Review

Molecular Basis of Symbiotic Promiscuity

Xavier Perret, Christian Staehelin, William J. Broughton
DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.64.1.180-201.2000

SUMMARY

SUMMARY Eukaryotes often form symbioses with microorganisms. Among these, associations between plants and nitrogen-fixing bacteria are responsible for the nitrogen input into various ecological niches. Plants of many different families have evolved the capacity to develop root or stem nodules with diverse genera of soil bacteria. Of these, symbioses between legumes and rhizobia (Azorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Mesorhizobium, and Rhizobium) are the most important from an agricultural perspective. Nitrogen-fixing nodules arise when symbiotic rhizobia penetrate their hosts in a strictly controlled and coordinated manner. Molecular codes are exchanged between the symbionts in the rhizosphere to select compatible rhizobia from pathogens. Entry into the plant is restricted to bacteria that have the “keys” to a succession of legume “doors”. Some symbionts intimately associate with many different partners (and are thus promiscuous), while others are more selective and have a narrow host range. For historical reasons, narrow host range has been more intensively investigated than promiscuity. In our view, this has given a false impression of specificity in legume-Rhizobium associations. Rather, we suggest that restricted host ranges are limited to specific niches and represent specialization of widespread and more ancestral promiscuous symbioses. Here we analyze the molecular mechanisms governing symbiotic promiscuity in rhizobia and show that it is controlled by a number of molecular keys.

Studies of nitrogen-fixing symbioses began in Europe, largely on Northern hemisphere plants. Thus, in 1542, the German physician and botanist Leonhard Fuchsius (88) published drawings of nodulated legumes. During the 17th century, Malpighi (167), who worked mostly in Bologna, Italy, observed nodules on the roots of beans (Phaseolus vulgarisand Vicia faba, members of the Leguminosae). Almost 200 years later, the Russian botanist Woronin (280) noted that the nodules of Alnus glutinosa (Betulaceae) andLupinus mutabilis (Leguminosae) were filled with minute bodies resembling bacteria. Although the observations that both legumes and nonlegumes possess nodules were historically important, the origin of nodules was controversial (86). Frank (85) found nodules on the roots of all healthy legumes in a study in Germany and demonstrated that incinerating soil prevented the nodulation ofPisum sativum. Hellriegel (120), and Hellriegel and Wilfarth (121) showed, in a study in Germany, that nodule formation results from external infection of Lupinusspp., P. vulgaris, P. sativum,Ornithopus sativa, Trifolium spp., andVicia sativa. However, it was Beyerinck (13-17), working in The Netherlands, who furnished the first proof that bacteria provoke nodules; he did this by preparing pure cultures of nodule organisms from V. faba and using them to infect Faba beans growing in sterile soil (18). Prazmowski (204, 205), working in Poland, inoculated P. sativum with pure cultures and showed that the bacteria penetrate legumes via infection threads in root hairs. In fact, it is now clear that many diverse soil bacteria harbor symbiotic loci (28), including the genera Azorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium,Mesorhizobium, and Rhizobium. Collectively, they are called rhizobia.

Root hairs, which develop near the root apex, are unicellular extensions of root epidermal cells. Most root hairs emerge at the apical end of particular epidermal cells and elongate by polar growth of the tip (43). The tips of root hairs have high exocytotic and cell wall assembly activities (221). In the soil, they are extensively colonized by soil-borne microorganisms, including nitrogen-fixing bacteria. In the rhizosphere, young, growing root hairs play an important role in symbiotic recognition. Rhizobia and the Nod factors they secrete (for reviews, see references 42, 63, 115, 173, 240, and 256) stimulate the reorientation of root hair cell wall growth (47, 139), resulting in curled root hairs. Within these curled root hairs, Nod factors promote the formation of infection threads, and it is through these tubular structures that the bacteria enter most (but not all) plants (Fig. 1 and2).

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Invasion of legume root hairs by Rhizobium. (A) Rhizobia (rh) colonize the rhizosphere and attach to the root hairs (r). (B) Opening the “outer door.” Nod factors induce root hair curling and permit bacterial penetration at the center of infection (ci). The plant nucleus (n) precedes the growing infection thread(s) (it). (C) Crossing the inner doors. Still accompanied by the nucleus (n) an elongating infection thread (it) reaches the base of the root hair cell. (D) A developing infection thread ramifies (rit) near the nodule primordia formed by dividing cortical cells. (E) Bacteroids (b) are released from the infection thread (it) and form symbiosomes (s) in nodule cells. Granules of poly-β-hydroxybutarate (phb) accumulate in bacteroids surrounded by the peribacteroid membrane (pb). Other abbreviations:c, cortex; d, digestive vacuole; ep, epidermis; ed, endodermis.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Early steps in nodulation of legumes showing that continued development of infection threads is under the control of thenodD1 gene in Rhizobium sp. NGR234. (A) Fluorescent image of a Vigna unguiculata root hair inoculated with a mutant incapable of producing NodNGR factors (NGRΔnodABC) and concomitantly treated with 10−7 M NodNGR(S) factors. Arrows point to rhizobia (rh). (B) Commencement of curling of a root hair stained with methylene blue. Extreme curling leads to the formation of a bright spot (bs), where rhizobia are often entrapped (same treatment as in panel A). (C) A bright-field image of a root hair inoculated with NGRΔnodABC::GUS3, treated with 10−7M NodNGR(S) factors, and stained for β-glucuronidase activity. Arrows point to the entrapped rhizobia within the curl. (D) Fluorescent image of a root hair curled in the shape of a shepherd's crook, showing the center of infection (ci). (E) Experiment in which the nodABCmutant was replaced with NGRΔnodD1::GUS3, but incubated with 10−7 M NodNGR(S) factors, and stained for β-glucuronidase activity. Apparently, the nodD1 mutant lacks a factor(s) that is necessary for the continued development of infection threads (it). In its absence, infection threads abort (ait), forming a structure that resembles a cerebellum (cb). (F) Photomicrograph of root hairs inoculated with wild-type NGR234 marked with GUS3. Infection threads develop along the length of the root hair (dit). B. Relić and W. J. Broughton (unpublished results; see reference 215 for further details).

Work on the molecular basis of host specificity also began at the end of the last century. In a study in Germany, Hiltner (123) prepared aqueous, bacterium-free filtrates from mature P. sativum nodules and demonstrated that they contain a substance that induces root hair formation (Hai) and deformation of the root hairs (Had) in this plant. Many attempts to define the structure of these deformation factors followed (213), but these investigations yielded fruit only in 1990, when Lerouge et al. (154), working in France, showed that the substances responsible are N-acylated oligomers ofN-acetyl-d-glucosamine. Since then, the Nod factor structures (the products of nod genes) of a number of rhizobia have been elucidated (see “Baroque decorations to the Nod factor core” below).

In other words, research on symbiotic nitrogen fixation was concentrated on European legumes, and although this has become less so with time, the focus on genera such as Medicago,Pisum, Trifolium, and Vicia has prevailed. Of course, model plants have advantages, but it is our contention that this bias toward European plants for historic reasons may have given a false impression of symbiotic specificity. What follows is an analysis of the molecular mechanisms governing broad host range (i.e., promiscuity) in rhizobia that may be regarded as a paradigm for other microbial symbioses. Readers are referred to the reviews by Irving et al. (128) and Downie and Walker (64) for more information on the role of the plant in nodulation.

BACTERIAL PROMISCUITY

Doubts that bacteria were faithful to the legume from which they were isolated also surfaced early. In experiments that are probably unrepeatable (Table 1), Bréal (25) induced nodule formation on Lupinus,Medicago sativa, and P. sativum by bacteria isolated from nodules of alfalfa (M. sativa). In similar, questionable experiments, Laurent (149) suggested that nodules could be produced on P. sativum by bacteria isolated from 36 species of plants. Perhaps the first reproducible data of this kind was obtained by Nobbe et al. (183, 184), who showed in experiments performed in Germany at the end of the 19th century that bacteria from P. sativum nodules were unable to nodulate plants of the tribes Genisteae and Hedysareae. Indeed, rhizobia which nodulate Lupinus, Medicago, Pisum,Vicia, etc., are now known to have restricted host ranges (Table 1).

View this table:
Table 1.

Nodulation capacities of symbiotic members of the bacterial family Rhizobiaceaea

The U.S. researcher J. K. Wilson was one of the first non-Europeans to publish extensive information on different symbiotic associations (279). He tested the host range properties of rhizobia isolated from 31 genera of legumes on 160 different legume species. All isolates, including those from Vicia spp., nodulated legumes of different tribes. The average number of plant species nodulated by a particular strain was 33%, but it ranged from 6% (for an isolate from Spartium scoparium) to 66% (for a slow-growing, and therefore probably Bradyrhizobium, strain isolated from Mucuna nodules). Indeed, four of Wilson's isolates nodulated more than half the legumes tested. These data are included in Table 2 to show the patterns of nodulation provoked by broad-host-range rhizobia. BothBradyrhizobium and Rhizobium species can be promiscuous, as shown in Table 2, and broad-host-range rhizobia were even isolated from Albizia julibrissin (Mimosoideae). Isolates from P. vulgaris, which include R. etliand R. tropici, were shown to nodulate 17 and 18 different legume genera, respectively (122). It thus seems as if rhizobia associated with most tribes of the Leguminosae have various degrees of promiscuity. The principal exceptions to this rule are the more specialized rhizobia associated with the tribes Cicereae, Trifolieae, and Viceae, which have restricted host ranges (28).

View this table:
Table 2.

Nodulation capacities of some broad-host-range rhizobia isolated from various legumes

LEGUME FIDELITY

As expected, hosts also vary greatly in their ability to enter into symbiosis with different rhizobia. In Wilson's study (279), six plants formed nodules with at least 90% of the isolates (Table 2). At the other extreme, Hippocrepis sp. and Ornithopus sativa formed nodules with only one other isolate. In further studies of this kind, numerous legumes have been inoculated with large collections of rhizobia and the capacity of the legumes to nodulate have been evaluated. Again, promiscuity exists among diverse legumes (Table 3). Mimosoid legumes not only harbor broad-host-range rhizobia but also are capable of interacting with diverse bacteria; Leucaena leucocephala, for example, is nodulated by a moderately broad spectrum of symbionts. The fact that Azorhizobium caulinodans, a microsymbiont ofSesbania rostrata, has a very restricted host range (Table1) gives the impression that Sesbania spp. have very defined rhizobial requirements. However, Wilson (279) showed thatS. drummondii, along with another tree (Robinia pseudoacacia), had the broadest capacity to nodulate among the legumes he tested.

View this table:
Table 3.

Responses of known promiscuous legumes to diverse rhizobia

However, most broad-spectrum hosts known are annual and climbing legumes of the tribe Phaseoleae. These include Macroptilium atropurpureum, which has been widely used as a test plant for nodulation by uncharacterized rhizobia (27, 248);Lablab purpureus, the legume from which Rhizobiumsp. strain NGR234 was isolated (269); and P. vulgaris (175). Equally, the other plants listed in Table 3 are considered to have broad host ranges (185). The capacity of Vigna unguiculata to nodulate with many different rhizobia has been exploited in the search for nodgenes (156, 157). Taken together, these data suggest that symbiotic promiscuity is widely dispersed in nature. It is not associated with a particular bacterial or plant taxonomic group and is not correlated with the growth habit of the legume. Broad-host-range legumes are also almost equally distributed between those that form indeterminate as opposed to determinate nodules (Table 3). Perhaps the only underlying similarity is that promiscuous bacteria and plants are found mostly in warm or tropical parts of the world.

MOLECULAR BASES

Nodulation leads to the colonization of plant cells by invading bacteria. Although many host plants and effective rhizobia have the ability to enter into symbiosis with more than one partner, only certain combinations of symbionts result in the formation of nitrogen-fixing nodules. Ineffective associations lead to empty or nonfixing bacteroid-containing nodules. Specificity among compatible partners minimizes the chances of infection by pathogens and the formation of ineffective associations that are detrimental to both symbionts. Experimental evidence suggests that the progression of invasive rhizobia towards nodule primordia is challenged at various “doors” (Fig. 1). Codes contained in molecular signals open these checkpoints. During the initial phases of nodulation (root hair curling and bacterial entry), these codes are given by flavonoids and Nod factors. In both cases, NodD proteins are the chief interlocutors of molecular traffic in the rhizosphere.

Flavonoids and Regulation of Nodulation GenesPlants jettison surprisingly large amounts of organic matter into the soil, most of which supports the growth of rhizospheric microorganisms. By labelling whole plants with14CO2, Helal and Sauerbeck (119) showed that 19% of the photosynthate was released as organic material into the rhizosphere. These compounds include carbohydrates, organic acids, vitamins, amino acids, and phenolic derivatives. Of these, flavonoids (2-phenyl-1,4-benzopyrone derivatives) are the most important from the symbiotic perspective. Although found throughout the plant kingdom, flavonoids specifically trigger the expression of the rhizobial genes required for nodulation (nod,nol, and noe). The inducing capacity varies with flavonoids and rhizobia; and in some cases flavonoids may inhibit induction (61, 79, 196, 197, 199). Other molecules, such as the betaines and erythronic and tetronic acids, may also act as inducers (90, 198).

Regulation of nod gene expression in rhizobia varies from strain to strain but is almost always mediated by NodD (for a review, see reference 237). NodD proteins belong to a family of LysR-like transcriptional regulators that bind to highly conserved 47-bp DNA motifs (nod boxes) found in the promoter regions of many nodulation loci (81, 227). Although NodD proteins bind to nod boxes even in the absence of an inducer, flavonoids are generally required for the expression of nodgenes (81, 82, 101, 110). Thus, NodD acts both as a sensor of the plant signal and as an activator of transcription ofnod loci (236). In R. leguminosarumbv. viciae, NodD proteins are localized in the cytoplasmic membrane (234), where the inducing flavonoid, naringenin, also accumulates (211). Direct binding of inducers to NodD has not been demonstrated, but point mutations in nodD affect the recognition of inducing molecules and cause an extension of the host range (30, 174). Furthermore, comparison of the NodD structure with various nuclear receptors has shown that the two types of proteins share conserved ligand-interacting domains located at the C-terminal end of their respective DNA-binding motifs (111).

Although nodD genes are ubiquitous in rhizobia, their symbiotic characteristics vary from one species to another. Some strains, such as R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii, have only one nodD gene, and in these cases, its mutation renders the strain incapable of nodulation (Nod−). In contrast,B. japonicum, Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234,R. meliloti, and R. tropici possess two to five copies of nodD (71, 105, 194, 269c). In R. meliloti, mutation of all three copies of nodD is required to abolish nodulation (124), whereas inactivation of nodD1 is sufficient to render strain NGR234 Nod− (213). nodD products of variousRhizobium species vary in that they respond to different sets of flavonoids (72, 249). Moreover, NodD homologues from the same strain may have different flavonoid preferences (112, 117, 198). In R. meliloti, NodD1 is activated when cells are supplied with a complex plant seed extract or the flavonoid luteolin; NodD2 is activated only with the complex extract, not with purified luteolin; and NodD3 apparently modulates the expression ofnod genes even in the absence of any plant factor (180). Together with syrM, nodD3 ofR. meliloti constitutes a self-amplifying positive regulatory circuit that is involved in the regulation of nodgenes within the developing nodule (266). In contrast, NodD1 of strain NGR234 responds to a wide range of inducing molecules that include flavonoids known to be inhibitors in other rhizobia (e.g., vanillin and isovanillin) (4, 72, 155) and several estrogenic compounds (112). Transfer of the nodD1gene of strain NGR234 to restricted-host-range rhizobia extends the nodulation capacity of the recipients to new hosts, including the nonlegume Parasponia andersonii (4, 11, 126). Although a number of correlations exist between the spectrum of flavonoids able to interact with NodD proteins and the breadth of the host range (11, 54, 126, 249, 250, 263, 269d), variations in the ability of these proteins to differentially sense inducing molecules (and regulate the expression of nod genes) are insufficient to explain the phenomenon of host specificity.

Nonetheless, NodD genes represent a molecular interface between the bacterium and the plant. However, other species-specific sensor-activator systems also contribute to the control of bacterial host range. For instance, nodV and nodW ofB. japonicum are essential for the nodulation of M. atropurpureum, Vigna radiata, and V. unguiculata but contribute only marginally to the symbiosis withG. max (104). Modulation of two-component regulatory systems such as nodV and nodW is mediated by a series of phosphorylation steps. NodV is thought to be a membrane-bound protein that senses signals from the plant and transduces the signal to NodW, which in turn activates the expression of nod genes (230). Both in vitro and in vivo studies have confirmed that phosphorylation of NodW is induced by genistein and depends on both acetyl phosphate and its cognate kinase, NodV (159). Also, comparison of the biological activities of the wild-type and mutant proteins indicates that phosphorylation of NodW is essential for nod gene activation (159). A search for genes whose transcription is dependent on NodW led to the identification of two suppressor genes, nwsA andnwsB. Together, these genes also form a dual-component regulatory system (109). When overexpressed, nwsBcan complement a nodW mutant as well as a nodD1 nodD2 double mutant, suggesting that in B. japonicum at least, alternatives to NodD- and flavonoid-sensing regulatory systems coexist (105).

nod gene expression is also subject to negative control. After initial induction by flavonoids, repression of several nodulation genes is required for optimal nodulation of M. sativa byR. meliloti (142) and of P. sativum byR. leguminosarum bv. viciae strain Tom (141). InR. meliloti, repression of several nod genes is controlled by NolR, a 13-kDa product that contains a helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif which is homologous to other regulators of the LysR family such as NodD and SyrM (143). In the dimeric form, NolR binds to conserved (A/T)TTAGN9A(T/A) target sequences found in the promoter regions it controls (46) and thus represses the expression of the nodD genes as well as those necessary for the synthesis of the core Nod factor structures (nodABC). However, it does not affect host-specific nod loci such asnodH. Interestingly, the absence of NolR repressor activity in R. meliloti stain 1021 is due to a single insertional mutation in the C-terminal coding sequence, which abolishes the DNA binding ability of the protein without affecting its HTH motif (45).

