several mechanisms could explain this behavior. It could result from elevated ATP levels (264, 324, 343). It could indicate that a compound derived from acetyl
P acts as the immediate phosphoryl donor (197, 198). It may reflect direct phosphorylation of a given RR, using acetyl
P as the phosphoryl donor (127, 238, 297, 298, 360). Alternatively, an unidentified mediator might facilitate RR phosphorylation at the expense of acetyl
P (127, 238, 264). A brief review of the evidence that acetyl
P can serve as a phosphoryl donor in vitro is presented here, followed by a few examples that show the utility of the HK deletion strategy, provide evidence that acetyl
P can influence the activity of certain RRs in vivo, and/or highlight salient outstanding issues. This is followed by evidence that acetyl
P can indeed influence certain RR-dependent behaviors, even in the presence of the cognate HK. Finally, the merits of the proposed mechanisms are debated. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. List of two-component RRs influenced by acetyl P
|
P as a phosphoryl donor to catalyze their own phosphorylation (Fig. 7A; Table 2). Other small phosphorylated compounds (carbamyl phosphate, phosphoramidate, monophosphoimidazole, and diphosphoimidazole) can perform a similar function, although no evidence exists that they perform this function in vivo. In contrast, neither ATP, PEP, nor creatine phosphate can donate their phosphoryl group to any RR (58, 115, 127, 190, 279, 296, 297, 376, 383, 411, 486). Each RR responds uniquely with respect to phosphoryl donor preference and its rate of autophosphorylation. Once phosphorylated, however, each RR behaves similarly by all criteria regardless of the phosphoryl donor, be it a small phosphorylated compound or a phosphorylated HK (127, 190, 279, 295, 297, 486).
Evidence in vivo. (i) Chemotaxis.
The first indication that an activated acetate might activate an RR in the absence of its cognate HK came from a study of the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. Using E. coli cells that expressed the chemotaxis RR CheY, but not its cognate HK CheA, Wolfe et al. found that exogenous acetate increased the clockwise (CW) rotation of flagellar motors, a behavior that requires CheY. By varying the growth conditions, using metabolic inhibitors and mutants defective for CoASH biosynthesis and acetate metabolism, these authors concluded that CheA-independent CheY activation involved AMP-ACS and/or the activated acetate acetyl-AMP (474). Subsequently, Dailey and Berg discovered that the acs mutant used in the initial study also exhibited substantially reduced ACKA activity. They reexamined the acetate effect and found that it depended on the ability of the cell to synthesize acetyl
P and the ability of CheY to accept a phosphoryl group, but did not depend on a functional PTS system (106). Later, it was shown that CheA-independent activation of CheY can occur by either of two mechanisms: (i) it can become phosphorylated using acetyl
P as its phosphoryl donor, or (ii) it can become acetylated by AMP-ACS using as its substrate either acetyl-CoA or both acetate and ATP (26). Chemotaxis itself, however, does not require ACKA, PTA, or therefore acetyl
P (106), most probably because the phosphotransfer from CheA to CheY is several orders of magnitude more efficient than the transfer from acetyl
P (109, 295, 411). The role of AMP-ACS and acetyl-AMP in chemotaxis remains more controversial (see below).
(ii) Nitrogen assimilation.
A complex sensory system monitors nitrogen availability (Fig. 6). By favoring the phosphatase activity of the HKP NRII, this sensory system reduces transcription of the glnALG operon, which encodes GS, which interconverts L-glutamate and ammonia with L-glutamine. The operon also encodes a 2CST pathway, composed of NRII (also known as NtrB and encoded by glnL) and its cognate RR NRI (also known as NtrC and encoded by glnG). In contrast, limiting nitrogen favors the kinase activity of NRII, which autophosphorylates a conserved histidine residue and then donates that phosphoryl group to NRI. In addition, NRI can accept its phosphoryl group from acetyl
P. Whereas small amounts of NRI
P suffice for glnALG transcription (thin arrow in Fig. 6), larger amounts are necessary for the transcription of genes (ntr) that facilitate the utilization of secondary nitrogen sources (thick arrows). For full glnA transcription, phosphoryl group donation by either NRII-P or acetyl
P suffices. In contrast, both donors are necessary for growth on certain secondary nitrogen sources, presumably because of the need for large amounts of NRI
P. For reviews, see references 322 and 370.
Evidence supporting the participation of acetyl
P in this regulatory scheme came from studies performed by Ninfa and coworkers. To examine the NRII-independent transcription of the glnALG operon, they constructed a nonpolar deletion of glnL, thus retaining an intact copy of glnG. They manipulated acetyl
P levels by varying the carbon source or by using mutants lacking PTA or both PTA and ACKA. They monitored the activity of the RR NRI indirectly by measuring GS activity. They found that GS activity depended on NRI and, in the absence of NRII, correlated directly with the ability of cells to synthesize acetyl
P. Since acetyl
P can donate its phosphoryl group directly to purified NRI, they proposed that this might be the mechanism used by intact cells (127). Recently, this relationship was used by Laio and coworkers to engineer an artificial quorum sensory circuit (67).
Strong evidence supports the notion that the reverse is true, i.e., that nitrogen availability plays a key role in the regulation of intracellular acetyl
P (20, 360). When harvested after several hours in stationary phase, cells that lack NRII (glnL) exhibit about eightfold-higher levels of acetyl
P than do their wild-type parents, a behavior that occurs whether the cells have been grown in tryptone broth (TB), TB plus yeast extract (LB), or LB supplemented with a source of excess nitrogen (i.e., L-glutamine) (360). Since acetyl
P can donate phosphate to NRI (127) and since NRII functions as an NRI
P phosphatase under the conditions tested (322), this observation argues that NRII and NRI drain phosphoryl groups from acetyl
P (20, 360). This hypothesis is consistent with the observation that glnL ackA double mutants grow poorly and accumulate suppressors while glnL pta ackA mutants do not (127). It remains to be seen whether glnL ackA mutants accumulate extremely elevated levels of acetyl
P and, if so, how those elevated levels influence the growth rate.
(iii) Phosphate assimilation. PhoR and CreC (formerly PhoM) are HKs that can donate their phosphoryl group to the RR PhoB (7, 288). When phosphorylated, PhoB activates transcription of the PHO regulon, including phoA, which encodes bacterial alkaline phosphatase (BAP) (287). Using the HK deletion strategy, Nakata and coworkers cloned the ackA gene serendipitously. Seeking the creC gene, they introduced a multicopy library of E. coli chromosomal fragments into a creC phoR strain (264) and screened for increased BAP activity. One such transformant carried ackA, which activated BAP expression only if overexpressed. Even then, the activity was considerably lower than that exhibited by wild-type cells or by phoR creC mutants that expressed creC from a plasmid. Since ackA overexpression also increased the intracellular ATP pool, the authors proposed that elevated ATP levels might facilitate autophosphorylation of a modulator protein that could cross talk to PhoB (264).
