Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MMBR
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Archive
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About MMBR
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
ARTICLE

Transposon Tn21, Flagship of the Floating Genome

Cynthia A. Liebert, Ruth M. Hall, Anne O. Summers
Cynthia A. Liebert
Department of Microbiology, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2605, 1 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ruth M. Hall
CSIRO Molecular Science, North Ryde, New South Wales 1690, Australia 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne O. Summers
Department of Microbiology, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2605, 1 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

SUMMARY

The transposon Tn21 and a group of closely related transposons (the Tn21 family) are involved in the global dissemination of antibiotic resistance determinants in gram-negative facultative bacteria. The molecular basis for their involvement is carriage by the Tn21 family of a mobile DNA element (the integron) encoding a site-specific system for the acquisition of multiple antibiotic resistance genes. The paradigm example, Tn21, also carries genes for its own transposition and a mercury resistance (mer) operon. We have compiled the entire 19,671-bp sequence of Tn21 and assessed the possible origins and functions of the genes it contains. Our assessment adds molecular detail to previous models of the evolution of Tn21 and is consistent with the insertion of the integron In2 into an ancestral Tn501-like mer transposon. Codon usage analysis indicates distinct host origins for the ancestral mer operon, the integron, and the gene cassette and two insertion sequences which lie within the integron. The sole gene of unknown function in the integron, orf5, resembles a puromycin-modifying enzyme from an antibiotic producing bacterium. A possible seventh gene in the mer operon (merE), perhaps with a role in Hg(II) transport, lies in the junction between the integron and the mer operon. Analysis of the region interrupted by insertion of the integron suggests that the putative transposition regulator, tnpM, is the C-terminal vestige of a tyrosine kinase sensor present in the ancestral mer transposon. The extensive dissemination of the Tn21 family may have resulted from the fortuitous association of a genetic element for accumulating multiple antibiotic resistances (the integron) with one conferring resistance to a toxic metal at a time when clinical, agricultural, and industrial practices were rapidly increasing the exposure to both types of selective agents. The compendium offered here will provide a reference point for ongoing observations of related elements in multiply resistant strains emerging worldwide.

With the rich insights provided by the burgeoning information on entire prokaryotic genome sequences, it is important to recall that a significant percentage of the DNA in natural isolates of many eubacteria is in the form of extrachromosomal elements called plasmids. Many of these elements are transferable even very widely across species and genus boundaries. In addition to genes for their own maintenance and transfer, these ubiquitous genetic elements frequently carry embedded mobile genetic elements called transposons, which are capable of moving from one carrier replicon to another.

Much of what we understand about DNA replication and recombination in general has been learned through the study of such plasmids and transposons in the eubacteria. Although they are major agents of the horizontal gene exchange which complicates simple phylogenetic analyses of whole bacterial genome sequences, there are no compendia of the complete sequences of the genomes of these peripatetic members of the “floating genome.” We have compiled and annotated sequence information for one of the first recognized, largest, and most widely distributed examples of this group, the multiply composite transposon Tn21.

This analysis has been stimulated by the demonstrated involvement of the Tn21-family in the global dissemination of antibiotic resistance determinants (16-18) and consequent interest in the processes involved in the accumulation and exchange of resistance loci by plasmids and transposons. Horizontal and vertical transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in members of the familyEnterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas is mostly due to large broad-host-range plasmids and to the transposons they carry and share with other replicons (17). Many transposons encoding multiple antibiotic resistances in gram-negative members of the Enterobacteriaceae belong to the Tn21subgroup of the Tn3 family of transposable elements (29, 63). Transposon Tn21 and many of its closest relatives carry within them a potentially independently mobile DNA element called an integron. The integron encodes a RecA-independent, site-specific integration system that is responsible for the acquisition of multiple small mobile elements called gene cassettes that encode antibiotic resistance genes (35, 60, 74, 104,109). Tn21 also carries the genes involved in its own transposition (tnp) and a mercury resistance (mer) operon (29, 98).

Transposon Tn21 itself is carried by plasmid NR1 (R100), which was originally isolated from Shigella flexneri in Japan in the late 1950s (70). NR1 is a 94.5-kb, self-transmissible, multiple-antibiotic resistance plasmid (Fig.1) and is the archetype of a large collection of similar R-plasmids that have been discovered worldwide (18, 116). NR1, which belongs to the FII incompatibility group of R-plasmids, was initially considered to have two components: a resistance transfer factor (RTF), which carries the genes for self-transmissibility (tra) and autonomous replication (rep), and a resistance determinant (R-det), which contains a composite Tn9-like transposon, carrying thecatA1 (catI) gene, and transposon Tn21(120). The R-det component is bound by direct repeats (IS1a and IS1b) and is itself transposable as Tn2670 (37, 43). Tn21 is an independent transposon within the R-det and is bounded by inverted repeats IRl and IRr (19, 28, 127). Located in the RTF region of NR1 is transposon Tn10, which carries tetR (tet repressor) and tetA(confers tetracycline resistance) and is bounded by IS10R and IS10L (46). The other major functional loci within the RTF are the origin of conjugative transfer (oriT) gene and the transfer (tra) genes.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

NR1, an IncFII self-transmissible, multiple-antibiotic resistance R plasmid. Inserts indicate mobile genetic elements.

Recently, the last section of the Tn21 transposon was sequenced (5), revealing that Tn21 itself includes four discrete mobile elements: a class 1 integron, theaadA1 gene cassette contained in the integron, and two insertion sequences, IS1326 and IS1353 (Table1 and Fig.2). We have assembled five overlapping GenBank sequences (accession no. X04891, M10791, X12870, U42226, andJ01730 [Table 2]) and updated the annotation of the assembled sequence of 19,671 bp (GenBank accession no. AF071413 [Tables 3 to5]). Due to the growing interest in integrons, we present the Tn21 sequence with the transposition genes on the left and the mer genes on the right, since this allows the components to be viewed in the orientation familiar to those studying the integron itself.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Transposon Tn21 and the mobile elements it contains

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Symbols for the transposition (tnp) region, the integron, and the mer operon of transposon Tn21 (GenBank accession no. AF071413). Vertical bars indicate flanking inverted repeats (IR) of transposons and insertion sequences (IS). The tnp region consists of genes for the transposase (tnpA), the resolvase (tnpR), the putative transposition regulator (tnpM), and the resolution site (res) for Tn21. The 5′-CS of the integron includes the integrase gene (intI1) and theattI1 insertion site. The aadA1 gene cassette contains the aminoglycoside adenylyltransferase gene and the 59-be. The arrow indicates the direction of transcription. The 3′-CS includes genes encoding resistance to quaternary ammonium compound disinfectants (qacEΔ1) and sulfonamide resistance (sul1), an ORF (orf5) of unknown function, and two insertion sequences (IS1353 is inserted into IS1326). Thetni (transposition of the integron) gene region has suffered deletion in Tn21, and only tniA and a portion oftniB remain. The mercury resistance (mer) operon consists of the regulatory genes merR and merDand the structural genes merT, merP,merC, and merA. There are two unknown reading frames, urf1 (also called merE) and urf2, downstream ofmerD. urf2M is a hypothetical gene defined in this work, which may have existed before integron insertion.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Sequenced regions comprising Tn21 (GenBank accession no. AF071413)

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Features of the tnp transposition region of Tn21

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Features of the mer region of Tn21

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 5.

Features of the In2 region of Tn21

TRANSPOSITION COMPONENTS

Tn 3-Like Transposable Elements—Subtype Tn21 Tn3-like transposable elements are characterized by flanking inverted repeats of about 38 bp and have two genes,tnpA and tnpR, which encode a transposase and resolvase, respectively (29, 95). The tnpR gene and the res site (the site at which the resolvase acts) are located just upstream of tnpA. In the Tn21transposon subgroup, the tnpA and tnpR genes are transcribed in the same direction. The TnpA proteins of this transposon family are at least 70% homologous to each other, as are their TnpR proteins (29). Transposases from this family share, as do many other transposases, a DD(35)E motif, which may form part of the catalytic center (125).

Tn 21, a Class II Replicative Transposon Transposition of transposon Tn21 is carried out by the transposase, TnpA (29). The sites of insertion, defined by a 5-bp duplication of target DNA, are usually AT rich but have no other obvious consensus sequence (77). Replicative transposition of Tn21 involves specific recognition of and binding to the terminal inverted-repeat (IR) elements of Tn21 by TnpA, which then mediates joining of the donor and recipient replicons (77). This cointegrate intermediate contains a copy of Tn21 and is resolved by the action of the tnpRgene product, a resolvase which acts at a specific site (res) adjacent to the tnpR gene (85).

The resolvase catalyzes site-specific recombination between supercoiled DNA and two directly repeated copies of the transposon DNA (102). Resolvase subunits bind to the three subsites (I, II, and III) of res within both recombination loci (100). These protein-DNA assemblies at each ressite then interact with each other to form a synaptic complex (101) in which the resolvase separates the cointegrate to give a new recombinant replicon with one copy of the transposon and the original donor replicon, which retains its copy. In the Tn21subgroup of transposons, the transposase-IR interactions and the resolvases are interchangeable; e.g., Tn21 tnpA can act on the Tn501 IRs and Tn21 tnpR can act on the Tn501 res site (29).

tnp transposition module.The positions of the important features of the tnp region of Tn21are presented in Table 3, and those of the IRmerregion are presented in Table 4. The tnp region begins with the left IR (designated IRtnp) and extends to include the res site. The right end of Tn21(designated IRmer) lies beyond the end of themerR gene. These left and right Tn21 IRs are 38-bp imperfect repeats (three base differences). tnpA is the largest structural gene in the transposon, encoding a 988-amino-acid (aa) transposase which terminates 5 bp into IRtnp (115). An independent promoter for tnpA has been suggested (29, 42) to occur within the last 80 bp of the tnpR gene. tnpR is 561 bp and terminates 2 bp before the putative initiation codon oftnpA. The predicted promoter region for the tnpRgene (and possibly the tnpA gene) is located within theres site (22, 31). The 129-bp res site has three resolvase binding sites (I, II, and III) with the recombination crossover point located in resI(85).

Putative tnpM. An adjacent putative gene of undefined function, tnpM (351 bp), was originally defined as starting at the junction of the tnp region and the integron IRi (leftward inverted repeat) and terminating withinresI (42). The ribosomal binding site and the promoter −10 and −35 regions for this putative tnpM gene are located within the integron, in IRi and in the noncoding region downstream of the intI1 gene, respectively.

