Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, December 2005, p. 665-695, Vol. 69, No. 4
1092-2172/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MMBR.69.4.665-695.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Molecular Microbiology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Haren, The Netherlands
SUMMARY INTRODUCTION FUNCTION Distribution and Phylogeny Transport Properties Physiological Function Malolactic fermentation. Genetic organization of malolactic fermentation genes. Oxidative malate decarboxylation pathway. Citrolactic fermentation. Citrate fermentation in the gamma subdivision of Proteobacteria. Distribution of citrate fermentation in the bacterial kingdom. Evolutionary states of energy coupling to oxaloacetate decarboxylases. PROTEINS Cloning and Expression Purification and Reconstitution STRUCTURE Primary Structure Superfamilies and structural classes. Sequence analysis. Domain structure. Membrane Topology Transmembrane segments. Amphipathic helix and membrane insertion. Pore-loop structure. Structural Model Quaternary Structure MECHANISMS Kinetics Symport and exchange. Antiport mechanism of CitS. Alternate access. Structure-Function Relationships The conserved Arg in TMS XI. Chimeras of CitP and MleP. Interaction of substrate and co-ions with the Xa region. Mutations in the Vb region. Mechanistic Model CONCLUSIONS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Secondary transporters use the free energy stored in ion and/or solute gradients across the membrane to drive transport. The transporters are commonly classified in three groups based on their mode of energy coupling: (i) uniporters catalyze the translocation of a single solute across the membrane, (ii) symporters couple the translocation of a solute to the translocation of a co-ion(s) in the same direction, and (iii) antiporters couple the translocation of a solute and a co-ion(s) in opposite directions. Many antiporters couple the translocation of one solute to the translocation of another solute rather than a co-ion. They exchange a substrate at one side of the membrane for another substrate at the other side of the membrane. Symporters (and uniporters) can catalyze a similar reaction when they operate in the exchange mode of transport, a partial reaction. This exchange mode catalyzed by symporters differs from the antiport mechanism in that the translocations of the two substrates in the two directions are not obligatorily coupled. Symporters catalyzing exchange under physiological conditions are termed exchangers. The different modes of energy coupling enable transporters to play an important role in different aspects of the physiology of the cell. Thus, the symport and uniport mechanisms allow the cell to take up nutrients from the medium, while antiporters may function in the excretion of end products or in defense mechanisms by removing harmful compounds from the cell. Antiporters and exchangers may combine the uptake of a nutrient from the environment and the excretion of a metabolic end product.
As a rule, transport catalyzed by secondary transporters is a metabolic energy-requiring process. Symporters and antiporters couple the translocation of the substrate to the translocation of protons or sodium ions. The electrochemical gradients of H+ and Na+ across the membrane, or proton motive force (PMF) and sodium ion motive force, respectively, are directed inward. Both forces consist of a chemical gradient of the ions (
pH or
pNa) and the membrane potential (
) that is common to both forces. The gradients are maintained across the membrane by the action of primary pumps that use the free energy released in chemical reactions to pump H+ and Na+ across the membrane. The free energy stored in the electrochemical gradients of the ions across the cytoplasmic membrane is used to concentrate the substrate in the compartment to which it is transported. Thus, the symporter accumulates the substrate inside the cell, while the antiporter depletes the substrate from the cell. Secondary transporters that catalyze exchange are not coupled to (net) proton or Na+ movement and are driven by the inward-directed substrate gradient and the outward-directed product gradient. Both gradients are maintained by metabolism of the substrate inside the cell, which lowers the internal substrate concentration and increases the internal product concentration. A small group of exchangers that is of particular importance to the transporter family that is the topic of this review use the free energy in the substrate and product gradients to generate metabolic energy in the form of a membrane potential. They are part of metabolic pathways that function as indirect proton pumps.
Secondary transporters are typical integral membrane proteins that fold as a bundle of hydrophobic
-helices, which are oriented more or less perpendicular to the membrane. At the two sides of the membrane, the transmembrane segments (TMSs) are connected by hydrophilic loops of various lengths. Thus far, eight three-dimensional crystal structures of secondary transporters have been described. These structures have provided a first glimpse of the structural and mechanistic diversity that may be present in the many different families of secondary transporters. The structures of the drug transporter AcrB, the lactose transporter LacY, the glycerol-P/Pi exchanger GlpT, the Na+/H+ antiporter NhaA, and the Cl/H+ antiporter ClC, all from Escherichia coli; of the glutamate transporter homolog GltPh from the archaeon Pyrococcus horikoshii; of the leucine transporter LeuT from Aquifex aeolicus; and of the mitochondrial ATP/ADP antiporter (2, 37, 47, 49, 98, 105, 153, 154) represent seven different structures and possibly as many different mechanisms (137).
Here we review the current knowledge about the 2-hydroxycarboxylate transporter (2HCT) family, a family of secondary transporters. The members are found exclusively in bacteria, and all transport substrates such as citrate, malate, and lactate. Well-studied members of the 2HCT family are the Na+-citrate symporter CitS of Klebsiella pneumoniae, the malate/lactate exchanger MleP and the citrate/lactate exchanger CitP found in lactic acid bacteria, and the citrate/malate H+-symporter CimH of Bacillus subtilis. The transport properties of the characterized 2HCT members will be discussed in the context of their physiological function. Based on sequence analysis and the genetic organization of the structural genes in the genomes, physiological functions are assigned to uncharacterized 2HCT members. No three-dimensional (3D) structure of any of the members of the 2HCT family is available, but a wealth of data obtained from experimental studies and computational analysis will be discussed, giving us models for the structures and translocation mechanisms of the transporters in this family.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Distribution of the 2-hydroxycarboxylate family in the bacterial kingdom
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Unrooted phylogenetic tree of members of the 2HCT family. Phylogenetic relationships were analyzed with the CLUSTAL W program using the default settings (141). The tree was generated with the DRAWTREE program in the Phylip package (J. Felsenstein, PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), version 3.6.a3, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, 2002). The tree is based on the C-terminal part of the multiple-sequence alignment, which contains the fewest gaps (positions 300 to 500 in Fig. 5A). Sequences included in the alignment correspond to the "typical" sequences in the "2HCT" column of Table 1. All other members of the 2HCT transporter family share over 60% sequence identity with one of the "typical" sequences. The six clusters in the tree are indicated by I to VI.
|
The citrate transporter CitS of K. pneumoniae is by far the best-studied transporter in the 2HCT family. Nevertheless, the exact stoichiometry between substrate and co-ions has still not been resolved. Dimroth and Thomer (30) reported that citrate transport catalyzed by CitS was Na+ dependent and proposed that translocation involved symport of trivalent citrate (cit3) with three Na+ ions (30). The proposal was based on the observed lack of charge translocation during turnover (electroneutral transport), which, however, was disputed in other studies (142, 143). Moreover, the latter studies reported that the proton gradient across the membrane was a driving force, suggesting that in addition to Na+ ions, protons were cotransported. Since at physiological conditions, the divalent form of citrate is most abundant, it was proposed that Hcit2 would be symported with at least three co-ions, including both Na+ and H+ (142, 143). The affinity of the transporter for total citrate was found to be about 10 µM at a pH range of between 5.5 and 6.5. Kinetic analysis of citrate uptake measured in E. coli cells expressing CitS revealed that translocation of citrate is coupled to translocation of two sodium ions (76), a result that was confirmed much later by uptake studies in right-side-out membrane vesicles (134). The relationship between the uptake rate and Na+ ion concentration was shown to be sigmoid, with approximately 3 mM Na+ yielding half of the maximal rate. The coupling stoichiometry of two Na+ ions was observed at the pH range of pH 6 to 8, suggesting that H+ does not compete with Na+ for the two binding sites (76). A strict coupling between citrate and Na+ ions is also supported by point mutations that lower the affinity for Na+ by an order of magnitude but leave the stoichiometry unaltered (135). The differing opinions on the coupling stoichiometry of CitS extend to the kinetic mechanism of the transporter (see "Kinetics" in "MECHANISMS" below) (109). Little is known about the stoichiometries of the other Na+ symporter, MaeN of B. subtilis, and of the H+ symporters, MalP of S. bovis, and CimH of B. subtilis (60, 63, 151). The latter transporter is believed to catalyze electroneutral transport (63).
The exchangers in the 2HCT family belong to a special group of secondary transporters that are involved in the generation of secondary metabolic energy (78). They are precursor/product exchangers that couple the uptake of the substrate (the precursor) to the excretion of the end product of a metabolic pathway (5, 78, 107). Membrane potential is generated during turnover, because of a charge difference between the two substrates. CitP of Leuconostoc mesenteroides and MleP of L. lactis exchange internal monovalent lactate (lac) for external divalent citrate and malate (Hcit2 and mal2, respectively), which results in a membrane potential of physiological polarity (positive outside). CitP was shown to be a proton symporter with affinity for both citrate and lactate. In the symport reaction, CitP couples the translocation of Hcit2 to a single H+, resulting in the translocation of one unit of negative charge per turnover. As a consequence, the symport reaction is driven by a pH gradient but is counteracted by the membrane potential (94). With lactate as the substrate, CitP catalyzes electroneutral symport of lac and H+. In the exchange mode, the proton is believed to go back and forth during transport. The precursor/product exchangers are symporters that were optimized to catalyze exchange, which is their physiological function; exchange is much faster than symport (see also "Kinetics" in "MECHANISMS" below) (7, 94, 96, 107). Exchangers such as CitP and MleP recognize structurally related compounds; citrate and lactate, and malate and lactate, are pairs of 2-hydroxycarboxylates, HO-CR2-COO, that differ in the R groups. The proteins are very specific towards the hydroxyl and carboxylate groups and, at the same time, very tolerant towards the two R groups of the molecules. As a consequence, both CitP and MleP were shown to translocate a wide range of nonphysiological substrates that differ in the R groups (7). The only restriction seems to be the size of the R group, which at the upper limit is set by the size of the physiological substrates. Thus, CitP accepts citrate, while the most bulky substrate for MleP is malate. At the lower limit, glycolate, HO-CH2-COO is recognized and translocated by both transporters. Nonphysiological substrates with different R groups that were shown to be translocated include the dicarboxylates tartarate, citramalate, and 2-hydroxyglutarate and the monocarboxylates mandalate, 2-hydroxyisovalerate, 2-hydroxyisobutyrate, and glycolate (7, 9). Despite the broad specificity, both CitP and MleP were found to be highly stereoselective with a strong preference for the S over the R enantiomers. The stereoselectivity was observed only with dicarboxylate substrates, suggesting a specific interaction of the protein with a carboxylate of the R group in the S enantiomers (9). In agreement, the affinity of both MleP and CitP for the S enantiomers of dicarboxylate substrates is 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher than that observed for monocarboxylates and for the R enantiomers of dicarboxylates (see also "Structure-Function Relationship" in "MECHANISMS" below).