Subsequently, Wanner and Wilmes-Riesenberg showed that the induction of PhoR- and CreC-independent BAP activity depends completely on the ability to synthesize acetyl
P. They noted that phoR creC mutants exhibited a BAP+ phenotype on energy-rich media and found that spontaneous and transposon-induced BAP+ suppressors of a phoR creC strain mapped to ackA. They manipulated the level of acetyl
P by varying the carbon source and by introducing mutant alleles of pta or ackA or both. They monitored BAP activity and found that it correlated with the predicted acetyl
P levels. They proposed two alternative mechanisms for acetyl
P-dependent activation of PhoB: (i) indirect activation through a HK that senses acetyl
P or (ii) direct activation, most probably by phosphorylation (464, 466). To distinguish between these two possibilities, they unsuccessfully sought mutants that lacked the acetyl
P sensor (466). Instead, they identified additional mutants that influenced PhoR- and CreC-independent activation of the PHO regulon, including one with a mutation in the RR ompR (463). The subsequent attempt to understand this ompR effect highlighted several critical issues pertaining to the relationship between acetyl
P and 2CST systems. First, it demonstrated clearly that acetyl
P is responsible for PhoR-independent activation of the PHO regulon. It also showed that acetyl
P-dependent activation functions independently of CreC-dependent activation and that the relative contributions of acetyl
P and CreC depend on the carbon source and other characteristics of the culture medium. Second, it raised the possibility that E. coli possesses a PTA-independent mechanism for the synthesis of acetyl
P, albeit one that produces only very small amounts. When grown in rich medium supplemented with glucose, phoR creC mutants that lack PTA exhibited 22.5 times more BAP activity than did those that lack both PTA and ACKA (238). Since these assays were performed during stationary phase, a PTA-bypass consisting of POXB and ACKA is a possible candidate (Fig. 5). Similar bypasses have been demonstrated or implicated in other organisms (343, 387). Third, it highlighted significant differences in the physiology and behavior of cells grown under different growth regimens. For example, phoR creC mutants exhibited substantial BAP activity on a minimal defined medium supplemented with pyruvate but not on the same medium containing glucose. These cells also exhibited significant BAP activity on a tryptone-based medium supplemented with glucose but not in the absence of that sugar (238). During exponential growth, metabolism of D-glucose, pyruvate, and the L-serine present in tryptone all lead to elevated acetyl
P pools (297, 355, 360). As cells grown on D-glucose and pyruvate enter stationary phase, however, their behavior with respect to acetyl
P pools diverges (297). Also, these BAP assays were performed with cells harvested from late stationary phase, and the little we know about the status of the acetyl
P pool in stationary phase cells comes from early stationary phase. Thus, one must use caution when interpreting data obtained from stationary-phase cells grown with different carbon sources, at least until the relationship between the acetyl
P pool and nonexponential growth conditions has been examined more thoroughly. Fourth, it exposed an intriguing connection between the PhoR/PhoB and EnvZ/OmpR 2CST pathways. phoR creC mutants that also lacked the RR OmpR, while retaining its cognate HK EnvZ, displayed 50 to 200 times more BAP activity on glucose and 2 to 3 times more activity on pyruvate. For glucose, this additional activity depended on the presence of EnvZ and the ability to synthesize acetyl
P; for pyruvate, it depended on either. In all cases, EnvZ-dependent activation of PhoB required the absence of OmpR. Although the authors proposed several schemes to explain these observations (238), the mechanism by which acetyl
P and EnvZ collaborate to facilitate PhoB phosphorylation remains unknown. Indeed, there is much that we do not understand about EnvZ and its cognate RR, OmpR.
(iv) Outer membrane porin expression and other OmpR-dependent behaviors.
The EnvZ-OmpR 2CST system mediates the regulation of the outer membrane porins, OmpC and OmpF (211). Although OmpR phosphorylation depends primarily on EnvZ, the following evidence supports the existence of an alternative pathway that involves acetyl
P. Mutants that lack EnvZ retain some ability to phosphorylate OmpR (134) and hence can still regulate OmpC and OmpF expression (133, 394). In fact, the residual OmpF expression responds quite strongly to elevated osmolarity (133). The EnvZ-independent phosphorylation of OmpR depends, in large part, on the ability of cells to synthesize acetyl
P (291). Even in cells that retain EnvZ, acetyl
P can contribute to OmpR phosphorylation. In fact, acetyl
P appears to play the predominant role when the environment becomes acidic (pH <6) (187) or depleted of nitrogen (273, 274), conditions under which EnvZ kinase activity remains low (187, 273). Similarly, the OmpR-dependent induction of acid tolerance in S. enterica does not depend on EnvZ but, rather, on the ability to synthesize acetyl
P (24). In contrast, both EnvZ and acetyl
P appear necessary for the autoinduction of ompR (25), a requirement similar to that for transcription of ntr genes (322).
A series of studies firmly established that OmpR can control flagellar biosynthesis in an acetyl
P-dependent manner. First, Prüß and Wolfe demonstrated an inverse correlation between acetyl
P levels and flagellar expression (360), confirming the observation that mutations in pta or ackA affect flagellar expression (409). Cells lacking PTA are hyperflagellated; in contrast, those lacking ACKA are poorly flagellated (360, 408). This led to the hypothesis that acetyl
P donates its phosphate to a RR that represses transcription of the flhDC operon, which encodes the master flagellum-specific activator (360). Subsequent studies demonstrated that OmpR could directly repress flhDC transcription in an acetyl
P-dependent manner, despite the presence of its cognate EnvZ (355, 408). Like PTA-deficient mutants, cells lacking OmpR are hyperflagellated (408). These observations led to the following model (Fig. 7B). Cells growing exponentially on an acetogenic carbon source possess elevated levels of acetyl
P. Consequently, acetyl
P acts a phosphoryl donor for OmpR, which then binds to and represses transcription from the flhDC promoter. Depletion of the acetogenic carbon source leads to reduction of the acetyl
P pool, the accumulation of nonphosphorylated OmpR, and, thus, the derepression of flhDC transcription and flagellar expression (355, 358). This model makes some strong predictions, which can be tested directly. Since flagellation depends, in part, on the status of the acetyl
P pool, manipulation of that pool should affect flagellation. Additional factors that could be tested include the nature and amounts of the carbon and nitrogen sources, the status of ATase, and osmolarity.
This model also can explain why the size of the acetyl
P pool correlates with the rate of cell division. Cells in the exponential growth possess a large acetyl
P pool and divide rapidly. As the carbon source becomes depleted, the acetyl
P decreases, and the cells divide more slowly. Like repression of flagellar biosynthesis, this cell division behavior requires PTA, OmpR, and FlhD (but not FlhC). Mutants lacking FlhD continue to divide rapidly as they enter stationary phase, while those lacking PTA or OmpR cannot divide rapidly at all and instead form filaments (355, 358).
FlhD, alone or in combination with FlhC, acts a global regulator. In addition to regulating flagellar biosynthesis and cell division, it coordinates anaerobic respiration and the Entner-Doudoroff pathway, two responses critical to life in the colon (356, 357). FlhDC also regulates virulence factors in diverse organisms (51, 60, 132, 140, 235, 272, 399). Since acetyl
P also contributes to OmpR autoinduction, it may help regulate the larger subset of OmpR-dependent yet FlhD-independent genes (330), including many associated with virulence (e.g., ssrAB, which encodes a 2CST pathway in S. enterica [261]). Indeed, acetyl
P and ArcB provide OmpR with the phosphate necessary to induce the protective response to the neutrophil bactericidal/permeability-increasing (BPI) protein (354) (P. Prohinar and J. Weiss, personal communication).
(v) Implications for biofilm development and pathogenesis.
Acetyl
P may play an even more global role, however, by influencing genes regulated by RRs other than OmpR. Recently, Wolfe et al. demonstrated that acetyl
P can influence the in vivo expression of almost 100 genes (473). These authors compared the transcriptome of wild-type cells to those of cells that either accumulate acetyl
P (ackA) or do not synthesize it (pta ackA). They designed this study specifically to differentiate genes that respond to perturbations in the acetyl
P pool from those that respond to a general defect in the PTA-ACKA pathway, i.e., the inability to properly recycle acetyl-CoA, to generate ATP, or to excrete acetate. This study verified that acetyl
P correlates with decreased expression of genes involved in flagella biogenesis (360) and showed that acetyl
P correlates with increased expression of genes involved in type 1 pilus assembly, the biosynthesis of colanic acid (an extracellular polysaccharide or capsule), and the response to multiple stresses (Fig. 8).
