This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, L.
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yuan, L.
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, R.

Next Article 

Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, September 2005, p. 373-392, Vol. 69, No. 3
1092-2172/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MMBR.69.3.373-392.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Laboratory-Directed Protein Evolution

Ling Yuan,1* Itzhak Kurek,2 James English,2 and Robert Keenan3

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, and Kentucky Tobacco Research and Development Center, University of Kentucky, Cooper and University Drives, Lexington, Kentucky 40546,1 Verdia Research Campus, Pioneer International, A Dupont Company, 700A Bay Road, Redwood City, California 94063,2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 606373

Systematic approaches to directed evolution of proteins have been documented since the 1970s. The ability to recruit new protein functions arises from the considerable substrate ambiguity of many proteins. The substrate ambiguity of a protein can be interpreted as the evolutionary potential that allows a protein to acquire new specificities through mutation or to regain function via mutations that differ from the original protein sequence. All organisms have evolutionarily exploited this substrate ambiguity. When exploited in a laboratory under controlled mutagenesis and selection, it enables a protein to "evolve" in desired directions. One of the most effective strategies in directed protein evolution is to gradually accumulate mutations, either sequentially or by recombination, while applying selective pressure. This is typically achieved by the generation of libraries of mutants followed by efficient screening of these libraries for targeted functions and subsequent repetition of the process using improved mutants from the previous screening. Here we review some of the successful strategies in creating protein diversity and the more recent progress in directed protein evolution in a wide range of scientific disciplines and its impacts in chemical, pharmaceutical, and agricultural sciences.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, and Kentucky Tobacco Research and Development Center, University of Kentucky, Cooper and University Drives, Lexington, KY 40546. Phone: (859) 257-4806. Fax: (859) 323-1077. E-mail: lyuan3{at}uky.edu.

Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, September 2005, p. 373-392, Vol. 69, No. 3
1092-2172/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MMBR.69.3.373-392.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Verdino, P., Aldag, C., Hilvert, D., Wilson, I. A. (2008). Closely related antibody receptors exploit fundamentally different strategies for steroid recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 11725-11730 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kurtovic, S., Shokeer, A., Mannervik, B. (2008). Diverging catalytic capacities and selectivity profiles with haloalkane substrates of chimeric alpha class glutathione transferases. Protein Eng Des Sel 21: 329-341 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rao, A. G. (2008). The Outlook for Protein Engineering in Crop Improvement. Plant Physiol. 147: 6-12 [Full Text]  
  • Emond, S., Mondon, P., Pizzut-Serin, S., Douchy, L., Crozet, F., Bouayadi, K., Kharrat, H., Potocki-Veronese, G., Monsan, P., Remaud-Simeon, M. (2008). A novel random mutagenesis approach using human mutagenic DNA polymerases to generate enzyme variant libraries. Protein Eng Des Sel 21: 267-274 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hawkins, A. C., Arnold, F. H., Stuermer, R., Hauer, B., Leadbetter, J. R. (2007). Directed Evolution of Vibrio fischeri LuxR for Improved Response to Butanoyl-Homoserine Lactone. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 5775-5781 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Emond, S., Potocki-Veronese, G., Mondon, P., Bouayadi, K., Kharrat, H., Monsan, P., Remaud-Simeon, M. (2007). Optimized and Automated Protocols for High-Throughput Screening of Amylosucrase Libraries. J Biomol Screen 12: 715-723 [Abstract]  
  • Hiniker, A., Ren, G., Heras, B., Zheng, Y., Laurinec, S., Jobson, R. W., Stuckey, J. A., Martin, J. L., Bardwell, J. C. A. (2007). Laboratory evolution of one disulfide isomerase to resemble another. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 11670-11675 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Igawa, T., Takahashi-Ando, N., Ochiai, N., Ohsato, S., Shimizu, T., Kudo, T., Yamaguchi, I., Kimura, M. (2007). Reduced Contamination by the Fusarium Mycotoxin Zearalenone in Maize Kernels through Genetic Modification with a Detoxification Gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 1622-1629 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Emren, L. O., Kurtovic, S., Runarsdottir, A., Larsson, A.-K., Mannervik, B. (2006). From the Cover: Functionally diverging molecular quasi-species evolve by crossing two enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 10866-10870 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Yu, J. H., Schaffer, D. V. (2006). Selection of novel vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein variants from a Peptide insertion library for enhanced purification of retroviral and lentiviral vectors.. J. Virol. 80: 3285-3292 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»