This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Villarreal, L P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Villarreal, L P

 Previous Article

Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1991 September; 55(3): 512-542

Relationship of eukaryotic DNA replication to committed gene expression: general theory for gene control.

Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine 92717.

SUMMARY

The historic arguments for the participation of eukaryotic DNA replication in the control of gene expression are reconsidered along with more recent evidence. An earlier view in which gene commitment was achieved with stable chromatin structures which required DNA replication to reset expression potential (D. D. Brown, Cell 37:359-365, 1984) is further considered. The participation of nonspecific stable repressor of gene activity (histones and other chromatin proteins), as previously proposed, is reexamined. The possible function of positive trans-acting factors is now further developed by considering evidence from DNA virus models. It is proposed that these positive factors act to control the initiation of replicon-specific DNA synthesis in the S phase (early or late replication timing). Stable chromatin assembles during replication into potentially active (early S) or inactive (late S) states with prevailing trans-acting factors (early) or repressing factors (late) and may asymmetrically commit daughter templates. This suggests logical schemes for programming differentiation based on replicons and trans-acting initiators. This proposal requires that DNA replication precede major changes in gene commitment. Prior evidence against a role for DNA replication during terminal differentiation is reexamined along with other results from terminal differentiation of lower eukaryotes. This leads to a proposal that DNA replication may yet underlie terminal gene commitment, but that for it to do so there must exist two distinct modes of replication control. In one mode (mitotic replication) replicon initiation is tightly linked to the cell cycle, whereas the other mode (terminal replication) initiation is not cell cycle restricted, is replicon specific, and can lead to a terminally differentiated state. Aberrant control of mitotic and terminal modes of DNA replication may underlie the transformed state. Implications of a replicon basis for chromatin structure-function and the evolution of metazoan organisms are considered.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Cullen, M. E., Patient, R. K. (1997). GATA-1 DNA Binding Activity Is Down-regulated in Late S Phase in Erythroid Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 2464-2469 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Segil, N, Guermah, M, Hoffmann, A, Roeder, R G, Heintz, N (1996). Mitotic regulation of TFIID: inhibition of activator-dependent transcription and changes in subcellular localization.. Genes Dev. 10: 2389-2400 [Abstract]  
• Smulson, M. E., Kang, V. H., Ntambi, J. M., Rosenthal, D. S., Ding, R., Simbulan, C. M. G. (1995). Requirement for the Expression of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase during the Early Stages of Differentiation of 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes, as Studied by Antisense RNA Induction. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 119-127 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bell, S., Kobayashi, R, Stillman, B (1993). Yeast origin recognition complex functions in transcription silencing and DNA replication. Science 262: 1844-1849 [Abstract]  
• Bell, S.P., Marahrens, Y., Rao, H., Stillman, B. (1993). The Replicon Model and Eukaryotic Chromosomes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 58: 435-442 [Abstract]