Although the roles of tnpA and tnpR have been defined, regulation of the tnp genes in Tn21 is less well understood. Studies by de la Cruz and Grinsted with Tn21 (19) and by Tanaka et al. with Tn2603 (112) showed that transposition and resolution functions were intact in deletion derivatives which left thetnpA, tnpR, and tnpM reading frames intact but disrupted the putative −35 promoter region oftnpM. These authors concluded that tnpM was not necessary for transposition. However, Hyde and Tu (42) proposed that the tnpM gene produces a protein which enhances Tn21 transposition and suppresses cointegrate resolution. The basis for their proposal was the finding that a strain carrying a nonsense mutation in the tnpM reading frame was less effective than its parent in effecting Tn21transposition and resolution. Furthermore, they observed that when a multicopy derivative carrying only Tn21 tnpM was present, transposition of Tn21 increased by 2.5-fold and resolution decreased 22-fold. They also noted an open reading frame (ORF) in Tn501 (orf2) at the same relative location and orientation, whose product was 84.6% similar to the putative Tn21 TnpM protein (Fig. 3). These similarities led Hyde and Tu to examine whether transposition and resolution of Tn501 was susceptible to modulation by Tn21 tnpM. They found that with the Tn21 tnpM gene in trans, transposition of Tn501also increased by 2.5-fold and resolution decreased by 1.5-fold. However, no TnpM protein has been demonstrated. Thus, at present, neither the exact nature of the control for TnpA and TnpR nor the role of the putative TnpM is understood. We offer here the possible alternative that the tnpM reading frame is actually derived from a longer ORF which was interrupted by the insertion of In2 (see below). These alternatives are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Defined or hypothetical proteins of Tn21, the closely related Tn501 and Tn5036, the distantly related transposons Tn5041 and Tn5053, and othermer operons in plasmids pDU1358, pKLH2, and pPB (narrow- and broad-spectrum mercury resistance operons). References are given in Table 6. Numbers in boxes and triangles representing mer or transposition genes are percent amino acid similarities to corresponding proteins of Tn21. Tall shaded boxes represent regions similar to putative Tn21 Urf2 (light gray), to the last 66 aa of putative TnpM (medium gray), or to hypothetical Tn21 Urf2M (dark gray). Black boxes represent small regions (5 to 7 aa) of similarity to the first 7 aa in Urf2M. Numbers below the tall shaded boxes are percent similarities to corresponding proteins in Tn21. Horizontal striped boxes represent tnigenes, and spotted boxes represent tnp genes. The slashed box represents a region similar to Tn21 Urf2M and Y proteins. merA of the pPB broad-spectrum meroperon has not been sequenced.

MER OPERON

Mercury ResistanceDivalent mercuric ion, Hg(II), has a high affinity for thiol groups of proteins and for this reason is extremely toxic in biological systems. The current model of the mercury resistance (Hgr) mechanism of gram-negative bacteria posits that Hg(II) enters the periplasm and is bound to a pair of cysteine residues in MerP which transfer Hg(II) to cysteine residues in MerT or MerC. The latter move the ion across the cytoplasmic membrane in a series of ligand exchange reactions, resulting in the delivery of Hg(II) to the active site of the cytoplasmic flavin disulfide oxidoreductase, mercuric reductase (MerA) (98). Mercuric reductase catalyzes the reduction of Hg(II) to the highly volatile and less reactive monoatomic gas, Hg0, which diffuses from the cell and from the medium.

mer GenesThe mer region (Table 4) (1, 65, 66), flanked on its right by Tn21 IRmerand on its left by the rightward IR (designated IRt) of the integron, is sufficient to confer resistance to Hg(II). The mercury resistance operon of Tn21 contains two regulatory genes,merR and merD, and four structural genes,merT, merP, merC, and merA, encoding the NADH-dependent flavin oxidoreductase, mercuric reductase (MerA); two inner membrane proteins (MerT and MerC); and a periplasmic protein (MerP). Further genes may also play a role in mercury resistance.

Metalloregulator (merR).ThemerR gene is at the opposite end of the transposon to thetnpA gene, and, like tnpA, merRterminates 5 bp into the IR bounding Tn21. ThemerR gene and the merTPCAD genes are transcribed divergently from a compact 71-bp promoter/operator (merOP) region in which their respective −10 RNA polymerase recognition hexamers overlap by 4 bp (39, 73). MerR binds a dyadic operator (merO) in the 19-bp spacer between themerTPCAD −35 and −10 promoter hexamers, and in the absence of Hg(II) it represses their expression. Since the dyadic binding site is also superimposed on the merR transcriptional start position, MerR represses its own synthesis (96). The metal binding domain of MerR, containing residues from Cys80 to Cys128, is sufficient to form a single, dimeric, trigonally coordinate, high-affinity Hg(II) binding site (126). When MerR binds Hg(II), an allosteric change in MerR allows transcription of themer structural genes without changing the level of slightly leaky repression of MerR (86, 107). MerR also sequesters RNA polymerase at the merT promoter, forming a stable preinitiation complex (39). MerR contacts the α, β, and ς70 subunits of RNA polymerase both in the preinitiation and Hg(II)-activated promoter complexes (51).

Mercury transport genes (merT,merP, and merC).The products of the first three structural genes of the mer operon are involved in uptake of Hg(II) into the cell. These small genes are tightly spaced, with the merT gene (351 bp) separated by only 13 bp from themerP gene (276 bp) and merP separated from themerC gene (423 bp) by 35 bp. Both MerT and MerC are inner membrane proteins (106) and are predicted to have three and four transmembrane-spanning α-helices, respectively. MerP is located in the periplasm (106) and is composed of four β-strands and two α-helices (103). Both cysteine residues (Cys33 and Cys36) in MerP are required for Hg(II) binding in vitro (90), and this is one of only two proteins of the operon whose structure is presently known (103). MerP is believed to transfer Hg(II) to the amino-terminal cysteine pair (Cys24 and Cys25) of MerT (36, 67). How Hg(II) is then transferred inside the cell to MerA is unknown. The MerP sequence constitutes the index example of the HMA motif found in several prokaryotic metal transporters (62, 72, 97) and in the human Cu transporters, MNK and WND (8).

The merC gene is apparently not required for Hg(II) resistance, if MerP and MerT are present, since there are functionalmer operons without merC, e.g., those found in transposons Tn501 and Tn5053 (Fig. 3) (98). Moreover, deleting merC from the Tn21 mer locus had no effect on Hg(II) resistance (36). However, the Thiobacillus mer loci do not have the merT or merP genes but have at least three distinct merC genes (Table6) (40), andThiobacillus MerC can function alone as a mercury transport system in Escherichia coli (52). Tn21MerC binds Hg(II) (91), possibly via a heavy-metal consensus binding region similar to those found in MerP and in the amino-terminal region of MerA. The actual interactions of MerP, MerT, MerC, and MerA remain to be defined.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 6.

Sequences of mer loci from gram-negative bacteria

Mercuric reductase gene (merA). merA, which begins 51 bp on the 3′ side of merC, encodes a cytoplasmic, redox enzyme (564 aa) and is the largest gene in the mer operon. MerA belongs to the class I pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductases and has sequence and structural homology to glutathione reductase and other disulfide oxidoreductases (93). The amino terminus of merA and of themerP gene (signal sequence excluded) are extensively homologous, indicating a fusion between ancestral genes for MerP and for glutathione reductase. MerA functions as an α2homodimer, and two pairs of cysteine residues, a redox-active pair (Cys135 and Cys140) from one subunit of MerA and a carboxyl-terminal pair (Cys561 and Cys562) from the other subunit of MerA, form the catalytic site (21). MerA uses two hydrides from two NADPH molecules for the reduction of flavin adenine dinucleotide, which in turn reduces Hg(II) bound to the redox-active cysteines of the enzyme (89, 93). Studies by Miller et al. (64) have shown that pyridine nucleotide complexed dimers of the enzyme are asymmetric. Since the reduced enzyme EH2-NADPH complex is the reductant of Hg(II), these observations suggest that the enzyme may function asymmetrically during catalysis. Miller et al. (64) have proposed an alternating-sites model for the catalytic reduction of Hg(II), where both subunits of the dimer function in catalysis but the steps are staggered, allowing subunits to reverse roles after part of the reduction so that the enzyme can both bind Hg(II) very tightly and reduce it (64).

Secondary regulatory gene (merD).The most promoter-distal experimentally defined gene of the meroperon, merD (363 bp), begins 17 bp downstream ofmerA (54). The MerD protein is made in very small amounts (54). The suggested role of MerD is that of a down-regulator of the mer operon which binds weakly to themerOP region; MerD null mutants show increased operon expression (69).

Putative merE (urf1).Two other reading frames at the end of the mer operon in Tn21 are also frequently found in other mer operons (Fig. 3), but experimental definition for them is lacking. The first of these, which overlaps the 3′ end of merD by 4 bp, is a 237-bp ORF variously designated orf1 (6, 27), urf1 (7, 84,124), urf (45), or merE (47, 49) (Table 6). Putative merE has a GTG start codon and an appropriately placed Shine-Dalgarno consensus sequence (AGGAGG) and encodes a predicted polypeptide of 78 aa. There is no evidence to indicate whether this ORF is transcribed or translated, and no null or nonsense mutations in it have been examined for their effect on Hg resistance. However, 10 highly similar (80.4% ± 8.6% as determined by GAP; Genetics Computer Group, Inc. [GCG], Madison, Wis.) putative MerE protein sequences (listed in Table 6) from othermer loci of gram-negative bacteria have been reported. Of the 10 putative merE genes, 9 lie in the same position and orientation as the urf1 in the Tn21 mer locus (Fig. 3) and the other is located 5′ to the merC gene of aThiobacillus mer locus (Table 6) (45). The putative Tn21 merE is also 58.0% similar to merT(previously called ORF2) in the mer locus of a gram-positive bacterium, Bacillus sp. strain RC607 (114). These 12 sequences are the only homologs of Tn21 merEin the database.