With a few exceptions, transcription of most inducible nodloci is repressed before rhizobia differentiate into functional bacteroids (235, 244), although transcription ofnodD and nodE of R. leguminosarum bv. viciae in P. sativum nodules and nodA of A. caulinodans in stem nodules of S. rostrata still occurs (56, 235). R. meliloti is no exception, although NolR does not play a direct role in the down regulation of flavonoid-inducible nodulation genes in bacteroids (46). InB. japonicum, repression of nod gene expression by NolA is probably an indirect effect, mediated perhaps bynodD2 (91). B. japonicum nolA andR. meliloti nolR mutants retain the ability to nodulate their respective hosts, albeit at lower efficiency, suggesting that fine-tuning of nod gene expression is required for optimal nodulation. Similarly, a nodD2 mutant of strain NGR234 fails to repress the expression of the nodABCIJnolOnoeI operon after initial flavonoid induction and, in contrast to the wild-type strain, is unable to form nitrogen-fixing nodules on V. unguiculata and Cajanus cajan (73).

nod Boxes: Variations on a ThemeSequence analysis showed that pNGR234a carries 19 sequences homologous to conserved NodD-dependent promoter elements (nod boxes), 5 of which control the expression of knownnod operons (87, 195). No significant difference was found between the consensus sequence derived for nodboxes of pNGR234a and those published for other rhizobia (269d, 278). Interestingly, analysis of the promoter regions of the nodABCIJnolOnoeI, nodSU, nodZ,noeE, and nolL loci showed that nodboxes with up to 11 base mismatches (compared to the consensus sequence) are still functional and regulate gene expression in a NodD1-dependent manner (195). It is possible, however, that some of these nod boxes have higher affinities for certain NodD1-inducer complexes than do others.

Thus, a microsymbiont such as strain NGR234 has many possibilities for fine-tuning nod gene expression. First, NodD1 may interact with a broad spectrum of inducing molecules to produce complexes that may preferentially trigger transcription from certain nodboxes over others. Second, supplementary activators of transcription (e.g., SyrM1 [114] and y4xI [274]) could, together with NodD1, form a regulatory network which exerts interlaced control over dispersed nodulation loci. Third, repressors such as NodD2 and NolR (73) could further modulatenod gene expression. Together, these systems control the expression of NGR234 nodulation genes in a host-specific way, possibly resulting in the secretion of different sets of molecular signals in response to the macrosymbiont. Nod factors are obviously the most important of these signals, and their synthesis depends upon the timely and coordinated expression of many nod genes.

nod Enzymes and Nod Factor Synthesis

Nod factor core.In response to the release by host plants of appropriate inducers, rhizobia synthesize and secrete a family of lipochitooligosaccharides (LCOs) called Nod factors. The first step in Nod factor assembly is performed by anN-acetylglucosaminyltransferase encoded by nodC(95). Chain elongation by NodC takes place at the nonreducing terminus (134, 135, 170). Then the deacetylase NodB removes the N-acetyl moiety from the nonreducing terminus of the N-acetylglucosamine oligosaccharides (132, 253). Finally, an acyltransferase encoded bynodA links the acyl chain to the acetyl-free C-2 carbon of the nonreducing end of the oligosaccharide (51, 226). Although not essential, NodI and NodJ seem to be involved in the export of Nod factors (34, 74, 254).

However, recent work suggests that nodA and nodCare also components of host-specific nodulation (hsn) (225). NodA varies in its specificity for different fatty acid substrates, thus contributing to the host range. For instance, replacement ofR. meliloti nodA by R. tropici nodA leads to the production of Nod factors acylated with vaccenic acid instead of C16:2 (51), whereas Bradyrhizobiumsp. strain ANU289 NodA is unable to direct the transfer of the R. leguminosarum bv. viciae nodFE-dependent multiunsaturated fatty acids to the chitin oligosaccharide acceptor (222). NodC is also a determinant of the length of the Nod factor backbone and thus of host specificity (133, 135).

Baroque decorations to the Nod factor core.Properly expressed nodABC genes are all that is needed for the synthesis of acylated dimers to pentamers ofN-acetyl-d-glucosamine that possess symbiotic activity on certain plants (3, 200, 252). Thus all other Nod factor substituents must play more subtle roles in nodulation, perhaps by permitting interaction with certain plants or by protecting Nod factors from degradation. In this sense, these substituents can be likened to baroque decorations—they enhance rather than support the basic structure (Table 4). By definition, the loci that control these additions are unique to one or a few rhizobia and are thus hsn genes.

View this table:
Table 4.

Nod factors and their baroque decorationsa  

(i) Fatty acids (nodEF).Two basic types of fatty acids are N-linked to the terminal nonreducing sugar of the chitomeric core by NodA (Table 4): (i) the relatively common saturated or monounsaturated fatty acids (e.g., stearic and vaccenic acids) and (ii) the rarer, highly unsaturated compounds containing two to four double bonds as found in R. leguminosarum and R. meliloti strains containing nodEF (54, 252). NodF has homology to acyl carrier proteins, while NodE is a β-acetoacetylsynthase (21, 22, 49, 245). Transfer ofR. meliloti nodEFGHPQ into R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii or bv. viciae confers on these strains the ability to nodulateM. sativa but prevents nodulation of the normal hosts,Trifolium repens and V. sativa, respectively (50, 70). Inactivation of R. leguminosarum bv. viciae nodE leads to the synthesis of vaccenic acid rather than the polyunsaturated fatty acids (C18:4) produced by the parent strain (252). Insertional inactivation ofR. leguminosarum bv. trifolii nodE severely inhibits the nodulation of several Trifolium species and simultaneously enhances the nodulation of P. sativum andV. sativa (59, 251). Mutation of R. leguminosarum bv. viciae nodE renders the strain Nod− on V. sativa (32). Replacement of R. meliloti nodEF with R. leguminosarum bv. viciae nodEF leads to the synthesis of Nod factors containing a polyunsaturated C18 fatty acid side chain which resembles those produced by R. leguminosarum bv. viciae (52). Thus, nodEF and the unsaturated Nod factors they produce appear to be specializations necessary for nodulation of the legume tribes Trifolieae and Vicieae.

(ii) 6-O glycosylation.An additional sugar, which can be either arabinose or fucose, represents another type of decoration.

(a) Arabinosylation (noeC). noeCand/or downstream genes are essential for arabinosylation ofA. caulinodans Nod factors (171). In these Nod factors, the reducing terminus can be fucosylated, arabinosylated, or both (172). Perhaps this suggests that both arabinosylated and fucosylated Nod factors are necessary for nodule formation on the stems of Sesbania rostrata (163, 164).d-Arabinosylated Nod factors result in larger numbers of nodules on the roots of S. rostrata, whereas the presence or absence of l-fucose has no effect. In contrast, other hosts of A. caulinodans prefer fucosylated Nod factors (75).

(b) Fucosylation (nodZ, nolK).Fucose is a frequent substitution, and its addition to Nod factors is encoded by nodZ in many rhizobia (162, 171, 208, 210, 261). Since all the usual Glycine max symbionts (B. elkanii, B. japonicum, R. fredii, and strain NGR234) secrete fucosylated Nod factors, the expectation that mutation of nodZ would prevent the nodulation of soybeans was strong. In fact, B. japonicum nodZ is required for nodulation of M. atropurpureum but not of G. max (261). Similarly, nodZ mutants of strain NGR234 produce nonfucosylated Nod factors and are unable to nodulatePachyrhizus tuberosus but retain the capacity to nodulate soybeans (208). Since transconjugants of R. leguminosarum containing B. japonicum nodZ acquire the capacity to nodulate Macroptilium (but not to fix nitrogen) (162), it seems as if fucosylated Nod factors play a role in nodulation of only a few legumes. In A. caulinodans, NolK is involved in the synthesis of GDP-fucose, which is used by NodZ as the fucosyl donor in fucosylation of A. caulonidans Nod factors (171).

(iii) Sulfation (nodH, noeE).NodH and NoeE, the only two characterized sulfotransferases, are specific to the reducing terminus of Nod factors (68, 154, 209, 224, 239). Both enzymes use 3′-phosphoadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate as the sulfate donor. 3′-Phosphoadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate is synthesized by the enzymes encoded by nodPQ (242, 243). NodH-dependent sulfation of the reducing terminus at C-6 ofR. meliloti Nod factors is a major determinant of host range in R. meliloti (154, 224). nodHmutants which fail to produce sulfated Nod factors were thought to completely lose the capacity to nodulate M. sativa but gain the ability to nodulate the nonhost V. sativa (49, 224). Although other data indicate that nodulation of alfalfa by some nodH mutants is strongly impaired rather than abolished (125, 186), these results confirm that optimal nodulation ofM. sativa requires sulfated Nod factors whereas V. sativa does not tolerate them (70).

In contrast, NoeE is a fucose-specific sulfotransferase (113, 209). Mutation of strain NGR234 noeE blocks the nodulation of P. tuberosus, while its introduction into the closely related strain USDA257 extends the host range of R. fredii to include Calopogonium caeruleum(113). Surprisingly, these transconjugants do not acquire the ability to nodulate P. tuberosus (M. Hanin, unpublished results).

(iv) Acetylation (nodL, nodX,nolL).Unlike sulfate groups, acetyl residues may be found at both extremities of Nod factors, i.e., on C-6 of the reducing or nonreducing termini, as well as on the fucose (Table 4). Furthermore, acetate groups on the fucose can move from one α-hydroxyl group to another (12). Mutation ofnodX provokes a drastic reduction in Nod factor production by R. leguminosarum strain TOM and the ability to nodulate primitive cultivars of P. sativum (48). InR. leguminosarum bv. viciae however, a fucosyl group added by NodZ can functionally replace the missing acetyl group in anodX mutant (189). Although NodL is responsible for acetylation of C-6 of the nonreducing terminus in R. meliloti Nod factors (2), R. meliloti nodLmutants are impaired in their ability to elicit infection thread formation on M. sativa but form nodules with only a moderate delay (96). A similar phenotype was observed when the corresponding mutant of R. leguminosarum bv. viciae was used to inoculate V. hirsuta, while nodL nodF double mutants of R. meliloti are unable to penetrate their hosts (2). In strain NGR234, disruption of the flavonoid-induciblenolL gene results in the synthesis of NodNGR factors that lack the 3-O- or 4-O-acetate group (12). Interestingly, the nodulation capacity of the mutant NGRΩnolL is not impaired whereas transconjugants of USDA257 containing nolL of NGR234 produce acetylated Nod factors and nodulate the nonhosts C. caerulum, L. leucocephala, and Lotus halophilus (12). Acetylation of the fucose on Nod factors of R. etli also conditions efficient nodulation of some P. vulgariscultivars and of the alternate host Vigna umbellata(44).

(v) N methylation and carbamoylation (nodS,nodU, nolO).NodS is anN-methyltransferase (93, 94, 129), while NodU and NolO control carbamoylation at C-6 and C-3 (or C-4), respectively, on the nonreducing N-acetyl-d-glucosamine (57, 129, 131). Inactivation of nodS in A. caulinodans, strain NGR234, and R. tropici abolishes the nodulation of L. leucocephala and P. vulgaris(158, 276). Introduction of either nodS ornodU into R. fredii extends its host range to include Leucaena spp. (129, 144).

(vi) 2-O methylation (noeI).The fucose group of Nod factors of B. japonicum USDA110, NGR234, and USDA257 is mostly 2-O methylated (Table 4). In strains NGR234, NoeI controls this function, and mutation of noeI leads to the production of fucosylated Nod factors that are not 2-O methylated (131). Introduction of noeI into R. loti allows the production of 2-O-methylated NodNGR factors. However, nodulation tests using L. leucocephala, Lotus japonicus, M. atropurpureum, and V. unguiculata and the NGRΔnoeI mutant have failed to identify a host which requires 2-O-methylated NodNGR factors (S. Jabbouri and M. Hanin, unpublished results).

Nod enzymes, which are responsible for the elaboration of Nod factors, are among the principal determinants of host specificity. Indeed, a number of them were called hsn determinants before the unified nod gene nomenclature was established. Most of them catalyze the adjunction of baroque decorations to the core Nod factor molecule (which is synthesized by NodC, NodB, and NodA); the effect of these different families of molecules on legumes is discussed below.

Nod Factors and Host SpecificityAlthough much information on the influence of Nod factor substituents on host range exists, no strict correlation can be drawn between the types of LCOs produced by rhizobia and the plants they nodulate. For example, although the Nod factors produced by R. etli and R. loti are identical, the two species have distinct host ranges (Phaseolus spp. and Lotusspp., respectively) (33). Also, the major Nod factors secreted by R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii are the same as two of the major LCOs produced by R. leguminosarum bv. viciae (188, 255), yet the two biovars nodulate distinct plants. Although the inability of NodD proteins to recognize the host flavonoids (and thus to activate nod gene expression) might be responsible for some of these phenotypes, these data emphasize the point that Nod factor structures alone cannot be used to predict host range. Furthermore, two rhizobia that nodulate the same plant may secrete different Nod factors. R. tropici and R. etli produce sulfated and acetylfucosylated Nod factors, respectively (Table 4), but both effectively nodulate P. vulgaris (202, 203). B. elkanii, B. japonicum, strain NGR234, and strain USDA257 have a number of common hosts (207), but their Nod factors vary considerably (Table 4).

The amounts of Nod factors released by rhizobia are also important in determining the host range. For instance, introduction of strain NGR234nodD1 into R. meliloti increases Nod factor production by about twofold and permits the nodulation of V. unguiculata, a nonhost (214). Similarly, conjugation of the nodSU genes of strain NGR234 into R. frediiUSDA257 not only extends the host range of the transconjugant to include L. leucocephala (144) but also vastly increases Nod factor production (Table5). In contrast, the NGRΔnodSU mutant, which secretes only 1/10 the amount of Nod- factor produced by the wild type, is incapable of nodulatingL. leucocephala (Table 5). One interpretation of these data is that higher levels of Nod factors (produced when a functional NodS or NodU is present) (129), not the presence of N-methylated or 6-O-carbamoylated LCOs, is necessary for nodulation ofLeucaena.

View this table:
Table 5.

Effects of apigenin, nodD1, andnodSU on Nod factor production and nodulation of L. leucocephala by strains NGR234 and USDA257

Although the supporting evidence is lacking, it also seems likely that in addition to variations in the levels of Nod factors, different members and various proportions of the respective Nod factor families are secreted into the rhizospheres of specific legumes. There, only certain combinations of Nod factors, present at optimal levels, are capable of inducing deformation (Had) and curling (Hac) in homologous legumes (118, 148, 154, 169, 206, 213, 238, 252, 269a).

Cooperation among Nod factors and related signal molecules has also been demonstrated. Minami et al. (177, 178) examined the effects of LCOs on changes in the expression of early nodulin genes inG. soja roots and found that any combination of one active Nod factor with a nonspecific LCO was sufficient to induce mRNA expression of early nodulin genes such as Enod2. In contrast, both synthetic Nod factors and the chitin pentamer PACT, which is unable to provoke Had on G. soja, induced the transient accumulation of Enod40 mRNA. It would thus seem that not only are absolute levels of Nod-factors important but also the composition and relative proportions of the mixtures excreted by rhizobia are necessary for the induction of different components of the nodulation pathway (190).

Nod factor binding proteins.The extent to which specific Nod factors bind to their respective plant receptors is still unknown. In Medicago, two putative Nod factor binding sites (NFSB) have been characterized (23, 181). Some properties of NFSB1 of M. truncatula suggest that it may also be involved in processes other than nodulation. First, its affinity and specificity for LCOs are low. Second, a similar site exists in particulate fractions of tomato roots (23). In contrast, NFSB2, which was isolated from the microsomal fraction of Medicago variacell suspension cultures, is sensitive to proteases and shows high affinity for Nod factors (181). Covalent linkage of both the lipid and the chitooligosaccharide moieties, as well as O acetylation of the nonreducing sugars of Nod factors, is required for high-affinity binding to NFSB2 (108). In competition experiments in which the ligand specificity of NFSB2 was assayed by titrating35S-labelled R. meliloti Nod factors against synthetic LCOs, those with short (C8) acyl chains were poor competitors compared to those with C16 and C18fatty acid side chains (108). However, NFSB2 does not select for the presence of sulfate on the reducing sugar or for the number and/or positions of double bonds in the acyl chain. Since sulfatedR. meliloti Nod factors are required for optimal nodulation of Medicago (see above) and as synthetic LCOs containing at least two double bonds are more active biologically than are monounsaturated compounds (53), it seems doubtful that these putative receptors are host-specific determinants of theMedicago-R. meliloti interaction.