CitW of K. pneumoniae was shown to be a citrate/acetate exchanger and the first member of the 2HCT family where the physiological substrate is not a 2-hydroxycarboxylate (58). Previously, it was demonstrated that CitP and MleP of lactic acid bacteria showed some activity with the 2-oxocarboxylates glyoxylate and oxaloacetate (7, 9). CitW differs from CitP and MleP in that it does not share the broad substrate specificity of the latter two exchangers. Only a low activity was observed with L-malate. The transported species was shown to be Hcit2, suggesting electrogenic citrate/acetate exchange, but the electrogenicity was not demonstrated.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Schematic representation of physiological pathways for citrate and malate degradation involving 2HCT family members. (A) Malolactic fermentation; (B) citrolactic fermentation; (C) oxidative malate decarboxylation pathway; (D) citrate fermentation in gram-negative bacteria. Shaded circles represent the 2HCT transporter proteins. The stoichiometry of the transporters and the pyruvate lyase step are omitted in panel D. Abbreviations: cit, citrate; mal, malate; lac, lactate; oxace, oxaloacetate; ace, acetate; pyr, pyruvate; ME, malic enzyme; CL, citrate lyase; OAD, oxaloacetate decarboxylase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; AK, acetate kinase.
|
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Mechanism of enzymes involved in citrate and malate metabolic pathways. (A) Malic enzymes. Malic enzyme homologs catalyze the conversion of malate to oxaloacetate, oxaloacetate to pyruvate, and pyruvate to lactate, while the substrate remains bound to the enzyme. Different types of malic enzymes (MleS, MalS, and CitM) catalyze different parts of the sequence as indicated at the top. (B) Oxaloacetate decarboxylase. Left, the OAD complex of K. pneumoniae, showing the domain, subunit composition, and the names of the corresponding structural genes. Right, mechanism of catalysis. The domain on the ![]() subunit transfers the carboxyl group of oxaloacetate to the biotin group attached to the domain, after which the decarboxylation of the carboxy-biotin group is coupled to the pumping of Na+ ions across the membrane. (C) Citrate lyase. Left, composition of the CL complex and the accessory enzymes necessary for the incorporation and activation of the modified CoA prosthetic group R-SH (2'-(5"-phosphoribosyl)-3'-dephospho-CoA) on the gamma subunit. The corresponding structural genes are indicated as well. Right, mechanism of catalysis. The gamma subunit is an intermediate acyl carrier protein that cycles between the citryl- and acetyl-loaded state during turnover. Abbreviations: Cit, citrate; OxAce, oxaloacetate; Ace, acetate; Pyr, pyruvate.
|
The malolactic fermentation pathway is not general to lactic acid bacteria, but is observed only in certain strains of Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, and Leuconostoc. The process is best studied in Oenococcus oeni, a bacterium which plays an important role in the nonalcoholic fermentation in wine production (73, 83). Conversion of malate into lactate is an important step in the deacidification of wine following the alcoholic fermentation. The pathway in O. oeni (previously known as Leuconostoc oenos) is slightly different from the one described above for L. lactis, and the transporter is not a member of the 2HCT family. Rather than malate2/lactate exchange, the transporter of O. oeni catalyzes uniport of monovalent malate (Hmal) (120). The effect on the membrane potential is the same: net negative charge is moved into the cell. Inside the cell, malolactic enzyme converts Hmal into lactic acid (Hlac), thereby consuming a proton and releasing carbon dioxide. Lactic acid leaves the cell by passive diffusion. The energetic consequences of the pathway are the same, but the pathway is better adapted to the acidic conditions of wine fermentation (119). The transporter that catalyzes the electrogenic uniport reaction is a member of the auxin efflux carrier (AEC) family (TC 2.A.69 in the transporter classification system [17, 117]), which contains many members from bacteria, archaea, and plants (70).
Decarboxylation pathways built from a precursor/product exchanger and a decarboxylase are not restricted to lactic acid bacteria or to malate as the substrate. One of the first pathways described was the decarboxylation of oxalate to formate in Oxalobacter formigenes. The conversion is the main energy source for ATP production in this obligate anaerobic bacterium (5). Electrogenic exchange between divalent oxalate and monovalent formate is catalyzed by OxlT, a transporter from the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) (TC 2.A.1) (1). Another group of decarboxylation pathways is formed by the decarboxylation of amino acids, yielding biogenic amines. Examples are histidine to histamine and tyrosine to tyramine (20, 86, 87, 97). The exchangers that couple the uptake of the amino acid to the excretion of the amine are members of the amino acid-polyamine-choline superfamily (TC 2.A.3). Apparently, nature has implemented analogous pathways by selecting the appropriate transporters, and also decarboxylases, from different gene families.
Genetic organization of malolactic fermentation genes. In L. lactis, the genes coding for the decarboxylase MleS and the transporter MleP are organized in an operon structure in the order mleS-mleP (M-T) (Table 1). Upstream of mleS, but separated by 27 other genes, the mleR gene codes for a positive regulator of expression of the malolactic operon that senses the presence of L-malate. MleR is a member of the LysR family of activators (114). The three proteins MleR, MleS, and MleP are characteristic of the malolactic fermentation pathway, and highly similar proteins are encoded in the genome of Leuconostoc mesenteroides (6, 26). Here, the mleR gene is found immediately upstream of the mleS-mleP pair but divergently transcribed. The operon organization in which the malic enzyme is followed by the transporter is also found in the genome of Enterococcus faecium. Moreover, the transporter, ZP000379, clusters with MleP of L. lactis and Leuconostoc mesenteroides on the phylogenetic tree of the transporters (Fig. 1, cluster I), strongly suggesting that the two genes code for a malolactic fermentation pathway. Similarly to the case for L. lactis, a homologous gene coding for the transcriptional regulator MleR is located distantly on the chromosome. The two transporters of the plant pathogen Onion yellows phytoplasma in cluster VI of the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) are loosely associated with the transporters in cluster I, and the gene coding for CitSp$on is preceded by a malic enzyme homolog (Table 1). However, the latter is quite distant from the malolactic enzymes associated with the transporters in cluster I, and since no mleR homolog is found in the genome, the two genes are not likely to form a malolactic operon.
The genetic organization of the malolactic operon in the wine bacterium O. oeni is identical to that observed in Leuconostoc mesenteroides; a divergently transcribed regulator gene precedes the malic enzyme/transporter pair (R<>M-T) (69). Strikingly, however, as mentioned above, the transporter MleP of O. oeni is a member of the AEC rather than the 2HCT transporter family. In fact, a search of 156 completed bacterial genomes available at the microbial genome site of the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/MICROBES/Complete.html; April 2005) for the combination of the three genes characteristic of malolactic fermentation, mleR, mleS, and mleP, showed that transporters of the AEC family are most frequently observed in conjunction with MleS (Table 2). The search showed that the malolactic fermentation pathway is quite rare in the bacterial kingdom and is only found in low-GC gram-positive organisms. However, even then, the capacity is not at all general, with only 5 out of 38 genomes from the phylum Firmicutes coding for the pathway (Table 2). In this group, the malic enzymes and transcriptional regulators represent highly conserved groups of proteins, with >50 and >30% sequence identity for MleS and MleR, respectively. In contrast, the divergence in the associated transporters is remarkable. Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Streptococcus mutants use a transporter of the AEC family for the uptake of malate, as was described for O. oeni above. L. lactis uses a transporter of the 2HCT family, and Clostridium acetobutylicum uses one of the [st303]AIT family. Members of the latter family are known to catalyze exchange; e.g., CitT of E. coli catalyzes citrate/succinate exchange, and SODiT1 of spinach chloroplasts catalyzes 2-oxoglutarate/malate exchange (110). It is likely that the transporter of C. acetobutylicum catalyzes malate/lactate exchange, as does MleP of L. lactis. Both the [st326]2HCT and [st303]AIT1 transporter families are found in structural class ST[3] in the MemGen classification (see "Primary Structure" in "STRUCTURE" below) and may well be distantly related.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Distribution of (putative) malolactic fermentation over 156 sequenced bacterial genomes (207 strains)
|
In B. subtilis, the Na+/malate symporter MaeN, which is closely related to the H+/malate symporter of S. bovis (Fig. 1, cluster IV), is essential for the uptake of malate from the medium during growth on malate as the sole carbon source. A transcriptome analysis showed that the transporter is induced by the presence of malate in the medium, which is mediated by a two-component signal transduction system, YufLM (140). The two-component system is similar to the MalSR system in S. bovis and is encoded upstream of the transporter gene, separated by four other genes (Table 1). The same organization is observed in the genome of Bacillus licheniformis. Transcriptional analysis revealed coinduction via the two-component system of YwkA, one of four malic enzyme homologs encoded in the genome of B. subtilis. YwkA was shown to be a malic enzyme of the oxidative malate decarboxylation type, strongly suggesting that the malate-to-pyruvate pathway is operative in B. subtilis (33). It should be noted that while the transporter MaeN was shown to be essential for growth on malate, the ywkA gene product was not. Instead, a constitutively expressed malic enzyme homolog of the oxidative type, encoded by the ytsJ gene, was essential (33). Moreover, the ywkA gene is transcribed in a single transcript with ywkB, coding for an AEC family transporter, which may encode a malate transporter as well (see previous section). Other transporters that are likely to play a role in malate metabolism in B. subtilis are YflS in the [st303]AIT family, a transporter which is also part of the YufLM regulon, and CimH in cluster V of the 2HCT family (Fig. 1). The presence of the gene coding for CimH correlates with the presence of the malSR-4/5-MaeN gene cluster in the genomes of B. subtilis and B. licheniformis (Table 1). CimH of B. subtilis transports citrate with a high affinity but a low maximal rate and transports malate with a low affinity but a high maximal rate (63). It has been suggested that CimH and MaeN would cover efficient uptake over a large range of malate concentrations in the medium (66). MaeN would take care of the lower concentrations and CimH of the higher concentrations. Unfortunately, no conditions under which the CimH protein is expressed have been identified (66, 140). The interplay between the different malate transporters and decarboxylases in B. subtilis needs to be investigated further.