Cysteine pairs are characteristically found in Mer proteins, and putative MerE has a cysteine pair (Cys28 and Cys30) which, with adjacent residues (LTCPCHL), is conserved in all of these putative MerE polypeptides. The predicted secondary structure of MerE would have two transmembrane helices with the cysteine pair positioned approximately in the middle of the first helix (87, 99). That the first cysteine pair is also found in the same predicted position in MerT, MerC, and MerF suggests that MerE may play a role in Hg(II) transport.

urf2 and the Hypothetical urf2MOverlapping the 3′ end of merE by 4 bp is the second reading frame of unknown function, urf2 (708 bp), whose stop codon lies 67 bp inside the right end of the integron rightward boundary at IRt. However, if the integron and one of its flanking 5-bp direct repeats were removed, urf2 would fuse in frame with the putativetnpM gene to produce a 987-bp hypothetical gene which we designate Tn21 urf2M (Fig. 3). Its 328-aa predicted product, Urf2M, is 76.9% identical and 79.3% similar to the predicted 329-aa product of orf2 found in transposon Tn501. Transposon Tn501 is a Tn21 subgroup transposon with a gene organization similar to that of Tn21 but lacking bothmerC and the integron (29). Also, the predicted product of urf2 in the mer operon of plasmid pPB is 78.7% similar to Tn21 Urf2M. The predicted product of orf2 (an incomplete sequence) in the mer operon of plasmid pDU1358 is 80.0% similar to Tn21 Urf2M.

Further, part of Tn21 Urf2M (226 of 328 aa) (Fig. 3) is also about 62% similar to a group of hypothetical proteins which belong to the YEGE/YHDA/YHJK/YJCC family of proteins (4, 121). These putative proteins (referred to here as Y proteins) are characterized by transmembrane regions and tyrosine kinase domains as found in two-component signal regulators (41). The carboxyl termini of the Y proteins are 62.3% ± 1.0% similar (40.3% ± 3.5% identical) to Tn21 Urf2M beginning at aa 22 and ending 35 aa into the beginning of putative TnpM (a total of 226 contiguous residues). This similarity to the carboxyl termini of the Y proteins also occurs in Tn501 Orf2 and pPB Urf2.

These similarities suggest that before In2 insertion, a distinct insertion or deletion occurred, forming an ORF (encoding a 328-aa product) between the mer and tnp genes or within a gene at the 3′ end of an ancestral mer operon. Possible remnants of this event are the last 66 aa of Tn21 TnpM, the last 67 aa of Tn501 Orf2 and pPB Urf2, and the last 70 aa of Tn5041 Urf2, pKLH2 Urf2y, and Tn5036 Urf2y, which are conserved (including three conserved cysteine pairs) (Fig. 3). Ribosomal binding sites in front of possible translation start sites occur in the genes encoding each of the aforementioned 66-, 67-, and 70-aa predicted products, suggesting that a smaller gene may be present in the larger ORFs.

To assess the possible origin of Tn21 urf2M and Tn501 orf2, we compared codon usage patterns of Tn21 urf2M with those of the Tn21 and Tn501 merA and tnpA genes (Tables7 and 8). The GCG program Correspond (24) compares two codon frequency tables (20) and yields the residuals statistic D2 (Table 7, footnote b), which, when greater than 3, indicates different codon usage patterns. D2 values of <3.0 are consistent with a common origin for the genes (24). We largely limited our analysis to sequences of >1,000 bp since we observed that D2 increased when the sequence was small.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 7.

Comparison of codon usage in tnpA,merA, and the tnp-mer junction of Tn21 family transposons and a distantly related transposon, Tn5041

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 8.

Comparative codon usage in Tn21

The D2 values, 0.98 to 1.31, indicated that Tn21 merA, Tn501 merA, and Tn501 orf2 have similar codon usage patterns to Tn21 urf2M (Table 7). Higher D2 values (3.21 and 3.61) indicated that Tn21 tnpA and Tn501 tnpAhave dissimilar codon usage patterns compared to Tn21 urf2M. Codon usage in each of the two ORFs which comprise the putative Tn21 urf2M (tnpM and urf2) shows that each is as distant from tnpA and as close to merA as is the putative composite gene; thus, by the D2statistic, neither component gene is related to tnpA or tomerA any differently than the putative fused gene. We also noted a surprisingly low D2 value of 1.13 between one of the genes which encodes the Y protein CY02B10.18C (Mycobacterium tuberculosis) and Tn21 urf2M. On the basis of these comparisons, Tn21 urf2M is more likely to have been associated longer with the mer genes than with thetnp genes, although its function in mercury resistance and its relationship to the Y proteins is unknown. An alternative hypothesis is that the origins of these ORFs cannot be discerned by codon usage comparisons because they are nonfunctional and therefore are freer to drift than is a functional gene.

IN2 INTEGRON

Integrons are a major vehicle for the spread of multiple-antibiotic resistance, and for class 1 integrons, this has been aided by the piggybacking of integrons on other transposons as in Tn21 and its relatives. Integrons provide the cassette-associated resistance genes with two advantages: a “built-in” expression system and ready mobility. Since the promoters located in the 5′-conserved sequence (5′-CS) of the integron (upstream of the inserted cassette) are functional in a wide range of bacteria, the integron can effect the coexpression of several cassette-associated antibiotic resistance genes (11). Cassette-associated resistance genes also harness several mechanisms for their dispersal. Not only are cassettes themselves mobile (10), but also the integrons into which they incorporate are transposable (5). Finally, integrons often occur in plasmids, many of which have broad host range, assisting interspecies spread (16, 81, 104). Integrons and gene cassettes have been reviewed elsewhere (34, 35, 80, 81).

The integron found in Tn21 is a class 1 integron, designated In2 (104), that includes one integrated gene cassette, theaadA1 cassette. At 11 kb, In2 accounts for over half of the total length of Tn21. In2 is flanked by imperfect inverted repeats of 25 bp (IRi and IRj) and bounded by a 5-bp direct duplication of the target sequence (5, 7), indicating that it has transposed into an ancestral tnp-mertransposon to create Tn21. In2 does not include a complete set of transposition (tni) genes and cannot transpose itself (5). However, movement of In2 has occurred, presumably by using transposition proteins supplied in trans, because close relatives of In2 are found in other independent locations (5).

In2 is a composite element that contains a single cassette and two insertion sequences (ISs). The backbone of In2 consists of three distinct regions: 5′-CS, the 3′-conserved segment (3′-CS), and vestiges of the tni transposition gene module (Fig. 2). The 5′-CS and 3′-CS lie on either side of the cassette insertion point, which in In2 is occupied only by the aadA1 cassette. A remnant of thetni module is located to the right of two IS elements, IS1326 and IS1353. One or more deletions originating at the right boundary of IS1326 may have eliminated most of the tni genes. Similarly, a deletion originating at the left end of IS1326 has removed part of the 3′-CS (5). IS1353, which is located within IS1326, is presumed to have been acquired after the integron moved into Tn21, because close relatives of Tn21, e.g., Tn2411, that do not contain IS1353 are known (5, 28). The aadA1 cassette is also found in Tn2411 and may have been present in the In2 progenitor that inserted into the tnp-mer transposon. These six regions are described in detail below.

5′-Conserved SegmentThe 5′-CS or intI module of class 1 integrons extends from the left IR, designated IRi, to the boundary of the first integrated cassette (Fig. 2). The 5′-CS includes three repeats at its left end that are predicted to bind the tnitransposase (79) (described in more detail below): theintI1 gene, encoding the class 1 integrase; the promoter regions for the intI1 and aadA1 genes; and the bulk of the attI1 site, the IntI1-specific recombination site into which cassettes are inserted. IntI1 is a member of the integrase family of site-specific recombinases (14, 26, 74) and catalyzes recombination between various pairs of recombination sites (59-be [see below] × 59-be, 59-be × attI1, and attI1 × attI1) in experimental conduction assays (32, 38, 60, 61, 82, 105). IntI1 also catalyzes the integration of additional gene cassettes atattI1 (10) and both the excision and rearrangement of gene cassettes (12, 13). Experimentally, the attI1 site consists of at least 34 bp but no more than 64 bp of the 5′-CS and includes 6 to 10 bp at the first adjacent cassette (Fig. 4) (82), although a shorter length has recently been claimed (38). There are four IntI1 binding sites in attI1: two sites appear to consist of a simple integrase recombination site made up of a pair of inversely oriented IntI1-binding sites and two additional IntI1-binding sites (DR1 and DR2) that enhance the efficiency of the simple recombination site (Fig. 4) (14, 25).

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

In2 promoter and attI1 regions. The direction and position of transcription from the promoters Pc and P2 for the aadA1 gene and transcription from the promoter Pint for the intI1 gene are indicated by arrows with parentheses. Translation start sites of aadA1 andintI1 are indicated by the dashed arrows. TheattI1 site includes a 64-bp region (sufficient for full recombination site activity for attI1). The numbering scheme relates to the number of base pairs to the left (negative) and to the right (positive) of the recombination crossover point (designated position 0), which is marked with a vertical arrow. A box surrounds theattI1-aadA1 recombination site. Integrase binding sites DR1 and DR2 (closely related to the 7-bp consensus sequence, GTTRRRY) and the “simple site” recognized by IntI1 are underscored with arrows. The numbers 5100 to 5500 indicate the location in the GenBank sequenceAF071413.

Integrons also include a promoter, Pc (formerly known as Pant or P1), that directs transcription of the cassette-borne gene(s) (Fig. 4). The sequences of the 5′-CS of class 1 integrons found in several different locations are >99% identical. The most frequent differences between the sequences of the 5′-CS from different integrons occur within the −10 or −35 regions of the Pc promoter (104), giving rise to variants with different strengths (9, 11, 55); the variant of Pc in In2 is the weakest. However, the 5′-CS of In2 contains a unique insertion of three G residues (bases 5278 to 5280 [Table 5]; bold G’s in Fig. 4) that increases the spacing between a distinct set of potential −10 and −35 hexamers from 14 to 17 bp, thereby creating a second promoter, P2, which is more efficient than Pc (11, 55). P2 is a secondary promoter found only in In2 and close relatives. Constitutive transcripts from both Pc and P2 can be detected (11); there is no information on whether either is subject to regulation by other factors.

aadA1 CassetteIn2 includes a single gene cassette containing theaadA1 gene, which determines resistance to streptomycin and spectinomycin. The AAD(3") protein is an aminoglycoside adenylytransferase that inactivates these antibiotics by adding an adenyl or other nucleotidyl group. The cassette also contains an IntI1-specific recombination site, the aadA1 59-base element (59-be; also called attC) located downstream of the gene (Fig. 5). The aadA1 cassette thus has the features typical of gene cassettes, i.e., a gene and a 59-be. The aadA1 cassette was presumably incorporated into In2 by IntI1-mediated recombination between the attI1 site and the 59-be in a free circular aadA1 cassette. Experimental evidence for the free circular intermediate and for cassette integration has been reviewed extensively elsewhere (34,35, 80).