Similarly, a root surface lectin of Dolichos biflorus has apyrase (Ca2+-dependent ATP diphosphatase) activity and binds Nod factors from both heterologous and homologous rhizobia (69). Reverse PCR-based techniques using mRNAs of L. japonicus and M. sativa root confirmed the presence of orthologues in these two legumes. Similar experiments were also performed with D. biflorus and Arabidopsis, leading to a second lectin in the former and a nonlegume lectin in the latter (223). Since much work still has to be done on these Nod factors binding lectin/nucleotide phosphohydrolases (LNPs), it is too early to pronounce on their exact symbiotic role. It is intriguing, however, that D. biflorus has two LNPs. Close orthologues of LNP1 are found only in legumes, while D. biflorus LNP2 is more closely related to apyrase sequences of nonleguminous plants (223).

Although Nod factors are bacterial products, they share many characteristics with plant hormones (213). One of these is that perturbations in the auxin-cytokinin balance mimic Nod factors in inducing meristematic activity of nodule meristems (128). Another is that the range of concentrations over which both hormones and Nod factors are active can vary by a millionfold. This suggests a desensitisation or an adaptation by the plant to increasing hormone concentrations (137). In turn, this implies that covalent and reversible modification to the “receptors” occurs; these suggestions are supported by the fact that the ethylene receptor is homologous to two-component chemoreceptors of bacteria (38). Perhaps this explains why the search for Nod factor receptors in direct Nod factor binding studies has been only moderately successful.

Hydrolysis of Nod factors.In principle, the chemical stability of Nod factors should influence the biological activity of the LCO mixtures secreted by rhizobia. In fact, chitinases and other enzymes rapidly cleave purified Nod factors in the host rhizosphere. The degradation products formed are only weakly active on their respective hosts (118, 258). Plant chitinases have been studied extensively in the context of plant-pathogen interactions. Among these are isoforms that are induced in symbiotic and/or pathogenic interactions (103, 192, 257, 273, 281). Distinct isoforms of chitinases and related hydrolases cleave specific β-1,4-linkages in the carbohydrate moiety of Nod factors (Tables6 and 7), resulting in the formation of acylated degradation products that are either di-, tri- or tetrameric. In general, leguminous and nonleguminous chitinases that belong to the same chitinase class have similar substrate specificities. Interestingly, the baroque decorations on certain Nod factors have a strong influence on the stability of these molecules (241, 258, 259) and modify the cleavage specificity of a given chitinase. For example, pentameric LCOs are hydrolyzed in two positions by an M. sativa class I chitinase, but only one of these positions is susceptible in sulfated Nod factors (Table7). Furthermore, the sulfate group at the reducing end and the O-acetyl group at the nonreducing terminus of R. meliloti Nod factors dramatically increase the stability of these LCOs, rendering tetrameric molecules resistant to degradation by a large number of different chitinases (Table 6). Novel enzymes have been identified in Medicago, and their cleavage preferences are different from those of known chitinases (Tables 6 and 7). One of them is an extracellular lipodisaccharide-releasing Nod factor hydrolase that cleaves all tetra- and pentameric R. meliloti Nod factors. Preincubation withR. meliloti Nod factors stimulated the activity of this enzyme in Medicago roots, suggesting that Nod factor inactivation is an early feedback response by the host plant.

View this table:
Table 6.

Hydrolysis of Nod factors by chitinases and related enzymesa

View this table:
Table 7.

Sites of hydrolytic cleavage of Nod factors ofRhizobium meliloti by enzymes isolated from the roots ofMedicago sativaa  

However, two different types of observations suggest that chitinases may not play major roles in the determination of host specificity. First, the class I, II, III, V, and VI chitinases isolated fromNicotiana tabacum, as well as the class III and IV chitinases of Beta vulgaris and Daucus carota(all nonlegumes), degrade Nod factors in similar ways to that used by legume chitinases (Table 6). One interpretation of these data is that chitinases form part of a generalized plant response system rather than tailoring Nod factor degradation to specific legume-Rhizobium associations. A second important consideration is that root hydrolases take hours to degrade Nod factors (260), while the first responses of root hairs to inoculation by rhizobia (or to the presence of purified Nod factors) can be measured in seconds (64). Nevertheless, expression of a chitinase from Serratia marcescens by R. frediiUSDA191 transconjugants resulted in delayed nodulation and a marked decrease in total nodule number on soybean cultivar McCall in comparison with the wild-type strain (146). What is undisputed, however, is that chitinases modulate the levels of Nod factors in the rhizosphere and, in so doing, help suppress defense responses stimulated by high concentrations of LCOs (231, 260). Since defense reactions also occur in aborted infection threads (273), it is possible that plant hydrolases help regulate Nod factor levels even after the bacterium has entered the plant. In other words, chitinases and related hydrolases cleave and so inactivate Nod factors. Local induction or down-regulation of these enzymes in leguminous roots would thus modulate local LCO concentrations. Since Nod factor levels seem to be host-range determinants, plant hydrolases might help tailor host specificity.

NOD FACTORS OPEN THE LEGUME OUTER DOOR

Although the mechanism of root hair deformation is poorly understood, it probably resembles that of root hair development (118). The tips of Nod factor-treated V. sativaroot hairs swell before polar growth is induced. Induction of tip growth is preceded by local hydrolysis of the cell wall and followed by polar growth (118). Schiefelbein and Somerville (233) showed that the phenotype of root hair-specific mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana resembles root hair deformations caused by rhizobia. Thus, initiation and deformation of root hairs appear to be ontogenically related.

Nod factors are the signals required for entry of rhizobia into some legumes. Concomitant treatment of G. max and V. unguiculata roots with NodNGR factors and nodABCmutants of strain NGR234 or B. japonicum USDA110 permits these strains to nodulate and fix nitrogen on their respective hosts (215). NodNGR factors also allow the entry of R. fredii USDA257 into the roots of the nonhost Calopogonium caeruleum (215) and of the nodABC mutant of NGR234 into Macroptilium atropurpureum (213). Similarly, coapplication of purified A. caulinodans Nod factors and a nodA mutant of the same strain restores the formation of outer cortical infection pockets in Sesbania rostrata (56). These data leave little doubt that at least in some symbioses, Nod factors act like keys to legume doors. Interestingly, a recent report suggests that one of the “latches” that is opened by a Nod factor “key” has been found. A transposon-tagged mutant of Lotus japonicus, which is arrested at the stage of bacterial recognition, was identified (232). The mutation, which has been named nin(for nodule inception), is required for the formation of infection threads and is a transcription factor.

Once Nod factors have opened the root hair door to the invading rhizobia, additional bacterial signals appear necessary for continued development of the infection threads. This is clearly seen in variations of the Nod factor complementation experiments described above. These experiments work well if the strain deficient in Nod factor production is mutated in genes essential for Nod factor synthesis (nodABC) but not if the strain is mutated innodD1. In this latter case, rhizobia bunch up in the curled part of the root hair and the infection thread fails to develop toward the root cortex, resulting in contortions that resemble a cerebellum (Fig. 2E). It thus seems probable that products of genes other than those needed for the synthesis of Nod factors, but also under the control of NodD1, are required for the continued development of infection threads.

DO INFECTION THREADS HAVE AN INNER DOOR?

Other Host Range KeysNodD proteins, with their ability to recognize different inducers, the complex mixtures of Nod factors as well as the various levels at which they are maintained, are not the only determinants of host specificity. Although Nod factors permit rhizobia to enter the outer door of the legume host and may play a role during nodule development (56, 267), additional “keys” are necessary for the formation of symbiotically proficient nodules. In fact, later steps of the infection process such as infection thread formation and propagation, as well as bacterial release into the cytoplasm of infected cells, require constituents of the cell wall and in some cases secretion of specific proteins (for a review, see reference275).

Polysaccharides and surface components.Symbiotically relevant components of the rhizobial cell wall include extracellular polysaccharides (also known as exopolysaccharides) (EPS), lipopolysaccharides (LPS), capsular polysaccharides (CPS and KPS), and cyclic β-glucans (Fig. 3). Surface polysaccharides (SPS) form a complex macromolecular structure at the bacterium-plant interface. They accumulate on the surface of the prokaryote as a capsular layer but are also released into the extracellular space as bacterial slime.

EPS I and EPS II represent the two major classes of EPS synthesized byR. meliloti. EPS I members are polymers of an octasaccharide repeating unit of succinoglycan ranging in size from 106 to 107 Da for the high-molecular-weight (HMW) fraction (152). In contrast, the low-molecular-weight (LMW) fraction is formed of monomers, dimers, and trimers (277). Although mutants of R. meliloti Rm1021 incapable of synthesizing succinoglycan (EPS I) produce normal root hair curling on M. sativa, the nodules are devoid of bacteria and bacteroids and thus are ineffective (76, 151). Addition of the LMW fraction, specifically trimers of succinoglycan, to roots of alfalfa restored the nodule invasion capability of the exo mutant (5, 277). Interestingly, EPS I mutant strains of R. meliloti derepressed for the synthesis of another class of EPS are capable of forming normal nodules on alfalfa (99). EPS II members are polymers of modified glucose-(β-1,3)-galactose (99), and only small amounts (as little as 7 pmol per plant) of the purified LMW fraction are sufficient to restore nodule invasion by noninfective strains (102). Thus, although EPS II members can replace succinoglycan in nodule invasion, they are not required when wild-type EPS I is produced.

Fluorescence microscopy analyses show that nodule invasion is aborted at various stages in different exo mutants (40). Cells that lack ExoR, a negative regulator of exo gene expression (212), vastly overproduce succinoglycan and are unable to colonize curled root hairs and form infection threads. In contrast, a mutant with a mutation in exoY that is incapable of synthesizing succinoglycan (since it lacks the first enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway) (217) colonizes curled root hairs but forms few, very short infection threads. Although the exoHmutant that produces symbiotically dysfunctional succinoglycan forms infection threads longer than those produced by the exoYmutant, they never extend as far as the base of the root hair cell. Thus, in R. meliloti, succinoglycan could be regarded as a symbiotic signal (or key) required for opening the inner root hair door(s). Mutants that fail to produce the symbiotically active forms of these EPSs in adequate quantities are incapable of penetrating the adjacent plant cell and thus remain blocked or trapped in the infected root hair (40, 153). Also, since nodules induced by EPS I mutants of R. meliloti show pronounced symptoms of plant defense, it is possible that a molecule derived from the EPS I biosynthetic pathway functions as a suppressor of plant defense reactions (182). It has been postulated that in other plants, EPS of R. leguminosarum bv. viciae accelerates root hair curling and infection in such a way that invasion by rhizobia precedes the plant defense response (272). Similarly, it is thought that the wild-type cyclic β-glucans of B. japonicum (Fig. 3) may function as suppressors of host defense responses (20).

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Examples of the five classes of rhizobial polysaccharides. (A) Structure of cyclic β-(1,6)-β-(1,3)-glucans common to B. japonicum. Redrawn from reference26. (B) Acidic EPS of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 (60). EPS I (succinoglycan) of R. meliloti resembles the EPS of strain NGR234. (C) KPS of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii (98). (D) The somatic K antigen of R. fredii USDA257 (83). (E) Core structure of the LPS of R. etli (84). Abbreviations: Gal, galactose; GalA, galacturonic acid; Glc, glucose; GlcA, glucoronic acid; Man, mannose; Kdo, 3-deoxy-d-manno-2-octulosonic acid; OAc, acetate group; Pyr, pyridine.

Formation of symbiosomes (which involves the release of rhizobia from infection threads into the cytoplasm of infected nodule cells) in plants other than M. sativa requires different components including EPS, LPS, CPS, KPS, and cyclic β-glucans (Fig. 3, Table8). Although EPS− mutants ofM. loti are fully effective on Lotus pedunculatus, they provoke small, ineffective, tumor-like growths on L. leucocephala (127). Similarly, Exo− mutants of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii (271), R. leguminosarum bv. viciae (24), and strain NGR234 (39) are ineffective on their respective hosts, T. repens, P. sativum, and L. leucocephala. In contrast, Exo− mutants of R. leguminosarum bv. phaseoli (58) andR. fredii (140), are fully effective on the determinate legumes P. vulgaris and G. max. One possible explanation of these data is that EPS is required for the formation of fully effective symbioses on plants that produce indeterminate nodules but not on legumes which form determinate nodules. However, Parniske et al. (192) showed that an EPS-defective mutant of B. japonicum which forms nitrogen-fixing nodules on G. max was ineffective onG. soja. Furthermore, a mutant of Rhizobiumstrain TAL1145 that is deficient in EPS synthesis still nodulates various hosts, independently of their nodule type (193).

View this table:
Table 8.

Effects of mutations in nonnodulation genes on Fix phenotypes in various legumes

A number of mutations that encode similar phenotypes but that occur in a variety of genes have been found (Table 8). For example, where the production of cyclic-β-(1→2)glucans, rhamnose-rich SPS, LPS, SG, β-(1→2)glucans, and KPS is impaired, Nod+Fix− phenotypes are also observed. Different regulators appear to control the expression of these diverse genes, and the resultant phenotype depends on the plant. Quite often an Inf+ Fix− phenotype is observed, suggesting that these genes play similar roles. One possibility is that such surface components are necessary for or form part of the developing infection thread. Hence, a plant that could not itself supply the missing carbohydrate would give a Fix− phenotype while the rhizobial mutant in a plant that normally synthesizes the compound would have no effect.

Secreted proteins.Several strains ofRhizobium secrete symbiotically active proteins. Among these, the nodO product is required for nodulation ofV. hirsuta by mutants of R. leguminosarum bv. viciae with nodFELMNT deleted (62), as well as for extension of the host range of an R. trifolii nodEmutant to include V. sativa (67). nodOencodes a Ca2+ binding protein that is thought to form cation-specific channels in membranes of leguminous plants (66, 264). Although NodO and NodS have distinct biochemical functions, a nodO homologue of Rhizobium sp. strain BR816 was shown to complement a nodS mutant of NGR234 for nodulation of L. leucocephala (269e), suggesting that secreted proteins may supplement some Nod factor deficiencies. Secretion of NodO is dependent on a C-terminal signal of about 24 residues (265) and on the prsDE genes, which encode two type I-like inner membrane proteins (77). In addition to NodO, at least three other proteins are secreted via this system, two of which (PlyA and PlyB) are glycanases involved in the processing of bacterial EPSs (78).

Sequencing the symbiotic plasmid of NGR234 revealed flavonoid-inducible genes encoding components of a type III secretion system (TTSS) (87). In a number of bacterial pathogens, TTSSs are induced upon contact with host cells (of plants or animals) and deliver virulence proteins directly into the eukaryotic cytosol (150). Strain NGR234, as well as several strains of R. fredii, was shown to excrete at least three to five proteins in a NodD1- and TTSS-dependent manner (145, 274). In USDA257, thenolXWBTUV cluster (corresponding to the nolX,rhcC1, nolB, rhcJ, nolU andnolV genes of NGR234) (274) regulates the nodulation of G. max in a cultivar-specific manner (168), whereas the TTSS of NGR234 profoundly affects the nodulation of various legumes such as P. tuberosus andTephrosia vogelii (274). The absence of conservednod box regulatory elements in the promoter regions of thenol and rhc operons indicates that NodD1-dependent transcriptional regulation of the TTSS genes is mediated by another factor. y4xI, an HrpG homologue which is under the control of a functional nod box, is thought to be the key intermediary in the regulatory cascade between flavonoids and activation of the TTSS machinery in NGR234 (274). The delayed induction of rhc genes in comparison with loci involved in the elaboration of the Nod factors suggests that the TTSS machinery is assembled after Nod factors have been elaborated and that protein export begins when intimate contact between bacteria and root hairs has been established. Thus, the most important role of TTSS-secreted proteins such as NolX and y4xL of NGR234 would occur after the bacteria have entered the plant, possibly during the development of infection threads.

It has been suggested that bacterial invasion of plant cells triggers nonspecific defense reactions and that successful pathogens overcome these defenses (89). Similarly, invading symbionts have probably evolved different strategies to lower host plant defenses. TTSS proteins and polysaccharides may contribute to this phenomenon. Some plants would perceive these compounds as part of the infection pathway and react to their presence by increased nodulation, as occurs in alfalfa inoculated with Exo+R. meliloti and in T. vogelii, which favors strains of NGR234 with a functional TTSS. An alternate explanation is that these secreted substances function as suppressers of plant defense reactions, as proposed for various polysaccharides (20, 182). In contrast,P. tuberosus which is poorly nodulated by wild-type NGR234, produces many effective nodules when inoculated with TTSS mutants, suggesting that secreted proteins have detrimental effects (elicitors of defense reactions?) on certain hosts (274). Other rhizobia may have different keys to the inner door. Since apparently functional TTSSs are absent from R. leguminosarum andR. meliloti, other factors probably play similar roles. Some of these are undoubtedly polysaccharides, but it seems likely that a variety of keys exist. When they are used sequentially and in the correct combinations, infection thread development continues beyond the epidermal cells and a home for the invading rhizobia is constructed in the cortex of the root. Improper use of the keys results in abortion of the infection threads, as shown in Fig. 2E.

Clearly, various components of nodulating rhizobia, which include the NodD proteins, the spectrum of inducers, the palette of Nod factor substituents, levels of Nod factors, polysaccharides, and secreted proteins, contribute to the control of host specificity. Although some of these may act synergistically (e.g., complementation ofnodS mutants by NodO), most are part of a developmental process that leads to nodule invasion. Host plants are thus capable of controlling the successive steps of the rhizobial infection through checkpoints demanding specific keys. The absence of a suitable key does not necessarily result in a Nod− or Fix−phenotype, however. Most determinants of symbiotic specificity optimize the chances of forming effective nodules. Consecutive host specificity barriers are thus like hurdles of different heights that allow the host to select among many strains for the one best suited to its requirements.