The 2HCT members from several Bacillus species found in phylogenetic clusters II and IV (Fig. 1) are organized in gene clusters together with a malic enzyme homolog and a MalSR two-component signal transduction system, suggesting their involvement in oxidative malate decarboxylation pathways (Table 1). In contrast to the clusters in the genomes of the lactic acid bacteria, the genes coding for the two-component systems of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, and Bacillus clausii (cluster IV) are transcribed in the same direction (malSR-T-M), while in Bacillus halodurans (139) and Oceanobacillus iheyensis (cluster II) the order of the transporter and malic enzyme is reversed. MaeN of Erwinia carotovora in cluster IV is the only transporter in the gamma subdivision of the phylum Proteobacteria which is clustered with a MalSR two-component system. As in B. subtilis and B. licheniformis, a malic enzyme homolog is missing and is probably located elsewhere in the genome. The remaining transporters in clusters II and IV, MaeN of Chromobacterium violaceum from the beta subdivision of the Proteobacteria and NP973298 of Treponema denticola from the phylum Spirochaetales, are associated neither with a malic enzyme nor with a two-component signal transduction system. The gene coding for MaeN of C. violaceum is clustered together with the genes for the two subunits of 3-isopropylmalate dehydratase, an enzyme in the leucine biosynthetic pathway. Possibly, the transporter is involved in the uptake of the intermediate 3-isopropylmalate rather than malate.
Citrolactic fermentation. Lactic acid bacteria in the phylum Firmicutes are facultative anaerobic bacteria that cannot grow on citrate as the sole source of carbon and energy, but many species are known to ferment citrate in cometabolism with a carbohydrate. The citrolactic fermentation pathway, like the malolactic fermentation pathway, is a secondary metabolic energy-generating route that produces proton motive force (96). The transporter involved in the uptake of citrate from the medium is the citrate/lactate exchanger, CitP, of the 2HCT transporter family. Exchange of divalent citrate for monovalent lactate by CitP yields a membrane potential of physiological polarity. Inside the cell, citrate is split by citrate lyase (CL), yielding oxaloacetate and acetate (Fig. 2B). The latter leaves the cell by passive diffusion. A cytoplasmic enzyme, oxaloacetate decarboxylase (CitM), converts oxaloacetate into pyruvate and carbon dioxide. This is the step in which a pH gradient is generated as the decarboxylation reaction consumes a cytoplasmic proton (77, 78). Therefore, like for malolactic fermentation, the proton motive force-generating system is built around a precursor/product exchanger (CitP) and a decarboxylase (CitM). The latter was recently shown to be a member of the malic enzyme family, to which malolactic enzyme (MleS) and the oxidative malate decarboxylase (MalS) also belong (129). The oxaloacetate decarboxylases are closely related to the MalS type of malic enzymes, which decarboxylate malate to pyruvate. Mechanistically, the conversion of malate to pyruvate by MalS proceeds via oxaloacetate (Fig. 3A). The electrons are donated to the cofactor NAD(P)+, while the subsequent decarboxylation of oxaloacetate to pyruvate is redox neutral. CitM is believed to skip the first step and to accept oxaloacetate directly as the substrate. NAD+/NADH was shown to be nonessential to the oxaloacetate decarboxylation activity. Nevertheless, the cofactor binding site appears to be conserved in the CitM proteins, and the ability to bind NAD+ and NADH was demonstrated by inhibition of enzyme activity in their presence (129).
The common decarboxylation step catalyzed by enzymes from the same family and the 50% sequence identity shared by the exchangers CitP and MleP (7) in cluster I on the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) indicate that the citrolactic and malolactic fermentation pathways are evolutionarily related. In Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Weissella paramesenteroides, all the genes involved in the citrolactic fermentation pathway are organized in a single operon that is located on a 22-kb plasmid. A transcriptional regulator (citR) and the citrate/lactate exchanger (citP) are downstream of the citDEFXG genes, coding for the citrate lyase subunits and accessory proteins, while the oxaloacetate decarboxylase gene (citM) is upstream (Table 1) (12, 13, 91). In L. lactis, the pathway is encoded in two separate operons; the transcriptional regulator is encoded together with the transporter on an 8-kb plasmid, while the remaining metabolic enzymes are encoded on the chromosome (35, 84, 88, 149). The only 2HCT transporter found in a Clostridium species, CitN in Clostridium perfringens, is also clustered with the citrate lyase genes and a malic enzyme homolog, suggesting its involvement in citrate degradation (Table 1). The order of the genes differs from the one in the lactobacilli; the malic enzyme is in between the citrate lyase genes and the transporter, while the citR and citG genes are upstream. CitN is closely related to the citrate transporters found in the gamma subdivision of the Proteobacteria (Fig. 1, cluster III).
The link between citrolactic fermentation and carbohydrate metabolism is evident, since lactate is a product of carbohydrate metabolism rather than citrate degradation. The pathways for citrate breakdown and carbohydrate breakdown merge at pyruvate, which subsequently, is reduced by lactate dehydrogenase to yield lactate, the substrate of the exchanger CitP (Fig. 2B). The redox equivalents necessary for the reduction are produced in glycolysis. Therefore, citrate fermentation is dependent on glycolysis. The coupling between the two pathways and the effect of citrate on growth are different for homofermentative and heterofermentative species (8, 48, 121). Homofermentative Lactococcus species produce 2 moles of pyruvate and, subsequently, of lactate per mole of glucose. The 2 moles of NADH needed for the reduction of pyruvate are produced in the earlier steps of the glycolytic pathway, which makes the pathway redox neutral as a whole. The end product, lactate, is used by CitP to take up citrate from the medium. The surplus of pyruvate fed into the pyruvate pool by citrate degradation is converted in a redox-neutral manner into aroma compounds such as diacetyl, a typical product of citrate/carbohydrate cometabolism. Heterofermentative Leuconostoc species yield 1 mol of ATP per mole of glucose, producing 1 mol of pyruvate and 1 mol of acetylphosphate (acetyl-P), which are reduced to 1 mol of lactate and 1 mol of ethanol, respectively, to balance the redox equivalents produced upstream in glycolysis. The more advantageous conversion of acetyl-P to acetate by acetate kinase, which would yield one more mole of ATP, would result in detrimental accumulation of redox equivalents and inhibition of growth. Consequently, the yield of ATP per mole of glucose is only 1 for a heterofermentative bacterium and 2 for a homofermentative bacterium. However, in the presence of citrate, pyruvate produced from citrate provides an alternative redox sink, allowing the conversion of acetyl-P to acetate. Citrate induces a metabolic shift from ethanol to acetate production with concomitant formation of additional ATP. The yield increases from 1 to 2 mol of ATP per mole of glucose. In Leuconostoc mesenteroides, lactate excreted by CitP is a more direct product of citrate fermentation, needing only the redox equivalents from glycolysis (89).
The proton motive force generated in the citrate degradation pathway is in addition to the proton gradient generated by F0F1-ATPase at the expense of ATP produced by substrate-level phosphorylation in glycolysis. Since the hydrolysis of one ATP is coupled to the pumping of three or four H+ ions across the membrane, the relative contribution of the metabolic energy generated by the secondary mechanism in the citrate degradation pathway is likely to be small when the fluxes through the two pathways are coupled. Assuming that energy is growth rate limiting, this is supported by the similar growth rates observed for L. lactis on glucose and on glucose/citrate (18, 138). In Leuconostoc mesenteroides, the energetic consequence of citrate cometabolism is more pronounced, but mainly because the ATP yield of glycolysis increases when metabolism shifts from ethanol to acetate production. Accordingly, a significant increase of growth rate is observed in the presence of citrate (19, 121, 123).
The lack of effect on the growth of L. lactis raises the question of the physiological benefit of the pathway in this organism. The answer is provided by the different induction profiles of the citrate metabolic pathways in Leuconostoc and Lactococcus species. In Leuconostoc mesenteroides, the enzymes of the pathway are induced by the presence of citrate in the medium, while in L. lactis, the induction additionally requires a low pH in the medium, suggesting a role in acid stress (40, 85, 89, 92, 93, 95). The conversion of carbohydrate to lactic acid results in acidification of the medium, which eventually inhibits growth. Proton consumption in the decarboxylation of oxaloacetate in the citrate degradation pathway initially results in alkalinization of the cytoplasm, but in the steady state of growth, when the pH gradient has developed, the alkalinizing effect is in the medium and counteracts the acidifying effect of glycolysis. Hence, the pH of the medium is buffered and the exponential phase of growth is prolonged during glucose/citrate cometabolism. Additionally, Magni et al. (89) demonstrated that the presence of citrate in the medium protects L. lactis against the toxicity exerted by lactate, which is produced in high concentrations in the medium (>10 mM) at the end of growth. Since lactic acid is a weak acid, it accumulates in the cell in response to a pH gradient across the cytoplasmic membrane. Cometabolism with citrate effectively lowers the cytoplasmic concentration of lactate by the action of the citrate/lactate exchanger CitP (89).
Citrate fermentation in the gamma subdivision of Proteobacteria.
K. pneumoniae is one of the best-studied organisms with respect to citrate fermentation (for a review, see reference 14). The organism is a gram-negative bacterium that under anaerobic conditions can grow on citrate as the sole carbon and energy source. Two transporters in the 2-hydroxycarboxylate transporter family are involved in the breakdown route, CitS in cluster III of the phylogenetic tree and CitW in cluster V (Fig. 1). CitS is responsible for the uptake of citrate from the medium. The first metabolic steps in the degradation of internalized citrate are the same as those observed in lactic acid bacteria, but the energetics of the pathway are different (Fig. 2D). Citrate is converted into acetate and oxaloacetate by CL, and oxaloacetate is converted to pyruvate and carbon dioxide by an oxaloacetate decarboxylase (OAD) which differs from the malic enzyme homologs (CitM) found in gram-positive bacteria. OAD is an integral membrane protein that uses the free energy released in the decarboxylation of oxaloacetate to pump Na+ across the membrane (29, 31). The activity of OAD recycles the sodium ions that have entered the cell in the symport reaction catalyzed by CitS. OAD consists of two integral membrane subunits, ß and
(encoded by oadB and oadG), and one membrane-associated subunit,
(encoded by oadAD) (152). Subunit
is the actual decarboxylase and consists of two domains,
and
. Domain
, the biotin acceptor domain, contains a biotin prosthetic group that accepts the carboxyl moiety of oxaloacetate in a reaction catalyzed by domain
. Subsequently, decarboxylation of the carboxybiotin group is coupled to Na+ translocation by the ß subunit (Fig. 3B). The pyruvate product is converted via acetyl-P into acetate. The latter reaction is catalyzed by acetate kinase and yields ATP, which is the main product of the citrate fermentation pathway in K. pneumoniae. It is believed that the exchanger, CitW, provides an additional uptake mechanism for citrate by coupling the transport of citrate into the cell to the excretion of the acetate end product produced by citrate lyase and acetate kinase (58). It is not known if the exchange is energy conserving.