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Acetyl P-responsive processes and the RRs known to regulate them.
|
P-responsive genes (Fig. 8). Like OmpR
P, RcsB
P represses flagellar synthesis directly (138, 330). In addition, RcsB
P activates both colanic acid biosynthesis (433) and at least one acetyl
P-responsive stress effector (osmC) (112). Several other acetyl
P-responsive genes are regulated by RcsC, the cognate HK of RcsB, suggesting that they might also be regulated by RcsB. These include ivy, osmB, osmY, yjbE, yiaD, and ycfJ. RcsC also regulates both rcsB and fimZ (138). FimZ
P represses flagellar synthesis and activates type 1 pilus expression (91). UvrY (known as SirA in S. enterica and GacA in Pseudomonas aeruginosa) also represses flagellar expression (156). However, the mechanism remains obscure: its only known direct target is the regulatory RNA csrB (436), whose binding protein CsrA controls flagellar expression in a csrB-independent manner (467). Other RRs also control flagellar expression: ArcA and AtoC both activate it, while CitB and YpdB both repress it (330). It is not known which of these RRs function directly and which ones act indirectly, nor is it known which of these RRs mediate acetyl
P-dependent regulation of flhDC or other flagellar regulators, e.g., the flagellum-specific sigma factor FliA.
Previously, other researchers had implicated flagella, type 1 pili, capsule, and diverse stress effectors in the formation of biofilms. Thus, Wolfe et al. tested whether cells altered in their ability to metabolize acetyl
P could construct normal biofilms and found that they could not. Cells defective for the degradation of acetyl
P or those defective for the production of acetyl
P each could form biofilms; however, these biofilms displayed characteristics substantially different from each other and from the biofilms formed by their wild-type parent. The authors hypothesized that acetyl
P helps coordinate expression of surface structures and cellular processes involved in wild-type biofilm development (473). Intriguingly, the ordered formation and dissolution of intracellular biofilm-like pods by uropathogenic E. coli depends on the very same structures that respond to the status of the acetyl
P pool, i.e., flagella, type 1 pili, and capsule (10).
Most human pathogens, including E. coli, S. enterica, Vibrio cholerae, Yersinia pestis, B. anthracis, group A Streptococcus, and P. aeruginosa, possess pta and ack homologs. These pathogens also express RRs known to regulate virulence factors. In E. coli, acetyl
P regulates the biosynthesis of several known virulence factors (473), and through its ability to control transcription of the flhDC operon and ompR (25, 356, 357), it probably regulates many more. In S. enterica, acetyl
P can influence expression of virulence factors through SirA (260) but not induction of the pathogenicity island SPI-2 (234). Some evidence suggests a relationship between acetyl
P and PhoP, although it probably does not influence gene expression in S. enterica (77). In V. cholerae, pta mutants do not produce the toxin-coregulated pilus, colonize mice poorly, and exhibit reduced virulence. Since overexpression of ToxT bypasses the pta defect, PTA probably sits above ToxT in the regulatory pathway. Because ToxT lacks a phosphate acceptor site, it probably does not receive phosphate from acetyl
P. It is more likely that an RR exists that receives a phosphoryl group from acetyl
P and, when phosphorylated, regulates either toxT transcription or the stability of ToxT. Alternatively, the RR
P might help ToxT regulate its target genes (83). It also is conceivable that the lack of virulence results from the inability of the pta mutant to efficiently generate ATP, as proposed for hydrogen peroxide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae (343) (see below).
(vi) Implications for metabolic engineering.
Acetyl
P also may impact efforts to engineer metabolic pathways. For example, the ability of cyanobacteria to accumulate polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) depends, in part upon the synthesis by PTA of acetyl
P, which activates PHB synthase. In cyanobacteria, PHB accumulates under conditions of excess acetate, excess reducing power, or deprivation of nutrients, such as nitrogen (19). Cells grown in nitrogen-sufficient conditions accumulate small amounts of PHB and exhibit low activities of both PTA and PHB synthase. In contrast, cells grown in nitrogen-limiting conditions accumulate large amounts of PHB and exhibit high PTA and PHB synthase activities. When added to crude lysates and membrane fractions isolated from cells grown under nitrogen-sufficient conditions, acetyl
P activates PHB synthase by some, as yet unidentified, post-translational mechanism (308). This mechanism may be a general feature of polyhydroxalkanoate synthases, because acetyl
P activates purified Thermus thermophilus PHA synthase (333). Surprisingly, pta mutants display enhanced PHB accumulation (309, 310). The authors explain this dichotomy, arguing that increased flux through acetyl-CoA in the pta mutant can compensate for the lack of acetyl
P-dependent activation of PHB synthase (309). Taken together, these observations suggest that the concentration of acetyl
P depends on the balance between nitrogen and carbon, that PHB synthase senses that balance by monitoring the acetyl
P pool, and that efforts to increase the acetyl-CoA flux can override the need for acetyl
P (308, 309).
P Work?
P acts as a phosphodonor for RRs in vivo. That acetyl
P influences gene expression appears solid enough; yet, the mechanism remains elusive and therefore controversial. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the link between acetyl
P and gene expression. First, it might function indirectly by means of its connection to the PTS pathway (135). Second, it might increase energy metabolism, generating ATP by substrate phosphorylation (264, 324, 343). Third, it might bind ATPase and increase its activity. Fourth, it might directly donate phosphate to a RR in an HK-independent manner (127, 238, 297, 298, 360). Finally, it might facilitate the ability of an HK to donate a phosphoryl group to a noncognate kinase (127, 238, 264).
The most obvious connection of acetyl
P to energy production depends on the presence of ACKA, the enzyme that interconverts acetyl
P and ADP with acetate and ATP. Thus, acetyl
P clearly can exert a global effect on energy in wild-type cells by enhancing ATP levels. Indeed, this appears to be the case in S. pneumoniae, where resistance to hydrogen peroxide appears dependent on the generation of ATP via acetyl
P (343) (see below). However, the vast majority of in vivo experiments whose results support a signaling role for acetyl
P use mutants that lack either ACKA or both ACKA and PTA. Thus, neither of these mutants can produce ATP via ACKA-dependent substrate phosphorylation. For the same reason, they cannot donate phosphate to EI of the PTS system (135). Thus, these mechanisms cannot explain the effects of acetyl
P on gene expression, at least not in cells that lack ACKA.
Acetyl
P could instead affect ATPase activity directly. The ackA mutant possesses elevated acetyl
P levels (297, 360). It is formally possible that this excess acetyl
P could bind ATPase, resulting in increased activity, which would not occur in the acetyl
P-less pta ackA mutant. Indeed, such an interaction has been shown in vitro with certain mammalian ATPases (229, 415). To our knowledge, however, no evidence exists for such an interaction with bacterial ATPase. However, if acetyl
P interacted efficiently with a bacterial ATPase, the concomitant increase in ATP synthesis might exert a stronger effect on certain 2CST pathways. Although all HKs use ATP as their phosphodonor, some may possess a higher Km and thus be more responsive to rising ATP levels. This hypothesis might explain some acetyl
P-dependent effects; however, it cannot account for those observed in the absence of the cognate HK, unless cross talk with an alternative HK is invoked. Nevertheless, this hypothesis should be tested directly. Most importantly, it must be determined whether treatments that alter the ATP pool similarly influence acetyl
P-sensitive 2CST pathways.
Another controversy revolves around the relationship between estimates of the acetyl
P concentration in vivo relative to the concentration required for efficient phosphorylation in vitro. Clearly, the in vivo concentration of acetyl
P (20 µM to 1.2 mM) is lower by several orders of magnitude than the concentration required to autophosphorylate most RRs in vitro (109, 295, 296, 411), an observation that some researchers have used to argue against a direct role for acetyl
P as a phosphoryl donor (109, 238). Unfortunately, this argument is based on studies of PhoB and CheY, two RRs that appear unresponsive to acetyl
P in the presence of their cognate HKs. Of equal importance, this argument fails to account for the consequences of molecular crowding. The inside of a cell is a very crowded environment, as crowded as a solution of 13% dextran (278). This environment is quite different from the dilute aqueous solutions generally used to study enzymatic reactions in vitro. The biochemistry of crowded solutions differs from that which operates in dilute solution (277, 278). For example, molecular crowding can slow protein diffusion, promote weak or unfavorable intermolecular associations, or drive unfavorable conformation changes. Thus, molecular crowding may cause the RR-acetyl
P interaction to occur more readily than it does in dilute solution. For example, molecular crowding could induce a conformational change in an RR, poising it so that the acetyl
P concentration required in vivo may be considerably lower than that required in dilute solutions. Thus, future in vitro kinetic studies should be performed in the presence of a crowding agent on RRs, e.g., OmpR or NRI, that readily respond to changes in the acetyl
P pool.