EVOLUTION OF HOST SPECIFICITY

Broad-host-range rhizobia most probably have keys which fit many legume doors. Experiments with two different but closely related bacteria, Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 and R. fredii USDA257, and 452 different species of legumes showed that NGR234 and USDA257 form fully functional nodules on 136 and 66 species of legumes, respectively (207). Exactly which symbiotic determinants are shared by these two rhizobia is not known, yet both produce similar Nod factors. Those of USDA257 lack the baroque decorations encoded by nodS, nodU,nolO, nolL, noeE, and noeIof NGR234 (Table 4). Similarly, nodZ mutants of NGR234 still nodulate most plants tested, although the Nod factors lack all substituents carried on the fucose group (Table 4). In other words, it seems as if these additional Nod factor substituents extend an already broad host range but that they are not necessary for basic promiscuity.

If this logic reflects evolution, then ancestral Nod factors were unmodified N-acylated oligomers ofN-acetyl-d-glucosamine, possessing simple, unsaturated fatty acid side chains. It should be remembered that polymers of N-acetyl-d-glucosamine, i.e., chitin, are abundant in nature where they form an important part of the cell wall of many fungi, including mycorrhizae. Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae establish symbiotic associations with a broad range of vascular plants (116, 246). The existence of mycorrhizal-like structures in fossils strongly suggests that fungal-plant associations developed before rhizobial symbioses (216). Since highly sensitive recognition systems for chitin oligomers are found in diverse plants, it is not unreasonable to suggest that evolution of rhizobial perception in legumes resulted in a perception apparatus that is specific to N-acylated chitin oligomers (i.e., Nod factors) (259).

Presumably, a bacterium producing ancestral Nod factors had the ability to nodulate many plants. Later, modifications followed which, in the case of NGR234, allowed it to nodulate even more plants. Acquisition of these broad-host-range genes was probably the result of lateral transfer. Concomitantly, Nod factor-cleaving chitinases coevolved in the legume host, thus directing selective pressure toward more stable Nod factors. In NGR234, this was provided through the acquisition of protective baroque decorations.

Morphological and molecular data suggest that both NGR234 and USDA257 have acquired the ability to nodulate three distinct subfamilies of plants, i.e., the Caesalpiniodieae, Mimosoideae, and Papilionoideae (207). In the Papilionoideae, this ability arose early and was maintained through to the Amorpheae, Robinieae, Indigofereae, Phaseoleae, and Desmodieae. Once acquired, the capacity to form symbioses with promiscuous rhizobia was only apparently lost in five tribes including the Cicereae, Vicieae, and Trifolieae. Since the microsymbionts of these plants generally secrete fewer, less highly modified Nod factors (albeit possessing polyunsaturated fatty acids), this implies that narrow host range is a specialization which developed for certain plants in restricted niches.

In other words, symbiotic promiscuity is probably ancestral to restricted host range. Support for this hypothesis comes from the observation that NGR234 and USDA257 also nodulate Parasponia andersonii (Ulmaceae) (207, 269). Parasponiaspp. are small trees (up to 15 m high) which grow as pioneer plants in mountainous areas of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Papua New Guinea (1). Since Trinick isolated NGR234 in Papua New Guinea (268), this means thatParasponia-Rhizobium symbioses evolved in the same habitat. Most probably, the direct correlation that exists between solar energy input and species diversity (228) is driving evolution in tropical regions. Thus, ancestors of bacteria such as NGR234 could have been the first to intimately associate with legumes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank C. Boivin, J. Dénarié, W. D'Haeze, J. A. Downie, M. Holsters, S. Jabbouri, T. Laeremans, K. Lindström, E. Martı́nez-Romero, G. Stacey, and J. Vanderleyden for helpful comments during the preparation of the manuscript. We are grateful to B. Relić for providing photographs of infected root hairs. Dora Gerber is thanked for her unfailing support of our work.