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

The aadA1 cassette containing theaadA1 (aminoglycoside adenylyltransferase) gene and 59-be. The base pairs comprising the 59-be in its free circular form are indicated by the heavy line below them, and those comprising its integrated form are indicated by the heavy line above them. Small boxes surround the composite attI/aadA1 (left) andaadA1/qacE 59-be (right) recombination sites. The putative initiation codon of the aadA1 gene and its stop codon are in bold (large box). The putative ribosomal binding site (rbs) is marked in italics. Arrows indicate imperfect inverted repeat sequences. The numbering scheme is as described in the legend to Fig. 4.

The aadA1 cassette is organized compactly (Fig. 5). The first possible in-frame ATG codon for aadA1 is only 8 bp from the cassette boundary but is not preceded by a consensus ribosome binding site within the cassette. Alternatively, translation ofaadA1 may initiate at a GTG codon, 12 bp downstream, which is preceded by a ribosome binding site. Translation of theaadA2 gene in a related cassette is initiated in this manner (3). The 59-be of the aadA1 cassette lies only 1 bp from the termination codon of the gene.

In the aadA1 cassette, the 59-be is actually 60 bp long and has features common to this family of recombination sites (13, 32,105). Since the 59-be, of the free circular cassette form, is separated into two parts by the recombination crossover, the 59-be immediately downstream from aadA1 in In2 actually includes 54 bp of the aadA1 59-be (from the circular cassette form) and at least 6 bp (lowercase in Fig. 5) of the adjacent module, which is the 3′-CS of In2. This composite 59-be is called theaadA1/qacE 59-be. The terminal 6 bp of the aadA159-be in the circular cassette form lie at the beginning of the integrated aadA1 cassette and constitute part of the composite attI1/aadA1 recombination site of In2. The outer 25 bp of all 59-be are relatively highly conserved (13,105). Within each 25-bp consensus region is a simple site configuration (1L-2L and 2R-1R [Fig. 5]), as found with other integrase recognition sites, and each simple site includes a pair of inversely oriented 7-bp core sites. Only 8 base of the composite core sites are completely conserved: three each in 1L and 1R (ACC and GTT) and one each in 2L and 2R (A and T) in all 59-be (105).

3′-Conserved SegmentIn early studies of class 1 integrons, the 3′-CS was defined as a conserved region containing three ORFs (qacEΔ1,sul1, and orf5) located to the right of the different cassette arrays found in various integrons (Fig. 2) (104). More recent studies (5, 33) have revealed that the length of the 3′-CS region is variable and that some integrons have additional sequence (orf6 or portions of orf6) downstream of orf5. However, not all class 1 integrons have this region (Fig.6); e.g., Tn402, also recently called Tn5090 (79), does not have a 3′-CS region.

Fig. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Evolution of Tn21. Dark gray represents the 5′-CS, and light gray represents the 3′-CS. Cassette insertion is indicated by plus (+), and cassette excision is indicated by minus (−).

The qacE gene encodes an inner membrane protein with four transmembrane segments and determines resistance to quaternary ammonium compounds (antiseptics and disinfectants) by an efflux mechanism (71, 88). The last 66 bp of qacEΔ1 (encoding 115 aa) differs from the complete qacE gene (encoding 110 aa); the qacEΔ1 gene confers only marginal resistance to quaternary ammonium compounds (75). The sul1 gene (formerly sulI) encodes a sulfonamide-resistant dihydropteroate synthase (279 aa), which can replace the normal bacterial enzyme targeted by this group of drugs (111). The function of orf5 is not known; however, the predicted protein is 38% identical and 47% similar to a puromycinN-acetyltransferase (gi 1346911) of Streptomyces alboniger and is 36% identical and 50% similar to a putative acetyltransferase (gi 3449263) of Streptomyces coelicolor(121). Although in In2, transcription originating from Pc or P2 in the 5′-CS is likely to extend into the 3′-CS, affording expression at these three 3′-CS genes, a weak promoter that is sufficient for expression of sulfonamide resistance has also been identified upstream of the qacEΔ1 gene (30).

In Tn402, the qacE gene is associated with a 59-be and hence is part of a mobile cassette (81), whereasqacEΔ1 is not mobile. The sul1 and adjacent sequence may also have originally been part of cassettes which integrated at attI1 and subsequently became immobilized by loss of their adjacent 59-be recombination sites (Fig. 6) (5,104). Thus, the 3′-CS appears to contain vestiges of the earliest insertion events. The presence of the sul1 gene would explain the wide distribution of integrons containing this region, since sulfonamides were the first widely used antimicrobial agents.

tni Transposition ModuleOf the class 1 integrons, where sufficient sequence is available, only Tn402 (Fig. 6) carries the full complement of fourtni genes (5, 79), believed to encode transposition functions on the basis of their similarity to thetni genes of Tn5053 (Fig. 3) (48). ThetniA, tniB, and tniQ genes of Tn5053 are required for transposition, and the fourth gene,tniR, encodes a resolvase which resolves the cointegrates as does TnpR of Tn21 (48). In In2, only one complete gene, tniA, and a truncated version of the tniBgene are present. All class 1 integrons, including Tn402, have complex ends (79). Both ends have three copies of a 19-bp sequence, the outermost of which overlaps the terminal 25-bp IRs. By analogy to Tn7, these three 19-bp repeats are believed to function as transposase binding sites, although the identity of the Tni protein involved is not known.

IS 1326 Insertion Sequence The insertion sequence IS1326 has terminal 26-bp IRs and includes two ORFs that overlap by 14 bp (5). These ORFs have been designated istA (1,524 bp) and istB(786 bp) due to the similarity of their predicted products to IstA and IstB, required for transposition in IS21 (83). IstA has a DD(45)E transposase motif and a helix-turn-helix motif, and IstB has a distinctive set of nucleoside triphosphate binding domains (5). These two genes have share a common promoter upstream of istA. However, in In2, IS1353 has inserted between the −10 and −35 promoter regions of IS1326, and thus istAB may not be expressed. IS1326 also occurs in other integrons, e.g., integrons In0 and In5 in plasmids pVS1 and pSCH884, respectively (5).

IS 1353 Insertion Sequence The acquisition of IS1353 by In2 appears to be a recent event that occurred after the movement of the In2 to its present location in Tn21 (5). IS1353 is a member of the IS3 family (5) and has the characteristic 5′-TG and CA-3′ at the outer ends of its terminal 12-bp IRs. IS1353 is flanked by a direct duplication of 2 bp of the target sequence. It contains two ORFs, orfA andorfB, transcribed in the opposite direction fromistA and istB of IS1326. A potential promoter for orfA and orfB lies 24 bp upstream of the putative OrfA translational start. OrfB has a DD(35)E transposase motif similar to other transposases of the IS3 family (23). A potential frameshift motif, A6G, and a predicted mRNA stem-loop are present where the orfA andorfB reading frames overlap, suggesting that (like other IS3 relatives, IS911 and IS150), three polypeptides, OrfA, OrfB, and a fusion protein (OrfAB) that is the actual transposase, may be produced (78). The initiation codon of OrfB has yet to be determined; it may be at the ATT codon 3 bp upstream of the A6G motif (as seen in IS911) or at the ATG codon 6 bp downstream of the A6G motif.

TN21 EVOLUTION

Transposons are important for bacterial evolution and adaptation because they carry traits that can be useful for the host cell in varying environments; Tn21 provides its host cell with both antibiotic and mercury resistance determinants. The Tn21subgroup of transposons is phylogenetically identified on the basis oftnp genes, res sites, and IR ends, but its members vary considerably in the number and types of additional genes (29, 58) they carry. Moreover, some transposons in this subgroup do not carry either a mer region or any resistance genes. The ubiquity and variety of elements in the Tn21subgroup is the result of several recombination processes (29).

Two characteristics of the transposition machinery of the Tn21 subgroup of transposons foster their ready association with many different genetic loci. The first of these characteristics is that both the resolvase and the transposase have rather broad substrate specificities for the DNA sites which are their substrates. For example, the Tn21 TnpA transposase recognizes several different IR sequences and can also mediate one-ended transposition to generate novel joint molecules (29). In addition, the various TnpR resolvases act on each other’s res sites, yielding distinct rearrangements of these transposons (29). The second characteristic of the Tn21 subgroup which enhances their variety is the placement of the res site to one side of tnpA and tnpR (Fig. 2) rather than between them (as found in the Tn3 transposon family). This arrangement minimizes the segregation of tnpR andtnpA which might otherwise occur in aberrant resolution events and results in a relatively stable resolvase-transposase “module.” In addition to these properties of the Tn21subgroup, two or more Tn21-like elements are often found in the same bacterial strain, typically on large conjugative plasmids, where host-mediated homologous recombination can also contribute to their reassortment (59).

Moreover, when an integron is present, two IntI1-mediated, RecA-independent, site-specific recombination processes occur: (i) insertion, rearrangement, or excision of antibiotic resistance gene cassettes (10, 12, 13) and/or (ii) formation and resolution of cointegrates. Both processes involve recombination between various pairs of specific recombination sites (59-be × 59-be, 59-be × attI1, and attI1 × attI1) (32, 38,60, 61, 82, 105), thus enabling the rapid development of new arrays of antibiotic resistance genes (Fig. 6). Further variation results from the acquisition of insertion sequences, transposons, and integrons and subsequent deletions arising at their ends and mediated by them (5).