It appears, therefore, that the "direct phosphodonor" model best explains most of the existing data. Most, but not all, of the connections predicted by this hypothesis have been documented, and no new players or mechanisms need to be found or envisioned. In vitro, acetyl
P can clearly donate phosphate to a large subset of RRs. In vivo, about 100 genes respond to the status of the acetyl
P pool, and many of these acetyl
P-responsive genes are known to be regulated by a subset of RRs, including OmpR, NRI, and RcsB. Unfortunately, the final, critical in vivo connection has not yet been demonstrated: that a specific response occurs because acetyl
P donates its phosphate to a specific RR. This demonstration is nontrivial. Only once has a phosphorylated RR been demonstrated in vivo (134). However, even this technically challenging procedure cannot distinguish an acetyl
P-dependent phospho-RR from a HK-dependent phospho-RR. Remember that ATP represents the source of phosphate for both. Consequently, genetics remains the only recourse. If acetyl
P donates phosphate to a specific RR, then an acetyl
P-insensitive derivative of that RR, one that can accept phosphate from its cognate phosphoryl donor but not from acetyl
P, should confer some subset of phenotypes that differs from those conferred by its wild-type parent. Fortunately, such an acetyl
P-insensitive OmpR mutant exists (448), and it fails to mediate the OmpR-dependent response to the bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (354). Preliminary studies, using this acetyl
P-insensitive mutant (which exerts only limited effects on the canonical OmpR targets ompF and ompC), suggest that the ability of OmpR to influence biofilm development does not require EnvZ but does require that it receive a phosphoryl group from acetyl
P (Wolfe, unpublished).
Clearly, some inconsistencies remain, the most pressing being the observation that the acetyl
P-dependent activation of PhoB depends on EnvZ, at least under certain environmental conditions (238). What is the nature of the mechanism by which this noncognate HK influences the ability of PhoB to receive phosphate from acetyl
P? It is highly unlikely that EnvZ autophosphorylates by using acetyl
P as its phosphoryl donor. No reaction like this has ever been documented. As proposed by Wanner and colleagues, it is conceivable that EnvZ or some other HK senses acetyl
P, autophosphorylates in response using ATP as its phosphoryl donor, and then donates that phosphoryl group to PhoB (238). Alternatively, EnvZ-P might donate phosphate to an unidentified RR, whose action combines with that of PhoB
P (derived from acetyl
P) to activate PhoA transcription. This scenario is somewhat analogous to that of growth on certain secondary nitrogen sources. There, NRI
P must receive phosphoryl groups from two donors, NRII-P and acetyl
P (322). Finally; EnvZ, in the absence of OmpR, might indirectly increase the acetyl
P pool to a level that increases the phosphorylation of PhoB via acetyl
P, a scenario that resembles the connection between GS and acetyl
P (322).
P Signal?
P is the most unstable phosphorylated compound in the cell, and the size of its pool can vary at minimum 100-fold (360). The status of that pool appears to depend on the nature and amount of the carbon source balanced against the availability of oxygen, nitrogen, and phosphate and against the status of the TCA cycle (196, 297, 360, 463). Other environmental factors appear to impact the acetyl
P pool: temperature, pH, and the concentration of extracellular acetate. Thus, the acetyl
P pool could integrate information concerning the surrounding environment, e.g., the mammalian intestine (298, 321). Although the vast majority of that acetyl
P donates its phosphate to generate ATP, a fraction is bled off to signal the network of two-component signaling pathways.
Two-component pathways tend to be present at low levels in unstimulated cells. In response to a specific stimulus, many of these pathways amplify themselves via positive autoregulatory loops. By donating its phosphate to the small amounts of selected RRs in unstimulated cells, acetyl
P could "prime" whole subsets of pathways. Such "priming" could favor a more rapid transition to the activated state (321). For example, acetyl
P might facilitate the transition from nitrogen-rich to nitrogen-poor environments (127). Relative to cells that lack it, those that possess NRII rapidly change their rate of glnA transcription after a nitrogen shift-up or shift-down (371). The slower response that occurs in the absence of NRII is controlled by acetyl
P (127). Cells under nitrogen-rich conditions possess only a few molecules of NRII. As cells become limited for nitrogen, decreased glutamate synthase and glutamate dehydrogenase activity would limit the drain of 2-ketoglutarate from the TCA cycle. The diminished capacity of the TCA cycle should result in elevated acetyl
P levels. Because glnL is part of the glnALG operon, the nitrogen status regulates NRII expression. Thus, phosphorylation of NRI by acetyl
P could stimulate glnALG transcription, which would lead to increased amounts of both NRII and NRI. Now, the cell is "primed" to use both acetyl
P and NRII-P to activate NRI for growth on secondary nitrogen sources. For reviews, see references 298, 321, and 322.
P In Vivo
P pool to inform RRs may represent a "primordial" mechanism that was later supplanted or appended by the evolution of HPKs (298). It is the latter class of RRs that are most likely sensitive to acetyl
P. Although currently their number is small (Table 2), the RRs known (or suspected) to respond to acetyl
P in vivo under physiologically relevant conditions seem to possess the following traits in common: (i) their cognate HKP functions primarily as a phosphatase, (ii) they exist in great excess over their cognate HK or HKP, or (iii) they seem to lack a cognate HK. For example, cells synthesize the RR OmpR in large excess over its cognate HK EnvZ (73), NRII functions primarily as an NRI
P phosphatase (322), and the RR RssB (also known as SprE and MviA) possesses no specific cognate HK (183). These conditions represent opportunities for regulation via an HK-independent pathway, such as that envisioned for acetyl
P. Clearly, further study is warranted.
P-Forming Enzymes
P. These include acetyl
P-forming pyruvate oxidase,sulfoacetaldehyde acetyltransferase, fructose-6-phosphatephosphoketolase, and protein C of glycine reductase. These enzymes are found in diverse bacteria but not in E. coli and its relatives.
Pyruvate oxidase.
Pyruvate oxidases can be divided into two classes: the acetate formers such as POXB of E. coli and the acetyl
P-formers (APF-POX [EC 1.2.3.3]) found in diverse lactobacilli, Pediococcus pseudomonas, and S. pneumoniae (49, 188, 315, 402, 403, 419). In the presence of inorganic phosphate, the thiamine diphosphate (ThDP)-dependent APF-POX catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate to acetyl
P, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen peroxide (Fig. 9A) (188, 315, 402, 403, 444). In S. pneumoniae, ACP-POX appears responsible for formation of the majority of the acetyl
P, despite the presence of both ACK and PTA. ACP-POX-deficient mutants (spxB) generate dramatically reduced amounts of acetyl
P (343) and produce undetectable levels of hydrogen peroxide (343, 419). spxB mutants are more sensitive to hydrogen peroxide exposure than are their wild-type parents, apparently because they cannot mount an acetyl
P-dependent response. Because this response does not depend on de novo protein synthesis, it has been proposed that it does not involve the acetyl
P-dependent induction of a stress effector (343). Instead, it may involve the ability of acetyl
P to maintain the ATP pool. Exposure to oxygen or hydrogen peroxide causes the spxB mutant to lose substantially more of its ATP pool than wild-type cells do. Since the acetyl
P pool exceeds the ATP pool by about 10-fold, the authors propose that ACP-POX and ACK form a hydrogen peroxide-resistant ATP-generating pathway, which provides energy when oxidative stress damages sugar transport and glycolysis, the primary sources of ATP for this strictly fermenting bacterium (343). Alternatively, acetyl
P could regulate the stability of a previously expressed stress effector by modulating an RR, e.g., RssB, that regulates a protease activity (57).