The citrate fermentation pathway in K. pneumoniae is induced under anaerobic conditions in the presence of citrate (15, 16). The genes coding for the enzymes are clustered in the genome in two operons that are transcribed in opposite directions (Table 1). The organization in the genome is typical for the pathway in the gamma subdivision of the Proteobacteria and is also found in the Salmonella enterica, Photobacterium profundum, and Vibrio cholerae genomes. The transporters in these organisms share a high degree of similarity with CitS of K. pneumoniae (Fig. 1, cluster III; Table 1). The gene coding for the CitS transporter is followed by the three genes coding for the three subunits of oxaloacetate decarboxylase, OadG, OadAD, and OadB (Fig. 3B), and the CitA and CitB pair, which forms a two-component signal transduction system that senses the presence of citrate in the medium. In the opposite direction and upstream of the citS gene are the genes for the biosynthesis of the citrate lyase complex in the same order as observed in the genomes of the lactic acid bacteria discussed above (CDEFXG). In the K. pneumoniae cluster, the citX gene is missing, but it is located distantly in the genome next to the gene coding for the citrate/acetate exchanger CitW (125). The location of citX correlates with the presence of citW in the genome. Apparently CitW is not essential to the pathway, since the genomes of S. enterica, P. profundum, and V. cholerae do not contain the citW gene. A close homolog of CitW is found in the genome of E. carotovora (76% sequence identity) immediately upstream of the citrate lyase gene cluster. The CitAB two-component system is divergently transcribed, but the OAD oxaloacetate decarboxylase genes are missing.
Distribution of citrate fermentation in the bacterial kingdom.
The enzyme CL, which splits citrate into oxaloacetate and acetate, is typical for bacteria and is involved in all known anaerobic bacterial citrate fermentation pathways. The presence of genes involved in the biosynthesis of CL is a diagnostic tool for the presence of the anaerobic citrate degradation pathway in the bacterium. The CL complex is built from three different subunits,
, ß, and
, which are encoded by the citF, citE, and citD genes, respectively (Fig. 3C). Subunit
is an acyl carrier protein that carries the acetyl group via a thioester bond on a coenzyme A (CoA)-derived prosthetic group covalently linked to the protein at a serine residue. The acetyl-loaded
subunit is an intermediate during catalysis. Subunit
replaces the acetyl group with a citryl group with the release of acetate. Subsequently, subunit ß regenerates the acetyl-loaded state of the cofactor by releasing oxaloacetate from the citryl group. Three additional gene products are involved in the maturation of the CL complex. CitG is involved in the modification of the CoA cofactor, CitX in the attachment of the prosthetic group to the
subunit, and CitC in the activation of the group by catalyzing the initial acetylation (124).
The citrate lyase genes are encoded in the genomes of only 19 of the 156 bacteria listed in Table 2 and for which the complete genome sequences are available (Table 3). Each organism listed in Table 3 contains a complete set of the three structural genes citDEF and the three accessory genes citC, citX, and citG, indicating that active CL complexes are produced. Salmonella enterica and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium each contain two sets of the genes, while Clostridium tetani contains an extra set of the structural genes, but not of the accessory genes. The CL genes are found mainly in the Bacillales and Clostridia of the phylum Firmicutes and in the gamma subdivision of the Proteobacteria. In part this may be due to the low number of sequenced genomes of organisms from many of the other phyla. It seems safe to conclude that citrate fermentation is not a trait present in the phylum Actinobacteria, the Mollicutes in the Firmicutes, and the alpha and beta subdivisions of the Proteobacteria (see Table 2 for the number of finished genomes). In the gamma subdivision, the genes are remarkably well-conserved in the order CDEFXG. In Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus ducreyi, the CitX and CitG proteins are combined as two domains in a single polypeptide chain. In the Firmicutes, the order of the structural genes citDEF is also conserved, but the positions of the accessory genes are more variable (Table 3). A noteworthy difference between the pathways in Proteobacteria and Firmicutes is that in the former regulation of expression seems to involve a two-component signal transduction system (CitAB), while in the latter a transcriptional regulator, CitR, is involved.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Distribution of citrate fermentation over 156 sequenced bacterial genomes (207 strains)
|
The CL gene clusters lacking an oxaloacetate decarboxylase gene are found mainly in the gamma subdivision of the Proteobacteria. In E. coli, the citT gene coding for the citrate/succinate exchanger (AIT transporter family) is located downstream of the CL genes, while the CitAB two-component signal transduction system is located upstream, on the opposite strand (Table 3). One of the two CL clusters in the genomes of S. enterica and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium have exactly the same configuration, indicating that they also code for the citrate-to-succinate pathway. Similarly, the AIT transporter gene follows the CL cluster in Haemophilus influenzae, Haemophilus ducreyi, and Shigella flexneri, but a two-component system is absent. On the H. ducreyi genome, the transporter is followed by a malic enzyme, the only one found in combination with the CL genes in the Proteobacteria. The genome of E. carotovora in the gamma subdivision does not contain a decarboxylase clustered with the CL gene, but the associated transporter is from the 2HCT family. The transporter gene is inserted between the CL genes and the genes coding for the CitAB two-component signal transduction system. The transporter is a close homolog of CitW of K. pneumoniae (
76% sequence identity; Fig. 1, cluster V), which catalyzes citrate/acetate exchange. Possibly, in this organism the CitW homolog functions as a citrate/succinate, rather than as a citrate/acetate exchanger, and has taken over the role of CitT. The only CL cluster outside the phylum Proteobacteria that is devoid of a decarboxylase is found in L. acidophilus, a Lactobacillus species in the phylum Firmicutes. This transporter is from the AIT family, which suggests that the citrate-to-succinate pathway is operative in this gram-positive bacterium. The genes coding for malate dehydrogenase, fumarase, and fumarate reductase are located immediately upstream of the CL genes. L. plantarum and other lactobacilli have been reported to produce succinate from citrate (23, 72).
CL clusters containing the OAD type of oxaloacetate decarboxylase genes are as widely distributed as the CL genes, but the actual number of the four genes, oadABDG, found in genomes of the different phyla varies. The two divergently transcribed operons coding for the OAD-dependent citrate fermentation pathway in the gamma subdivision of the Proteobacteria are found in P. profundum, Salmonella enterica, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and V. cholerae (44). The operons are extremely well conserved and contain a complete complement of the OAD genes. The associated transporter is the Na+-citrate symporter in cluster III of the 2HCT transporter family (Fig. 1). A second group of OAD-dependent pathways is found in the Firmicutes. The genomes of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus pyogenes, and E. faecalis contain the genes oadA, oadB, and oadD, coding for the
, ß, and
subunits of oxaloacetate decarboxylase. In the Proteobacteria, the carboxyl transferase
and the biotin-containing carboxyl-accepting
are two domains of one protein, but in the gram-positive bacteria they form separate proteins. A gene coding for the
subunit is missing in the gene cluster and is not found elsewhere on the chromosome. The E. faecalis cluster contains both an OAD type and a malic enzyme type of decarboxylase. The transporter associated with the pathway in the Firmicutes is from the [st301]CITM transporter family in structural class ST[3] in the MemGen classification (TC 2.A.11 CitMHS). Characterized members from this family transport complexes of citrate and divalent metal ions. CitM from B. subtilis transports citrate in complex with Mg2+, while CitH transports the complex of citrate and Ca2+. Both transporters are H+ symporters (65, 66). The citrate fermentation-associated genes in the spirochete T. denticola are fragmented into three parts. As in the Firmicutes, the OAD cluster contains the genes coding for the
and
subunits (in one protein) and for the ß subunit, but not that coding for the
subunit. However, no [st301]CITM transporter homolog is encoded on the chromosome. A 2HCT member which is a close relative of BH0400 of B. halodurans (Fig. 1, cluster II) is distantly located. Finally, the fusobacterium Fusobacterium nucleatum only contains the oadA gene in a cluster with a 2HCT transporter.
CL clusters with the gene coding for the malic enzyme (CitM) decarboxylase are found mainly in the phylum Firmicutes. The transporters in these clusters are from four different families. The pathways in L. lactis and C. perfringens involve a 2HCT transporter. L. plantarum utilizes a transporter from the AIT family, E. faecalis uses a transporter from the CITM family, and C. tetani uses a transporter of the [st313]AITC family, which is also found in structural class ST[3]. The substrate specificity of the [st313]AITC transporters is not known. It is unlikely that all these gene clusters represent citrolactic fermentation pathways as present in L. lactis. Rather, other metabolic pathways yielding the initial pyruvate product may exist, as is observed for the malate fermentation pathways. On the other hand, the related malolactic fermentation pathway also involves transporters from different families (Table 2). The cluster in L. plantarum resembles the cluster in L. acidophilus, which does not contain a malic enzyme homolog and is believed to catalyze the conversion of citrate to succinate (see above). Both clusters contain the necessary enzymes for the latter conversion, suggesting that in L. plantarum oxaloacetate may be converted to succinate or to pyruvate. If so, the AIT transporter in the cluster is likely to be involved in the pathway yielding succinate. The existence of two parallel pathways following the action of citrate lyase in the anaerobic breakdown of citrate is observed in other bacteria as well. E. faecalis contains both the OAD and CitM-dependent pathways, H. ducreyi contains both the CitM-dependent pathway and the citrate-to-succinate pathway, and the Salmonella species contain the OAD-dependent and the citrate-to-succinate pathways. The two pathways may not be operative under the same conditions.