Financial assistance was provided by the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique and the Université de Genève.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Akkermans A. D. L.,
    2. van Dijk C.
    Non-leguminous root-nodule symbiosis with actinomycetes and Rhizobium Nitrogen fixation Broughton W. J. 1. Ecology 1981 57 103 Oxford University Press Oxford, United Kingdom
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ardourel M.,
    2. Demont N.,
    3. Debellé F.,
    4. Maillet F.,
    5. DeBilly F.,
    6. Promé J.-C.,
    7. Dénarié J.,
    8. Truchet G.
    Rhizobium meliloti lipooligosaccharide nodulation factors: different structural requirements for bacterial entry into target root hair cells and induction of plant symbiotic developmental responses.Plant Cell6199413571374
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Banfalvi Z.,
    2. Kondorosi Á.
    Production of root hair deformation factors by Rhizobium meliloti nodulation genes in Escherichia coli: HsnD (NodH) is involved in the plant-specific modification of the NodABC factor.Plant Mol. Biol.131989112
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bassam B. J.,
    2. Djordjevic M. A.,
    3. Redmond J. W.,
    4. Batley M.,
    5. Rolfe B. G.
    Identification of a nodD-dependent locus in the Rhizobium strain NGR234 activated by phenolic factors secreted by soybeans and other legumes.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.11988161168
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Battisti L.,
    2. Lara J. C.,
    3. Leigh J. A.
    Specific oligosaccharide form of the Rhizobium meliloti exopolysaccharide promotes nodule invasion in alfalfa.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA89199256255629
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.
    1. Bec-Ferté M. P.,
    2. Krishnan H. B.,
    3. Promé D.,
    4. Savagnac A.,
    5. Pueppke S. G.,
    6. Promé J.-C.
    Structures of nodulation factors from the nitrogen-fixing soybean symbiont Rhizobium fredii USDA257.Biochemistry3319941178211788
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.
    1. Bec-Ferté M. P.,
    2. Krishnan H. B.,
    3. Savagnac A.,
    4. Pueppke S. G.,
    5. Promé J.-C.
    Rhizobium fredii synthesizes an array of lipooligosaccharides, including a novel compound with glucose inserted into the backbone of the molecule.FEBS Lett.3931996273279
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.
    1. Becker A.,
    2. Kleickmann A.,
    3. Keller M.,
    4. Arnold W.,
    5. Pühler A.
    Identification and analysis of the Rhizobium meliloti exoAMONP genes involved in exopolysaccharide biosynthesis and mapping of promoters located on the exoHKLAMONP fragment.Mol. Gen. Genet.2411993367379
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.
    1. Becker A.,
    2. Kleickmann A.,
    3. Küster H.,
    4. Keller M.,
    5. Arnold W.,
    6. Pühler A.
    Analysis of the Rhizobium meliloti genes exoU, exoV, exoW, exoT, and exoI involved in exopolysaccharide biosynthesis and nodule invasion: exoU and exoW probably encode glucosyltransferases.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.61993735744
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.
    1. Becker B. U.,
    2. Kosch K.,
    3. Parniske M.,
    4. Müller P.
    Exopolysaccharide (EPS) synthesis in Bradyrhizobium japonicum: sequence, operon structure and mutational analysis of an exo gene cluster.Mol. Gen. Genet.2591998161171
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Bender G. L.,
    2. Nayudu M.,
    3. Strange K. K. L.,
    4. Rolfe B. G.
    The nodD1 gene from Rhizobium strain NGR234 is a key determinant in the extension of host range to the nonlegume Parasponia.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.11988259266
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.↵
    1. Berck S.,
    2. Perret X.,
    3. Quesada-Vincens D.,
    4. Promé J.-C.,
    5. Broughton W. J.,
    6. Jabbouri S.
    nolL of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 is required for O-acetyltransferase activity.J. Bacteriol.1811999957964
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Beyerinck M. W.
    Die Bacterien der Papilionaceen-Knöllchen.Bot. Zeitung461888725740
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Beyerinck M. W.
    Die Bacterien der Papilionaceen-Knöllchen.Bot. Zeitung461888741750
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Beyerinck M. W.
    Die Bacterien der Papilionaceen-Knöllchen.Bot. Zeitung461888757771
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Beyerinck M. W.
    Die Bacterien der Papilionaceen-Knöllchen.Bot. Zeitung461888781790
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Beyerinck M. W.
    Die Bacterien der Papilionaceen-Knöllchen.Bot. Zeitung461888797804
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Beyerinck M. W.
    Künstliche Infection von Vicia Faba mit Bacillus radicicola. Ernährungsbedingungen dieser Bacterie.Bot. Zeitung521890837843
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.
    1. Bhagwat A. A.,
    2. Gross K. C.,
    3. Tully R. E.,
    4. Keister D.
    β-Glucan synthesis in Bradyrhizobium japonicum: characterization of a new locus (ndvC) influencing β-(1→6) linkages.J. Bacteriol.178199646354642
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Bhagwat A. A.,
    2. Mithofer A.,
    3. Pfeffer P. E.,
    4. Kraus C.,
    5. Spickers N.,
    6. Hotchkiss A.,
    7. Ebel J.,
    8. Keister D. L.
    Further studies of the role of cyclic β-glucans in symbiosis. An ndvC mutant of Bradyrhizobium japonicum synthesizes cyclodecakis-(1→3)-β-glucosyl.Plant Physiol.119199910571064
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Bibb M. J.,
    2. Biro S.,
    3. Motamedi H.,
    4. Collins J. F.,
    5. Hutchinson C. R.
    Analysis of the nucleotide sequence of the Streptomyces glaucescens tcmI genes provides key information about the enzymology of polypeptide antibiotic biosynthesis.EMBO J.8198927272736
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Bloemberg G. V.,
    2. Kamst E.,
    3. Harteveld M.,
    4. van Der Drift K. M.,
    5. Haverkamp J.,
    6. Thomas-Oates J. E.,
    7. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    8. Spaink H. P.
    A central domain of Rhizobium NodE protein mediates host specificity by determining the hydrophobicity of fatty acyl moieties of nodulation factors.Mol. Microbiol.16199511231136
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Bono J. J.,
    2. Riond J.,
    3. Nicolaou K. C.,
    4. Bockovich N. J.,
    5. Estevez V. A.,
    6. Cullimore J. V.,
    7. Ranjeva R.
    Characterization of a binding site for chemically synthesized lipo-oligosaccharidic NodRm factors in particulate fractions prepared from roots.Plant J.71995253260
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Borthakur D.,
    2. Barbur C. E.,
    3. Lamb J. W.,
    4. Daniels M. J.,
    5. Downie J. A.,
    6. Johnston A. W. B.
    A mutation that blocks exopolysaccharide synthesis prevents nodulation of peas by Rhizobium leguminosarum but not of beans by R. phaseoli and is corrected by cloned DNA from Rhizobium or the phytopathogen Xanthomonas.Mol. Gen. Genet.2031986320323
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Bréal E.
    Observations sur les tubercules à bactéries qui se développent sur les racines des légumineuses.Ann. Agron.141888481495
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Breedveld M. W.,
    2. Miller K. J.
    Cyclic β-glucans of members of the family Rhizobiaceae.Microbiol. Rev.581994145161
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Broughton W. J.,
    2. John C. K.
    Rhizobia in tropical legumes. III. Experimentation and supply in Malaysia 1927–1976 Soil microbiology and plant nutrition. Broughton W. J., John C. K., Rajaro J. C., Lim B. 1979 113 136 University of Malaya Press Kuala Lumpur
  28. 28.↵
    1. Broughton W. J.,
    2. Perret X.
    Genealogy of Legume-Rhizobium symbioses.Curr. Opinion in Plant Biol.21999305311
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.
    Reference deleted.
  30. 30.↵
    1. Burn J.,
    2. Rossen L.,
    3. Johnston A. W. B.
    Four classes of mutations in the nodD gene of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar. viciae that affect its ability to autoregulate and/or activate other nod genes in the presence of flavonoid inducers.Genes Dev.11987456464
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.
    1. Campbell G. R. O.,
    2. Reuhs B. L.,
    3. Walker G. C.
    Different phenotypic classes of Sinorhizobium meliloti mutants defective in synthesis of K. antigen.J. Bacteriol.180199854325436
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Canter-Cremers H. C. J.,
    2. Spaink H. P.,
    3. Wijfjes A. H. M.,
    4. Pees E.,
    5. Wijffelman C. A.,
    6. Okker R. J. H.,
    7. Lugtenberg B. J. J.
    Additional nodulation genes on the Sym plasmid of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae.Plant Mol. Biol.131989163174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Cardenas L.,
    2. Dominguez J.,
    3. Quinto C.,
    4. Lopez-Lara I. M.,
    5. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    6. Spaink H. P.,
    7. Rademaker G. J.,
    8. Haverkamp J.,
    9. Thomas-Oates J. E.
    Isolation, chemical structure and biological activity of the lipo-chitin oligosaccharide nodulation signals from Rhizobium etli.Plant Mol. Biol.291995453464
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Cardenas L.,
    2. Dominguez J.,
    3. Santana O.,
    4. Quinto C.
    The role of nodI and nodJ genes in the transport of Nod metabolites in Rhizobium etli.Gene1731996183187
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.
    1. Carlson R. W.,
    2. Sanjuan J.,
    3. Bhat U. R.,
    4. Glushka J.,
    5. Spaink H. P.,
    6. Wijfjes A. H.,
    7. van Brussel A. A. N.,
    8. Stokkermans T. J.,
    9. Peters N. K.,
    10. Stacey G.
    The structures and biological activities of the lipo-oligosaccharide nodulation signals produced by type I and II strains of Bradyrhizobium japonicum.J. Biol. Chem.26819931837218381
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.
    1. Cava J. R.,
    2. Elias P. M.,
    3. Turowski D. A.,
    4. Noel K. D.
    Rhizobium leguminosarum CFN42 genetic regions encoding lipopolysaccharide structures essential for complete nodule development on bean plants.J. Bacteriol.1711989815
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.
    1. Chakravorty A. K.,
    2. Zurowski W.,
    3. Shine J.,
    4. Rolfe B. G.
    Symbiotic nitrogen fixation: molecular cloning of Rhizobium genes involved in exopolysaccharide synthesis and effective nodulation.J. Mol. Appl. Genet.11982585596
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Chang C.,
    2. Kwok S. F.,
    3. Bleecker A. B.,
    4. Meyerowitz E. M.
    Arabidopsis ethylene-response gene ETR1: similarity of product to two-component regulators.Science2621993539544
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Chen H.,
    2. Batley M.,
    3. Redmond J.,
    4. Rolfe B. G.
    Alteration of the effective nodulation properties of a fast-growing broad host range Rhizobium due to changes in exopolysaccharide synthesis.J. Plant Physiol.1201985331349
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    1. Cheng H.-P.,
    2. Walker G. C.
    Succinoglycan is required for initiation and elongation of infection threads during nodulation of alfalfa by Rhizobium meliloti.J. Bacteriol.180199851835191
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.
    1. Cheng H.-P.,
    2. Walker G. C.
    Succinoglycan production by Rhizobium meliloti is regulated through the ExoS-Chv1 two-component regulatory system.J. Bacteriol.18019982026
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Cohn J.,
    2. Day R. B.,
    3. Stacey G.
    Legume nodule organogenesis.Trends Plant Sci.31998105110
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Cormack R. G. H.
    Development of root hairs in angiosperms.Bot. Rev.281962446464
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    1. Corvera A.,
    2. Promé D.,
    3. Promé J.-C.,
    4. Martı́nez-Romero E.,
    5. Romero D.
    The nolL gene from Rhizobium etli determines nodulation efficiency by mediating the acetylation of the fucosyl residue in the nodulation factor.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.121999236246
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Cren M.,
    2. Kondorosi Á.,
    3. Kondorosi É.
    An insertional point mutation inactivates NolR repressor in Rhizobium meliloti 1021.J. Bacteriol.1761994518519
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Cren M.,
    2. Kondorosi Á.,
    3. Kondorosi É.
    NolR controls expression of the Rhizobium meliloti nodulation genes involved in the core Nod factor synthesis.Mol. Microbiol.151995733747
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    1. Dart P.
    Infection and development of leguminous nodules A treatise on dinitrogen fixation, sect. Hardy R. W. F., Silver W. S. 1977 367 342III. Cambridge University Press, London, United Kingdom.
  48. 48.↵
    1. Davis E. O.,
    2. Evans I. J.,
    3. Johnston A. W. B.
    Identification of nodX, a gene that allows Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae strain TOM to nodulate Afghanistan peas.Mol. Gen. Genet.2121988531535
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Debellé F.,
    2. Sharma S. B.
    Nucleotide sequence of Rhizobium meliloti RC2011 genes involved in host specificity of nodulation.Nucleic Acids Res.14198674537472
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.↵
    1. Debellé F.,
    2. Maillet F.,
    3. Vasse J.,
    4. Rosenberg C.,
    5. De Billy F.,
    6. Truchet G.,
    7. Dénarié J.,
    8. Ausubel F. M.
    Interference between Rhizobium meliloti and Rhizobium trifolii nodulation genes: genetic basis of R. meliloti dominance.J. Bacteriol.170198857185727
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Debellé F.,
    2. Plazanet C.,
    3. Roche P.,
    4. Pujol C.,
    5. Savagnac A.,
    6. Rosenberg C.,
    7. Promé J.-C.,
    8. Dénarié J.
    The NodA proteins of Rhizobium meliloti and Rhizobium tropici specify the N-acylation of Nod factors by different fatty acids.Mol. Microbiol.221996303314
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Demont N.,
    2. Debellé F.,
    3. Aurelle H.,
    4. Dénarié J.,
    5. Promé J.-C.
    Role of the Rhizobium meliloti nodF and nodE genes in the biosynthesis of lipooligosaccharidic nodulation factors.J. Biol. Chem.26819932013420142
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Demont-Caulet N.,
    2. Maillet F.,
    3. Tailler D.,
    4. Jacquinet J.-C.,
    5. Promé J.-C.,
    6. Nicolaou K. C.,
    7. Truchet G.,
    8. Beau J.-M.,
    9. Dénarié J.
    Nodule-inducing activity of synthetic Sinorhizobium meliloti nodulation factors and related lipo-chitooligosaccharides on alfalfa. Importance of the acyl chain structure.Plant Physiol.12019998392
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Dénarié J.,
    2. Debellé F.,
    3. Rosenberg C.
    Signaling and host range variation in nodulation.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.461992497531
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.
    Reference deleted.
  56. 56.↵
    1. D'Haeze W.,
    2. Gao M.,
    3. De Rycke R.,
    4. van Montagu M.,
    5. Engler G.,
    6. Holsters M.
    Roles for azorhizobial Nod factors and surface polysaccharides in intercellular invasion and nodule penetration, respectively.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.1119989991008
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    1. D'Haeze W.,
    2. van Montagu M.,
    3. Promé J.-C.,
    4. Holsters M.
    Carbamoylation of azorhizobial Nod factors is mediated by NodU.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.1219996873
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Diebold R.,
    2. Noel K. D.
    Rhizobium leguminosarum exopolysaccharide mutants: biochemical and genetic analyses and symbiotic behavior on three hosts.J. Bacteriol.171198948214830
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    1. Djordjevic M. A.,
    2. Schofield P. R.,
    3. Rolfe B. G.
    Tn-5 mutagenesis of Rhizobium trifolii host specific nodulation genes results in mutants with altered host range ability.Mol. Gen. Genet.2001985463471
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. 60.↵
    1. Djordjevic S. P.,
    2. Rolfe B. G.
    The structure of the exopolysaccharide from Rhizobium sp. strain ANU280 (NGR234).Carbohydr. Res.14819868799
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. 61.↵
    1. Djordjevic M. A.,
    2. Redmond J. W.,
    3. Batley M.,
    4. Rolfe B. G.
    Clovers secrete specific phenolic compounds which either stimulate or repress nod gene expression in Rhizobium trifolii.EMBO J.6198711731178
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.↵
    1. Downie J. A.,
    2. Surin B.
    Either of two nod gene loci can complement the nodulation defect of a nod deletion mutant of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae.Mol. Gen. Genet.22219908186
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    1. Downie J. A.
    Functions of rhizobial nodulation genes The Rhizobiaceae. Spaink H. P., Kondorosi Á., Hooykaas P. J. J. 1998 387 402 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands
  64. 64.↵
    1. Downie J. A.,
    2. Walker S. W.
    Plant responses to nodulation factors.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.21999483489
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. 65.
    1. Dunlap J.,
    2. Minami E.,
    3. Bhagwat A. A.,
    4. Keister D. L.,
    5. Stacey G.
    Nodule development induced by mutants of Bradyrhizobium japonicum defective in cyclic β-glucan synthesis.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.91996546555
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. 66.↵
    1. Economou A.,
    2. Hamilton W. D. O.,
    3. Johnston A. W. B.,
    4. Downie J. A.
    The Rhizobium nodulation gene nodO encodes a Ca2+-binding protein that is exported without N-terminal cleavage and is homologous to haemolysin and related proteins.EMBO J.91990349354
    OpenUrlPubMed
  67. 67.↵
    1. Economou A.,
    2. Davies A. E.,
    3. Johnston A. W. B.,
    4. Downie J. A.
    The Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae nodO gene can enable a nodE mutant of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii to nodulate vetch.Microbiology140199423412347
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  68. 68.↵
    1. Ehrhardt D. W.,
    2. Atkinson E. M.,
    3. Faull K. F.,
    4. Freedberg D. I.,
    5. Sutherlin D. P.,
    6. Armstrong R.,
    7. Long S. R.
    In vitro sulfotransferase activity of NodH, a nodulation protein of Rhizobium meliloti required for host-specific nodulation.J. Bacteriol.177199562376245
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. 69.↵
    1. Etzler M. E.,
    2. Kalsi G.,
    3. Ewing N. N.,
    4. Roberts N. J.,
    5. Day R. B.,
    6. Murphy J. B.
    A nod factor binding lectin with apyrase activity from legume roots.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA96199958565861
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. 70.↵
    1. Faucher C.,
    2. Camut S.,
    3. Dénarié J.,
    4. Truchet G.
    The nodH and nodQ host range genes of Rhizobium meliloti behave as avirulence genes in R. leguminosarum bv. viciae and determine changes in the production of plant-specific extracellular signals.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.21989291300
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  71. 71.↵
    1. Fellay R.,
    2. Perret X.,
    3. Viprey V.,
    4. Broughton W. J.,
    5. Brenner S.
    Organisation of host-inducible transcripts on the symbiotic plasmid of Rhizobium sp. NGR234.Mol. Microbiol.161995657667
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  72. 72.↵
    1. Fellay R.,
    2. Rochepeau P.,
    3. Relić B.,
    4. Broughton W. J.
    Signals to and emanating from Rhizobium largely control symbiotic specificity Pathogenesis and host specificity in plant diseases. Histopathological, biochemical, genetic and molecular bases. Singh U. S., Singh R. P., Kohmoto K. 1995 199 220 Pergamon Elsevier Science Ltd. Oxford, United Kingdom
  73. 73.↵
    1. Fellay R.,
    2. Hanin M.,
    3. Montorzi G.,
    4. Frey J.,
    5. Freiberg C.,
    6. Golinowski W.,
    7. Staehelin C.,
    8. Broughton W. J.,
    9. Jabbouri S.
    nodD2 of Rhizobium sp. NGR234 is involved in repression of the nodABC operon.Mol. Microbiol.27199810391050
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.↵
    1. Fernandez-Lopez M.,
    2. D'Haeze W.,
    3. Mergaert P.,
    4. Verplancke C.,
    5. Promé J.-C.,
    6. van Montagu M.,
    7. Holsters M.
    Role of nodI and nodJ in lipochitooligosaccharide secretion in Azorhizobium caulinodans and Escherichia coli.Mol. Microbiol.2019969931000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  75. 75.↵
    1. Fernandez-Lopez M.,
    2. D'Haeze W.,
    3. van Montagu M.,
    4. Holsters M.
    Changes in the glycosylation pattern at the reducing end of azorhizobial Nod factors affect nodulation efficiency.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.1581998237242
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. 76.↵