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Other acetyl P-forming enzymes. (A) ACP-POX, acetyl P-forming pyruvate oxidase; ThDP, thiamine diphosphate. (B) XSC, sulfoacetaldehyde acetyltransferase. (C) XPK, xylulose 5-phosphate phosphoketolase; GA-3-P, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate. (D) GR, glycine reductase.
|
P (produced through either ACP-POX or ACK), which is then converted to acetyl-CoA by PTA (419). spxB mutants are poorly virulent, perhaps because they fail to adhere to the host cell glycoconjugates proposed to be components of pneumococcal receptors. The addition of acetate restores adherence, consistent with the idea that adherence and hence virulence, requires acetyl
P (419). It is unclear, however, whether the decreased virulence of spxB mutants actually results from reduced acetyl
P-dependent adherence. It also is unclear whether reduced virulence results from an inability to phosphorylate an RR, generate ATP under conditions of oxidative stress, or even generate hydrogen peroxide.
Sulfoacetaldehyde acetyltransferase.
Sulfoacetaldehyde is a key intermediate in the dissimilation of sulfonated compounds. For 30 years, it was believed incorrectly that the desulfonating enzyme cleaved sulfoacetaldehyde to acetate and sulfite (94). Recently, Cook and coworkers purified this desulfonating enzyme from several bacteria, demonstrated definitively that it actually produces acetyl
P and sulfite, and renamed it sulfoacetaldehyde acetyltransferase (XSC) (EC 2.3.1.-) (Fig. 9B). This ThDP-dependent enzyme appears to be widespread. Bacteria from several subdivisions of Proteobacteria and at least a couple of gram-positive bacteria either exhibit XSC activity, express the protein, or possess the gene; they include Alcaligenes degragrans, Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Desulfonispora thiosulfatigenes, Sinorhizobium meliloti, Rhodobacter capsulatus, Alcaligenes defragrans, Paracoccus denitrificans, Rhodococcus opacus, and Ralstonia spp. (65, 114, 387). However, it is not present in E. coli (387). It is hypothesized that during fermentation or effective sulfite reduction, the acetyl
P formed by XSC possesses two divergent metabolic fates: either conversion by PTA to acetyl-CoA for anabolism or as a phosphodonor for the generation of ATP by ACK. In most organisms tested, pta is located either immediately downstream of xsc or in the immediate vicinity (65, 387; for a review, see reference 94).
Phosphoketolase.
The phosphoketolase pathway (PKP) metabolizes pentose sugars and sugar alcohols and, in some organisms under aerobic conditions, also certain hexoses, including glucose and gluconate. Xylulose 5-phosphate phosphoketolase (XPK), the central enzyme of the PKP, converts xylulose 5'-phosphate (X5P) into glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and acetyl
P (Fig. 9C) (302). XPK has been identified in heterofermentative lactobacilli, Acetobacter xylinum, Thiobacillus novellus, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Fibrobacter succinogenes, Fibrobacter intestinalis, and yeasts (350). Note that XPK is unsimilar to the transketolases (TKT) used by many species (including E. coli) for conversion of X5P. XPK utilizes inorganic phosphate instead of phosphorylated aldose, it produces acetyl
P instead of fructose-6-phosphate (F6P), and its sequence only poorly resembles that of TKT (350).
Two variants of XPK exist in Bifidobacteria spp.: one specific for F6P and one that recognizes both X5P and F6P (XFP) (301). The xfp gene, which encodes the dual-substrate enzyme, resides just upstream of pta (301). This arrangement, reminiscent of xsc and pta, suggests that the acetyl
P formed by XFP also may perform dual metabolic functions: anabolism and energy conservation (387). CcpA-dependent carbon catabolite repression inhibits xpkA expression in Lactobacillus pentosus (350), the opposite of its effect on PTA and ACK in B. subtilis (164, 353). Since the PTA-ACK pathway in B. subtilis operates in a strictly catabolic role, this regulatory arrangement suggests that XPK and its homolog XFP operate primarily in their anabolic role.
Glycine reductase.
Some strictly anaerobic gram-positive amino-acid-degrading bacteria, including Clostridium sticklandii (422), Eubacterium acidaminophilum (401), and Tissierella creatinophila (179), form acetyl
P during the reductive deamination of glycine, sarcosine, or betaine (16, 17, 199, 305, 423). The enzymes responsible, e.g., glycine reductase, consist of several subunits. The substrate specificity resides in substrate-activating proteins B (12), which convert their substrate to a common carboxymethyl residue attached to selenoprotein A while evolving ammonia, monomethylamine or trimethylamine. In the presence of inorganic phosphate, protein C oxidizes carboxymethyl selenoprotein A with the transfer of the acetyl group to phosphate to from acetyl
P (462). Energy is conserved because ACK converts the acetyl
P to ATP (Fig. 9D) (17; for reviews, see references 11 and 12).
|
|
|---|
P concentrations peak (62, 249, 360). acs transcription reaches its maximum as the culture enters stationary phase (249), decreases rapidly, and then slowly increases in parallel with extracellular acetate (Wolfe and Beatty, unpublished). Since acs transcription rises during early stationary phase whether or not extracellular acetate accumulates, one must look elsewhere for the cause of increased transcription during stationary phase.
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Transcription of acs by cells grown in glucose minimal medium relative to optical density, consumption of carbon sources, excretion of acetate, and intracellular concentrations of FIS and IHF. OD, optical density.
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 11. Regulation of acs transcription. (A) Organization of the nrf-acs locus. The bent arrows represent transcription initiation sites. (B) nrf-acs intergenic region, showing the location of binding sites for CRP, FIS, and IHF. The numbers are relative to the transcription initiation site of acsP2. Numbers in parentheses are relative to the transcription initiation site of acsP1. (C) Proposed interactions for synergistic class III CRP-dependent activation. Cross-hatched double oval, CRP dimer; light gray ovals, -CTD. Although RNAP possesses only two -CTDs, several are depicted to demonstrate vacillation amongst various possible sites. Other gray and cross-hatched shapes represent the rest of RNAP.
|
70-Dependent Transcription
70) and either a wild-type or null allele of rpoS (which encodes
S). On the basis of immunoblot analysis, reverse transcription-PCR, and acs::lacZ transcriptional fusion analyses performed on cells containing at most two copies of the acs promoter region, they concluded that acs induction during the transition from exponential growth to stationary phase depends on
70. Cells that lacked a functional
70 did not assimilate extracellular acetate, exhibited barely detectable levels of AMP-ACS, synthesized no detectable acs transcript, and displayed little acs promoter activity (250).
Some controversy exists concerning the role of
S. One study concluded that
S helps initiate acs transcription, because transcription was slightly reduced and delayed in rpoS mutants (410). A later study concluded that
S inhibits acs transcription after entry into stationary phase, because acs transcription did not decrease in rpoS mutants as it does in wild-type cells (250). Since the steady-state levels of
S increase during entry into stationary phase (183), the authors suggested that the rising pool of
S may inhibit acs transcription by competing with
70 for core polymerase, as proposed previously (125). This competition would reduce acs transcription to levels appropriate for stationary phase (250). The discrepancy between these two studies may result from several factors, including the use of different genetic backgrounds, temperatures, and media. It also may result from the reliance on multicopy transcriptional fusions in the earlier study (410), whereas the later study involved diverse analyses of cells containing one or two copies of the acs promoter region (250).
Upstream of acsP2, CRP binds to two sites (CRP I and CRP II), each located in class I positions (Fig. 11B). Each of these DNA sites permits a CRP dimer to recruit RNAP to the acsP2 promoter by contacting the C-terminal domain of each of the two
subunits of RNAP (
-CTD). An explanation of simple CRP-dependent activation including class I is given in Fig. 12. For a review, see reference 64. The higher-affinity site, CRP I (centered at position 69.5), is absolutely required for acsP2 transcription. The lower-affinity site, CRP II (centered at position 122.5), is necessary for maximal activation. CRP-dependent activation of acsP2 transcription involves activation region 1 (AR1) of CRP but does not involve AR2 (Fig. 11C). Activation also involves the 287, 261, and 265 determinants of the C-terminal domain of the
-CTD. Together, these observations are consistent with a synergistic class III mechanism by which tandem CRP proteins, each located at a class I position, activate acsP2 transcription by interacting with the
-CTD (40).