Evolutionary states of energy coupling to oxaloacetate decarboxylases. The conversion of citrate to pyruvate is common to the anaerobic breakdown of citrate in bacteria. The conversion involves the splitting of citrate into oxaloacetate and acetate catalyzed by citrate lyase and the decarboxylation of oxaloacetate to pyruvate and carbon dioxide catalyzed by oxaloacetate decarboxylase. The free energy change associated with the conversion is mainly in the latter reaction. While the standard free energy of the reaction catalyzed by citrate lyase is around zero, the standard free energy of the decarboxylation reaction is about 32 kJ/mol, which is comparable to the value for the ATP hydrolysis reaction. In mitochondria, the reverse reaction, the carboxylation of pyruvate, is coupled to ATP hydrolysis by pyruvate carboxylase. It is therefore no surprise that nature has selected the oxaloacetate decarboxylase reaction as the target site for free energy conservation in the pathway from citrate to pyruvate. The oxaloacetate decarboxylases of the CitM type and the OAD type that are involved in the citrate fermentation pathways in bacteria are completely different enzymes, and the two types represent completely different mechanisms of conserving the free energy released in the decarboxylation reaction. The malic enzymes are single-gene products that do not themselves conserve the free energy. Instead, energy conservation is achieved indirectly by "metabolic" coupling to a PMF-generating secondary transporter that takes up the substrate and expels the product of the pathway. In contrast, the OAD complex is a multisubunit complex that directly conserves the free energy by pumping Na+ across the membrane, thereby generating a sodium ion motive force. It is likely that during evolution the function of energy conservation was added to the decarboxylation reaction catalyzed by a hypothetical primordial oxaloacetate decarboxylase. Different states in evolution may still be recognized in different organisms (Fig. 4).
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Energy coupling to oxaloacetate decarboxylation in bacteria. (A and C) Primordial oxaloacetate decarboxylases of the ME type (A) and OAD type (C) do not conserve the free energy released in the reaction. (B) Metabolic coupling. In citrolactic fermentation, the malic enzyme activity drives the exchange of external citrate for internal lactate catalyzed by the 2HCT exchanger CitP, thereby generating membrane potential. (F) Direct coupling. The OAD complex couples the decarboxylation reaction directly to the pumping of Na+ across the membrane. (D and E) Intermediate evolutionary states of energy coupling by OAD type of decarboxylases. The organisms in which the pathways are found and the transporter involved in the uptake of citrate into the cell are indicated at the bottom. For clusters of the 2HCT family, see Fig. 1. Abbreviations: Cit, citrate; OxaCe, oxaloacetate; Lac, lactate; Pyr, pyruvate. See the text for further explanation.
|
subunit of the Na+-pumping oxaloacetate decarboxylase found in Proteobacteria, is present. The
subunit of the OAD complex is responsible for the transfer of the carboxyl group from oxaloacetate to the biotin cofactor on the
subunit (encoded by oadD) (Fig. 3B). Since the latter is not present, it is likely that carbon dioxide is released freely by the
subunit in F. nucleatum. Moreover, in the OAD complex the
subunit is peripherally bound to the membrane through a specific interaction mediated by the
subunit (oadG), an integral membrane protein (124, 127). It follows that in F. nucleatum, OadA is a cytoplasmic enzyme that does not conserve the free energy released upon decarboxylation of oxaloacetate, in much the same way as the malic enzyme in C. perfringens (Fig. 4A and C). The pathways in F. nucleatum and C. perfringens share a similar transporter for the uptake of citrate (cluster III) and a single-subunit enzyme, but of different origin, for the decarboxylation of oxaloacetate.
Two intermediate states between the single-subunit oxaloacetate decarboxylase in F. nucleatum (Fig. 4C) and the energy-conserving OAD complex in the Proteobacteria (Fig. 4F) are found in S. mutans in the phylum Firmicutes (Fig. 4D) and in T. denticola in the phylum Spirochaetales (Fig. 4E). Energy coupling is achieved by coupling the decarboxylation reaction catalyzed by OadA to a primary transporter that transports Na+ across the membrane. Na+ pumping is driven by the decarboxylation of a carboxybiotin group that is carried by a proteinaceous substrate. Essential to the coupling mechanism is that the carboxyl group released from oxaloacetate by OadA is transferred to the carboxyl-carrier protein rather than being released freely. The gene clusters in S. mutans and T. denticola lack the gene for the
subunit, leaving the
protein in the cytoplasm. In S. mutans, the carboxyl-carrier protein
is likely to shuttle back and forth between the oxaloacetate decarboxylase
subunit in the cytoplasm and the Na+ pump ß in the membrane. A separate acquisition of the gene coding for the
subunit and for the ß-
pair is evident from their positions in the CL cluster. In T. denticola, the genes coding for the
and
subunits have fused, making
and
two domains of one protein that shuttles between the cytoplasm and the ß subunit in the membrane. Subunit
was added to the enzyme system, linking the
-
protein to the transporter in the membrane, resulting in the complex found in K. pneumoniae.
|
|
|---|
Heterologous expression systems for E. coli are abundantly available, and the NICE system, based on the nisin-inducible promoter, has provided a reliable system for expression in L. lactis (27, 67). Together, gram-negative E. coli and gram-positive L. lactis may serve as suitable hosts for genes originating from a wide range of bacteria. E. coli is especially suitable for expression of the citrate transporters in the 2HCT family, since the inability to grow on citrate as the sole carbon source under aerobic conditions is due to lack of a citrate transport system in the membrane. Functional expression of a citrate transporter from a recombinant plasmid is immediately evident from growth on citrate or the phenotype on citrate metabolism indicator plates (Simmons agar) (131). Moreover, mutants deficient in malate uptake systems are available that do not grow or grow only poorly on malate, the other main substrate of the transporters of the 2HCT family (25, 75). The genera Klebsiella and Salmonella are closely related to the genus Escherichia, and CitS and CitW of K. pneumoniae (58, 126, 143) and CitC of several Salmonella serovars (50) were successfully expressed in E. coli and characterized. However, CimH and MaeN of B. subtilis and MalP of S. bovis, more distantly related gram-positive bacteria, could also be functionally expressed in E. coli (60, 63, 151). Like that of Leuconostoc mesenteroides, the capacity of L. lactis to take up citrate is plasmid bound, making plasmid-free strains like L. lactis MG1363 good candidates for hosting citrate transporters. Strain MG1363 is deficient in malolactic fermentation because of a defect in the malate/lactate exchanger gene mleP. CitP of Leuconostoc mesenteroides and MleP of L. lactis were functionally expressed in L. lactis and then characterized in right-side-out membrane vesicles (7, 9, 10, 11). Introduction of MleP (and CitP) restored malolactic fermentation activity in L. lactis MG1363 (J. S. Lolkema, unpublished results). Early attempts to express the citrate/lactate exchanger CitP of L. lactis in E. coli resulted in poor levels of expression (24, 130), and a more systematic study in which expression vectors and host strains were varied did not result in much improvement (8). Moreover, the latter study suggested that the transporter in E. coli and L. lactis membranes may have different properties.
domain in Fig. 3B) of the 
subunit of the oxaloacetate decarboxylase of K. pneumoniae was fused to the C terminus of CitS. BAD is a
10-kDa protein fragment that is biotinylated in vivo when expressed in E. coli. The His tag and BAD tag allow for purification on immobilized Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid and monomeric avidin resins, respectively (108). A complication with the C-terminal BAD is that the C terminus of the CitS protein is located in the periplasm, which results in less efficient biotinylation of the protein, a reaction catalyzed by biotin ligase situated in the cytoplasm (144). Optimization was sought by coexpressing the birA gene, coding for biotin ligase, and by adding biotin to the growth medium (56). The yield of the procedure was further improved by replacing the His6 tag with a His10 tag (109), by moving the BAD domain from the C to the N terminus (109), and by using different expression systems, growth conditions, and host strains (56). These improvements resulted in yields of as much as 6.5 mg of pure protein from 1 liter of culture for the His10-tagged CitS protein. Purified His-tagged CitS showed a higher mobility, corresponding to a protein with a molecular mass of 33 kDa on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), than the expected 47 kDa. An aberrant mobility is normal for membrane proteins and is due to the larger amount of SDS binding to these hydrophobic proteins compared to the average amount bound by the globular proteins used as standards. The BAD-tagged proteins undergo proteolytic cleavage of the BAD domain at the fusion sites, which is evidenced by the appearance of two equally stained bands after SDS-PAGE, one corresponding to the BAD-CitS fusion protein and one to CitS. The copurification of tagged and untagged CitS was taken as evidence for an oligomeric structure of the protein (see "Quartenary Structure" in "STRUCTURE" below) (108). Purified CitS was used for mechanistic studies following reconstitution in proteoliposomes (56, 109) and for single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy studies (57). The procedure for the reconstitution of CitS of K. pneumoniae in protein-free liposomes was first developed using solubilized membranes prepared from K. pneumoniae grown under anaerobic conditions (30). Although interference of other proteins cannot be excluded, the resulting proteoliposomes showed the main transport characteristics of the CitS protein. Later, the solubilized membranes were replaced by purified CitS, resulting in a liposomal system containing essentially one membrane protein. Purified CitS in dodecylmaltoside solution was reconstituted by dilution into a suspension of preformed liposomes made of soybean phosphatidylcholine (56, 108, 109). Kinetic analysis of citrate transport catalyzed by CitS suggested that the protein was inserted asymmetrically in the liposomal membrane (109).
More recently, small-scale purification methods were developed for members of the 2HCT family strictly for analytical purposes (64, 135, 136). The purification method is based on Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid affinity chromatography and yields enough protein for visualization by SDS-PAGE. This method was used in labeling studies of single-Cys mutants of CimH of B. subtilis (63) and CitS of K. pneumoniae (135, 136).
|
|
|---|
A different approach for establishing distant evolutionary relationships between families of membrane proteins involves hydropathy profile alignment (79). The approach is based on the fact that during evolution the structure of a protein is much better conserved than the amino acid sequence. Consequently, proteins grouped in a family based on sequence identity also share a similar fold, and comparing the structures of proteins enables the detection of more distant evolutionary relationships than is possible by sequence comparison. Due to their architecture, proteins that reside in the plasma membrane have characteristic hydropathy profiles which are a "fingerprint" of their structure (68). In this approach, the hydropathy profile is used to estimate structural similarity between membrane proteins and replaces the actual structure in the search for evolutionary relationships. The procedure involves computation of the optimal alignment of two averaged family hydropathy profiles. The difference between the optimal aligned profiles is compared to the average difference between the individual profiles and the average profile in each family. This provides a statistical criterion for structural similarity and, therefore, for an evolutionary relationship. Using this approach, the 2HCT family was shown to be related to 31 other families of membrane proteins (80, 81). The 32 families are contained in structural class ST[3] in the MemGen database (http://molmic35.biol.rug.nl/memgen/main.htm). The implication is that all proteins in ST[3] share a similar fold. The wider scope of the hydropathy profile comparison method versus the sequence comparison method is evident from the inclusion of the complete ion transporter superfamily from the TC system in structural class ST[3]. In addition, ST[3] contains a number of families which, like the 2HCT family ([st326]2HCT), are completely unrelated in sequence. All characterized transporters in ST[3] are either organic/inorganic anion transporters or Na+/H+ antiporters.