    1. Finan T. M.,
    2. Hirsch A. M.,
    3. Leigh J. A.,
    4. Johansen E.,
    5. Kuldau G. A.,
    6. Deegan S.,
    7. Walker G. C.,
    8. Signer E. R.
    Symbiotic mutants of Rhizobium meliloti that uncouple plant from bacterial differentiation.Cell401985869877
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  77. 77.↵
    1. Finnie C.,
    2. Hartley N. M.,
    3. Findlay K. C.,
    4. Downie J. A.
    The Rhizobium leguminosarum prsDE genes are required for secretion of several proteins, some of which influence nodulation, symbiotic nitrogen fixation and exopolysaccharide modification.Mol. Microbiol.251997135146
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  78. 78.↵
    1. Finnie C.,
    2. Zorreguieta A.,
    3. Hartley N. M.,
    4. Downie J. A.
    Characterization of Rhizobium leguminosarum exopolysaccharide glycanases that are secreted via a type I exporter and have a novel heptapeptide repeat motif.J. Bacteriol.180199816911699
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. 79.↵
    1. Firmin J. L.,
    2. Wilson K. E.,
    3. Rossen L.,
    4. Johnston A. W. B.
    Flavonoid activation of nodulation genes in Rhizobium reversed by other compounds present in plants.Nature32419869092
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  80. 80.
    1. Firmin J. L.,
    2. Wilson K. E.,
    3. Carlson R. W.,
    4. Davies A. E.,
    5. Downie J. A.
    Resistance to nodulation of cv. Afghanistan peas is overcome by nodX, which mediates an O-acetylation of the Rhizobium leguminosarum lipooligosaccharide nodulation factor.Mol. Microbiol.101993351360
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  81. 81.↵
    1. Fisher R. F.,
    2. Egelhoff T. T.,
    3. Mulligan J. T.,
    4. Long S. R.
    Specific binding of proteins from Rhizobium meliloti cell-free extracts containing NodD to DNA sequences upstream of inducible nodulation genes.Genes Dev.21988282293
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. 82.↵
    1. Fisher R. F.,
    2. Long S. R.
    Interactions of NodD at the nod box: NodD binds to two distinct sites on the same face of the helix and induces a bend in the DNA.J. Mol. Biol.2331993336348
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  83. 83.↵
    1. Forsberg L. S.,
    2. Reuhs B. L.
    Structural characterization of the K antigens from Rhizobium fredii USDA257: evidence for a common structural motif, with strain-specific variation, in the capsular polysaccharides of Rhizobium spp.J. Bacteriol.179199753665371
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. 84.↵
    1. Forsberg L. S.,
    2. Carlson R. W.
    The structures of the lipopolysaccharides from Rhizobium etli strains CE358 and CE359. The complete structure of the core region of R. etli lipopolysaccharides.J. Biol. Chem.273199827472757
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  85. 85.↵
    1. Frank B.
    Über die Parasiten in den Wurzelanschwellungen der Papilionaceeen.Bot. Zeitung241879377388
    OpenUrl
  86. 86.↵
    1. Fred E. B.,
    2. Baldwin I. L.,
    3. McCoy E.
    Root nodule bacteria and leguminous plants. University of Wisconsin. Studies in Science 5 1932 University of Wisconsin, Madison
  87. 87.↵
    1. Freiberg C.,
    2. Fellay R.,
    3. Bairoch A.,
    4. Broughton W. J.,
    5. Rosenthal A.,
    6. Perret X.
    Molecular basis of symbiosis between Rhizobium and legumes.Nature3871997394401
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  88. 88.↵
    1. Fuchsius L.
    De historia stirpium commentarii isignes. 1542Michael Isingrin, Basel, Switzerland.
  89. 89.↵
    1. Gabriel D. W.,
    2. Rolfe B. G.
    Working models of specific recognition in plant-microbe interactions.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.281990365391
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  90. 90.↵
    1. Gagnon H.,
    2. Ibrahim R. K.
    Aldonic acids: a novel family of nod gene inducers of Mesorhizobium loti, Rhizobium lupini, and Sinorhizobium meliloti.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.111998988998
    OpenUrl
  91. 91.↵
    1. Garcia M.,
    2. Dunlap J.,
    3. Loh J.,
    4. Stacey G.
    Phenotypic characterization and regulation of the nolA gene of Bradyrhizobium japonicum.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.91996625635
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  92. 92.
    1. Garcia-de los Santos A.,
    2. Brom S.
    Characterization of two plasmid-borne lpsβ loci of Rhizobium etli required for lipopolysaccharide synthesis and for optimal interaction with plants.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.71997891902
    OpenUrl
  93. 93.↵
    1. Geelen D.,
    2. Mergaert P.,
    3. Geremia R. A.,
    4. Goormachtig S.,
    5. van Montagu M.,
    6. Holsters M.
    Identification of nodSUIJ genes on Nod locus 1 of Azorhizobium caulinodans: evidence that nodS encodes a methyltransferase involved in Nod factor modification.Mol. Microbiol.91993145154
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. 94.↵
    1. Geelen D.,
    2. Leyman B.,
    3. Mergaert P.,
    4. Klarskov K.,
    5. van Montagu M.,
    6. Geremia R. A.,
    7. Holsters M.
    NodS is an S-adenosyl-l-methionine-dependent methyltransferase that methylates chitooligosaccharides deacetylated at the non-reducing end.Mol. Microbiol.171995387397
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. 95.↵
    1. Geremia R. A.,
    2. Mergaert P.,
    3. Geelen D.,
    4. van Montagu M.,
    5. Holsters M.
    The NodC protein of Azorhizobium caulinodans is an N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91199426692673
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  96. 96.↵
    1. Gerhold D.,
    2. Stacey G.,
    3. Kondorosi Á.
    Use of promoter-specific probe to identify two loci from the Rhizobium meliloti nodulation regulon.Plant Mol. Biol.121989181188
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  97. 97.
    1. Geurts R.,
    2. Heidstra R.,
    3. Hadri A. E.,
    4. Downie J. A.,
    5. Franssen H.,
    6. van Kammen A.,
    7. Bisseling T.
    Sym2 of pea is involved in a nodulation factor-perception mechanism that controls the infection process in the epidermis.Plant Physiol.1151997351359
    OpenUrlAbstract
  98. 98.↵
    1. Gidley M. J.,
    2. Dea I. C. M.,
    3. Eggleston G.,
    4. Morris E. R.
    Structure and gelation of Rhizobium capsular polysaccharide.Carbohydr. Res.1601987381396
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  99. 99.↵
    1. Glazebrook J.,
    2. Walker G. C.
    A novel exopolysaccharide can function in place of the calcofluor-binding exopolysaccharide in nodulation of alfalfa by Rhizobium meliloti.Cell561989661672
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  100. 100.
    1. Glowacka M.,
    2. Urbanik T.,
    3. Derylo M.
    Rhizobium trifolii mutant defective in the structure of lipopolysaccharide.Arch. Microbiol.1521989539541
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  101. 101.↵
    1. Goethals K.,
    2. van Montagu M.,
    3. Holsters M.
    Conserved motifs in a divergent nod box of Azorhizobium caulinodans ORS571 reveal a common structure in promoters regulated by LysR-type proteins.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA89199216461650
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  102. 102.↵
    1. Gonzalez J. E.,
    2. Reuhs B. L.,
    3. Walker G. C.
    Low molecular weight EPS II of Rhizobium meliloti allows nodule invasion in Medicago sativa.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA93199686368641
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  103. 103.↵
    1. Goormachtig S.,
    2. Lievens S.,
    3. van de Velde W.,
    4. van Montagu M.,
    5. Holsters M.
    Srchi13, a novel early nodulin from Sesbania rostrata, is related to acidic class III chitinases.Plant Cell101998905915
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  104. 104.↵
    1. Göttfert M.,
    2. Grob P.,
    3. Hennecke H.
    Proposed regulatory pathway encoded by the nodV and nodW genes, determinants of host specificity in Bradyrhizobium japonicum.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA87199026802684
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  105. 105.↵
    1. Göttfert M.,
    2. Holzhauser D.,
    3. Bani D.,
    4. Hennecke H.
    Structural and functional analysis of two different nodD genes in Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.51992257265
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  106. 106.
    1. Gray J. X.,
    2. Zhan H.,
    3. Levery S. B.,
    4. Battisti L.,
    5. Rolfe B. G.,
    6. Leigh J. A.
    Heterologous exopolysaccharide production in Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 and consequences for nodule development.J. Bacteriol.173199130663077
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  107. 107.
    1. Gressent F.,
    2. Bono J. J.,
    3. Niebel A.,
    4. Canut H.,
    5. Cullimore J. V.,
    6. Ranjeva R.
    Characterization of a high affinity binding site for NodRm factors in Medicago varia cell culture extracts Biological nitrogen fixation for the 21st century Elmerich C., Kondorosi Á., Newton W. E. 1998 213 214 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands
  108. 108.↵
    1. Gressent F.,
    2. Drouillard S.,
    3. Mantegazza N.,
    4. Samain E.,
    5. Geremia R. A.,
    6. Canut H.,
    7. Niebel A.,
    8. Driguez H.,
    9. Ranjeva R.,
    10. Cullimore J.,
    11. Bono J. J.
    Ligand specificity of a high-affinity binding site for lipo-chitooligosaccharidic nod factors in Medicago cell suspension cultures.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA96199947044709
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  109. 109.↵
    1. Grob P.,
    2. Michel P.,
    3. Hennecke H.,
    4. Göttfert M.
    A novel response-regulator is able to suppress the nodulation defect of a Bradyrhizobium japonicum nodW mutant.Mol. Gen. Genet.2411993531541
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  110. 110.↵
    1. Györgypal Z.,
    2. Kiss G. B.,
    3. Kondorosi Á.
    Transduction of plant signal molecules by the Rhizobium NodD proteins.Bioessays131991575581
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. 111.↵
    1. Györgypal Z.,
    2. Kondorosi Á.
    Homology of the ligand-binding regions of Rhizobium symbiotic regulatory protein NodD and vertebrate nuclear receptors.Mol. Gen. Genet.2261991337340
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  112. 112.↵
    1. Györgypal Z.,
    2. Kondorosi É.,
    3. Kondorosi Á.
    Diverse signal sensitivity of NodD protein homologs from narrow and broad host range rhizobia.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.41991356364
    OpenUrl
  113. 113.↵
    1. Hanin M.,
    2. Jabbouri S.,
    3. Quesada-Vincens D.,
    4. Freiberg C.,
    5. Perret X.,
    6. Promé J.-C.,
    7. Broughton W. J.,
    8. Fellay R.
    Sulphation of Rhizobium sp. NGR234 Nod factors is dependent on noeE, a new host-specificity gene.Mol. Microbiol.24199711191129
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  114. 114.↵
    1. Hanin M.,
    2. Jabbouri S.,
    3. Broughton W. J.,
    4. Fellay R.
    SyrM1 of Rhizobium sp. NGR234 activates transcription of symbiotic loci and controls the level of sulfated Nod factors.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.111998343350
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  115. 115.↵
    1. Hanin M.,
    2. Jabbouri S.,
    3. Broughton W. J.,
    4. Fellay R.,
    5. Quesada-Vincens D.
    Molecular aspects of host-specific nodulation Plant-microbe interactions Stacey G., Keen N. T. 4 1999 1 37 American Phytopathological Society St. Paul, Minn
    OpenUrl
  116. 116.↵
    1. Harrison M. J.
    Development of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.11998360365
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  117. 117.↵
    1. Hartwig U. A.,
    2. Maxwell C. A.,
    3. Joseph C. M.,
    4. Phillips D. A.
    Effects of alfalfa nod gene-inducing flavonoids on nodABC transcription in Rhizobium meliloti strains containing different nodD genes.J. Bacteriol.172199027692773
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  118. 118.↵
    1. Heidstra R.,
    2. Geurts R.,
    3. Franssen H.,
    4. Spaink H. P.,
    5. van Kammen A.,
    6. Bisseling T.
    Root hair deformation activity of nodulation factors and their fate in Vicia sativa.Plant Physiol.1051994787797
    OpenUrlAbstract
  119. 119.↵
    1. Helal H. M.,
    2. Sauerbeck D.
    Carbon turnover in the rhizosphere.Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenkd.1521989211216
    OpenUrl
  120. 120.↵
    1. Hellriegel H.
    Welche Stickstoffquellen stehen der Pflanze zu Gebote? Landwirtsch. Versuchstat. Dresden 33 1886 464 465
    OpenUrl
  121. 121.↵
    1. Hellriegel H.,
    2. Wilfarth H.
    Untersuchungen über die Stickstoff-nahrung der Gramineen und Leguminosen. Beilageheft zu der Zeitschrift des Vereins für die Rübenzucker-Industrie des Deutschen Reiches, Buchdruckerei der “Post.” 1888Kayssler & Co., Berlin, Germany.
  122. 122.↵
    1. Hernandez-Lucas I.,
    2. Segovia L.,
    3. Martı́nez-Romero E.,
    4. Pueppke S. G.
    Phylogenetic relationships and host range of Rhizobium spp. that nodulate Phaseolus vulgaris.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.61199527752779
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  123. 123.↵
    Hiltner, L. 1900. Über die Ursachen, welche die Grösse, Zahl, Stellung und Wirkung der Wurzelknöllchen der Leguminosen bedingen. Arbeiten aus der Biologischen Abteilung für Land- und Forstwirthschaft am Kaiserlichen Gesundheitsamte, Berlin 1:177–222.
  124. 124.↵
    1. Honma M. A.,
    2. Asomaning M.,
    3. Ausubel F. M.
    Rhizobium meliloti nodD genes mediate host-specific activation of nodABC.J. Bacteriol.1721990901911
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  125. 125.↵
    1. Horvath B.,
    2. Kondorosi É.,
    3. John M.,
    4. Schmidt J.,
    5. Török I.,
    6. Györgypal Z.,
    7. Barabas I.,
    8. Wieneke U.,
    9. Schell J.,
    10. Kondorosi Á.
    Organization, structural and symbiotic function of Rhizobium meliloti nodulation genes determining host specificity for alfalfa.Cell461986335343
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  126. 126.↵
    1. Horvath B.,
    2. Bachem C. W.,
    3. Schell J.,
    4. Kondorosi Á.
    Host-specific regulation of nodulation genes in Rhizobium is mediated by a plant signal interacting with the nodD gene product.EMBO J.61987841848
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  127. 127.↵
    1. Hotter G. S.,
    2. Scott D. B.
    Exopolysaccharide mutants of Rhizobium loti are fully effective on a determinate nodulating host but are ineffective on an indeterminate nodulating host.J. Bacteriol.1731991851859
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  128. 128.↵
    Irving, H. I., N. M. Boukli, M. N. Kelly, and W. J. Broughton. Nod-factors in the symbiotic development of root hairs. In R. W. Ridge and A. M. Emons (ed.), Cell and molecular biology of plant root hairs, in press. Springer-Verlag KG, Berlin, Germany.
  129. 129.↵
    1. Jabbouri S.,
    2. Fellay R.,
    3. Talmont F.,
    4. Kamalaprija P.,
    5. Burger U.,
    6. Relić B.,
    7. Promé J.-C.,
    8. Broughton W. J.
    Involvement of nodS in N-methylation and nodU in 6-O-carbamoylation of Rhizobium sp. NGR234 Nod factors.J. Biol. Chem.27019952296822973
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  130. 130.
    1. Jabbouri S.,
    2. Hanin M.,
    3. Fellay R.,
    4. Quesada-Vincens D.,
    5. Reuhs B.,
    6. Carlson R. W.,
    7. Perret X.,
    8. Freiberg C.,
    9. Rosenthal A.,
    10. Leclerc D.,
    11. Broughton W. J.,
    12. Relić B.
    Rhizobium species NGR234 host-specificity of nodulation locus III contains nod- and fix-genes Biology of plant-microbe interactions Stacey G., Mullen B., Gresshoff P. 1996 319 324 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands
  131. 131.↵
    1. Jabbouri S.,
    2. Relić B.,
    3. Hanin M.,
    4. Burger U.,
    5. Promé J.-C.,
    6. Broughton W. J.
    nolO and noeI (HsnIII) of Rhizobium sp. NGR234 are involved in 3-O-carbamoylation and 2-O-methylation of Nod-factors.J. Biol. Chem.27319981204712055
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  132. 132.↵
    1. John M.,
    2. Röhrig H.,
    3. Schmidt J.,
    4. Wieneke U.,
    5. Schell J.
    Rhizobium NodB protein involved in nodulation signal synthesis is a chitooligosaccharide deacetylase.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA901993625629
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  133. 133.↵
    1. Kamst E.,
    2. van der Drift K. M.,
    3. Thomas-Oates J. E.,
    4. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    5. Spaink H. P.
    Mass spectrometric analysis of chitin oligosaccharides produced by Rhizobium NodC protein in Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.21199562826285
    OpenUrl
  134. 134.↵
    1. Kamst E.,
    2. Pilling J.,
    3. Raamsdonk L. M.,
    4. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    5. Spaink H. P.
    Rhizobium nodulation protein NodC is an important determinant of chitin oligosaccharide chain length in Nod factor biosynthesis.J. Bacteriol.179199721032108
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  135. 135.↵
    1. Kamst E.,
    2. Bakkers J.,
    3. Quaedvlieg N. E.,
    4. Pilling J.,
    5. Kijne J. W.,
    6. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    7. Spaink H. P.
    Chitin oligosaccharide synthesis by rhizobia and zebrafish embryos starts by glycosyl transfer to O4 of the reducing-terminal residue.Biochemistry38199940454052
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  136. 136.
    1. Kannenberg E. L.,
    2. Rathburn E. A.,
    3. Brewin N. J.
    Molecular dissection of structure and function in the lipopolysaccharide of Rhizobium leguminosarum strain 3841 using monoclonal antibodies and genetic analysis.Mol. Microbiol.6199224772487
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  137. 137.↵
    1. Kende H.,
    2. Gardner G.
    Hormone binding in plants.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.271976267290
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  138. 138.
    1. Kereszt A.,
    2. Kiss E.,
    3. Reuhs B. L.,
    4. Carlson R. W.,
    5. Kondorosi Á.,
    6. Putnoky P.
    Novel rkp gene clusters of Sinorhizobium meliloti involved in capsular polysaccharide production and invasion of the symbiotic nodule: the rkpK gene encodes a UDP-glucose dehydrogenase.J. Bacteriol.180199854265431
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  139. 139.↵
    1. Kijne J. W.
    The Rhizobium infection process Biological nitrogen fixation. Stacey G., Burris R. H., Evans H. J. 1992 349 398 Chapman & Hall New York, N.Y
  140. 140.↵
    1. Kim C. H.,
    2. Tully R. E.,
    3. Keister D. L.
    Exopolysaccharide-deficient mutants of Rhizobium fredii HH303 which are symbiotically effective.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.55198918521854
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  141. 141.↵
    1. Kiss E.,
    2. Mergaert P.,
    3. Olàh B.,
    4. Kereszt A.,
    5. Staehelin C.,
    6. Davies A. E.,
    7. Downie J. A.,
    8. Kondorosi Á.,
    9. Kondorosi É.
    Conservation of nolR in the Sinorhizobium and Rhizobium genera of the Rhizobiaceae family.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.11199811861195
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  142. 142.↵
    1. Kondorosi É.,
    2. Gyuris J.,
    3. Schmidt J.,
    4. John M.,
    5. Duda E.,
    6. Hoffman B.,
    7. Schell J.,
    8. Kondorosi Á.
    Positive and negative control of nod gene expression in Rhizobium meliloti is required for optimal nodulation.EMBO J.8198913311340
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  143. 143.↵
    1. Kondorosi É.,
    2. Pierre M.,
    3. Cren M.,
    4. Haumann U.,
    5. Buire M.,
    6. Hoffmann B.,
    7. Schell J.,
    8. Kondorosi Á.
    Identification of NolR, a negative transacting factor controlling the nod regulon in Rhizobium meliloti.J. Mol. Biol.2221991885896
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  144. 144.↵
    1. Krishnan H. B.,
    2. Lewin A.,
    3. Fellay R.,
    4. Broughton W. J.,
    5. Pueppke S. G.
    Differential expression of nodS accounts for the varied abilities of Rhizobium fredii USDA257 and Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234 to nodulate Leucaena spp.Mol. Microbiol.6199233213330
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  145. 145.↵
    1. Krishnan H. B.,
    2. Kuo C.-I.,
    3. Pueppke S. G.
    Elaboration of flavonoid-induced proteins by the nitrogen-fixing soybean symbiont Rhizobium fredii is regulated by both nodD1 and nodD2, and is dependent on the cultivar-specificity locus, nolXWBTUV.Microbiology141199522452251
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  146. 146.↵
    1. Krishnan H. B.,
    2. Kim K. Y.,
    3. Krishnan A. H.
    Expression of a Serratia marcescens chitinase gene in Sinorhizobium fredii USDA191 and Sinorhizobium meliloti RCR2011 impedes soybean and alfalfa nodulation.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.121999748751
    OpenUrlPubMed
  147. 147.
    1. Król J.,
    2. Wielbo J.,
    3. Mazur A.,
    4. Kopciñska J.,
    5. Lotocka B.,
    6. Golinowski W.,