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 12. Simple CRP regulation operates through two related mechanisms, designated class I and class II. Both classes depend on specific interactions between CRP and RNAP. At class I promoters, a CRP dimer (cross-hatched double oval) binds to DNA at a site centered near position 61.5, 71.5, 82.5, or 92.5. CRP bound at any of these positions uses a defined surface (activating region 1 [AR1]) in the downstream subunit of CRP to contact a specific surface determinant (287) of the C-terminal domain of the -subunit of RNAP ( -CTD; gray double oval). Two additional -CTD determinants contribute to class I activation: the 261 determinant, proposed to interact with the subunit of RNAP (checkered shape), and the 265 determinant, which binds DNA, preferably A+T-rich sequences, e.g., the UP element. At class II promoters, a CRP dimer binds to DNA at a site centered near position 41.5. When bound at this position, CRP uses AR1 of the upstream subunit of CRP to contact determinant 287 of the -CTD. CRP uses a second surface (AR2) of the downstream subunit to contact the 162-165 determinant of the N-terminal domain of . The 265 determinant of the -CTD also contributes by binding DNA. Class III promoters use more complex mechanisms that utilize two CRP dimers to achieve maximal transcription activation. In class III activation, the CRP dimers can bind either to tandem class I positions (as is the case at acs) or to one class II and one class I position. For reviews, see references 64, 69, and 158.
|
Negative regulation by FIS. FIS can negatively regulate CRP-dependent acsP2 transcription during early exponential phase by using both indirect and direct mechanisms. Since FIS represses crp transcription (155), it can preclude acs transcription by restricting the availability of CRP. Within the nrfA-acs intergenic region, FIS binds to several lower-affinity sites and three higher-affinity sites, FIS I, FIS II, and FIS III, centered at positions 267, 98, and 59, respectively, relative to the acsP2 transcription initiation site (Fig. 11B) (62). Thus, FIS also can regulate acs transcription directly, apparently using three distinct mechanisms. (i) FIS may repress acsP2 transcription by steric hindrance, since it can bind weakly to a DNA site that overlaps the 35 element of acsP2 (62). (ii) FIS can anti-activate CRP-dependent acsP2 transcription, since it clearly interferes with the binding of CRP. Note that FIS II (98) lies between CRP II (122.5) and CRP I (69.5), while FIS III (59) overlaps CRP I. Competitive DNase I footprint and electrophoretic mobility shift analyses and in vitro transcription assays indicate that FIS can displace CRP from both its sites. In vivo, a mutation in FIS II that diminishes its affinity for FIS by more than 10-fold increases acs transcription 2- to 3-fold during growth in tryptone broth. A similar increase results from a mutation that favors the binding of CRP over that of FIS to their overlapping sites (CRP I and FIS III). Thus, the competition between FIS and CRP for binding to their overlapping and tandem sites helps to keep acsP2 transcription low. (iii) Relative to acsP1, FIS I is centered at position 60 (Fig. 11B). In vivo, a fis mutant exhibits threefold more transcription from acsP1, suggesting that FIS helps keep this promoter repressed. The distal location of this site suggests a mechanism that does not involve steric hindrance of RNAP (63).
Negative regulation by IHF. It appears likely that IHF contributes to reduced acs transcription. Within the nrfA-acs intergenic region, it binds to three higher-affinity sites: IHF I to IHF III, centered at positions 226, 180, and 153, respectively (Fig. 11B) (62). The distal-most site (IHF I) is centered at position 19 relative to the acsP1 transcription initiation site. In vivo, a mutant that lacks IHF displays threefold more transcription from acsP1, suggesting that IHF helps FIS keep this secondary promoter repressed. Given the location of this binding site, IHF probably represses acsP1 transcription by steric hindrance, i.e., by interfering directly with RNAP binding (63). In vitro transcription assays show that IHF decreases CRP-dependent acsP2 transcription by about twofold (62). The mechanism appears to involve a complex interaction between IHF, two CRP dimers, and RNAP. In vivo, the presence of IHF III strongly reduces CRP-dependent transcription, suggesting that the binding of IHF to this site interferes with the ability of CRP to activate transcription (62). This reduced transcription requires the integrity of IHF III, CRP II, the AR2 surface of CRP, and CRP I. Loss of the first three elements yields activity close to that of the wild-type promoter, while loss of the last element eliminates activity altogether. Together with the observation that IHF can bind simultaneously with CRP, these data suggest a working model in which the binding of IHF to IHF III alters the interaction of one CRP dimer with the other and/or with RNAP itself (C. M. Beatty, D. Thach, and A. J. Wolfe, unpublished data).
Independent regulation of acs transcription by FIS and IHF. Competitive DNase I footprint analyses show that FIS and IHF can bind the acs regulatory region simultaneously with no apparent effect on each other. In vitro transcription studies indicate that FIS and IHF inhibit CRP-dependent acsP2 transcription independently. These observations, coupled with the knowledge that cells inversely regulate their FIS and IHF pools (Fig. 10), support the hypothesis that these nucleoid proteins regulate CRP-dependent acs transcription by mediating the formation of temporally and spatially distinct nucleoprotein complexes (62). Thus, acs is not simply a substrate-induced, catabolite-repressed gene but, rather, a prime example of complex regulatory circuitry in which dynamic nucleoprotein complexes ensure that transcription occurs appropriately.
Mutants deficient for the GB enzyme ICL, the GB repressor IclR, or the activator of iclR transcription (FadR) exhibit acs transcription profiles that resemble that displayed by poxB mutants. This suggests the influence of some as yet unidentified signal of carbon flux (249). Note that no evidence exists for a direct effect by either IclR or FadR: although in vitro DNA binding experiments have not been performed, sequence analysis reveals no sequence with similarity to the consensus for either transcription factor (Wolfe, unpublished).
Whereas Cra positively regulates the genes that encode the GB and gluconeogenesis (319, 366, 389, 439), there exists no evidence that this global regulator exerts a significant effect on acs transcription (Beatty and Wolfe, unpublished). Finally, no evidence supports a role for arp, a putative gene predicted to encode an ankyrin-like protein and mistakenly annotated as an ACS regulatory protein (Beatty and Wolfe, unpublished).
P, or acetate operate directly on acs transcription (249). In contrast, some ratio of these or related central metabolites might play such a role. For example, starved cells possess a low acetyl-CoA/CoASH ratio (84). Since acs replenishes the acetyl-CoA pool, it seems reasonable for a low acetyl-CoA/CoASH ratio to signal the timing of acs induction. This might explain why acs transcription is induced in response to spent medium that contains no acetate (410) and why acs transcription increases once both glucose and acetate become depleted. The mechanism by which this ratio might be sensed is not understood; however, signaling roles for acetyl-CoA and other acyl-CoAs have been documented (99, 221, 245, 266). |
|
|---|
Unlike acetyl
P-dependent phosphorylation of CheY, the physiological consequence of CheY-Ac can be seen in the presence of the cognate HK CheA. Cells that lack AMP-ACS exhibit reduced sensitivity to both attractants and repellents. The normal response to repellents, but not to attractants, requires residue K92 of CheY (27). Although the role of CheA-P has been defined clearly, the mechanistic function of CheY-Ac remains obscure. The kinetics of acetylation preclude a direct role in excitation, and a role in adaptation also seems unlikely (27). In contrast to phosphorylation, acetylation generates CW rotation without increasing the binding of CheY to the flagellar switch. Thus, CheY-Ac must act on a step following switch binding (364).
An intriguing connection between phosphorylation and acetylation apparently exists, at least in vitro. First, both phosphoryl donors of CheY, CheA-P and acetyl
P, each bind AMP-ACS and strongly inhibit CheY acetylation. Second, CheZ, the enzyme that enhances CheY dephosphorylation, enhances CheY acetylation. Finally, the presence of AMP-ACS raises the levels of both CheA-P and CheY-P. On the basis of these observations, Barak and Eisenbach propose that acetylation of CheY acts as a tuning system that compensates for cell-to-cell variations in the concentrations of CheA and CheZ (29). If so, such compensation would operate as cells transit from exponential growth to stationary phase and thus from growth on sugars to consumption of acetate.