Model for Tn 21 Evolution Several transposons, considered to be very close relatives of Tn21, have nearly identical DNA sequences or restriction maps in the tnp and mer regions but differ in that they carry no or different antibiotic resistance genes. Tanaka et al. (112) first proposed that those Tn21-like transposons which confer multiple antibiotic resistance had descended from an ancestral mercury resistance transposon like Tn501by successive insertions of antibiotic resistances and/or insertion sequences. Their restriction endonuclease analysis indicated similarity between the mer and the tnp regions of Tn2613, which lacks antibiotic resistance genes, and the corresponding regions of Tn2608, which has a 6.3-kb insertion between the mer and tnp regions and has also gained streptomycin and sulfonamide resistances. These observations suggested that Tn2613 might reasonably be considered the predecessor of Tn2608. However, Tn21 itself has a slightly different restriction map in the Tn21 IRmer and in the tnpM regions from those of both Tn2613 and Tn2608, suggesting that neither of these transposons was the immediate predecessor of Tn21.

A more recent model for the evolution of Tn21 and other family members (5) is based on restriction maps, heteroduplex analyses, and sequence data for a larger group of these transposons (19, 53, 63, 94, 110, 113, 117, 119, 122, 123). In this analysis, those considered members of the family are similar to Tn21 in carrying the same tnpRA transposition genes and an integron in the same position as In2. They may or may not carry the complete mer locus, and they also differ from Tn21 in either the identity or number of gene cassettes in the integron or by the acquisition or loss of other IS elements or transposons. For example, the original Tn21, isolated in Japan, includes a 1.6-kb region corresponding to IS1353 that is not present in related isolates from Germany (29), which suggests that Tn21 acquired IS1353 after the global spread of an ancestor such as Tn2411 that does not contain this IS (5).

Brown et al. (5) proposed that Tn2411 arose from a hypothetical ancestor called Tn21Δ, which lacks an integron but contains the mer operon (Fig. 6). In Tn21Δ, urf2M would be present (as seen in orf2 and urf2 adjacent to mer operons in Tn501[6] and pPB [84], respectively [Fig.3]). The ancestor of In2 (without IS1353) inserted into Tn21Δ, perhaps via a transposition event catalyzed intrans by another transposon with a complete set oftni transposition genes. The alternative, i.e., that the In2 ancestor might have been complete and later lost its tnigenes by a deletion event occurring on or after insertion of IS1353, seems unlikely since integrons with very similar organization to In2 are found in other locations (5).

Subsequently, transposon Tn2411 became widely distributed, experiencing integration, excision, or exchange of gene cassettes, insertion of transposons or insertion sequences, and IS-mediated deletions or excisions (Fig. 6), which have given rise to the examples of this group described so far (19, 53, 63, 94, 110, 119, 122,123) and probably many others.

Model for In2 EvolutionThe In2 integron is believed to have been a highly evolved element (Fig. 6) before it integrated into Tn21Δ. Brown et al. (5) have proposed that the central components of In2 evolved from a progenitor, similar to Tn402, which had experienced several genetic events prior to insertion into Tn21Δ. These genetic events would include the creation of the 3′-CS via the integration of qacE, as well as sul1, and other putative cassettes and subsequent events to immobilize them. After the insertion of IS1326, this IS caused the partial deletion of the adjacent 3′-CS and tni module. The insertion of IS1353 occurred after the integron moved into Tn21Δ and is likely to be the latest event in the creation of both In2 and Tn21.

Codon Usage ComparisonsTn21 can be viewed as an assemblage of genes captured by transposition genes: the tnp genes acquired themer operon, and the tni genes acquired the integrase system. After these two independent events, the integron progenitor, itself an assemblage of genes captured by either thetni module or the integrase module, inserted into Tn21Δ, followed by insertion of IS1353 (Fig.6). Some hints about the variety of sources of these many components is given by their codon usage patterns.

Codon usage comparisons of Tn21 genes point to significant diversity in their origins (Table 8). Codon usage comparisons ofmerA and urf2M reveal low D 2 values with respect to each other but not with respect to other integron ortnp genes, with the exception of orfAB of IS1353. Codon usage in aadA1, as in the majority of genes found in integrated cassettes (2), is quite dissimilar to that in other genes within the integron, presumably reflecting diverse origins of the cassette-associated genes. In Tn21, the exception to this appears to be the low D2 values betweenaadA1 and istAB (IS1326) and orfAB (IS1353). High D2 values are also observed between qacEΔ1 (a former cassette) and all other Tn21 genes compared with it. Codon usage comparisons of genes within the integron revealed low D2 values between intI1, sul1, and tniA, suggesting that these genes originated from closely related microorganisms which are different from E. coli orPseudomonas aeruginosa (2, 79). This observation supports the view that sul1 was integrated early in the evolution of class 1 integrons (104). Comparison of codon usage in Tn402 genes revealed similar low D2 values (0.81) between int andtniA as for those genes in Tn21 and high D2 (9.27 to 6.98) values between qacEand other genes within this integron (79). The low D2 values between most of the Tn21genes and the orfAB genes in IS1353 suggest that perhaps IS1353 was acquired while Tn21 was in a host with codon utilization similar to that of the ancestral host of Tn21.

TN21 SAILS THE WORLD

The Tn21 family is widely distributed in both clinical and environmental isolates of gram-negative bacteria. All characterized examples of the Tn21 family have been found on large conjugative plasmids. Although bacterial conjugation was once believed to be restricted in host range, it now appears that this mechanism of transfer permits genetic exchange between many different bacterial genera in nature (16, 50).

Environmental OccurrencesPearson et al. observed the widespread distribution of Tn21- and Tn501-related tnpA andtnpR sequences in soil bacteria from three sites (two mercury-polluted sites and one pristine site); 20 of 30 isolates hybridized to transposase and resolvase gene probes (76). They observed extensive recombination between different transposition genes and reassortment of the mer and the transposition gene regions. Further evidence for widespread distribution includes a recent report of the occurrence of Tn21-, Tn501-, and Tn3-related tnpA sequences in total bacterial DNA from the marine environment (15). The Tn21 tnpA sequence occurred once per 103 or 104 bacteria.

Clinical OccurrencesApart from the above environmental isolates, Tn21carriage of integrons and integrated cassette-associated resistance genes in gram-negative pathogens is also well documented (32, 53,80). The Tn21 family encodes resistances against both older and newer antibiotics. Strains of bacteria resistant to streptomycin, an antibiotic rarely used medically in the past 30 years but still extensively used in animal husbandry, are frequently found (68). In a 1995 study, over half (53%) of 49 clinical isolates with transferable resistance to aminoglycosides carried integrons with aadA1 (25%) or aacA4 (75%) gene cassettes (92). In an earlier (1992) study, 807 unselected gram-negative clinical isolates were screened to determine the distribution of the integron and Tn21 transposition genes (128). A total of 19% of the isolates carried some part of the tnpA tnpR, or intI1 gene and 8% of the isolates had all of the genes, although linkage of tnp genes and integrons was not demonstrated. Besides complete Tn21-like transposons, a great variety of defective transposons were observed in many genera of bacteria (128).

Tn21 and Tn21-like transposons with integrons have also been observed in primate intestinal bacteria that were challenged with Hg(II) released from dental amalgams (108). There was a strong association of multiple-antibiotic resistance with two of the most abundant phylogenetic types of Hg resistance locus (locus 1 and locus 4) in these bacteria (58, 118). Using PCR, we have established (Fig. 7) thatmer locus 1 carries a In2-like integron and that some examples of mer locus 4 carry a class 1 integron similar to In4 in Tn1696 (119). In both mer locus types, the adjacent integrons carry from one to four antibiotic resistance genes. Hg exposure experienced by the fecal flora of these animals led to enrichment for strains carrying Hg resistance loci closely linked to integron multiple-antibiotic resistant transposons.

Fig. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

PCR primers used to detect integron components and physical linkage between mer operons and class 1 integrons in gram-negative bacteria. Primers I1 and I2 are located in theintI1 gene, and intergenic primers, 5′-CS and 3′-CS, lie between the intI1 gene and the antibiotic resistance (AbiR) gene cassette and between the AbiR gene cassette and theqacEΔ1 gene, respectively (56). S1 and N1 primers are located in the sul1 and tniA genes of the integron, and primer A9 is located in the merA gene of the mer operon (57). Numbers under bars indicate the expected size (in kilobases) of the PCR products for Tn21.

The causes of the dissemination of the Tn21 family of transposons are presently unknown but may be due to the chance association of the integron and mer at a time when the rich ecosystem of the human intestinal microflora was experiencing increasing antibiotic usage coinciding with exposure to Hg due to its use in the treatment of syphilis and in amalgam dental restorations.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

Tn21 and its relatives are major agents in the dissemination of mercury resistance and antibiotic resistance genes in gram-negative bacteria. Understanding the molecular processes involved in the accumulation and exchange of resistance genes by these integron-carrying transposons will inform efforts to control the spread of these genes as well as others which will arise in response to newer antibiotics. The regulation of antibiotic resistance gene cassette movement and stability, the factors that influence the recombination processes in the transposon, and the question whether there are environmental selection pressures other than antibiotics that contribute to their spread are subjects of intense study in many laboratories worldwide. Like mariners of old, Tn21 has left its kin in many ports and picked up barnacles along the way. As others of its family come to light, we expect that there will be answers to many of the questions posed above. We encourage others working on similar complex transposable elements and plasmids to compile and deposit their sequences. Such data will be essential to understanding the still-evolving relationships between the ubiquitous, peripatetic “floating” genome and the more constant cellular chromosomes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge the cheerful and competent assistance of Alice L. Watson for sequence entry into GenBank; GCG advice from Michael Weise; and comments on the manuscript by Nigel Brown, Paul H. Roy, Jim Shapiro, and an anonymous reviewer.

This project was partially supported by grants from NIH (GM28211), the Wallace Research Foundation, and the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology to A.O.S. and grants from the NHIMRC to R.M.H.