Sequence analysis. The amino acid sequences of the members of the 2HCT family vary in length between 421 and 456 residues, with the exception of the two Onion yellows phytoplasma sequences, which are both considerably shorter, with 371 and 381 residues. Onion yellows phytoplasma is a plant pathogen belonging to the class Mollicutes, containing many minimal life forms. They live in insects and plants and are characterized by a highly degenerative genome. The Onion yellows phytoplasma genome contains only 860 kbp, which code for no more than 754 proteins. The CitS and CitS_1 sequences of Onion yellows phytoplasma are the most distant sequences in the family (Fig. 1). A multiple-sequence alignment shows that the sequences are truncated at the N terminus by some 100 residues. The hydropathy profile over the multiple-sequence alignment reveals two or three hydrophobic peaks in this region, suggesting that the Onion yellows phytoplasma transporters would miss at least two N-terminal transmembrane segments (Fig. 5A). Even though it would be quite coincidental that two similarly truncated transporter proteins are found in the same genome, it remains to be demonstrated that the two genes code for functional transporters.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Profile analysis of the 2HCT family of transporters. The profiles were calculated based upon a multiple-sequence alignment of the "typical" sequences listed in Table 1, using a window of 20 residues (see also the legend to Fig. 1). Bars in the tops of the panels indicate the positions of gaps in the sequences. (A) Hydropathy profile using the Eisenberg scale (38). (B) Pairwise sequence identity (PSI) profile. The fraction of identical pairs at each position averaged over the window is plotted. (C) Hydrophobic moment profile. The hydrophobic moment was calculated at a periodicity of 100o ( -helix). (D) Frequency distribution of the glycine, alanine, and serine residues.
|
Domain structure. Early studies (45) recognized that many of the structural genes coding for transporters of the major facilitator superfamily contain a repeat in the two halves of the gene, implying that they arose from an ancient gene duplication. The proteins would have consisted of two domains with similar structures. A low-resolution structure of the oxalate transporter OxlT of O. formigenes (46) and the recent high-resolution structures of the lactose transporter LacY (2) and the glycerol-3-P transporter GlpT (47) of E. coli, all MFS members, clearly revealed the two domains, each consisting of six transmembrane segments and with superimposable structures. The two domains are connected by a hydrophilic linker that shows up as a "dip" in the hydropathy profile and separates the N-terminal domain from the C-terminal domain. A similar "dip" is observed in the profiles of structural class ST[3] family profiles (around position 300 in Fig. 5A for the 2HCT family), suggesting a similar two-domain structure, but sequence identity between the N- and C-terminal halves is not evident.
Sequence homology between the N- and C-terminal halves of the proteins in the different families of structural class ST[3] was searched for by use of the BLAST algorithm (4). It was demonstrated that the N-terminal (or C-terminal) halves "hit" a C-terminal (or N-terminal) half with a significantly higher frequency than the proteins in a control set of the same length and amino acid composition taken from unrelated transport protein families. Most of the Expect values of the hits, which provide a measure of significance, were high, indicating a weak relationship. Remarkably, most hits were observed between the N- and C-terminal halves of different proteins, rather than the same protein. Analysis of the best-scoring local alignments showed that the homologous region involved the complete N- and C-terminal parts, consistent with two homologous domains (82).
The number of hits between N-terminal and C-terminal halves of the 2HCT family of transporters was small. The longest local alignment was observed between the N-terminal half of FN1375 of F. nucleatum and the C-terminal half of NP973298 of T. denticola. The span of 148 positions with 29% sequence identity covered 60 and 70% of the N- and C-terminal sequences, respectively. A higher sequence identity of 33% was observed in a span of 78 positions between the N- and C-terminal halves of BH0400 of B. halodurans. All local alignments involved more or less corresponding parts of both halves. A multiple-sequence alignment of the N- and C-terminal halves of these best-hit scoring sequences revealed a single sequence motif, GGxG, just in front of position 210 in the alignment (Fig. 6). In the multiple-sequence alignment of all 2HCT family members, the motif is completely conserved in the C-terminal half and almost fully conserved in the N-terminal half (Fig. 7). In the latter half, the motif is violated by the two truncated Onion yellows phytoplasma sequences. The motifs are at the center of the conserved regions around positions 225 and 460 (Fig. 5B). The alignment of the N- and C-terminal halves shows that, except for the two regions containing the GGxG motif, the hydrophobic regions coincide in the two halves. However, the first hydrophobic region in the N-terminal domain does not have a counterpart in the C-terminal domain (see below).
![]() View larger version (73K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Multiple-sequence alignment of N- and C-terminal domains of selected members of the 2HCT family. N-terminal halves of sequences that produced hits with C-terminal halves, and vice versa, were selected, and a multiple sequence alignment was produced with CLUSTAL W (141). The overall sequence similarity between the two groups of five N-terminal (top) and C-terminal (bottom) halves is indicated with an asterisk for identical residues and with a tilde for similar residues. The positions of the putative TMSs in the N- and C-terminal halves are indicated by solid lines above and below the sequences, respectively. Similarly, the positions of the conserved regions, Vb and Xa, are indicated by dotted lines.
|
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Sequence logos of the region around the sequence motif GGxG (positions 5, 6, and 8) in the N-terminal (top) and C-terminal (bottom) domains of the 2HCT transporters. The multiple-sequence alignment included all typical sequences (see Fig. 1 and Table 1). The logos were generated using WebLogo, version 2.8.1 (http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/cgi-bin/seqlogo/logo.cgi).
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Topology model of the members of the 2HCT family, based on experimental data for CitS of K. pneumoniae. Boxes represent putative transmembrane segments. The lengths of the loops correlate with the numbers of residues present in the loops. Segment Vb corresponds to a hydrophobic region that was predicted to be transmembrane. Loop Xa is one of the best-conserved regions in the 2HCT family and folds as a pore-loop structure. The AH loop folds into an amphipathic surface helix. The positions of the five endogenous cysteine residues Cys 278, Cys317, Cys347, Cys398, and Cys414 in CitS of K. pneumoniae are indicated by dots.
|
The topology of CitS with the 11 TMSs was confirmed by inserting the 10-kDa BAD of the oxaloacetate decarboxylase of K. pneumoniae (21, 28) or six consecutive histidine residues (His tag) in specific loops of the full-length protein. The localization of the tag was then determined (146). At many sites, the protein tolerated the insertion and was still active in citrate transport, thereby confirming the correct folding of the protein. A cytoplasmic localization of the BAD follows from the presence of the biotin cofactor bound to the domain, requiring posttranslational modification by biotin ligase, an endogenous enzyme present in the cytoplasm of E. coli (22). Biotinylation is easily detected with alkaline phosphatase-labeled streptavidin. His-tagged mutants were treated in spheroplasts by proteinase K, which digests tags located at the periplasmic side of the membrane but leaves cytoplasmically located tags intact. The latter were detected by immunoblotting using antibodies raised against the His tag. Insertions and fusions of the BAD confirmed the cytoplasmic location of the N terminus, the loops between TMSs VI and VII and between TMSs X and XI, and the periplasmic location of the C terminus (146). A His tag insertion confirmed the localization of the Vb loop in the periplasm. Support for the cytoplasmic location for the AH and Xa loops (Fig. 8) was obtained by labeling of endogenous or engineered cysteine residues in the loops. Two native cysteine residues located in the Xa region were shown to be inaccessible from the periplasm with the membrane-impermeative reagent AmdiS (4-acetamido-4'-maleimidylstilbene-2,2'-disulfonate) but were readily accessible from the cytoplasm (135). The same results were obtained for a series of engineered cysteine residues in loop AH (see below) (136).
Amphipathic helix and membrane insertion. The cytoplasmic loop between TMSs VIII and IX in CitS forms an amphipathic surface helix which is proposed to play a role in the atypical insertion of TMSs VIII and IX (145). Insertion of truncated versions of CitS, comprising TMSs I to VIII, into the bacterial membrane showed that TMS VIII (around position 350 in Fig. 5A), which is one of the most hydrophobic transmembrane segments of CitS, resided in the periplasm and did not insert into the membrane. Insertion was induced when the truncation was extended to contain the next TMS, TMS IX (around position 390 in Fig. 5A), which is the least hydrophobic TMS in the protein. Apparently the presence of TMS IX is both essential and sufficient for proper insertion of both segments (145). It was proposed that hydrophobic segment VIII would drive the insertion of the VIII/IX helix pair into the membrane and that the truncation up to TMS VIII would represent a trapped folding intermediate in a nonsequential insertion mechanism. During cotranslational insertion of CitS, the part of the nascent chain containing both segments VIII and IX would first be exported to the periplasm, and only when both segments are completely synthesized would the hydrophobicity of TMS VIII facilitate the insertion of TMS IX (145, 147).
Profiles of the hydrophobic moment revealed a strong amphipathic character of the cytoplasmic loop between TMSs VIII and IX, when folded as an
helix (Fig. 5C), suggesting that the loop might form a surface helix (AH) (Fig. 8). This property is conserved in all members of the 2HCT family and throughout structural class ST[3] in the MemGen classification. Cysteine-scanning mutagenesis was used to study the secondary structure of the AH loop in CitS of K. pneumoniae. CitS derivatives containing single cysteine residues at 20 successive positions in the loop were labeled with the fluorescent probe fluorescein-5-maleimide in membrane vesicles with an inverted orientation (inside-out membranes). The labeling showed a clear periodicity in the accessibility of the 20 positions. Residues predicted to be at the hydrophobic face of the putative
-helix were not accessible to the label, whereas those at the hydrophilic face were easily accessed and labeled. Pretreatment of whole cells and inside-out membranes expressing the mutants with the membrane-impermeative thiol reagent AmdiS confirmed the cytoplasmic localization of the AH region. Cysteine residues at the hydrophilic face were accessible for labeling with AmdiS only from the cytoplasmic side of the membrane (136).
The presence of the amphipathic structure is believed to play a role in the insertion mechanism of the TMS pair VIII and IX. Studies done with the Tsr chemoreceptor protein of E. coli showed that introduction of mutations into an amphipathic stretch of 11 residues in a cytoplasmic loop immediately downstream of a transmembrane segment, affected the insertion process. A correlation was observed between the export of the cytoplasmic loop and the amphipaticity of the stretch. It was suggested that an amphipathic sequence might represent a determinant of membrane topology (128). A similar function was then proposed for the CitS AH region, where it would be involved in proper insertion of the protein into the membrane, possibly by stabilizing the folding intermediate with TMS VIII in the periplasm (136).