    7. Skorupska A.
    Molecular characterisation of pssCDE genes of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii strain TA1: pssD mutant is affected in exopolysaccharide synthesis and endocytosis of bacteria.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.11199811421148
    OpenUrlPubMed
  148. 148.↵
    1. Kurkdjian A. C.
    Role of differentiation of root epidermal cells in Nod factor (from Rhizobium meliloti)-induced root-hair depolarization of Medicago sativa.Plant Physiol.1071995783790
    OpenUrlAbstract
  149. 149.↵
    1. Laurent E.
    Recherches sur les nodosités des légumineuses.Inst. Pasteur Ann.51891105139
    OpenUrl
  150. 150.↵
    1. Lee C. A.
    Type III secretion systems: machines to deliver bacterial proteins into eukaryotic cells? Trends Microbiol. 5 1997 149 156
    OpenUrl
  151. 151.↵
    1. Leigh J. A.,
    2. Signer E. R.,
    3. Walker G. C.
    Exopolysaccharide-deficient mutants of Rhizobium meliloti that form ineffective nodules.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA82198562316235
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  152. 152.↵
    1. Leigh J. A.,
    2. Lee C. C.
    Characterization of polysaccharides of Rhizobium meliloti exo mutants that form ineffective nodules.J. Bacteriol.170198833273332
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  153. 153.↵
    1. Leigh J. A.,
    2. Walker G. C.
    Exopolysaccharides of Rhizobium: synthesis, regulation and symbiotic function.Trends Genet.1019946367
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  154. 154.↵
    1. Lerouge P.,
    2. Roche P.,
    3. Faucher C.,
    4. Maillet F.,
    5. Truchet G.,
    6. Promé J.-C.,
    7. Dénarié J.
    Symbiotic host-specificity of Rhizobium meliloti is determined by a sulphated and acylated glucosamine oligosaccharide signal.Nature3441990781784
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  155. 155.↵
    1. Le Strange K. K.,
    2. Bender G. L.,
    3. Djordjevic M. A.,
    4. Rolfe B. G.,
    5. Redmond J. W.
    The Rhizobium strain NGR234 nodD1 gene product responds to activation by simple phenolic compounds vanillin and isovanillin present in wheat seedling extracts.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.31990214220
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  156. 156.↵
    1. Lewin A.,
    2. Rosenberg C.,
    3. Meyer z. A. H.,
    4. Wong C.-H.,
    5. Nelson L.,
    6. Manen J.-F.,
    7. Stanley J.,
    8. Dowling D. N.,
    9. Dénarié J.,
    10. Broughton W. J.
    Multiple host-specificity loci of the broad host range Rhizobium sp. NGR234 selected using the widely compatible legume Vigna unguiculata.Plant Mol. Biol.81987447459
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  157. 157.↵
    1. Lewin A.,
    2. Rosenberg C.,
    3. Stanley J.,
    4. Dowling D. N.,
    5. Manen J.-F.,
    6. Debellé F.,
    7. Broughton W. J.
    Multiple host-specificity loci in the broad host-range Rhizobium NGR234 Molecular genetics of plant-microbe interactions. Verma D. P. S., Brisson N. 1987 232 237 Martinus Nijhoff Dordrecht, The Netherlands
  158. 158.↵
    1. Lewin A.,
    2. Cervantes E.,
    3. Wong C.-H.,
    4. Broughton W. J.
    nodSU, two new nod-genes of the broad host range Rhizobium strain NGR234, encode host-specific nodulation of the tropical tree leucaena leucocephala.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.31990317326
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  159. 159.↵
    1. Loh J.,
    2. Garcia M.,
    3. Stacey G.
    NodV and NodW, a second flavonoid recognition system regulating nod gene expression in Bradyrhizobium japonicum.J. Bacteriol.179199730133020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  160. 160.
    1. López-Lara I. M.,
    2. van der Drift K. M.,
    3. van Brussel A. A.,
    4. Haverkamp J.,
    5. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    6. Thomas-Oates J. E.,
    7. Spaink H. P.
    Induction of nodule primordia on Phaseolus and Acacia by lipo-chitin oligosaccharide nodulation signals from broad-host-range Rhizobium strain GRH2.Plant Mol. Biol.291995465477
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  161. 161.
    1. López-Lara I. M.,
    2. van der Berg J. D. J.,
    3. Thomas-Oates J. E.,
    4. Glushka J.,
    5. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    6. Spaink H. P.
    Structural identification of the lipo-chitin oligosaccharide nodulation signals of Rhizobium loti.Mol. Microbiol.151995627638
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  162. 162.↵
    1. López-Lara I. M.,
    2. Blok-Tip L.,
    3. Quinto C.,
    4. Garcia M. L.,
    5. Bloemberg G. V.,
    6. Lamers G. E. M.,
    7. Kafetzopoulos D.,
    8. Stacey G.,
    9. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    10. Thomas-Oates J. E.,
    11. Spaink H. P.
    NodZ of Bradyrhizobium extends the nodulation host range of Rhizobium by adding a fucosyl residue to nodulation factors.Mol. Microbiol.211996397408
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  163. 163.↵
    1. Lorquin J.,
    2. Lortet G.,
    3. Ferro M.,
    4. Méar N.,
    5. Dreyfus B.,
    6. Promé J.-C.,
    7. Boivin C.
    Nod factors from Sinorhizobium saheli and S. teranaga bv. sesbania are both arabinosylated and fucosylated, a structural feature specific to Sesbania rostrata.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.101997879890
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  164. 164.↵
    1. Lorquin J.,
    2. Lortet G.,
    3. Ferro M.,
    4. Méar N.,
    5. Promé J.-C.,
    6. Boivin C.
    Sinorhizobium teranga bv. acaciae ORS1073 and Rhizobium sp. strain ORS1001, two distantly related Acacia-nodulating strains, produce similar Nod factors that are O carbamoylated, N methylated, and mainly sulfated.J. Bacteriol.179199730793083
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  165. 165.
    1. Lortet G.,
    2. Méar N.,
    3. Lorquin J.,
    4. Dreyfus B.,
    5. de Lajudie P.,
    6. Rosenberg C.,
    7. Boivin C.
    Nod factor thin-layer chromatography profiling as a tool to characterize symbiotic specificity of rhizobial strains: applications to Sinorhizobium saheli, S. teranga, and Rhizobium sp. strains isolated from Acacia and Sesbania.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.91996736747
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  166. 166.
    1. Mabberley D. J.
    The plant book 1997 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, United Kingdom
  167. 167.↵
    1. Malpighi M.
    Anatome plantarum. 1675 Regiae Societati (J. Martyn) London, United Kingdom
  168. 168.↵
    1. Meinhardt L. W.,
    2. Krishnan H. B.,
    3. Balatti P. A.,
    4. Pueppke S. G.
    Molecular cloning and characterization of a sym plasmid locus that regulates cultivar-specific nodulation of soybean by Rhizobium fredii USDA257.Mol. Microbiol.919931729
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  169. 169.↵
    1. Mergaert P.,
    2. van Montagu M.,
    3. Promé J.-C.,
    4. Holsters M.
    Three unusual modifications, a d-arabinosyl, an N-methyl, and a carbamoyl group, are present on the Nod factors of Azorhizobium caulinodans strain ORS71.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA90199315511555
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  170. 170.↵
    1. Mergaert P.,
    2. D'Haeze W.,
    3. Geelen D.,
    4. Promé D.,
    5. van Montagu M.,
    6. Geremia R.,
    7. Promé J.-C.,
    8. Holsters M.
    Biosynthesis of Azorhizobium caulinodans Nod factor: study of the activity of the NodABC proteins by expression of the genes in Escherichia coli.J. Biol. Chem.27019952921729223
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  171. 171.↵
    1. Mergaert P.,
    2. D'Haeze W.,
    3. Fernandez-Lopez M.,
    4. Geelen D.,
    5. Goethals K.,
    6. Promé J.-C.,
    7. van Montagu M.,
    8. Holsters M.
    Fucosylation and arabinosylation of Nod factors in Azorhizobium caulinodans: involvement of nolK, nodZ as well as noeC and/or downstream genes.Mol. Microbiol.211996409419
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  172. 172.↵
    1. Mergaert P.,
    2. Ferro M.,
    3. D'Haeze W.,
    4. van Montagu M.,
    5. Holsters M.,
    6. Promé J.-C.
    Nod factors of Azorhizobium caulinodans strain ORS571 can be glycosylated with an arabinosyl group, a fucosyl group or both.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.101997683687
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  173. 173.↵
    1. Mergaert P.,
    2. van Montagu M.,
    3. Holsters M.
    Molecular mechanisms of Nod factor diversity.Mol. Microbiol.251997811817
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  174. 174.↵
    1. McIver J.,
    2. Djordjevic M. A.,
    3. Weinman J. J.,
    4. Bender G. L.,
    5. Rolfe B. G.
    Extension of host range of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii caused by point mutations in nodD that result in alterations in regulatory function and recognition of inducer molecules.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.2198997106
    OpenUrlPubMed
  175. 175.↵
    1. Michiels J.,
    2. Dombrecht B.,
    3. Vermeiren N.,
    4. Xi C.-W.,
    5. Luyten E.,
    6. Vanderleyden J.
    Phaseolus vulgaris is a non-selective host for nodulation.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.261998193205
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  176. 176.
    1. Milner J. L.,
    2. Araujo R. S.,
    3. Handelsman J.
    Molecular and symbiotic characterization of exopolysaccharide-deficient mutants of Rhizobium tropici strain CIAT899.Mol. Microbiol.6199231373147
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  177. 177.↵
    1. Minami E.,
    2. Kouchi H.,
    3. Carlson R. W.,
    4. Cohn J. R.,
    5. Kolli V. K.,
    6. Day R. B.,
    7. Ogawa T.,
    8. Stacey G.
    Cooperative action of lipo-chitin nodulation signals on the induction of the early nodulin, ENOD2 in soybean roots.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.91996574583
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  178. 178.↵
    1. Minami E.,
    2. Kouchi H.,
    3. Cohn J. R.,
    4. Ogawa T.,
    5. Stacey G.
    Expression of the early nodulin, ENOD40, in soybean roots in response to various lipo-chitin signal molecules.Plant J.1019962332
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  179. 179.
    1. Minic Z.,
    2. Brown S.,
    3. de Kouchkovsky Y.,
    4. Schultze M.,
    5. Staehelin C.
    Purification and characterisation of a novel chitinase-lysozyme, of another chitinase, both hydrolysing Rhizobium meliloti Nod factors, and of a pathogenesis-related protein from Medicago sativa roots.Biochem. J.3321998329335
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  180. 180.↵
    1. Mulligan J. T.,
    2. Long S. R.
    A family of activator genes regulates expression of Rhizobium meliloti nodulation genes.Genetics1221989718
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  181. 181.↵
    1. Niebel A.,
    2. Bono J. J.,
    3. Ranjeva R.,
    4. Cullimore J. V.
    Identification of a high affinity binding site for lipo-oligosaccharidic NodRm factors in the microsomal fraction of Medicago cell suspension cultures.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.101997132134
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  182. 182.↵
    1. Niehaus K.,
    2. Kapp D.,
    3. Pühler A.
    Plant defence and delayed infection of alfalfa pseudonodules induced by an exopolysaccharide (EPS I)-deficient Rhizobium meliloti mutant.Planta1901993415425
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  183. 183.↵
    1. Nobbe F.,
    2. Schmid E.,
    3. Hiltner L.,
    4. Hotter E.
    Versuche über die Stickstoff-Assimilation der Leguminosen.Landwirtsch. Versuchstat. Dresden391891327359
    OpenUrl
  184. 184.↵
    1. Nobbe F.,
    2. Hiltner L.,
    3. Schmid E.
    Versuche über die Biologie der Knöllchenbakterien der Leguminosen, insbesondere über die Frage der Arteinheit derselben.Landwirtsch. Versuchstat. Dresden451895127
    OpenUrl
  185. 185.↵
    1. Norris D. O.
    Legumes and the Rhizobium symbiosis.Empire J. Exp. Agric.241956247270
    OpenUrl
  186. 186.↵
    1. Ogawa J.,
    2. Brierley H. L.,
    3. Long S. R.
    Analysis of Rhizobium meliloti nodulation mutant WL131: novel insertion sequence ISRm3 in nodG and altered nodH protein product.J. Bacteriol.173199130603065
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  187. 187.
    1. Olsthoorn M. M. A.,
    2. Lopez-Lara I. M.,
    3. Petersen B. O.,
    4. Bock K.,
    5. Haverkamp J.,
    6. Spaink H. P.,
    7. Thomas-Oates J. E.
    Novel branched Nod factor structure results from alpha-(1→3) fucosyl transferase activity: the major lipo-chitin oligosaccharides from Mesorhizobium loti strain NZP2213 bear an alpha-(1→3) fucosyl substituent on a nonterminal backbone residue.Biochemistry37199890249032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  188. 188.↵
    1. Orgambide G. G.,
    2. Lee J. I.,
    3. Hollingsworth R. I.,
    4. Dazzo F. B.
    Structurally diverse chitolipooligosaccharide Nod factors accumulate primarily in membranes of wild-type Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii.Biochemistry34199538323840
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  189. 189.↵
    1. Ovtsyna A. O.,
    2. Geurts R.,
    3. Bisseling T.,
    4. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    5. Tikhonovich A. I.,
    6. Spaink H. P.
    Restriction of host range by the sym2 allele of afghan pea is nonspecific for the type of modification at the reducing terminus of nodulation signals.Mol. Plant-Microbe. Interact.111998418422
    OpenUrl
  190. 190.↵
    1. Ovtsyna A. O.,
    2. Rademaker G. J.,
    3. Esser E.,
    4. Weinman J.,
    5. Rolfe B. G.,
    6. Tikhonovich I. A.,
    7. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    8. Thomas-Oates J. E.,
    9. Spaink H. P.
    Comparison of characteristics of the nodX genes from various Rhizobium leguminosarum strains.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.121999252258
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  191. 191.
    Reference deleted.
  192. 192.↵
    1. Parniske M.,
    2. Schmidt P. E.,
    3. Kosch K.,
    4. Müller P.
    Plant defense responses of host plants with determinate nodules induced by EPS-defective exoB mutants of Bradyrhizobium japonicum.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.71994631638
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  193. 193.↵
    1. Parveen N.,
    2. Webb D. T.,
    3. Borthakur D.
    The symbiotic phenotypes of exopolysaccharide-defective mutants of Rhizobium sp. strain TAL1145 do not differ on determinate- and indeterminate-nodulating tree legumes.Microbiology143199719591967
    OpenUrl
  194. 194.↵
    1. Perret X.,
    2. Broughton W. J.,
    3. Brenner S.
    Canonical ordered cosmid library of the symbiotic plasmid of Rhizobium species NGR234.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA88199119231927
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  195. 195.↵
    1. Perret X.,
    2. Freiberg C.,
    3. Rosenthal A.,
    4. Broughton W. J.,
    5. Fellay R.
    High resolution transcriptional analysis of the symbiotic replicon of Rhizobium sp. NGR234.Mol. Microbiol.321999415425
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  196. 196.↵
    1. Peters N. K.,
    2. Frost J. W.,
    3. Long S. R.
    A plant flavone, luteolin, induces expression of Rhizobium meliloti nodulation genes.Science2331986977980
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  197. 197.↵
    1. Peters N. K.,
    2. Long S. R.
    Alfalfa root exudates and compounds which promote or inhibit induction of Rhizobium meliloti nodulation genes.Plant Physiol.881988396402
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  198. 198.↵
    1. Phillips D. A.,
    2. Joseph C. M.,
    3. Maxwell C. A.
    Trigonelline and stachydrine released from alfalfa seeds activate NodD2 protein in Rhizobium meliloti.Plant Physiol.99199215261531
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  199. 199.↵
    1. Phillips D. A.,
    2. Kapulnik Y.
    Plant isoflavonoids, pathogens and symbionts.Trends Microbiol.319955864
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  200. 200.↵
    1. Plazinski J.,
    2. Ridge R. W.,
    3. McKay I. A.,
    4. Djordjevic M. A.
    The nodDABC genes of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii confer root-hair curling ability to a diverse range of soil bacteria and the ability to induce novel swellings on beans.Aust. J. Plant Physiol.211994311325
    OpenUrl
  201. 201.
    1. Polhill R. M.
    Classification of the Leguminosae, p. xvi–xxxvii.Phytochemical dictionary of the LeguminosaeBisby F. A., Buckingham J., Harborne J. B.1. Plants and their constituents1994Chapman & HallLondon, United Kingdom
  202. 202.↵
    1. Poupot R.,
    2. Martı́nez-Romero E.,
    3. Promé J.-C.
    Nodulation factors from Rhizobium tropici are sulfated or non-sulfated chitopentasaccharides containing an N-methyl-N-acylglucosamine terminus.Biochemistry3219931043010435
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  203. 203.↵
    1. Poupot R.,
    2. Martı́nez-Romero E.,
    3. Gautier N.,
    4. Promé J.-C.
    Wild-type Rhizobium etli, a bean symbiont, produces acetyl-fucosylated, N-methylated, and carbamoylated nodulation factors.J. Biol. Chem.270199560506055
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  204. 204.↵
    1. Prazmowski A.
    Das Wesen und die biologische Bedeutung der Wurzelknöllchen der Erbse.Bot. Centbl.391889356362
    OpenUrl
  205. 205.↵
    1. Prazmowski A.
    Die Wurzelknöllchen der Erbse.Landwirtsch. Versuchsstat. Berlin371890161238
    OpenUrl
  206. 206.↵
    1. Price N. P. J.,
    2. Relić B.,
    3. Talmont F.,
    4. Lewin A.,
    5. Promé D.,
    6. Pueppke S. G.,
    7. Maillet F.,
    8. Dénarié J.,
    9. Promé J.-C.,
    10. Broughton W. J.
    Broad-host-range Rhizobium species strain NGR234 secretes a family of carbamoylated and fucosylated, nodulation signals that are O-acetylated or sulphated.Mol. Microbiol.6199235753584
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  207. 207.↵
    1. Pueppke S. G.,
    2. Broughton W. J.
    Rhizobium sp. NGR234 and R. fredii USDA257 share exceptionally broad, nested host-ranges.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.121999293318
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  208. 208.↵
    1. Quesada-Vincens D.,
    2. Fellay R.,
    3. Nassim T.,
    4. Viprey V.,
    5. Burger U.,
    6. Promé J.-C.,
    7. Broughton W. J.,
    8. Jabbouri S.
    Rhizobium sp. NGR234 NodZ protein is a fucosyltransferase.J. Bacteriol.179199750875093
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  209. 209.↵
    1. Quesada-Vincens D.,
    2. Hanin M.,
    3. Fellay R.,
    4. Broughton W. J.,
    5. Jabbouri S.
    In vitro sulfotransferase activity of NoeE, a nodulation protein of Rhizobium sp. NGR234.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.111998592600
    OpenUrlPubMed
  210. 210.↵
    1. Quinto C.,
    2. Wijfjes A. H. M.,
    3. Bloemberg G. V.,
    4. Blok-Tip L.,
    5. Lopez-Lara I. M.,
    6. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    7. Thomas-Oates J. E.,
    8. Spaink H. P.
    Bacterial nodulation protein NodZ is a chitin oligosaccharide fucosyltransferase which can also recognize related substrates of animal origin.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94199743364341
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  211. 211.↵
    1. Recourt K.,
    2. van Brussel A. A. N.,
    3. Driessen A. J.,
    4. Lugtenberg B. J. J.
    Accumulation of a nod gene inducer, the flavonoid naringenin, in the cytoplasmic membrane of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae is caused by the pH-dependent hydrophobicity of naringenin.J. Bacteriol.171198943704377
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  212. 212.↵
    1. Reed J. W.,
    2. Glazebrook J.,
    3. Walker G. C.
    The exoR gene of Rhizobium meliloti affects RNA levels of other exo genes but lacks homology to known transcriptional regulators.J. Bacteriol.173199137893794
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  213. 213.↵
    1. Relić B.,
    2. Talmont F.,
    3. Kopcinska J.,
    4. Golinowsky W.,
    5. Promé J.-C.,
    6. Broughton W. J.
    Biological activity of Rhizobium sp. NGR234 Nod-factors on Macroptilium atropurpureum.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.61993764774
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  214. 214.↵
    1. Relić B.,
    2. Staehelin C.,
    3. Fellay R.,
    4. Jabbouri S.,
    5. Boller T.,
    6. Broughton W. J.
    Do Nod-factor levels play a role in host-specificity? Proceedings of the 1st European Nitrogen Fixation Conference. Kiss G. B., Endre G. 1994 69 75 Officina Press Szeged, Hungary
  215. 215.↵
    1. Relić B.,
    2. Perret X.,
    3. Estrada-Garcia M. T.,
    4. Kopcinska J.,
    5. Golinowski W.,
    6. Krishnan H. B.,
    7. Pueppke S. G.,
    8. Broughton W. J.
    Nod factors of Rhizobium are a key to the legume door.Mol. Microbiol.131994171178
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  216. 216.↵
    1. Remy W.,
    2. Taylor T. N.,
    3. Hass H.,
    4. Kerp H.
    Four hundred-million-year-old vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9119941184111843