  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Barrineau P.,
    2. Gilbert M. P.,
    3. Jackson W. J.,
    4. Jones C. S.,
    5. Summers A. O.,
    6. Wisdom S.
    (1984) The DNA sequence of the mercury resistance operon of the IncFII plasmid NR1. J. Mol. Appl. Genet. 2:601–619.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Bissonnette L.,
    2. Roy P. H.
    (1992) Characterization of In0 of Pseudomonas aeruginosa plasmid pVS1, an ancestor of integrons of multiresistant plasmids and transposons of gram-negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 174:1248–1257.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Bito A.,
    2. Susani M.
    (1994) Revised analysis of aadA2 gene of plasmid pSA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1172–1175.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Blattner F. R.,
    2. Plunkett G.,
    3. Bloch C. A.,
    4. Perna N. T.,
    5. Burland V.,
    6. Riley M.,
    7. Collado Vides J.,
    8. Glasner J. D.,
    9. Rode C. K.,
    10. Mayhew G. F.,
    11. Gregor J.,
    12. Davis N. W.,
    13. Kirkpatrick H. A.,
    14. Goeden M. A.,
    15. Rose D. J.,
    16. Mau B.,
    17. Shao Y.
    (1997) The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science 277:1453–1474.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Brown H. J.,
    2. Stokes H. W.,
    3. Hall R. M.
    (1996) The integrons In0 In2, and In5 are defective transposon derivatives. J. Bacteriol. 178:4429–4437.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Brown N. L.,
    2. Ford S. J.,
    3. Pridmore R. D.,
    4. Fritzinger D. C.
    (1983) Nucleotide sequence of a gene from the Pseudomonas transposon Tn501 encoding mercuric reductase. Biochemistry 22:4089–4095.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Brown N. L.,
    2. Misra T. K.,
    3. Winnie J. N.,
    4. Schmidt A.,
    5. Seiff M.,
    6. Silver S.
    (1986) The nucleotide sequence of the mercuric resistance operons of plasmid R100 and transposon Tn501: further evidence for mer genes which enhance the activity of the mercuric ion detoxification system. Mol. Gen. Genet. 202:143–151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bull P. C.,
    2. Cox D. W.
    (1994) Wilson disease and Menkes disease: new handles on heavy-metal transport. Trends Genet. 10:246–252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Bunny K. L.,
    2. Hall R. M.,
    3. Stokes H. W.
    (1995) New mobile cassette containing an aminoglycoside resistance gene, aacA7, and a chloramphenicol resistance gene, catB3, in a integron in pBWH301. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:686–693.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Collis C. M.,
    2. Grammaticopoulos G.,
    3. Briton J.,
    4. Stokes H. W.,
    5. Hall R. M.
    (1993) Site-specific insertion of gene cassettes into integrons. Mol. Microbiol. 9:41–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Collis C. M.,
    2. Hall R. M.
    (1995) Expression of antibiotic resistance genes in the integrated cassettes of integrons. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:155–162.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Collis C. M.,
    2. Hall R. M.
    (1992) Gene cassettes from the insert region of integrons are excised as covalently closed circles. Mol. Microbiol. 6:2875–2885.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Collis C. M.,
    2. Hall R. M.
    (1992) Site-specific deletion and rearrangement of integron insert genes catalyzed by the integron DNA integrase. J. Bacteriol. 174:1574–1585.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Collis C. M.,
    2. Kim M.-J.,
    3. Stokes H. W.,
    4. Hall R. M.
    (1998) Binding of the purified integron DNA integrase IntI1 to integron- and cassette-associated recombination sites. Mol. Microbiol. 29:477–490.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Dahlberg C.,
    2. Hermansson M.
    (1995) Abundance of Tn3, Tn21, and Tn501 transposase (tnpA) sequences in bacterial community DNA from marine environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:3051–3056.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Davies J.
    (1994) Inactivation of antibiotics and the dissemination of resistance genes. Science 264:375–382.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Davies J. E.
    (1997) Origins, acquisition and dissemination of antibiotic resistance determinants. in Antibiotic resistance: origins, evolution, selection and spread. eds Chadwick D. J., Goode J. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, N.Y), pp 15–27.
  18. ↵
    1. Davies J. E.,
    2. Rownd R.
    (1972) Transmissible multiple drug resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. Science 176:758–768.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. de la Cruz F.,
    2. Grinsted J.
    (1982) Genetic and molecular characterization of Tn21, a multiple resistance transposon from R100.1. J. Bacteriol. 151:222–228.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Devereux J.,
    2. Haeberli P.,
    3. Smithies O.
    (1984) A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:387–395.
  21. ↵
    1. Distefano M. D.,
    2. Moore M. J.,
    3. Walsh C. T.
    (1990) Active site of mercuric reductase resides at the subunit interface and requires Cys-135 and Cys-140 from one subunit and Cys-558 and Cys-559 from the adjacent subunit: evidence from in vivo and in vitro heterodimer formation. Biochemistry 29:2703–2713.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Diver W. P.,
    2. Ginstead J.,
    3. Fritzinger D. C.,
    4. Brown D. C.,
    5. Altenbuchner J.,
    6. Rogowsky P.,
    7. Schmitt R.
    (1983) DNA sequence of and complementation by tnpR genes of Tn21, Tn501, and Tn1721. Mol. Gen. Genet. 191:189–193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Fayet O.,
    2. Ramond P.,
    3. Polard P.,
    4. Prère M.,
    5. Chandler M.
    (1990) Functional similarities between retroviruses and the IS3 family of bacterial insertion sequences. Mol. Microbiol. 4:1771–1777.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Grantham R.,
    2. Gautier C.,
    3. Guoy M.,
    4. Jacobzone M.,
    5. Mercier R.
    (1981) Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 9:r43–r74.
  25. ↵
    1. Gravel A.,
    2. Fournier B.,
    3. Roy P. H.
    (1998) DNA complexes obtained with the integron integrase IntI1 at the attI site. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:4347–4355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Gravel A.,
    2. Messier N.,
    3. Roy P. H.
    (1998) Point mutations in the integron integrase IntI1 that affect recombination and/or substrate recognition. J. Bacteriol. 180:5437–5442.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Griffin H. G.,
    2. Foster T. J.,
    3. Silver S.,
    4. Misra T. K.
    (1987) Cloning and DNA sequence of the mercuric and organomercurial-resistance determinates of plasmid pDU1358. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:3112–3116.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Grinsted J.,
    2. Brown N.
    (1984) A Tn21 terminal sequence within Tn501: complementation of tnpA gene function and transposon evolution. Mol. Gen. Genet. 197:497–502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Grinsted J.,
    2. de la Cruz F.,
    3. Schmitt R.
    (1990) The Tn21 subgroup of bacterial transposable elements. Plasmid 24:163–189.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Guerineau F.,
    2. Brooks L.,
    3. Mullineaux P.
    (1990) Expression of the sulfonamide resistance gene from plasmid R-46. Plasmid 23:35–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Halford S.,
    2. Jordan S. L.,
    3. Kirkbrid E. A.
    (1985) The resolvase protein from the transposon Tn21. Mol. Gen. Genet. 200:169–175.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Hall R. M.,
    2. Brookes D. E.,
    3. Stokes H. W.
    (1991) Site-specific insertion of genes into integrons: role of the 59-base element and determination of the recombination cross-over point. Mol. Microbiol. 5:1941–1959.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Hall R. M.,
    2. Brown H. J.,
    3. Brookes D. E.,
    4. Stokes H. W.
    (1994) Integrons found in different locations have identical 5′ ends but variable 3′ ends. J. Bacteriol. 174:6286–6294.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Hall R. M.,
    2. Collis C. M.
    (1998) Antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria: the role of gene cassettes and integrons. Drug Resist. Updates 1:109–119.
  35. ↵
    1. Hall R. M.,
    2. Collis C. M.
    (1995) Mobile gene cassettes and integrons: capture and spread of genes by site-specific recombination. Mol. Microbiol. 15:593–600.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Hamlett N. V.,
    2. Landale E. C.,
    3. Davis B. H.,
    4. Summers A. O.
    (1992) Roles of the Tn21 merT, merP, and merC gene products in mercury resistance and mercury binding. J. Bacteriol. 174:6377–6385.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Hanni C.,
    2. Meyer J.,
    3. Iida S.,
    4. Arber W.
    (1982) Occurrence and properties of composite transposon Tn2672: evolution of multiple drug resistance transposons. J. Bacteriol. 150:1266–1273.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Hansson K.,
    2. Skold O.,
    3. Sundstrom L.
    (1997) Non-palindromic attI sites of integrons are capable of site-specific recombination with one another and with secondary sites. Mol. Microbiol. 26:441–453.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Heltzel A.,
    2. Lee I. W.,
    3. Totis P. A.,
    4. Summers A. O.
    (1990) Activator-dependent preinduction binding of ς-70 RNA polymerase at the metal-regulated mer promoter. Biochemistry 29:9572–9584.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Hobman J. L.,
    2. Brown N. L.
    (1997) Bacterial mercury-resistance genes. in Metal ions in biological systems. eds Sigel A., Sigel H. (Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, N.Y), pp 527–568.
  41. ↵
    1. Hoch A. H.,
    2. Sander C.
    (1995) Two-component signal transduction. (ASM Press, Washington, D.C).
  42. ↵
    1. Hyde D. R.,
    2. Tu C. P. D.
    (1985) tnpM: a novel regulatory gene that enhances Tn21 transposition and suppresses cointegrate resolution. Cell 42:629–638.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Iida S.,
    2. Hanni C.,
    3. Echardi C.,
    4. Arber W.
    (1981) Is the Is1 flanked R-determinate of the R plasmid NR1 a transposon? J. Gen. Microbiol. 126:413–425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Inoue C.,
    2. Sugawara K.,
    3. Kusano T.
    (1991) The merR regulatory gene in Thiobacillus ferrooxidans is spaced apart from the mer structural genes. Mol. Microbiol. 5:2707–2718.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Inoue C.,
    2. Sugawara K.,
    3. Kusano T.,
    4. Kitagawa Y.
    (1989) Nucleotide sequence of the Thiobacillus ferrooxidans chromosomal gene encoding mercuric reductase. Gene. 84:47–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Jorgensen R. A.,
    2. Reznikoff W. S.
    (1979) Organization of structural and regulatory genes that mediate tetracycline resistance in transposon Tn10. J. Bacteriol. 138:705–714.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Kholodii G. Y.,
    2. Gorlenko O. L.,
    3. Lomovskaya S. Z.,
    4. Nikiforov V. G.
    (1993) Molecular characterization of an aberrant mercury resistance transposable element from an environmental Acinetobacter strain. Plasmid 30:303–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Kholodii G. Y.,