Pore-loop structure. The cytoplasmic loop between TMSs X and XI is one of the best-conserved regions in the proteins of the 2HCT transporter family. Experimental evidence has been presented for two transporters, CitS of K. pneumoniae and CimH of B. subtilis, showing that the loop may form a so-called pore-loop or reentrant loop that is part of the translocation site (64, 135). A pore-loop structure is formed by part of a loop which is folded back in between the TMSs. Pore-loops are commonly found in channel proteins, where they function as selectivity filters, but the recent structure of the glutamate transporter homolog of P. horikoshii, GltPh, revealed that they may be essential features of secondary transporters as well (154). Known channel structures and the GltPh transporter show that at least two pore-loops are found together in the structure. For example, potassium channels are tetrameric structures with four pore-loops (one on each subunit), which enter the pore formed by the TMSs from the same side of the membrane (cis pore-loops) to form a pathway for potassium ions (34). In aquaporins (39, 99) and the glutamate transporter, two pore-loops in one polypeptide chain enter the membrane-embedded part of the structure from opposite sides of the membrane (trans pore-loops), where they meet in the 3D structure. Pore-loop structures are not easily predicted by computational methods. In the hydropathy profiles of proteins known to form pore-loops, they show up as moderately hydrophobic regions (132).
Without the availability of a 3D structure, pore-loop structures are experimentally identified in a membrane protein by accessibility studies. In general, a region of a loop that folds back in between the TMSs is detected by the accessibility of residues in the loop from the opposite side of the membrane. Often, pore-loops are characterized as regions in putative loops that are accessible from both sides of the membrane. This property may be related to their presumed function in the translocation mechanism (42, 43, 133). The CitS protein of K. pneumoniae contains five native cysteine residues, and two of them, Cys398 and Cys414, are located in cytoplasmic loop Xa (Fig. 8). Labeling of both residues with the membrane-impermeative thiol reagent AmdiS indicated a cytoplasmic localization of the Xa region, since they were accessible to the reagent only in inside-out membranes and not in whole cells. However, when small impermeable reagents (e.g., MTSET {[2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate bromide}) were used, the cysteine residues at positions 398 and 414 were accessible from the periplasmic as well as from the cytoplasmic side of the membrane. The experiment indicated that an access pathway for small molecules exists from the periplasm to both residues in the cytoplasmic loop (135). Similarly, in the CimH protein of B. subtilis, cysteine residues engineered at positions 420 and 428 of the Xa region were accessible to impermeative MTSES (2-sulfonatoethyl-methanethiosulfonate) from the periplasmic side of the membrane (64). Protection of the cysteine residues in the Xa region against attack from the periplasmic side of the membrane by substrate and/or co-ion emphasized the involvement of the pore-loop structure in the binding and translocation mechanism in both proteins.
Using similar approaches, pore-loop structures were proposed for members of the glutamate transporter family (DAACS, TC 2.A.23). Studies of GltT of Bacillus stearothermophilus and GLT-1, found in the central nervous system, identified the presence of two pore-loop structures. One of the loops penetrated the membrane-embedded part of the protein from the cytoplasm (43, 133) and the other from the periplasm (42). In the glutamate transporters, the pore-loop entering from the cytoplasm was shown to be accessible to the larger AmdiS reagent from both sides of the membrane. This suggests a different access pathway, based on size, or a pore-loop that penetrates all the way to the other side of the membrane. Recently crystallized GltPh, a homolog of GltT and GLT-1, confirmed the presence of the two pore-loops in the structure, demonstrating that the biochemical experimental approaches enable the correct prediction of pore-loops (154). Pore-loop structures have been proposed to be present in the members of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger family (CaCA, TC 2.A.19) (51, 100, 112), the phosphate exchanger (71), and the melibiose transporter MelB of E. coli (GPH, TC 2.A.2) (32).
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. New structural model for the members of 2HCT transporter family. Two homologous domains containing five TMSs each, with an inverted topology in the membrane, are surrounded by dashed boxes. The two domains contain a pore-loop structure and enter the membrane-embedded part of the protein from the periplasmic or cytoplasmic side of the membrane, respectively (Vb and Xa). AH represents an amphipathic surface helix. The position of the conserved arginine residue in TMS XI is indicated by a black dot.
|
10 kDa) allowed discrimination between the two proteins on SDS-PAGE. The result indicated that (part of) the protein population that specifically bound to the avidin resin was a heterodimer of BAD-CitS and CitS, indicating a strong interaction between CitS monomers. It was unclear how the BAD was removed from the untagged CitS molecules. Finally, strong evidence for the existence of the homodimeric association state of CitS was provided by single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy of purified CitS (57). Labeling of purified CitS at the position of cysteine residue Cys394 in region Xa with two different fluorophores (Alexa Fluor 546 and 568) produced a population of CitS dimers with both fluorophores attached. The colocalization of the two fluorophores could be demonstrated by the consecutive two-step bleaching of a single fluorescence spot and the associated change of the dichroic ratio upon bleaching of the first fluorophor.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Kinetic schemes representing mechanisms of a symporter (A), a symporter in the exchange mode (B), and an antiporter (C). E represents the transporter. The subscript i and o indicate the orientation of the binding sites toward the cytoplasm and periplasm, respectively. The antiport mechanism in panel C assumes a dimer of two transporter molecules with one binding site oriented to the periplasm and the other to the cytoplasm. H, proton; S, substrate; P, product; A and B, two substrates at different sides of the membrane.
|
Antiport mechanism of CitS. An alternative kinetic mechanism was proposed for the Na+-citrate transporter, CitS, of K. pneumoniae (109). The mechanism is based on the observed dimeric structure of the protein and is similar to the mechanism proposed for mitochondrial translocators. Mitochondrial transporters are antiporters that translocate a substrate in one direction and, obligatorily, couple transport of a second, structurally related substrate in the opposite direction. Well-known examples are the ATP/ADP translocator and the mitochondrial tricarboxylate carrier (102, 104). The transporters are homodimers, and each of the subunits contains a substrate binding site which faces the opposite side of the membrane (Fig. 10C). Reorientation of the binding site of one subunit is coupled to reorientation of the binding site on the other subunit (steps 5 and 6). At any given moment, half of the transporter has a binding site exposed to one or the other side of the membrane. Coupling between the inward and outward translocations in the dimer is warranted by the fact that isomerization is inhibited when only one of the two subunits has bound a substrate molecule (steps 1 and 2). Evidence for the antiport mechanism catalyzed by the CitS dimer was obtained in a kinetic study of purified CitS reconstituted in proteoliposomes. The rate of sodium motive force-driven citrate uptake in the proteoliposomes was dependent on the internal Na+ concentration. It was proposed that the inward movement of Hcit2 and two Na+ ions bound to one subunit in the dimer was coupled to the outward movement of one hydroxyl ion (OH) and one Na+ ion bound to the other subunit. The mechanism accounts for the net translocation of one Na+ ion, while the dependence of the initial rate on two external Na+ ions is still maintained (76, 109, 135).
Alternate access. The kinetic states with the binding sites oriented to the two sides of the membrane correspond to different conformations of the transporter protein. The state with the binding sites exposed to the external medium corresponds to a conformation in which an aqueous pathway exists from the bulk water phase to the binding pocket on the surface of the protein. A similar pathway exists in the opposite orientation, but from the water phase at the other side of the membrane. The isomerization corresponds to a conformational change that blocks the pathway from one side of the membrane and, at the same time, opens up the pathway on the other side (Fig. 11). Important aspects of the alternate access model for substrate translocation were confirmed by the 3D crystal structures of the lactose transporter, LacY, and the glycerol-3-P/Pi exchanger, GlpT, which were crystallized with the substrate binding site facing the cytoplasm (2, 47). The model predicts that residues which are a part of or close to the substrate and co-ion binding sites should be accessible from both sides of the membrane, but never at the same time. Moreover, the properties of the access pathways are likely to be different at the two sides of the membrane. This is reflected in different affinities for substrate and co-ions in the two conformations. In the citrate/malate proton symporter, CimH, of B. subtilis and the Na+/citrate symporter, CitS, of K. pneumoniae, cysteine residues in pore-loop Xa were shown to be accessible to membrane-impermeative reagents from both sides of the membrane in the absence of substrate, when the transporter can freely shift between the two conformations (Fig. 11, states 1 and 2; see "Membrane topology" in "STRUCTURE" above) (64, 135). Differences between the two conformations were demonstrated by locking the transporter in either conformation, which was achieved by adding substrate or co-ions at one side of the membrane. In the resulting binary complexes, the isomerization was blocked (see previous section). Binding of Na+ to CitS from the periplasmic side (Fig. 11, state 3) resulted in complete protection of Cys414 against the thiol-modifying reagents, whereas binding of Na+ from the cytoplasmic side (state 4) only marginally affected the reactivity of the same cysteine residue. Also, the differences between the citrate-locked states 7 and 8 could be demonstrated. At the periplasmic side (state 7), the reactivity of Cys398 was moderately reduced in the citrate-bound state compared to the free state (state 1). The concentration of citrate producing half of the effect was below 1 mM. In contrast, at the cytoplasmic face, a much stronger reduction of reactivity was observed, but concentrations of one order of magnitude higher were required to induce it. The accessibility of specific sites in the protein from both sides of the membrane and the different properties observed in the two major conformations of the transporter suggest a similar translocation mechanism for the 2HCT, LacY, and GlpT transporters.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 11. Schematic representation of the alternate access model for substrate translocation in the symport mode of transport, based on CitS of K. pneumoniae. The protein can reorient the binding sites in the "unloaded" (states 1 and 2) and "fully loaded" (states 5 and 6) states. Reorientation is blocked in the citrate-bound (states 7 and 8) and Na+-bound (states 3 and 4) states. Symbols: ovals, citrate; squares, Na+.
|
A more detailed interaction between the arginine residue in TMS XI and the substrates follows from a binding site model that is based upon the substrate selectivity and, in particular, the stereoselectivity of the exchangers CitP and MleP of lactic acid bacteria (7, 9, 11). The transporters were shown to recognize a broad range of substrates, as long as they contained the 2-hydroxycarboxylate motif, i.e., HO-CR2-COO, indicating specific and obligate interactions between sites on the protein and the carboxylate and hydroxyl groups on the substrate molecules (Fig. 12). At the same time, both transporters were quite tolerant towards the two R groups of the substrates (see "Transport properties" in "FUNCTION" above). However, a significant affinity difference was observed between di- and tricarboxylates and monocarboxylates, suggesting a specific interaction between a site on the protein and a carboxylate of one of the R groups. High affinity was observed only for the S enantiomers of dicarboxylates, while the R enantiomers behaved like monocarboxylate substrates. Arg425 in TMS XI was shown to be the residue in CitP that interacts with the carboxylate of the R group in the S enantiomeric configuration. In the exchange reaction, the affinity of the Arg425Lys mutant for (S)-malate was reduced from 90 µM to 1400 µM, while in the Arg425Cys mutant the affinity was reduced to undetectable levels (>10 mM). In contrast, the affinity for the monocarboxylate 2-hydroxyisobutyrate increased from 4.9 mM for the wild-type CitP to 1.2 mM for the Arg425Lys mutant and 0.22 mM for the Arg425Cys mutant. Clearly, Arg425 has a favorable interaction with the carboxylated R group in the S enantiomer of malate and an unfavorable interaction with a neutral R group (Fig. 12).
