This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Morris, C. E. Articles by Troussellier, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Morris, C. E. Articles by Troussellier, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, December 2002, p. 592-616, Vol. 66, No. 4
1092-2172/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.66.4.592-616.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Microbial Biodiversity: Approaches to Experimental Design and Hypothesis Testing in Primary Scientific Literature from 1975 to 1999

Station de Pathologie Végétale,¹ Station de Technologie de Produits Végétaux, INRA, Avignon,⁵ CEA Cadarache, DSV DEVM LEMIR, UMR 163 CNRS-CEA, Univ-mediterranee, St Paul-Lez-Durance,² UMR INRA-UHP Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes, Centre INRA de Nancy, Nancy,³ University of Paris VI, UMR 7621 CNRS, Laboratoire ARAGO, Banyuls-sur-mere,⁶ ModLibre.org, Eguilles,⁷ Laboratoire Ecosystèmes Lagunaires, UMR 5119 CNRS-Université Montpellier II, Montpellier, France,⁸ Laboratoire de Microbiologie, University of NeuchÂtel, NeuchÂtel, Switzerland⁴

Research interest in microbial biodiversity over the past 25 years has increased markedly as microbiologists have become interested in the significance of biodiversity for ecological processes and as the industrial, medical, and agricultural applications of this diversity have evolved. One major challenge for studies of microbial habitats is how to account for the diversity of extremely large and heterogeneous populations with samples that represent only a very small fraction of these populations. This review presents an analysis of the way in which the field of microbial biodiversity has exploited sampling, experimental design, and the process of hypothesis testing to meet this challenge. This review is based on a systematic analysis of 753 publications randomly sampled from the primary scientific literature from 1975 to 1999 concerning the microbial biodiversity of eight habitats related to water, soil, plants, and food. These publications illustrate a dominant and growing interest in questions concerning the effect of specific environmental factors on microbial biodiversity, the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of this biodiversity, and quantitative measures of population structure for most of the habitats covered here. Nevertheless, our analysis reveals that descriptions of sampling strategies or other information concerning the representativeness of the sample are often missing from publications, that there is very limited use of statistical tests of hypotheses, and that only a very few publications report the results of multiple independent tests of hypotheses. Examples are cited of different approaches and constraints to experimental design and hypothesis testing in studies of microbial biodiversity. To prompt a more rigorous approach to unambiguous evaluation of the impact of microbial biodiversity on ecological processes, we present guidelines for reporting information about experimental design, sampling strategies, and analyses of results in publications concerning microbial biodiversity.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Taylor, M. W., Radax, R., Steger, D., Wagner, M. (2007). Sponge-Associated Microorganisms: Evolution, Ecology, and Biotechnological Potential. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71: 295-347 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nakatsu, C. H. (2007). Soil Microbial Community Analysis Using Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis. Soil Sci. 71: 562-571 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wan, Y., Broschat, S. L., Call, D. R. (2007). Validation of Mixed-Genome Microarrays as a Method for Genetic Discrimination. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 1425-1432 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Saikaly, P. E., Stroot, P. G., Oerther, D. B. (2005). Use of 16S rRNA Gene Terminal Restriction Fragment Analysis To Assess the Impact of Solids Retention Time on the Bacterial Diversity of Activated Sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 5814-5822 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stres, B., Mahne, I., Avgustin, G., Tiedje, J. M. (2004). Nitrous Oxide Reductase (nosZ) Gene Fragments Differ between Native and Cultivated Michigan Soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 301-309 [Abstract] [Full Text]