    2. Mindlin S. Z.,
    3. Bass I. A.,
    4. Yurieva O. V.,
    5. Minakhina S. V.,
    6. Nikiforov V. G.
    (1995) Four genes, two ends, and a res region are involved in transposition of Tn5053: a paradigm for a novel family of transposons carrying either a mer operon or an integron. Mol. Microbiol. 17:1189–1200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Kholodii G. Y.,
    2. Yurieva O. V.,
    3. Lomovskaya O. L.,
    4. Gorlenko Z. M.,
    5. Mindlin S. Z.,
    6. Nikiforov V. G.
    (1993) Tn5053, a mercury resistance transposon with integron ends. J. Mol. Biol. 230:1103–1107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Kruse H.,
    2. Sorum H.
    (1994) Transfer of multiple drug resistance plasmids between bacteria of diverse origins in natural microenvironments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:4015–4021.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Kulkarni R.,
    2. Summers A. O.
    (1999) MerR crosslinks to the α, β and ς70 subunits of RNA polymerase in the pre-initiation complex at the merTPCAD promoter. Biochemistry 38:3362–3368.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Kusano T.,
    2. Ji G.,
    3. Inoue C.,
    4. Silver S.
    (1990) Constitutive synthesis of a transport function encoded by the Thiobacillus ferrooxidans merC gene cloned in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 172:2688–2692.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Lafond M.,
    2. Couture F.,
    3. Vezina G.,
    4. Levesque R. C.
    (1989) Evolutionary perspectives on multiresistance β-lactamase transposons. J. Bacteriol. 171:6423–6429.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Lee I. W.,
    2. Gambill B. D.,
    3. Summers A. O.
    (1989) Translation of merD in Tn21. J. Bacteriol. 171:2222–2225.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Levesque C.,
    2. Brassard S.,
    3. Lapointe J.,
    4. Roy P. H.
    (1994) Diversity and relative strengths of tandem promoters for the antibiotic resistance genes of several promoters. Gene 142:49–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    1. Levesque C.,
    2. Piche L.,
    3. Larose C.,
    4. Roy P. H.
    (1995) PCR mapping of integrons reveals several novel combinations of resistance genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:185–191.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Liebert C. A.
    (1999) Ph.D. dissertation. (University of Georgia, Athens).
  57. ↵
    1. Liebert C. A.,
    2. Wireman J.,
    3. Smith T.,
    4. Summers A. O.
    (1997) Phylogeny of mercury resistance (mer) operons of gram-negative bacteria isolated from the fecal flora of primates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:1066–1076.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Lloyd R. G.,
    2. Low K. B.
    (1996) Homologous recombination. in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, eds Neidhardt F. C., Curtiss III R., Ingraham J. L., Lin E. C. C., Low K. B., Magasanik B., Reznikoff W. S., Riley M., Schaechter M., Umbarger H. E. (ASM Press, Washington, D.C), 2nd ed. pp 2236–2255.
  59. ↵
    1. Martinez E.,
    2. de la Cruz F.
    (1990) Genetic elements involved in Tn21 site-specific integration, a novel mechanism for the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. EMBO J. 9:1275–1281.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    1. Martinez E.,
    2. de la Cruz F.
    (1988) Transposon Tn21 encodes a RecA-independent site-specific integration system. Mol. Gen. Genet. 211:320–325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    1. Melchers K.,
    2. Weitzenegger T.,
    3. Buhmann A.,
    4. Steinhilber W.,
    5. Sachs G.,
    6. Schafer K. P.
    (1996) Cloning and membrane topology of a P type ATPase from Helicobacter pylori. J. Biol. Chem. 271:446–457.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Mercier J.,
    2. Lachapelle J.,
    3. Couture F.,
    4. Lafond M.,
    5. Vezina G.,
    6. Boissinot M.,
    7. Levesque R. C.
    (1990) Structural and functional characterization of tnpI, a recombinase locus in Tn21 and related β-lactamase transposons. J. Bacteriol. 172:3745–3757.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Miller S. M.,
    2. Massey V.,
    3. Williams C. H.,
    4. Ballou D. P.,
    5. Walsh C. T.
    (1991) Communication between the active sites in dimeric mercuric ion reductase: an alternating sites hypothesis for catalysis. Biochemistry 30:2600–2612.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Misra T. K.,
    2. Brown N. L.,
    3. Fritzinger D. C.,
    4. Pridmore R. D.,
    5. Barnes W. M.,
    6. Haberstroh L.,
    7. Silver S.
    (1984) The mercuric-ion resistance operons of plasmid R100 and transposon Tn501: the beginning of the operon including the regulatory region and the first two structural genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:5975–5979.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Misra T. K.,
    2. Brown N. L.,
    3. Haberstroh L.,
    4. Schmidt A.,
    5. Goddette D.,
    6. Silver S.
    (1985) Mercuric reductase structural genes from plasmid R100 and transposon Tn501: functional domains of the enzyme. Gene 34:253–262.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Morby A. P.,
    2. Hobman J. L.,
    3. Brown N. L.
    (1995) The role of cysteine residues in the transport of mercuric ions by the Tn501 MerT and MerP mercury-resistance proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 17:25–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    1. Morell V.
    (1997) Antibiotic resistance: road of no return. Science 278:575–576.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Mukhopadhyay D.,
    2. Yu H.,
    3. Nucifora G.,
    4. Misra T. K.
    (1991) Purification and functional characterization of MerD: a coregulator of the mercury resistance operon in Gram-negative bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 266:18538–18542.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. Nakaya R.,
    2. Nakamura A.,
    3. Murata Y.
    (1960) Resistance transfer agents in Shigella. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 3:654–659.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. ↵
    1. Neyfakh A. A.,
    2. Bidnenko V. E.,
    3. Chen L. B.
    (1991) Efflux-mediated multidrug resistance in Bacillus subtilis: similarities and dissimilarities with the mammalian system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:4781–4785.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    1. Odermatt A.,
    2. Solioz M.
    (1995) Two trans-acting metalloregulatory proteins controlling expression of the copper-ATPases of Enterococcus hirae. J. Biol. Chem. 270:4349–4354.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. O’Halloran T. V.,
    2. Frantz B.,
    3. Shin M. K.,
    4. Ralston D. M.,
    5. Wright J. G.
    (1989) The MerR heavy metal receptor mediates positive activation in a topologically novel transcription complex. Cell 56:119–129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  73. ↵
    1. Ouellette M.,
    2. Bissonnette L.,
    3. Roy P. H.
    (1987) Precise insertion of antibiotic resistance determinants into Tn21-like transposons: nucleotide sequence of the OXA-1 β-lactamase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:7378–7382.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    1. Paulsen I. T.,
    2. Littlejohn T. G.,
    3. Radstrom P.,
    4. Sundstrom L.,
    5. Skold O.,
    6. Swedberg G.,
    7. Skurray R. A.
    (1993) The 3′ conserved segment of integrons contains a gene associated with multidrug resistance to antiseptics and disinfectants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:761–768.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Pearson A. J.,
    2. Bruce K. D.,
    3. Osborn A. M.,
    4. Ritchie D. A.,
    5. Strike P.
    (1996) Distribution of class II transposase and resolvase genes in soil bacteria and their association with mer genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:2961–2965.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Plasterk R. H.
    (1995) Mechanisms of DNA transposition. in Mobile genetic elements. ed Sherratt D. J. (Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y), pp 18–32.
  77. ↵
    1. Polard P.,
    2. Prere M. F.,
    3. Chandler M.,
    4. Fayet O.
    (1991) Programmed translational frameshifting and initiation at an AUU codon in gene expression of bacterial insertion sequence IS911. J. Mol. Biol. 222:465–477.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  78. ↵
    1. Radstrom P.,
    2. Skold O.,
    3. Swedberg G.,
    4. Flensburg J.,
    5. Roy P. H.,
    6. Sundstrom L.
    (1994) Transposon Tn5090 of the plasmid R751, which carries an integron is related to Tn7, Mu, and the retroelements. J. Bacteriol. 176:3257–3268.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. ↵
    1. Recchia G. D.,
    2. Hall R. M.
    (1995) Gene cassettes: a new class of mobile element. Microbiology 141:3015–3027.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  80. ↵
    1. Recchia G. D.,
    2. Hall R. M.
    (1997) Origins of the mobile gene cassettes found in integrons. Trends Microbiol. 5:389–394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  81. ↵
    1. Recchia G. D.,
    2. Stokes H. W.,
    3. Hall R. M.
    (1994) Characterization of specific and secondary recombination sites recognised by the integron DNA integrase. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:2071–2078.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  82. ↵
    1. Reimmann C.,
    2. Moore R.,
    3. Little S.,
    4. Savioz A.,
    5. Willetts N. S.,
    6. Haas D.
    (1989) Genetic structure, function and regulation of the transposable element IS21. Mol. Gen. Genet. 215:416–424.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  83. ↵
    1. Reniero D.,
    2. Mozzon E.,
    3. Galli E.,
    4. Barbieri P.
    (1998) Two aberrant mercury resistance transposons in the Pseudomonas stutzeri plasmid pPB. Gene 208:37–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  84. ↵
    1. Rogowsky P.,
    2. Halford S. E.,
    3. Schmitt R.
    (1985) Definition of three resolvase binding sites at the res loci of Tn21 and Tn1721. EMBO J. 4:2135–2141.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Ross W.,
    2. Park S.-J.,
    3. Summers A. O.
    (1989) Genetic analysis of transcriptional activation and repression in the Tn21 mer operon. J. Bacteriol. 171:4009–4018.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. ↵
    1. Rost B.,
    2. Casadio R.,
    3. Fariselli P.,
    4. Sander C.
    (1995) Prediction of helical transmembrane segments at 95% accuracy. Protein Sci. 4:521–533.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  87. ↵
    1. Rouch D. A.,
    2. Cram D. S.,
    3. DiBerardino D.,
    4. Littlejohn T. G.,
    5. Skurray R. A.
    (1990) Efflux-mediated antiseptic resistance gene qacA from Staphylococcus aureus: common ancestry with tetracycline- and sugar-transport proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 4:2051–2062.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  88. ↵
    1. Sahlman L.,
    2. Lambeir A.-M.,
    3. Lindskog S.,
    4. Dunford H. B.
    (1984) The reaction between NADPH and mercuric reductase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Biol. Chem. 259:12403–12408.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  89. ↵
    1. Sahlman L.,
    2. Skarfstad E. G.