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 12. Models for binding of tri-, di-, and monocarboxylates to 2HCT transporters. Open arrows point to the carboxylate and hydroxy groups of the 2-hydroxycarboxylate motif that is common to all substrates. The arrows represent essential interactions between the substrate molecules and binding site residues on the protein. Arg+ represents the conserved arginine residue in TMS XI that interacts with a second carboxylate of citrate (top panel) and (S)-malate (middle panel), resulting in high affinity binding. Citrate binds in the divalent anionic state, and the protonated carboxylate group points away from the Arg residue. In the monocarboxylate 2-hydroxyisobutyrate, the interaction is not favorable, resulting in low-affinity binding (bottom panel).
|
Chimeras of CitP and MleP. The citrate/lactate exchanger CitP and malate/lactate exchanger MleP found in lactic acid bacteria share 48% sequence identity. Exchanging the 46 C-terminal residues containing (most of) pore-loop Xa and the conserved arginine residue in TMS XI between MleP and CitP did not alter the exchange kinetics with the di- and tricarboxylate substrates citrate and malate (10). The affinities of the chimeric transporters for citrate and malate were determined by the N-terminal parts of the proteins, indicating that the different interactions of the two transporters with citrate and malate are located there. The situation was different for monocarboxylate substrates such as mandelate and 2-hydroxyisovalerate. Wild-type CitP cannot exchange (S)-malate for (S)-mandelate and (S)-2-hydroxybutyrate, while MleP can. The activity was associated with the C-terminal 46 residues (10). CitP acquired exchange activity when the C-terminal stretch was replaced by the corresponding part of MleP, while MleP lost the activity following the reverse replacement. The results are consistent with a direct interaction of sites in the C-terminal fragment with the monocarboxylate substrates and support the involvement of region Xa and TMS XI in the binding pocket and translocation pathway.
Interaction of substrate and co-ions with the Xa region. The pore-loop structure proposed for the Xa region is likely to be an essential feature in the translocation mechanism, and it is expected that mutations and chemical modifications of residues in the region affect the properties of the transporters. Cys398 and Cys414 are both in the predicted pore-loop of CitS of K. pneumoniae. Mutation of both endogenous cysteines to Ser did not affect the activity with respect to citrate (134), but modification of the residues by the alkylating agent N-ethylmaleimide significantly reduced the transport activity of the proteins. Cys414 was highly reactive towards the reagent (134, 135). Insertion of the 10-kDa biotin acceptor domain at the Cys398 position completely abolished activity. Interestingly, insertion of the same domain 10 residues upstream (Ile389), between TMS X and the pore-loop, was tolerated by the protein (146). Residues Arg420 and Gln428 are between the pore-loop and TMS XI of CimH of B. subtilis. Mutation of the residues to Cys did not affect transport activity, but treatment of the cysteine mutants with N-ethylmaleimide completely abolished uptake activity. The reactivity of the cysteine residue in Arg420Cys was significantly lower than that observed for the cysteine in Gln428Cys (64).
Binding of citrate to CitS of K. pneumoniae in the absence of Na+ ions (Fig. 11, states 7 and 8) reduced the reactivity of Cys398 towards thiol reagents, while the effect on the reactivity of Cys414 was only marginal. Also for Cys398, the protection was far from complete at saturating concentrations of citrate, especially from the periplasmic side of the membrane (see above). This indicates that both residues may not be directly involved in binding of the substrate, but the bound substrate somehow obstructs the access pathway for the reagent to the residue (135). An analogous conclusion may be made for the Arg420-to-Cys and Gln428-to-Cys mutations in loop Xa of CimH of B. subtilis. While the affinity of the Arg420Cys mutant for citrate and malate was similar to that of wild type CimH, the presence of saturating concentrations of substrate protected the cysteine residue from reacting with different thiol reagents (64). Similarly, the Gln428Cys mutation did not alter the affinities for the substrates, but citrate protected against membrane-impermeative MTSES when added at the periplasmic side of the membrane. The accessibility pathway to Cys428 from the cytoplasmic side of the membrane was not affected.
Na+ symporters have the advantage over H+ symporters in that it is easier to study the interactions of the transporter with the co-ion. CitS of K. pneumoniae showed an obligate requirement for Na+ and transported two Na+ ions in symport with citrate, as evidenced by the sigmoidal increase of the rate of citrate transport with increasing Na+ concentration (76, 135). Half of the maximal rate in the right-side-out membranes was obtained at an Na+ concentration of 3 mM. The apparent affinity for Na+ was two times lower in a mutant where the Cys414 in the pore-loop region Xa was mutated to Ser. A more drastic effect could be attributed to mutation Cys398Ser, which increased the apparent affinity constant to 28 mM. In both mutants, the sigmoidal relationship was retained, indicating that the transport stoichiometry was not affected. Binding of Na+ to CitS in the absence of citrate was shown to have a significant effect on the conformation of the Xa region (134, 135). In the periplasmically oriented conformation of the Na+-bound state (Fig. 11, state 3), Cys398 and Cys414 in the pore loop are not accessible for thiol reagents. Titration with increasing Na+ ion concentrations revealed a sigmoidal increase of the protection, demonstrating that two Na+ ions bound to CitS in the absence of citrate (134). In the opposite orientation (state 4) and in the presence of saturating concentrations of Na+, the accessibility of the two cysteine residues was reduced by different amounts depending on the reagent used (135).
While binding of citrate or Na+ to CitS of K. pneumoniae resulted in various levels of protection (ranging from full to none) of the two endogenous cysteine residues in pore-loop Xa against thiol reagents, both residues were almost fully protected in the presence of both substrate and co-ion (134, 135). At concentrations of citrate and Na+ ions that hardly affected the inactivation of the single-Cys CitS mutants in right-side-out membrane vesicles by N-ethylmaleimide and MTSET when present separately, the combination of both resulted in almost complete protection. This indicates that the conformation of the "ternary complexes" (Fig. 11, states 5 and 6) is different from that of the "binary complexes."
Mutations in the Vb region. Hydrophobic region Vb is predicted to contain a pore-loop region that enters the membrane-embedded part of the protein from the periplasmic side of the membrane (Fig. 9). Little information is available on the importance of this part of the protein for its function. A His tag inserted at a position between the pore-loop and TMS VI was tolerated by CitS of K. pneumoniae (146). The sequence motif GGxG that is conserved in the pore-loops (Fig. 7) is GGNG in the Vb region of CitS. Mutation of asparagine to valine in the motif reduced the affinity for citrate by one order of magnitude, suggesting that Asp185 could participate in binding of the substrate (56). Mutation of the glutamate residue Glu194 in the putative pore-loop had little effect on the overall kinetics of CitS (56).
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 13. Mechanistic model for the transporters of the 2HCT family. The scheme shows TMSs X and XI and pore-loop Xa in the C-terminal domain. States 1, 3, and 5 represent conformations of the protein with the binding site exposed to the external medium. States 2, 4, and 6 represent conformations with the binding site facing the cytoplasm. Isomerization of the two conformations is allowed only between states 1 and 2 and between the states that have bound both citrate and Na+ (not shown in the model). See text for further explanation. Symbols: ovals, citrate; squares, Na+ ions; circles, Cys residues; R, conserved arginine residue.
|
|
|
|---|
In their phylogenetic niche, the transporters of the 2HCT family are involved in related physiological functions. The characterized members are involved in the metabolism of the di- and tricarboxylates citrate and malate, mostly under fermentative conditions. They function in the uptake of the substrates from the medium, but in the malolactic and citrolactic fermentation pathways they also function in the excretion of the end products. Typical components of the pathways are the transporters and a decarboxylase for malate or oxaloacetate, the first intermediate in citrate fermentation. The "chemistries" of the pathways are similar, but there is remarkable flexibility in their implementation in terms of selecting transporters from different families, different types of decarboxylases, different energy-coupling mechanisms, and even different sensory systems for substrate detection. As a result, different combinations of transporters and decarboxylases, and decarboxylases of various subunit composition, are found in the genomes of related organisms (Tables 2 and 3). It looks like nature had a toolbox containing the tools suitable for the job and that different organisms took from it what became available at some point in evolution. All of these data support the notion that evolution is not a gradual process but that extensive mixing of fragments of DNA containing complete genes took place between organisms.
The great sequence diversity of secondary transporters suggests that the proteins developed independently of each other more than once during evolution. The notion is supported by the high-resolution structures that have recently become available. The drug transporter AcrB of E. coli (98), the lactose transporter LacY (2) and the glycerol-P/Pi exchanger GlpT (47) of E. coli, members of the major facilitator superfamily, the Na+/H+ antiporter NhaA of E. coli (49), the glutamate transporter homolog GltPh of the archaeon P. horikoshii (154), the leucine transporter LeuT of A. aeolicus (153), and the mitochondrial ATP/ADP translocator (105) all reveal different folds and catalyze translocation by different mechanisms. Moreover, the structural and functional distinction between transporters and channels is challenged by the ammonia transporter AmtB of E. coli, a presumed secondary transporter which revealed a structure more reminiscent of a channel protein (61) and by the members of the chloride channel family, ClC, that are either Cl/H+ antiporters or voltage-gated chloride channels (3, 106, 122). More 3D structures of secondary transporters are needed to determine the number of different folds, and more functional studies are needed to determine the number of different translocation mechanisms among the many transporter families that have been identified. The 2HCT family is likely to reveal yet another transporter structure and mechanism that may be representative of the 32 families in structural class ST[3] of the MemGen classification (79, 80). The antibody library recently obtained for CitS of K. pneumoniae may be helpful in determining its 3D structure (115).
Present address: Analytical Biochemistry, University Centre for Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Postbus 196, 9700 AD Groningen, The Netherlands. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»