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  217. 217.↵
    1. Reuber T. L.,
    2. Walker G. C.
    Biosynthesis of succinoglycan, a symbiotically important exopolysaccharide of Rhizobium meliloti.Cell741993269280
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  218. 218.
    Reference deleted.
  219. 219.
    Reference deleted.
  220. 220.
    Reference deleted.
  221. 221.↵
    1. Ridge R. W.
    Freeze-substitution improves the ultrastructural preservation of legume root hairs.Bot. Mag.1011988427441
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  222. 222.↵
    1. Ritsema T.,
    2. Wijfjes A. H. M.,
    3. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    4. Spaink H. P.
    Rhizobium nodulation protein NodA is a host-specific determinant of the transfer of fatty acids in Nod factor biosynthesis.Mol. Gen. Genet.25119964451
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  223. 223.↵
    1. Roberts N. J.,
    2. Brigham J.,
    3. Wu B.,
    4. Murphy J. B.,
    5. Volpin H.,
    6. Phillips D. A.,
    7. Etzler M. E.
    A Nod factor-binding lectin is a member of a distinct class of apyrases that may be unique to the legumes.Mol. Gen. Genet.2621999261267
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  224. 224.↵
    1. Roche P.,
    2. Debellé F.,
    3. Maillet F.,
    4. Lerouge P.,
    5. Faucher C.,
    6. Truchet G.,
    7. Dénarié J.,
    8. Promé J.-C.
    Molecular basis of symbiotic host specificity in Rhizobium meliloti: nodH and nodPQ genes encode the sulfation of lipochitooligosaccharide signals.Cell67199111311143
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  225. 225.↵
    1. Roche P.,
    2. Maillet F.,
    3. Plazanet C.,
    4. Debellé F.,
    5. Ferro M.,
    6. Truchet G.,
    7. Promé J.-C.,
    8. Dénarié J.
    The common nodABC genes of Rhizobium meliloti are host-range determinants.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9319961530515310
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  226. 226.↵
    1. Röhrig H.,
    2. Schmidt J.,
    3. Wieneke U.,
    4. Kondorosi É.,
    5. Barlier I.,
    6. Schell J.,
    7. John M.
    Biosynthesis of lipooligosaccharide nodulation factors-Rhizobium NodA protein is involved in N-acylation of the chitooligosaccharide backbone.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91199431223126
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  227. 227.↵
    1. Rostas K.,
    2. Kondorosi É.,
    3. Horvath B.,
    4. Simoncsits A.,
    5. Kondorosi Á.
    Conservation of extended promoter regions of nodulation genes in Rhizobium.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA83198617571761
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  228. 228.↵
    1. Roy K.,
    2. Jablonski D.,
    3. Valentine J. W.,
    4. Rosenberg G.
    Marine latitudinal diversity gradients: tests of causal hypotheses.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA95199836993702
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  229. 229.
    1. Sanjuan J.,
    2. Carlson R. W.,
    3. Spaink H. P.,
    4. Bhat U. R.,
    5. Barbour W. M.,
    6. Glushka J.,
    7. Stacey G.
    A 2-O-methylfucose moiety is present in the lipo-oligosaccharide nodulation signal of Bradyrhizobium japonicum.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA89199287898793
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  230. 230.↵
    1. Sanjuan J.,
    2. Grob P.,
    3. Göttfert M.,
    4. Hennecke H.,
    5. Stacey G.
    NodW is essential for full expression of the common nodulation genes in Bradyrhizobium japonicum.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.71994364369
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  231. 231.↵
    1. Savouré A.,
    2. Sallaud C.,
    3. El-Turk J.,
    4. Zuanazzi J.,
    5. Ratet P.,
    6. Schultze M.,
    7. Kondorosi Á.,
    8. Esnault R.,
    9. Kondorosi É.
    Distinct response of Medicago suspension cultures and roots to Nod factors and chitin oligomers in the elicitation of defense-related responses.Plant J.111997277287
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  232. 232.↵
    1. Schauser L.,
    2. Roussis A.,
    3. Stiller J.,
    4. Stougaard J.
    A plant regulator controlling development of symbiotic root nodules.Nature4021999191195
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  233. 233.↵
    1. Schiefelbein J. W.,
    2. Somerville C.
    Genetic control of root-hair development in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant Cell21990235243
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  234. 234.↵
    1. Schlaman H. R.,
    2. Spaink H. P.,
    3. Okker R. J.,
    4. Lugtenberg B. J. J.
    Subcellular localization of the nodD gene product in Rhizobium leguminosarum.J. Bacteriol.171198946864693
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  235. 235.↵
    1. Schlaman H. R.,
    2. Horvath B.,
    3. Vijgenboom E.,
    4. Okker R. J.,
    5. Lugtenberg B. J. J.
    Suppression of nodulation gene expression in bacteroids of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae.J. Bacteriol.173199142774287
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  236. 236.↵
    1. Schlaman H. R.,
    2. Okker R. J.,
    3. Lugtenberg B. J. J.
    Regulation of nodulation gene expression by NodD in rhizobia.J. Bacteriol.174199251775182
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  237. 237.↵
    1. Schlaman H. R.,
    2. Phillips D. A.,
    3. Kondorosi É.
    Genetic organization and transcriptional regulation of rhizobial nodulation genes The Rhizobiaceae. Spaink H. P., Kondorosi Á., Hooykaas P. J. J. 1998 361 386 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands
  238. 238.↵
    1. Schultze M.,
    2. Quiclet-Sire B.,
    3. Kondorosi É.,
    4. Virelizier H.,
    5. Glushka J. N.,
    6. Endre G.,
    7. Géro S. D.,
    8. Kondorosi Á.
    Rhizobium meliloti produces a family of sulfated lipooligosaccharides exhibiting different degrees of plant host specificity.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA891992192196
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  239. 239.↵
    1. Schultze M.,
    2. Staehelin C.,
    3. Röhrig H.,
    4. John M.,
    5. Schmidt J.,
    6. Kondorosi É.,
    7. Schell J.,
    8. Kondorosi Á.
    In vitro sulfotransferase activity of Rhizobium meliloti NodH protein: lipochitooligosaccharide nodulation signals are sulfated after synthesis of the core structure.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92199527062709
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  240. 240.↵
    1. Schultze M.,
    2. Kondorosi Á.
    Regulation of symbiotic root nodule development.Annu. Rev. Genet.3219983357
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  241. 241.↵
    1. Schultze M.,
    2. Staehelin C.,
    3. Brunner F.,
    4. Genetet I.,
    5. Legrand M.,
    6. Fritig B.,
    7. Kondorosi É.,
    8. Kondorosi Á.
    Plant chitinase/lysozyme isoforms show distinct substrate specificity and cleavage site preference towards lipochitooligosaccharide Nod signals.Plant J.161998571580
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  242. 242.↵
    1. Schwedock J. S.,
    2. Long S. R.
    ATP sulphurylase activity of the nodP and nodQ gene products of Rhizobium meliloti.Nature3481990644647
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  243. 243.↵
    1. Schwedock J. S.,
    2. Liu C.,
    3. Leyh T. S.,
    4. Long S. R.
    Rhizobium meliloti NodP and NodQ form a multifunctional sulfate-activating complex requiring GTP for activity.J. Bacteriol.176199470557064
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  244. 244.↵
    1. Sharma S. B.,
    2. Signer E. R.
    Temporal and spatial regulation of the symbiotic genes of Rhizobium meliloti in planta revealed by transposon Tn5-gusA.Genes Dev.41990344356
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  245. 245.↵
    1. Shearman C. A.,
    2. Rossen L.,
    3. Johnston A. W. B.,
    4. Downie J. A.
    The Rhizobium leguminosarum nodulation gene nodF encodes a polypeptide similar to acyl-carrier protein and is regulated by nodD plus a factor in pea root exudate.EMBO J.51986647652
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  246. 246.↵
    1. Simon L.,
    2. Bousquet J.,
    3. Lévesque R. C.,
    4. Lalonde M.
    Origin and diversification of endomycorrhizal fungi and coincidence with vascular land plants.Nature36319936769
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  247. 247.
    1. Skorupska A.,
    2. Bialek U.,
    3. Urbanik-Sypniewska T.,
    4. van Lammeren A.
    Two types of nodules induced on Trifolium pratense by mutants of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii deficient in exopolysaccharide production.J. Plant Physiol.147199593100
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  248. 248.↵
    1. Somasegaran P.,
    2. Hoben H. J.
    Methods in legume-Rhizobium technology. 1985 NifTAL, MIRCEN, University of Hawaii Press Maui
  249. 249.↵
    1. Spaink H. P.,
    2. Wijffelman C. A.,
    3. Pees E.,
    4. Okker R. J. H.,
    5. Lugtenberg B. J. J.
    Rhizobium nodulation gene nodD as a determinant of host specificity.Nature3281987337340
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  250. 250.↵
    1. Spaink H. P.,
    2. Okker R. J. H.,
    3. Wijffelman C. A.,
    4. Tak T.,
    5. Goosen-de-Roo L.,
    6. Pees E.,
    7. van Brussel A. A. N.,
    8. Lugtenberg B. J. J.
    Symbiotic properties of rhizobia containing a flavonoid-independent hybrid nodD product.J. Bacteriol.171198940454053
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  251. 251.↵
    1. Spaink H. P.,
    2. Weinman J.,
    3. Djorjevic M. A.,
    4. Wijffelman C. A.,
    5. Okker R. J. H.,
    6. Lugtenberg B. J. J.
    Genetic analysis and cellular localisation of the Rhizobium host specificity determining NodE protein.EMBO J.8198928112818
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  252. 252.↵
    1. Spaink H. P.,
    2. Sheeley D. M.,
    3. van Brussel A. A. N.,
    4. Glushka J.,
    5. York W. S.,
    6. Tak T.,
    7. Geiger O.,
    8. Kennedy E. P.,
    9. Reinhold V. N.,
    10. Lugtenberg B. J. J.
    A novel highly unsaturated fatty acid moiety of lipo-oligosaccharide signals determines host-specificity of Rhizobium.Nature3541991125130
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  253. 253.↵
    1. Spaink H. P.,
    2. Wijfjes A. H. M.,
    3. van der Drift K. M. G. M.,
    4. Haverkamp J.,
    5. Thomas-Oates J. E.,
    6. Lugtenberg B. J. J.
    Structural identification of metabolites produced by the NodB and NodC proteins of Rhizobium leguminosarum.Mol. Microbiol.131994821831
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  254. 254.↵
    1. Spaink H. P.,
    2. Wijfjes A. H. M.,
    3. Lugtenberg B. J. J.
    Rhizobium NodI and NodJ proteins play a role in the efficiency of secretion of lipochitin oligosaccharides.J. Bacteriol.177199562766281
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  255. 255.↵
    1. Spaink H. P.,
    2. Bloemberg G. V.,
    3. van Brussel A. A. N.,
    4. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    5. van der Drift K. M. G. M.,
    6. Haverkamp J.,
    7. Thomas-Oates J. E.
    Host specificity of Rhizobium leguminosarum is determined by the hydrophobicity of highly unsaturated fatty acyl moieties of the nodulation factors.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.81995155164
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  256. 256.↵
    1. Spaink H. P.
    Regulation of plant morphogenesis by lipo-chitin oligosaccharides.Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.151996559582
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  257. 257.↵
    1. Staehelin C.,
    2. Müller J.,
    3. Mellor R. B.,
    4. Wiemken A.,
    5. Boller T.
    Chitinase and peroxidase in effective (Fix+) and ineffective (Fix−) soybean nodules.Planta1871992295300
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  258. 258.↵
    1. Staehelin C.,
    2. Schultze M.,
    3. Kondorosi É.,
    4. Mellor R. B.,
    5. Boller T.,
    6. Kondorosi Á.
    Structural modifications in Rhizobium meliloti Nod factors influence their stability against hydrolysis by root chitinases.Plant J.51994319330
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  259. 259.↵
    1. Staehelin C.,
    2. Granado J.,
    3. Müller J.,
    4. Wiemken A.,
    5. Mellor R. B.,
    6. Felix G.,
    7. Regenass M.,
    8. Broughton W. J.,
    9. Boller T.
    Perception of Rhizobium nodulation factors by tomato cells and inactivation by root chitinases.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91199421962200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  260. 260.↵
    1. Staehelin C.,
    2. Schultze M.,
    3. Kondorosi É.,
    4. Kondorosi Á.
    Lipochitooligosaccharide nodulation signals from Rhizobium meliloti induce their rapid degradation by the host plant alfalfa.Plant Physiol.108199516071614
    OpenUrlAbstract
  261. 261.↵
    1. Stacey G.,
    2. Luka S.,
    3. Sanjuan J.,
    4. Banfalvi Z.,
    5. Nieuwkoop A. J.,
    6. Chun J. Y.,
    7. Forsberg L. S.,
    8. Carlson R. W.
    nodZ, a unique host-specific nodulation gene, is involved in the fucosylation of the lipopolysaccharide nodulation signal of Bradyrhizobium japonicum.J. Bacteriol.1761994620633
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  262. 262.
    1. Stanfield S. W.,
    2. Ielpi L.,
    3. O'Brochta D.,
    4. Helinski D.,
    5. Ditta G. S.
    The ndvA gene product of Rhizobium meliloti is required for β-(1→2)glucan production and has homology to the ATP-binding export protein HlyB.J. Bacteriol.170198835233530
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  263. 263.↵
    1. Surin B. P.,
    2. Downie J. A.
    Rhizobium leguminosarum genes required for expression and transfer of host specific nodulation.Plant Mol. Biol.1219891929
    OpenUrlPubMed
  264. 264.↵
    1. Sutton J. M.,
    2. Lea E. J.,
    3. Downie J. A.
    The nodulation-signaling protein NodO from Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae forms ion channels in membranes.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91199499909994
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  265. 265.↵
    1. Sutton J. M.,
    2. Peart J.,
    3. Dean G.,
    4. Downie J. A.
    Analysis of the C-terminal secretion signal of the Rhizobium leguminosarum nodulation protein NodO; a potential system for the secretion of heterologous proteins during nodule invasion.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.91996671680
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  266. 266.↵
    1. Swanson J. A.,
    2. Mulligan J. T.,
    3. Long S. R.
    Regulation of syrM and nodD3 in Rhizobium meliloti.Genetics1341993435444
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  267. 267.↵
    1. Timmers A. C.,
    2. Auriac M. C.,
    3. de Billy F.,
    4. Truchet G.
    Nod factor internalization and microtubular cytoskeleton changes occur concomitantly during nodule differentiation in alfalfa.Development1251998339349
    OpenUrlAbstract
  268. 268.↵
    1. Trinick M. J.
    Symbiosis between Rhizobium and the non-legume, Trema aspera.Nature2441973459460
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  269. 269.↵
    1. Trinick M. J.
    Relationships amongst the fast-growing rhizobia of Lablab purpureus, Leucaena leucocephala, Mimosa spp., Acacia farnesiana and Sesbania grandiflora and their affinities with other rhizobial groups.J. Appl. Bact.4919803953
    OpenUrl
  270. 269a.↵
    1. van Brussel A. A. N.,
    2. Bakhuizen R.,
    3. van Spronsen P. C.,
    4. Spaink H. P.,
    5. Tak T.,
    6. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    7. Kijne J. W.
    Induction of preinfection thread structures in the leguminous host plant by mitogenic lipo-oligosaccharides of Rhizobium.Science25719927072
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  271. 269b.
    1. van der Drift K. M.,
    2. Spaink H. P.,
    3. Bloemberg G. V.,
    4. van Brussel A. A. N.,
    5. Lugtenberg B. J. J.,
    6. Haverkamp J.,
    7. Thomas-Oates J. E.
    Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii produces lipo-chitin oligosaccharides with nodE-dependent highly unsaturated fatty acyl moieties. An electrospray ionization and collision-induced dissociation tandem mass spectrometric study.J. Biol. Chem.27119962256322569
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  272. 269c.↵
    1. van Rhijn P. J.,
    2. Feys B.,
    3. Verreth C.,
    4. Vanderleyden J.
    Multiple copies of nodD in Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 and BR816.J. Bacteriol.1751993438447
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  273. 269d.↵
    1. van Rhijn P.,
    2. Vanderleyden J.
    The Rhizobium-plant symbiosis.Microbiol. Rev.591995124142
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  274. 269e.↵
    1. van Rhijn P.,
    2. Luyten E.,
    3. Vlassak K.,
    4. Vanderleyden J.
    Isolation and characterization of a pSym locus of Rhizobium sp. BR816 that extends nodulation ability of narrow host range Phaseolus vulgaris symbionts to Leucaena leucocephala.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.919967477
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  275. 270.
    1. van Workum W. A. T.,
    2. van Brussel A. A. N.,
    3. Tak T.,
    4. Wijffelman C. A.,
    5. Kijne J. W.
    Ethylene prevents nodulation of Vicia sativa ssp. nigra by exopolysaccharide-deficient mutants of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.81995278285
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  276. 271.↵
    1. van Workum W. A. T.,
    2. Canter-Cremers H. C. J.,
    3. Wijfjes A. H. M.,
    4. van der Kolk C.,
    5. Wijffelman C. A.,
    6. Kijne J. W.
    Cloning and characterization of four genes of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii involved in exopolysaccharide production and nodulation.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.101997290301
    OpenUrlPubMed
  277. 272.↵
    1. van Workum W. A. T.,
    2. van Slageren S.,
    3. van Brussel A. A. N.,
    4. Kijne J. W.
    Role of exopolysaccharides of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae as host plant-specific molecules required for infection thread formation during nodulation of Vicia sativa.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.11199812331241
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  278. 273.↵
    1. Vasse J.,
    2. de Billy F.,
    3. Truchet G.
    Abortion of infection during the Rhizobium meliloti-alfalfa symbiotic interaction is accompanied by a hypersensitive reaction.Plant J.41993555566
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  279. 274.↵
    1. Viprey V.,
    2. Del Greco A.,
    3. Golinowski W.,
    4. Broughton W. J.,
    5. Perret X.
    Symbiotic implications of type III protein secretion machinery in Rhizobium.Mol. Microbiol.28199813811389
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  280. 275.↵
    1. Viprey V.,
    2. Perret X.,
    3. Broughton W. J.
    Host-plant invasion by rhizobia.Subcell. Biochem.331999437456
    OpenUrl
  281. 276.↵
    1. Waelkens F.,
    2. Voets T.,
    3. Vlassak K.,
    4. Vanderleyden J.,
    5. van Rhijn P.
    The nodS gene of Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 is necessary for nodulation of Phaseolus vulgaris and Leucaena leucocephala.Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.81995147154
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  282. 277.↵
    1. Wang L. X.,
    2. Wang Y.,
    3. Pellock B.,
    4. Walker G. C.
    Structural characterization of the symbiotically important low-molecular-weight succinoglycan of Sinorhizobium meliloti.J. Bacteriol.181199967886796
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  283. 278.↵
    1. Wang S.-P.,
    2. Stacey G.
    Studies of the Bradyrhizobium japonicum nodD1 promoter: a repeated structure for the nod box.J. Bacteriol.173199133563365
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  284. 279.↵
    1. Wilson J. K.
    Leguminous plants and their associated organisms. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station memoir 221. 1939 Cornell University Press Ithaca, N.Y
  285. 280.↵
    1. Woronin M. S.
    Über die bei der Schwarzerle (Alnus glutinosa) und bei der gewöhnlichen Gartenlupine (Lupinus mutabilis) auftretenden Wurzelanschwellungen. 1866Mémoires de l'Academie Impériale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg, VII Series, vol. X.
  286. 281.↵
    1. Xie Z.-P.,
    2. Staehelin C.,
    3. Wiemken A.,
    4. Broughton W. J.,
    5. Müller J.,
    6. Boller T.
    Symbiosis-stimulated chitinase isoenzymes of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) J.Exp. Bot.501999327333
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  287. 282.
    1. Yang G. P.,
    2. Debellé F.,
    3. Savagnac A.,
    4. Ferro M.,
    5. Schiltz O.,
    6. Maillet F.,
    7. Promé D.,
    8. Treilhou M.,
    9. Vialas C.,
    10. Lindstrom K.,
    11. Dénarié J.,
    12. Promé J.-C.
    Structure of the Mesorhizobium huakuii and Rhizobium galegae Nod factors: a cluster of phylogenetically related legumes are nodulated by rhizobia producing Nod factors with α-,β-unsaturated N-acyl substitutions.Mol. Microbiol.341999227237
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Print

Alerts
Email