    (1993) Mercuric ion binding abilities of MerP variants containing only one cysteine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 196:583–588.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Sahlman L.,
    2. Wong W.,
    3. Powlowski J.
    (1997) A mercuric ion uptake role for the integral inner membrane protein, MerC, involved in bacterial mercuric ion resistance. J. Biol. Chem. 272:29518–29526.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. ↵
    1. Sallen B.,
    2. Rajoharison A.,
    3. Desvarenne S.,
    4. Mabilat C.
    (1995) Molecular epidemiology of integron-associated antibiotic-resistance genes in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. Microb. Drug Resist. 1:195–202.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  92. ↵
    1. Schiering N.,
    2. Kabsch W.,
    3. Moore M. J.,
    4. Distefano M. D.,
    5. Walsh C. T.,
    6. Pai E. F.
    (1991) Structure of the detoxification catalyst mercuric ion reductase from Bacillus sp. strain RC607. Nature 352:168–172.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Schmidt F.,
    2. Klopfer-Kaul I.
    (1984) Evolutionary relationships between Tn21-like elements and pBP201, a plasmid from Klebsiella pneumoniae mediating resistance to gentamycin and eight other drugs. Mol. Gen. Genet. 197:109–119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. Sherratt D.
    (1989) Tn3 and other related transposable elements: Site-specific recombination and transposition. in Mobile DNA. eds Berg D. E., Howe M. M. (American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C), pp 163–184.
  95. ↵
    1. Shewchuk L. M.,
    2. Helmann J. D.,
    3. Ross W.,
    4. Park S. J.,
    5. Summers A. O.,
    6. Walsh C. T.
    (1989) Transcriptional switching by the MerR protein: activation and repression mutants implicate distinct DNA and mercury(II) binding domains. Biochemistry 28:2340–2344.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Silver S.,
    2. Nucifora G.,
    3. Phung L. T.
    (1993) Human Menkes X-chromosome disease and the staphylococcal cadmium-resistance ATPases: a remarkable similarity in protein sequences. Mol. Microbiol. 10:7–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  97. ↵
    1. Silver S.,
    2. Phung L. T.
    (1996) Bacterial heavy metal resistance: new surprises. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 50:753–789.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  98. ↵
    1. Sonnhammer E. L.,
    2. von Heijne G.,
    3. Krogh A.
    (1998) A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, pp 175–182.
  99. ↵
    1. Soultanas P.,
    2. Oram M.,
    3. Halford S. E.
    (1995) Site-specific recombination at res site containing DNA binding sequences for both Tn21 and Tn3 resolvases. J. Mol. Biol. 245:208–218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    1. Stark W. M.,
    2. Boocock M. R.
    (1995) Topological selectivity in site-specific recombination. in Mobile genetic elements. ed Sherratt D. J. (Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y), pp 101–125.
  101. ↵
    1. Stark W. M.,
    2. Boocock M. R.,
    3. Sherratt D. J.
    (1989) Site-specific recombination by Tn3 resolvase. Trends Genet. 5:304–309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  102. ↵
    1. Steel R. A.,
    2. Opella S. J.
    (1997) Structures of the reduced and mercury-bound forms of MerP, the periplasmic protein from the bacterial mercury detoxification system. Biochemistry 36:6885–6895.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Stokes H. W.,
    2. Hall R. M.
    (1989) A novel family of potentially mobile DNA elements encoding a site-specific gene-integration function: integrons. Mol. Microbiol. 3:1669–1683.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  104. ↵
    1. Stokes H. W.,
    2. O’Gorman D. B.,
    3. Recchia G. D.,
    4. Parekhian M.,
    5. Hall R. M.
    (1997) Structure and function of 59-base element recombination sites associated with mobile gene cassettes. Mol. Microbiol. 26:731–745.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  105. ↵
    1. Summers A. O.
    (1986) Organization, expression and evolution of genes for mercury resistance. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 40:607–634.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  106. ↵
    1. Summers A. O.
    (1992) Untwist and shout: a heavy metal-responsive transcriptional regulator. J. Bacteriol. 174:3097–3101.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  107. ↵
    1. Summers A. O.,
    2. Wireman J.,
    3. Vimy M. J.,
    4. Lorscheider F. L.,
    5. Marshall B.,
    6. Levy S. B.,
    7. Bennett S.,
    8. Billard L.
    (1993) Mercury released from dental “silver” fillings provokes an increase in mercury- and antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the oral and intestinal flora of primates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:825–834.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  108. ↵
    1. Sundstrom L.,
    2. Radstrom P.,
    3. Swedberg G.,
    4. Skold O.
    (1988) Site-specific recombination promotes linkage between trimethoprim and sulfonamide resistance genes. Sequence characterization of the dhfrV and sulI and a recombination active locus of Tn21. Mol. Gen. Genet. 213:191–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  109. ↵
    1. Sundstrom L.,
    2. Swedberg G.,
    3. Skold O.
    (1993) Characterization of transposon Tn5086, carrying the site-specifically inserted gene dhfrVII mediating trimethoprim resistance. J. Bacteriol. 175:1796–1805.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  110. ↵
    1. Swedberg G.
    (1987) Organization of two sulfonamide resistance genes on plasmids of gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31:306–311.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  111. ↵
    1. Tanaka M.,
    2. Yamamoto T.,
    3. Sawai T.
    (1983) Evolution of complex resistance transposons from an ancestral mercury transposon. J. Bacteriol. 153:1432–1438.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  112. ↵
    1. Tanaka M.,
    2. Yamamoto T.,
    3. Sawai T.
    (1983) Fine structure of transposition genes of Tn2603 and complementation of its tnpA and tnpR mutations by related transposons. Mol. Gen. Genet. 191:442–450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  113. ↵
    1. Wang Y.,
    2. Moore M. J.,
    3. Levinson H. S.,
    4. Silver S.,
    5. Walsh C. T.
    (1989) Nucleotide sequence of a chromosomal mercury resistance determinant from a Bacillus sp. with broad-spectrum mercury resistance. J. Bacteriol. 171:83–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  114. ↵
    1. Ward E.,
    2. Grinsted J.
    (1987) The nucleotide sequence of the tnpA gene of Tn21. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:1799–1806.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. ↵
    1. Watanabe T.
    (1963) Infective heredity of multiple drug resistance in bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev. 27:87–115.
  116. ↵
    1. Wiedemann B.,
    2. Meyer J. F.,
    3. Zuhlsdorf M. T.
    (1986) Insertions of resistance genes into Tn21-like transposons. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 18 (Suppl. C):85–92.
  117. ↵
    1. Wireman J.,
    2. Liebert C. A.,
    3. Smith C. T.,
    4. Summers A. O.
    (1997) Association of mercury resistance and antibiotic resistance in the gram-negative fecal bacteria of primates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:4494–4503.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  118. ↵
    1. Wohlleben W.,
    2. Arnold W.,
    3. Bissonnette L.,
    4. Pelletier A.,
    5. Tanguay A.,
    6. Roy P. H.,
    7. Gamboa G. C.,
    8. Barry G. F.,
    9. Aubert E.,
    10. Davies J.,
    11. Kagan S. A.
    (1989) On the evolution of Tn21-like multiresistance transposons: sequence analysis of the gene (aacC1) for gentamicin acetyltransferase-3-I(AAC(3)-I), another member of the Tn21-based expression cassette. Mol. Gen. Genet. 217:202–208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  119. ↵
    1. Womble D. D.,
    2. Rownd R. H.
    (1988) Genetic and physical map of plasmid NR1: comparison with other IncFII antibiotic resistance plasmids. Microbiol. Rev. 52:433–451.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  120. ↵
    1. Worley K. C.,
    2. Wiese B. A.,
    3. Smith R. F.
    (1995) BEAUTY: an enhanced BLAST-based search tool that integrates multiple biological information resources into sequence similarity search results. Genome Res. 5:173–184.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  121. ↵
    1. Yamamoto T.,
    2. Tanaka M.,
    3. Baba R.,
    4. Yamagishi S.
    (1981) Physical and functional mapping of Tn2603, a transposon encoding ampicillin, streptomycin, sulfonamide, and mercury resistance. Mol. Gen. Genet. 181:464–469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  122. ↵
    1. Yoshifumi I.,
    2. Watson J. M.,
    3. Haas D.,
    4. Leisinger T.
    (1984) Genetic and molecular characterization of the Pseudomonas plasmid pVS1. Plasmid 11:206–220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  123. ↵
    1. Yurieva O.,
    2. Kholodii G.,
    3. Minakhin L.,
    4. Gorlenko Z.,
    5. Kalyaeva E.,
    6. Mindlin S.,
    7. Nikiforov V.
    (1997) Intercontinental spread of promiscuous mercury-resistance transposons in environmental bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 24:321–329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  124. ↵
    1. Yurieva O.,
    2. Nikiforov V.
    (1996) Catalytic center quest: comparison of transposases belonging to the Tn3 family reveals an invariant triad of acidic amino acid residues. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 38:15–20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  125. ↵
    1. Zeng Q.,
    2. Stålhandske C.,
    3. Anderson M. C.,
    4. Scott R.,
    5. Summers A. O.
    (1998) The core metal-recognition domain of MerR. Biochemistry 37:15885–15895.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  126. ↵
    1. Zheng Z. X.,
    2. Chandler M.,
    3. Hipskind R.,
    4. Clerget M.,
    5. Caro L.
    (1982) Dissection of the r-determinants of the plasmid R100.1: the sequence at the extremes of Tn21. Nucleic Acids Res. 9:6265–6278.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  127. ↵
    1. Zuhlsdorf M. T.,
    2. Wiedemann B.
    (1992) Tn21-specific structures in gram-negative bacteria from clinical isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36:1915–1921.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Transposon Tn21, Flagship of the Floating Genome
Cynthia A. Liebert, Ruth M. Hall, Anne O. Summers
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews Sep 1999, 63 (3) 507-522; DOI:

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transposon Tn21, Flagship of the Floating Genome
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.
Share
Transposon Tn21, Flagship of the Floating Genome
Cynthia A. Liebert, Ruth M. Hall, Anne O. Summers
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews Sep 1999, 63 (3) 507-522; DOI:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • SUMMARY
    • TRANSPOSITION COMPONENTS
    • MER OPERON
    • IN2 INTEGRON
    • TN21 EVOLUTION
    • TN21 SAILS THE WORLD
    • CONCLUDING REMARKS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About MMBR
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #MMBRJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 1092-2172; Online ISSN: 1098-5557