Several groups have suggested a connection between acetate metabolism and chemotaxis (26, 364, 474). Flagellar biosynthesis begins during mid-exponential growth as acetyl
P levels begin to diminish (360). Motility (and chemotaxis) reaches its maximum as E. coli cells transition from exponential growth to stationary phase (9), when the extracellular concentration of acetate and acs transcription both peak (249, 360). Since AMP-ACS-mediated acetylation of CheY increases the probability of CW rotation, its absence should decrease such behavior. However, a triple mutant lacking the three known routes to CheY activation (i.e., CheA, the PTA-ACKA pathway, and AMP-ACS) rotates its flagella CW more often than does a double mutant that retains AMP-ACS (364). This surprising observation may reflect the ability of CobB to drain acetyl groups from CheY through AMP-ACS. If so, then a mutant lacking CheA and the PTA-ACKA pathway should exhibit more CW behavior in the absence of CobB than in its presence, and the effect should depend upon AMP-ACS. If so, then the ability of CobB to regulate AMP-ACS-dependent acetylation of CheY might explain phosphorylation-independent chemotactic behaviors (27, 28).
|
|
|---|
Unlike E. coli, B. subtilis produces no formate, apparently because the organism does not possess the gene that encodes PFL (252). Mutants lacking a functional PDHC cannot grow anaerobically and do not excrete fermentation products. Thus, B. subtilis produces most, if not all, of its acetate from pyruvate via the PDHC and the PTA-ACKA pathway (317). Note that the gram-positive pathogen Enterococcus faecalis also uses PDHC to metabolize pyruvate during anaerobiosis (414).
Like E. coli, B. subtilis excretes acetate during exponential growth. During late exponential growth, it diverts some of the pyruvate to an uncharged compound, either acetoin (under aerobic conditions) or 2,3-butanediol (during anaerobiosis). The excretion of these uncharged compounds instead of the organic acids pyruvate and acetate avoids overacidification of the environment (418). During stationary phase, when the glucose has become depleted, B. subtilis assimilates and activates acetate via AMP-ACS (163) and acetoin by means of the acetoin dehydrogenase system (204), which oxidizes acetoin to acetyl-CoA and acetaldehyde with the production of one NADH (365).
Like E. coli, the B. subtilis PTA-ACKA pathway converts acetyl-CoA to acetate via an acetyl
P intermediate (164, 353, 407). PTA plays a general role during anaerobic energy metabolism (365) and contributes to aerobic growth (353, 407). As in E. coli, mutants that lack pta grow poorly during anaerobiosis, although they reach rates close to wild type in aerobic and complex nutrient environments (365, 407). Although pta mutants excrete reduced amounts of acetate, especially during aerobic exponential growth on glucose and anaerobiosis (353, 365), they still manage to excrete substantial amounts of acetate during stationary phase. Thus, an additional acetate excretion pathway must exist; however, it does not involve the acetoin excretion pathway (353). Mutants that lack ACKA grow on complex medium about as rapidly as their wild-type parents do, except in the presence of excess glucose (164). Since pta mutants do not exhibit this behavior, this growth defect may be caused by an accumulation of acetyl
P (164, 353).
Like E. coli and S. enterica, many bacteria organize pta and ack as a single operon (224, 259, 412, 435, 466). In contrast, the B. subtilis pta (formerly ywfJ) and ackA genes are located at distant loci on the chromosome (353, 407). Many organisms use a similar arrangement, including Mycoplasma genitalium (139), Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis (243, 244), Bifidobacterium lactis (301), and organisms that possess xsc (387). To coordinate the transcription of these distant genes, B. subtilis primarily uses CcpA (164, 165, 184). This ubiquitous member (253) of the LacI-GalR family of transcription factors (185) binds to conserved cre (formerly amyO) sites in the promoter regions of its target genes (184, 207, 236, 468). CcpA acts as a negative regulator of secondary carbon utilization genes, e.g., acsA. CcpA also functions as a positive regulator of genes involved in the excretion of excess carbon, e.g., pta, ackA, and alsSD, which encodes the acetoin production pathway (164, 184, 206, 353, 374, 453). Although CcpA is expressed constitutively in B. subtilis (184, 307), its activity is controlled by the status of either HPr (ptsH) or its paralog Crh (crh). HPr and Crh are phosphorylated and dephosphorylated by HPrK/P, an ATP-dependent kinase/phosphatase encoded by ptsK (116, 145, 146, 222, 372, 373). Nutritional status determines the balance between the kinase and phosphatase activities of HprK/P. Growth on glucose and, hence, high concentrations of the early glycolytic intermediates D-fructose-1,6-diphosphate and D-fructose-2,6-diphosphate favor kinase activity, while inorganic phosphate, glyceraldehyde-6-phosphate, and acetyl
P favor phosphatase activity (248, 470). Mutations that disrupt this signaling pathway eliminate glucose repression of acsA and glucose activation of pta and ackA (116, 117, 353, 407, 452).
During growth on complex media, transcription of both pta and ackA peaks during mid-exponential growth and diminishes during entry into the stationary phase (353, 363, 452). The way in which cells achieve basal transcription of pta and ackA remains a mystery; however, for ackA, the binding of CcpA to a single cre site seems important (452). The presence of glucose further activates the transcription of both pta and ackA (164, 353). This increased transcription depends on the ability of activated CcpA to bind to cre sites located at positions 55.5 (pta) and 56.5 (ackA) relative to their respective transcription initiation sites (353, 407, 452). The molecular mechanism by which CcpA activates transcription is not known; although its E. coli ortholog Cra (367, 389) activates transcription of ppsA, which encodes a gluconeogenic enzyme, from a site located at position 45.5 (319). At these three promoters, CcpA and Cra probably sit on the same face of the helix; thus, they probably activate transcription by a similar mechanism (452). Additional factors probably influence the transcription of both ackA and pta. Both promoters possess two sequence elements located just upstream of their respective cre site, and activation of ackA transcription depends on these elements. The strong conservation of these elements and their similar location relative to cre suggest that similar mechanisms activate ackA and pta transcription, thereby providing the coordination that E. coli obtains by operon structure (312).
Additional information exists concerning the regulation of the PTA-ACKA pathway. Various stresses regulate the steady-state levels of PTA, as monitored by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (13). However, the activity of the pathway is unaffected by oxygen tension, nitrate, or nitrite, and pta transcription does not depend on the anaerobic sensing systems ResDE (a 2CST pathway), FNR (365), or ArfM (formerly YwiD) (289). Transcription of pta also does not depend on the sporulation regulators SpoOA or SpoOH (407). Finally, pta may regulate its own gene because a strain carrying the intact open reading frame yields about twice as much pta promoter activity as does a strain deleted for pta (353).
Unlike E. coli, B. subtilis does not utilize the PTA-ACKA pathway for growth on acetate; instead, it relies exclusively on AMP-ACS, encoded by acsA (163). During growth on mixtures of amino acids, acsA transcription exhibits a diauxic pattern of expression: it is induced during midexponential growth, plateaus for several hours, and then is induced again 3 h into stationary phase. This pattern of expression suggests a preference for certain amino acids (165), not unlike that observed with E. coli (359). The mechanism by which cells achieve this pattern of expression remains unknown, although it does not depend on CcpA (165). In contrast, the mechanism by which excess glucose represses acsA transcription requires activated CcpA and a cre site (O2) located at position +44.5 (163, 165, 485). The downstream location of its DNA site suggests that CcpA might act as a transcriptional roadblock; however, CcpA-dependent repression does require the transcription-repair coupling factor (Mfd) (485).
Twenty base pairs upstream of the acs promoter (pacs), another promoter is located. This promoter, pacu, drives the expression of the divergently transcribed acu operon, which influences the utilization of acetoin by some unknown mechanism (163). acu does not encode AoDH ES, which is encoded by the aco operon (204). A second cre site (O1) overlaps the pacu 35 element. Disruption of O1 eliminates glucose repression of acu transcription, most probably because CcpA can no longer hinder RNAP binding. Disruption of this CcpA-cre interaction has no effect on acsA transcription or on glucose repression of that transcription. Similarly, disruption of the other cre site, O2, has no effect on acu transcription. However, it not only eliminates glucose repression of acsA transcription but, surprisingly, also permits the activation of acsA transcription in response to glucose. Several possible mechanisms have been proposed for this behavior (165). Repression probably involves the binding of CcpA to both cre sites. In the absence of binding to the downstream site O2, CcpA can bind only O1. Since it is centered at position 63.5 relative to the transcription initiation site of pacsA, it might activate transcription by making contact with RNAP, perhaps via its
-CTD. Alternatively, the second factor may not be CcpA. Indeed, CodY, a GTP-sensing transcription factor, has been reported to repress acsA (131, 485).
P intermediate (52, 331). Deletion of either PduW or PTA results in a 50% increase in propionate excreted into the environment. ACKA can compensate for PduW only if overexpressed (331). Note that both E. coli and S. enterica also possess the inducible propionate kinase, encoded by tdcD, required for decarboxylation of threonine (186).
P intermediate. Instead, it is generated from acetyl-CoA through the action of acetyl-CoA hydrolase, a ubiquitous cytosolic enzyme (97). This permits the lipophilic acetate to diffuse freely across membranes that separate subcellular compartments. In the nervous system, acetylcholinesterase degrades the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, producing acetate, which AMP-ACS reactivates to replenish acetylcholine stores (75, 430). In the nucleus, histone deacetylases generate acetate, which must be reactivated to acetyl-CoA for reutilization (247). Like yeast (455, 487), mammals possess two isoforms of AMP-ACS (144, 281, 475, 480), one cytosolic and the other mitochondrial. The activity of the cytosolic enzyme (AceCS1), found predominantly in the liver, activates acetate to supply cells with acetyl-CoA for lipid synthesis (281, 475). AceCS1 activity responds to changes in nutritional and hormonal status (475). Transcription of AceCS1 is regulated by at least two members of the sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP) family (144, 210, 281). Like Ino2p and Ino4p, proteins that regulate yeast acs transcription (189), SREBP family members are basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors that mediate cholesterol and fatty acid biosynthesis (202). AceCS1 transcripts accumulate in the livers of transgenic mice that overexpress SREBP and are almost absent in SREBP-null mice. Fasting reduces transcript levels, while refeeding restores them. Diabetic mice express low levels, which can be induced by insulin (416). In contrast, the mitochondrial enzyme (AceCS2) is found predominantly in heart and skeletal muscle but also in the spleen, lungs, kidneys, testes, and brain (144). Ketogenic conditions, e.g., starvation or diabetes, induce AceCS2 expression. Under such conditions, the liver releases substantial amounts of acetate, which accumulates in the bloodstream (66, 405, 481). AceCS2 activates this acetate, providing acetyl-CoA to the TCA cycle, where it is oxidized for the generation of ATP (144).
AMP-ACS also may be regulated developmentally. During mouse embryogenesis, for example, AceCS1 transcripts accumulate differentially in the developing nervous system and during organogenesis (276), a situation similar to that observed in developing Arabidopsis seeds, where it accumulates within chloroplasts (230).
|
|
|---|
The molecular switch that interconverts acetyl-CoA and acetate not only supplies the cell with opportunities to recover much needed NAD+, recycle limited stores of CoASH, and generate ATP, but it also produces compounds that can pass freely through membranes. For bacteria, the first half of this switch, acetate dissimilation, permits cells to grow rapidly when carbon is present in excess over oxygen or nitrogen, while the second half allows cells to reclaim that excreted acetate. For eukaryotes, this switch facilitates the passage of two-carbon units from one compartment to another, for example permitting the pyruvate formed by glycolysis (in the cytosol) to be fully oxidized by the TCA cycle (within the mitochondrial matrix).
Each half of the acetate switch furnishes the cell with a prime opportunity to monitor its nutritional status and the likelihood of its internal acidification and to use that information to coordinate its gene expression and cellular processes. Its instability and the tendency of its pool to rise and fall as a function of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and phosphate fluxes through central metabolic pathways make acetyl
P an excellent global signal. Clearly, the mechanism(s) by which acetyl
P exerts its influence must be clarified. However, its propensity in vitro to donate phosphoryl groups, especially to RRs of 2CST pathways, suggests an obvious mechanismone which remains to be tested definitively. Of course, other mechanisms also must be considered seriously. In some cases, acetyl
P may represent an alternative source of energy, as proposed for peroxide resistance in S. pneumoniae (343). Alternatively, it may function as a ligand for the activation of diverse enzymes, as it does in vitro for B. subtilis HprK/P (470) and ATP-PFK of Desulfurococcus amylolyticus (177). In all probability, acetyl
P influences cellular processes through a combination of mechanisms.
The extent to which acetyl
P influences gene expression and other cellular processes also remains to be determined. If acetyl
P interacts with even a small subset of RRs, the extent is likely to be vast. The knowledge that acetyl
P influences the activity of RRs in both gram-negative and gram-positive bacterium suggests a universal relationship. Since most bacteria possess 2CST systems, many of which regulate virulence factors, this relationship probably contributes to the pathogenicity of many organisms, including many potential biological weapons. Given that mammals do not synthesize acetyl
P or possess 2CST pathways, the interface between acetyl
P and 2CST pathways represents a prime target for pharmaceutical therapies or immune strategies.
The assimilation half of the "acetate switch" presents the cell with a second opportunity to monitor nutritional status. It makes perfect sense for the presence or absence of covalently bound acetyl groups to regulate AMP-ACS, an enzyme whose sole purpose is to activate acetate by acetylating AMP and then CoASH. It also makes sense for the acetylation state of that enzyme to depend upon an NAD+-dependent activity. It would be detrimental to cells that had not sufficiently regenerated NAD+ to begin assimilating acetate: MDH, a key enzyme in both the GB and the TCA cycle, requires NAD+. This NAD+-dependent regulation of AMP-ACS also suggests a mechanism for phosphoryl-independent chemotaxis. Through AMP-ACS, fluctuations in the intracellular NAD+ concentration could regulate CheY activity and thus the probability of CW flagellar motor rotation. Using such a mechanism, a swimming cell could sense the direction of a gradient of some assimilable carbon source, because its consumption alters the balance between NAD+ and NADH. Perhaps this represents the primordial chemotaxis machinery, which permitted motile cells to scavenge for food prior to the evolution of histidine kinases and chemoreceptors.
The complexity of acs transcription should not be surprising considering the importance of acetate assimilation. We expect that our dissection of the acs transcriptional machinery will teach us fundamental lessons about how bacterial cells regulate the vast number of similarly complex promoters. In particular, it will be fascinating to see how the component that recognizes the specific acetate-associated signal integrates into the overall, already quite complex, transcription scheme. On this note, one might consider the possibility that this missing signal may be related to the ratio of NAD+ to NADH or, perhaps, of acetyl-CoA to CoASH.
Finally, we must fully invest in efforts to understand the "acetate switch" of other organisms. Relative to E. coli and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, we know almost nothing concerning acetate metabolism in other model organisms, clinically important pathogens, industrial production strains, and ourselves.
I thank all my collaborators, all the individuals who provided me with access to their unpublished results, and anyone with whom I have spent hours discussing various aspects of the "acetate switch." I specifically want to emphasize the intellectual and technical efforts of four postdoctoral fellows, Christine M. Beatty, Douglas F. Browning, Suman Kumari, and Birgit M. Prüß.
|
|
|---|
-amylase gene expression in Bacillus subtilis involves a trans-acting gene product homologous to the Escherichia coli lacI and galR repressors. Mol. Microbiol. 5:575-584.[CrossRef][Medline]